Skip to main content

Nadolol (Monograph)

Brand name: Corgard
Drug class: beta-Adrenergic Blocking Agents

Medically reviewed by Drugs.com on Apr 10, 2024. Written by ASHP.

Introduction

Nonselective β-adrenergic blocking agent (β-blocker).a

Uses for Nadolol

Hypertension

Management of hypertension, alone or in combination with other antihypertensive agents.135 600 1200 a

β-Blockers generally not preferred for first-line therapy of hypertension according to current evidence-based hypertension guidelines, but may be considered in patients who have a compelling indication (e.g., prior MI, ischemic heart disease, heart failure) for their use or as add-on therapy in those who do not respond adequately to the preferred drug classes (ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor antagonists, calcium-channel blockers, or thiazide diuretics).176 501 502 503 504 515 523 524 527 800 1200 Nadolol is one of several β-blockers (including bisoprolol, carvedilol, metoprolol succinate, metoprolol tartrate, propranolol, and timolol) recommended by a 2017 ACC/AHA multidisciplinary hypertension guideline as first-line therapy for hypertension in patients with stable ischemic heart disease/angina.1200

Individualize choice of therapy; consider patient characteristics (e.g., age, ethnicity/race, comorbidities, cardiovascular risk) as well as drug-related factors (e.g., ease of administration, availability, adverse effects, cost).501 502 503 504 515 1200 1201

The 2017 ACC/AHA hypertension guideline classifies BP in adults into 4 categories: normal, elevated, stage 1 hypertension, and stage 2 hypertension.1200 (See Table 1.)

Source: Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension. 2018;71:e13-115.

Individuals with SBP and DBP in 2 different categories (e.g., elevated SBP and normal DBP) should be designated as being in the higher BP category (i.e., elevated BP).

Table 1. ACC/AHA BP Classification in Adults1200

Category

SBP (mm Hg)

DBP (mm Hg)

Normal

<120

and

<80

Elevated

120–129

and

<80

Hypertension, Stage 1

130–139

or

80–89

Hypertension, Stage 2

≥140

or

≥90

The goal of hypertension management and prevention is to achieve and maintain optimal control of BP.1200 However, the BP thresholds used to define hypertension, the optimum BP threshold at which to initiate antihypertensive drug therapy, and the ideal target BP values remain controversial.501 503 504 505 506 507 508 515 523 526 530 1200 1201 1207 1209 1222 1223 1229

The 2017 ACC/AHA hypertension guideline generally recommends a target BP goal (i.e., BP to achieve with drug therapy and/or nonpharmacologic intervention) <130/80 mm Hg in all adults regardless of comorbidities or level of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk.1200 In addition, an SBP goal of <130 mm Hg generally is recommended for noninstitutionalized ambulatory patients ≥65 years of age with an average SBP of ≥130 mm Hg.1200 These BP goals are based upon clinical studies demonstrating continuing reduction of cardiovascular risk at progressively lower levels of SBP.1200 1202 1210

Other hypertension guidelines generally have based target BP goals on age and comorbidities.501 504 536 Guidelines such as those issued by the JNC 8 expert panel generally have targeted a BP goal of <140/90 mm Hg regardless of cardiovascular risk and have used higher BP thresholds and target BPs in elderly patients501 504 compared with those recommended by the 2017 ACC/AHA hypertension guideline.1200

Some clinicians continue to support previous target BPs recommended by JNC 8 due to concerns about the lack of generalizability of data from some clinical trials (e.g., SPRINT study) used to support the 2017 ACC/AHA hypertension guideline and potentials harms (e.g., adverse drug effects, costs of therapy) versus benefits of BP lowering in patients at lower risk of cardiovascular disease.1222 1223 1224 1229

Consider potential benefits of hypertension management and drug cost, adverse effects, and risks associated with the use of multiple antihypertensive drugs when deciding a patient's BP treatment goal.1200 1220 1229

For decisions regarding when to initiate drug therapy (BP threshold), the 2017 ACC/AHA hypertension guideline incorporates underlying cardiovascular risk factors.1200 1207 ASCVD risk assessment is recommended by ACC/AHA for all adults with hypertension.1200

ACC/AHA currently recommend initiation of antihypertensive drug therapy in addition to lifestyle/behavioral modifications at an SBP ≥140 mm Hg or DBP ≥90 mm Hg in adults who have no history of cardiovascular disease (i.e., primary prevention) and a low ASCVD risk (10-year risk <10%).1200

For secondary prevention in adults with known cardiovascular disease or for primary prevention in those at higher risk for ASCVD (10-year risk ≥10%), ACC/AHA recommend initiation of antihypertensive drug therapy at an average SBP ≥130 mm Hg or an average DBP ≥80 mm Hg.1200

Adults with hypertension and diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease (CKD), or age ≥65 years are assumed to be at high risk for cardiovascular disease; ACC/AHA state that such patients should have antihypertensive drug therapy initiated at a BP ≥130/80 mm Hg.1200 Individualize drug therapy in patients with hypertension and underlying cardiovascular or other risk factors.502 1200

In stage 1 hypertension, experts state that it is reasonable to initiate drug therapy using the stepped-care approach in which one drug is initiated and titrated and other drugs are added sequentially to achieve the target BP.1200 Initiation of antihypertensive therapy with 2 first-line agents from different pharmacologic classes recommended in adults with stage 2 hypertension (SBP ≥140 mm Hg or DBP ≥90 mm Hg) and average BP >20/10 mm Hg above BP goal.1200

Black hypertensive patients generally tend to respond better to monotherapy with calcium-channel blockers or thiazide diuretics than to β-blockers.154 158 159 501 504 1200 However, diminished response to β-blockers is largely eliminated when administered concomitantly with a thiazide diuretic.500

Chronic Stable Angina

Long-term management of chronic stable angina.600 a

β-Blockers are recommended as first-line anti-ischemic drugs in most patients with chronic stable angina; despite differences in cardioselectivity, intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, and other clinical factors, all β-blockers appear to be equally effective for this use.1101

Supraventricular Tachyarrhythmias

Has been used for management of frequent VPCs, paroxysmal atrial tachycardia, and sinus tachycardia and to decrease heart rate in patients with atrial flutter or fibrillation† [off-label].a

Vascular Headache

Prophylaxis of migraine headache† [off-label].100 101 148

US Headache Consortium states there is evidence of efficacy, and clinical experience suggests clinically important improvement in most patients.148

Nadolol Dosage and Administration

General

BP Monitoring and Treatment Goals

Administration

Oral Administration

Administer orally once daily without regard to meals.a 135 600

Dosage

Adults

Hypertension
Nadolol Therapy
Oral

Initially, 20–40 mg daily, either alone or in combination with a diuretic.600 a

May gradually increase by 40–80 mg daily at 2- to 14-day intervals until optimum BP response is achieved.a

Manufacturers recommend usual maintenance dosage of 40–80 mg daily; dosages up to 240 or 320 mg daily may be needed.600 a

Some experts state usual dosage range is 40–120 mg once daily;1200 may be preferable to add another antihypertensive agent to the regimen rather than to continue increasing nadolol dosage.157

Nadolol/Bendroflumethiazide Fixed-combination Therapy
Oral

Initially 40 mg of nadolol and 5 mg of bendroflumethiazide once daily.135 If needed, increase to 80 mg of nadolol and 5 mg of bendroflumethiazide once daily.135

If BP is not adequately controlled with the fixed combination alone, may gradually add another nondiuretic hypotensive agent, starting with 50% of the usual recommended starting dosage to avoid excessive reduction in BP.135

Manufacturers state fixed-combination preparations should not be used for initial antihypertensive therapy.601

Chronic Stable Angina
Oral

Initially, 40 mg daily.600 a Gradually increase by 40–80 mg daily at 3- to 7-day intervals until optimum control of angina is obtained or there is pronounced slowing of the heart rate (i.e., <55 bpm).600 a

Usual maintenance dosage is 40 or 80 mg daily.600 a Up to 160 or 240 mg daily may be needed.600 a

Periodically evaluate chronic therapy for angina to determine need for dosage alteration or continued therapy.a

Supraventricular Tachyarrhythmias† [off-label]
Various Cardiac Arrhythmias† [off-label]
Oral

Maintenance dose: 60–160 mg daily in single or divided doses has been used.a

Vascular Headache† [off-label]
Prevention of Migraine†
Oral

Usual effective dosage: 80–240 mg daily.148

Prescribing Limits

Adults

Chronic Stable Angina
Oral

Safety and efficacy of dosages >240 mg daily not established.600 a

Special Populations

Renal Impairment

Adjust intervals for usual dosage of nadolol alone or in fixed combination with bendroflumethiazide:600

Clcr (mL/minute per 1.73 m2)

Dosage Interval

>50

24 h

31–50

24–36 h

10–30

24–48 h

<10

40–60 h
Detailed Nadolol dosage information

Cautions for Nadolol

Contraindications

Warnings/Precautions

Warnings

Heart Failure

Possible precipitation of heart failure.600 a Avoid use in patients with overt heart failure;600 a may use cautiously in patients with inadequate myocardial function and, if necessary, in patients with well-compensated heart failure (e.g., those controlled with cardiac glycosides and/or diuretics).600 a

Adequate treatment (e.g., with a cardiac glycoside and/or diuretic) and close observation recommended if signs or symptoms of impending heart failure occur; if heart failure continues, discontinue therapy, gradually if possible.600 a

Abrupt Withdrawal of Therapy

Abrupt withdrawal of nadolol not recommended as it may exacerbate angina symptoms or precipitate MI in patients with angina pectoris and/or CAD.600 a Avoid abrupt discontinuance, even when used only for hypertension.600 a Abrupt withdrawal may cause transient symptoms (e.g., tremulousness, sweating, palpitation, headache, malaise) in patients without CAD.a

Discontinue long-term therapy gradually (particularly in patients with myocardial ischemia); decrease dosage over 1–2 weeks and monitor carefully.600 a If exacerbation of angina occurs or acute coronary insufficiency develops, reinstitute therapy promptly, at least temporarily, and initiate appropriate measures for the management of unstable angina.600 a

Bronchospastic Disease

Possible inhibition of bronchodilation produced by endogenous or exogenous catecholamines;600 a use not recommended in patients with bronchial asthma.600 (See Contraindications under Cautions.)

Generally, β-blockers should not be used in patients with bronchospastic disease.600 a Use with caution in patients with a history of nonallergic bronchospasm (e.g., chronic bronchitis, emphysema).600 a

Major Surgery

Possible increased risks associated with general anesthesia and surgical procedures due to decreased ability of the heart to respond to reflex β-adrenergic stimuli.600 Use with caution in major surgery involving general anesthesia.a Manufacturer states that chronically administered β-blocking therapy should not be routinely withdrawn prior to major surgery.600 If nadolol is continued during surgery, inform the anesthesiologist.a

Diabetes and Hypoglycemia

Possible masked signs and symptoms of acute hypoglycemia (e.g., tachycardia and BP changes but not sweating), impaired glucose tolerance, delayed rate of recovery of blood glucose concentration following drug-induced hypoglycemia, altered hemodynamic response to hypoglycemia (possibly resulting in an exaggerated hypertensive response), and impaired peripheral circulation.600 a

Use with caution in patients with diabetes mellitus (especially those with labile diabetes or those prone to hypoglycemia).600 a If used with hypoglycemic agents, may need to adjust hypoglycemic agent dosage.a

Thyrotoxicosis

Signs of hyperthyroidism (e.g., tachycardia) may be masked.600 a Possible thyroid storm if therapy is abruptly withdrawn; carefully monitor patients having or suspected of developing thyrotoxicosis.600 a

General Precautions

History of Anaphylactic Reactions

Possible increased reactivity to a variety of allergens; patients may be unresponsive to usual doses of epinephrine used to treat anaphylactic reactions.600 a

Other Precautions

Shares the toxic potentials of β-blockers; observe usual precautions of these agents.a In addition, when used in fixed-combination with bendroflumethiazide, consider the cautions, precautions, and contraindications associated with thiazide diuretics.a

Specific Populations

Pregnancy

Category C.600 135

Lactation

Distributed into milk.600 a Discontinue nursing or the drug.600 a

Pediatric Use

Safety and efficacy not established.600 a

Hepatic Impairment

Use with caution.a

Renal Impairment

Use with caution.600

Clearance may be decreased; dosage adjustments necessary depending on degree of renal impairment.600 a (See Renal Impairment under Dosage and Administration)

Common Adverse Effects

Bradycardia (heart rate <60 bpm), peripheral vascular insufficiency (usually Raynaud’s type), dizziness, fatigue.a

Drug Interactions

Specific Drugs

Drug

Interaction

Comments

Antidiabetic agents

Potential for altered antidiabetic response600

Adjust antidiabetic agent dosage if needed600

Cardiovascular drugs (e.g., cardiac glycosides, nondihydropyridine calcium-channel blocking agents)

Possible additive negative effects on SA or AV nodal conduction116 117

Catecholamine-depleting drugs (e.g., reserpine)

Potential for additive effects (increased hypotension and marked bradycardia) 600 a

Monitor closely for symptoms (e.g., vertigo, syncope, postural hypotension)600

Diuretics

Possible increased hypotensive effecta

Careful dosage adjustments recommendeda

Drugs with anticholinergic effects

Potential for antagonism of cardiac β-adrenergic blocking effects

Hypotensive agents

Possible increased hypotensive effect a

Careful dosage adjustments recommendeda

Mibefradil (no longer commercially available in the US)

Slowing or complete suppression of SA node activity with development of slow ventricular rates116 117

Reported principally in geriatric patients with concomitant β-adrenergic blocker therapy116 117

Myocardial depressant general anesthetics

Increased risk of hypotension, myocardial depression, and heart failure600

See Major Surgery under Cautions

Neuromuscular blocking agents (e.g., tubocurarine chloride)

High doses of nadolol may increase effects of neuromuscular blocking agentsa

Phenothiazines

Possible additive hypotensive effect, especially when large phenothiazine doses are useda

Sympathomimetic agents (e.g., isoproterenol, epinephrine)

Possible antagonism of β-adrenergic stimulating effectsa

Administer epinephrine with caution; decreased pulse rate with first- and second-degree heart block and hypertension may occura

Very large doses of isoproterenol may be needed to overcome β-adrenergic blocking effectsa
Nadolol drug interactions (more detail)

Nadolol Pharmacokinetics

Absorption

Bioavailability

Following oral administration, absorption is variable; averages about 30–40%.135 600 a

Duration

Following doses of 40–320 mg daily, duration of antihypertensive and antianginal effects is ≥24 hours.a

Food

Food does not affect the rate or extent of absorption.600 a

Distribution

Extent

Widely distributed; minimal amounts detected in the brain of dogs.a Distributed into bile.a

Nadolol crosses the placenta in ratsa and is distributed into human milk.600

Plasma Protein Binding

About 30%.135 600 a

Elimination

Metabolism

Not metabolized.600 a

Elimination Route

Excreted principally unchanged in feces (about 76.9%) and urine (about 24.6%) in 4 days.a

Half-life

10–24 hours.600 135 a

Special Populations

Increased half-life in patients with renal impairment.600 a Removed by hemodialysis.a

Stability

Storage

Oral

Tablets

Tight, light-resistant containers at room temperature.600 a

Actions

Advice to Patients

Preparations

Excipients in commercially available drug preparations may have clinically important effects in some individuals; consult specific product labeling for details.

Please refer to the ASHP Drug Shortages Resource Center for information on shortages of one or more of these preparations.

* available from one or more manufacturer, distributor, and/or repackager by generic (nonproprietary) name

Nadolol

Routes

Dosage Forms

Strengths

Brand Names

Manufacturer

Oral

Tablets

20 mg*

Corgard (scored)

Pfizer

Nadolol Tablets

40 mg*

Corgard (scored)

Pfizer

Nadolol Tablets

80 mg*

Corgard (scored)

Pfizer

Nadolol Tablets
Nadolol Combinations

Routes

Dosage Forms

Strengths

Brand Names

Manufacturer

Oral

Tablets

40 mg with Bendroflumethiazide 5 mg

Corzide (scored)

Pfizer

Nadolol and Bendroflumethiazide Tablets

80 mg with Bendroflumethiazide 5 mg

Corzide (scored)

Pfizer

Nadolol and Bendroflumethiazide Tablets

AHFS DI Essentials™. © Copyright 2025, Selected Revisions April 10, 2024. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc., 4500 East-West Highway, Suite 900, Bethesda, Maryland 20814.

† Off-label: Use is not currently included in the labeling approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.

References

100. Ryan RE Sr, Ryan RE Jr, Sudilovsky A. Nadolol: its use in the prophylactic treatment of migraine. Headache. 1983; 23:26-31. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6131052

101. Ryan RE Sr. Comparative study of nadolol and propranolol in prophylactic treatment of migraine. Am Heart J. 1984; 108:1156-9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6148878

105. Weber MA, Laragh JH. Hypertension: steps forward and steps backward: the Joint National Committee fifth report. Arch Intern Med. 1993; 153:149-52. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8422205

106. Collins R, Peto R, MacMahon S et al. Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Part 2, short-term reductions in blood pressure: an overview of randomized drug trials in their epidemiological context. Lancet. 1990; 335:827-38. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1969567

107. Alderman MH. Which antihypertensive drugs first—and why! JAMA. 1992; 267:2786-7. Editorial.

108. MacMahon S, Peto R, Cutler J et al. Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Part 1, prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias. Lancet. 1990; 335:765-74. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1969518

109. SHEP Cooperative Research Group. Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension: final results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). JAMA. 1991; 265:3255-64. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2046107

110. Dahlof B, Lindholm LH, Hansson L et al. Morbidity and mortality in the Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension (STOP-hypertension). Lancet. 1991; 338:1281-5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1682683

111. MRC Working Party. Medical Research Council trial of treatment of hypertension in older adults: principal results. BMJ. 1992; 304:405-12. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1445513 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1995577/

112. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. NHLBI panel reviews safety of calcium channel blockers. Rockville, MD; 1995 Aug 31. Press release.

113. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. New analysis regarding the safety of calcium-channel blockers: a statement for health professionals from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Rockville, MD; 1995 Sep 1.

114. Psaty BM, Heckbert SR, Koepsell TD et al. The risk of myocardial infarction associated with antihypertensive drug therapies. JAMA. 1995; 274:620-5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7637142

115. Yusuf S. Calcium antagonists in coronary artery disease and hypertension: time for reevaluation? Circulation. 1995; 92:1079-82. Editorial.

116. Roche. Posicor (mibefradil hydrochloride) tablets prescribing information. Nutley, NJ; 1997 Dec.

117. Ellison RH. Dear doctor letter regarding appropriate use of Posicor. Nutley, NJ: Roche Laboratories; 1997 Dec.

118. Mylan Pharmaceuticals. Nadolol tablets prescribing information. Morgantown, WV; 1993 Nov.

119. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute National High Blood Pressure Education Program. The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC VI). Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 1997 Nov. (NIH publication No. 98-4080.)

120. Kaplan NM. Choice of initial therapy for hypertension. JAMA. 1996; 275:1577-80. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8622249

121. Psaty BM, Smith NL, Siscovich DS et al. Health outcomes associated with antihypertensive therapies used as first-line agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 1997; 277:739-45. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9042847

123. Whelton PK, Appel LJ, Espeland MA et al. for the TONE COllaborative Research Group. Sodium reduction and weight loss in the treatment of hypertension in older persons: a randomized controlled trial of nonpharmacologic interventions in the elderly (TONE). JAMA. 1998; 279:839-46. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9515998

125. Genuth S. United Kingdom prospective diabetes study results are in. J Fam Pract. 1998; 47:(Suppl 5):S27.

127. Watkins PJ. UKPDS: a message of hope and a need for change. Diabet Med. 1998; 15:895-6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9827842

128. Bretzel RG, Voit K, Schatz H et al. The United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS): implications for the pharmacotherapy of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 1998; 106:369-72. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9831300

129. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. BMJ. 1998; 317:703-13. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9732337 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC28659/

130. American Diabetes Association. The United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) for type 2 diabetes: what you need to know about the results of a long-term study. Washington, DC; 1998 Sep 15 from American Diabetes Association web site. http://www.diabetes.org

131. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Efficacy of atenolol and captopril in reducing risk of macrovascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 39. BMJ. 1998; 317:713-20. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9732338 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC28660/

132. Davis TME. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study: the end of the beginning? Med J Aust. 1998; 169:511-2.

134. Anon. Consensus recommendations for the management of chronic heart failure. On behalf of the membership of the advisory council to improve outcomes nationwide in heart failure. Part II. Management of heart failure: apporaches to the prevention of heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 1999; 83:9A-38A.

135. Monarch. Corzide (40/5) and Corzide (80/5) (nadolol and bendroflumethazide) tablets prescribing information. Bristol, TN; 2001 Oct.

136. Lim PO, MacDonald TM. Antianginal and β-adrenergic blocking drugs. In: Dukes MNG, ed. Meyler’s side effects of drugs. 13th ed. New York: Elsevier/North Holland Inc; 1996:488-535.

137. Gress TW, Nieto FJ, Shahar E et al. Hypertension and antihypertensive therapy as risk factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342:905-12. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10738048

138. Sowers JR, Bakris GL. Antihypertensive therapy and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342:969-70. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10738057

139. Izzo JL, Levy D, Black HR. Importance of systolic blood pressure in older Americans. Hypertension. 2000; 35:1021-4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10818056

140. Frohlich ED. Recognition of systolic hypertension for hypertension. Hypertension. 2000; 35:1019-20. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10818055

141. Bakris GL, Williams M, Dworkin L et al. Preserving renal function in adults with hypertension and diabetes: a consensus approach. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000; 36:646-61. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10977801

142. Hansson L, Zanchetti A, Carruthers SG et al. Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial Lancet. 1998; 351:1755-62.

147. Williams CL, Hayman LL, Daniels SR et al. Cardiovascular health in childhood: a statement for health professional from the Committee on Atherosclerosis, Hypertension, and Obesity in the Young (AHOY) of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, American Heart Association. Circulation. 2002; 106:143-60. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12093785

148. Ramadan NM, Silberstein SD, Freitag FG et al. Evidence-based guidelines for migraine headache in the primary care setting: pharmacological management for prevention of mirgaine. St. Paul, MN; 2001. From the American Academy of Neurology web site. http://www.aan.com

151. Appel LJ. The verdict from ALLHAT—thiazide diuretics are the preferred initial therapy for hypertension. JAMA. 2002; 288:3039-42. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12479770

152. The ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Major outcomes in high-riskhypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA. 2002; 288:2981-97. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12479763

154. Douglas JG, Bakris GL, Epstein M et al. Management of high blood pressure in African Americans: Consensus statement of the Hypertension in African Americans Working Group of the International Society on Hypertension in Blacks. Arch Intern Med. 2003; 163:525-41.

157. Carter B for the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC). Personal communication.

158. Wright JT, Dunn JK, Cutler JA et al. Outcomes in hypertensive black and nonblack patients treated with chlorthalidone, amlodipine, and lisinopril. JAMA. 2005; 293:1595-607. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15811979

159. Neaton JD, Kuller LH. Diuretics are color blind. JAMA. 2005; 293:1663-6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15811986

160. Thadani U. Beta blockers in hypertension. Am J Cardiol. 1983; 52:10-5D.

161. Conolly ME, Kersting F, Dollery CT. The clinical pharmacology of beta-adrenoceptor-blocking drugs. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1976; 19:203-34. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10600

162. Shand DG. State-of-the-art: comparative pharmacology of the β-adrenoceptor blocking drugs. Drugs. 1983; 25(Suppl 2):92-9.

163. Breckenridge A. Which beta blocker? Br Med J. 1983; 286:1085-8. (IDIS 169422)

164. Anon. Choice of a beta-blocker. Med Lett Drugs Ther. 1986; 28:20-2. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2869400

165. Wallin JD, Shah SV. β-Adrenergic blocking agents in the treatment of hypertension: choices based on pharmacological properties and patient characteristics. Arch Intern Med. 1987; 147:654-9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2881524

166. McDevitt DG. β-Adrenoceptor blocking drugs and partial agonist activity: is it clinically relevant? Drugs. 1983; 25:331-8.

167. McDevitt DG. Clinical significance of cardioselectivity: state-of-the-art. Drugs. 1983; 25(Suppl 2):219-26.

168. Frishman WH. β-Adrenoceptor antagonists: new drugs and new indications. N Engl J Med. 1981; 305:500-6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6114433

169. Thadani U, Davidson C, Chir B et al. Comparison of the immediate effects of five β-adrenoceptor-blocking drugs with different ancillary properties in angina pectoris. N Engl J Med. 1979; 300:750-5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/581782

170. Lewis RV, McDevitt DG. Adverse reactions and interactions with β-adrenoceptor blocking drugs. Med Toxicol. 1986; 1:343-61. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2878346

171. Frishman WH. Clinical differences between beta-adrenergic blocking agents: implications for therapeutic substitution. Am Heart J. 1987; 113:1190-8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2883867

172. Heel RC, Brogden RN, Speight TM et al. Atenolol: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in hypertension. Drugs. 1979; 17:425-60. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38096

173. Opie LH. Drugs and the heart. Lancet. 1980; 1:693-8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6103100

174. Opie LH. Drugs and the heart. Lancet. 1980; 1:693-8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6103100

175. Frishman WH. Pindolol: a new β-adrenoceptor antagonist with partial agonist activity. N Engl J Med. 1983; 308:940-4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6339926

176. Dahlof B, Devereux RB, Kjeldsen SE, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension Study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet. 2002;359:995-1003.

500. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute National High Blood Pressure Education Program. The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC 7). Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2004 Aug. (NIH publication No. 04-5230.)

501. James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL et al. 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA. 2014; 311:507-20. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24352797

502. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K et al. 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens. 2013; 31:1281-357. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23817082

503. Go AS, Bauman MA, Coleman King SM et al. An effective approach to high blood pressure control: a science advisory from the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Hypertension. 2014; 63:878-85. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24243703

504. Weber MA, Schiffrin EL, White WB et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of hypertension in the community: a statement by the American Society of Hypertension and the International Society of Hypertension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2014; 16:14-26. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24341872

505. Wright JT, Fine LJ, Lackland DT et al. Evidence supporting a systolic blood pressure goal of less than 150 mm Hg in patients aged 60 years or older: the minority view. Ann Intern Med. 2014; 160:499-503. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24424788

506. Mitka M. Groups spar over new hypertension guidelines. JAMA. 2014; 311:663-4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24549531

507. Peterson ED, Gaziano JM, Greenland P. Recommendations for treating hypertension: what are the right goals and purposes?. JAMA. 2014; 311:474-6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24352710

508. Bauchner H, Fontanarosa PB, Golub RM. Updated guidelines for management of high blood pressure: recommendations, review, and responsibility. JAMA. 2014; 311:477-8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24352759

515. Thomas G, Shishehbor M, Brill D et al. New hypertension guidelines: one size fits most?. Cleve Clin J Med. 2014; 81:178-88. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24591473

523. Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2012; 126:e354-471.

524. WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, Yancy CW, Jessup M et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2013; 128:e240-327.

526. Kernan WN, Ovbiagele B, Black HR et al. Guidelines for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014; :. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24788967

527. O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2013; 127:e362-425. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3695607/

530. Myers MG, Tobe SW. A Canadian perspective on the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8) hypertension guidelines. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2014; 16:246-8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24641124

536. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Blood Pressure Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the management of blood pressure in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int Suppl. 2012: 2: 337-414.

600. Pfizer. Corgard (nadolol) tablets prescribing information. New York, NY; 2013 July.

601. Pfizer. Corzide (nadolol and bendroflumethiazide) tablets prescribing information. New York, NY; 2013 July.

800. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B et al. 2016 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update on New Pharmacological Therapy for Heart Failure: An Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America. Circulation. 2016; :. http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/134/13/e282.long

1101. Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2012; 126:e354-471.

1200. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension. 2018; 71:el13-e115. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29133356

1201. Bakris G, Sorrentino M. Redefining hypertension - assessing the new blood-pressure guidelines. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378:497-499. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29341841

1202. Carey RM, Whelton PK, 2017 ACC/AHA Hypertension Guideline Writing Committee. Prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: synopsis of the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association hypertension guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2018; 168:351-358. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29357392

1207. Burnier M, Oparil S, Narkiewicz K et al. New 2017 American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology guideline for hypertension in the adults: major paradigm shifts, but will they help to fight against the hypertension disease burden?. Blood Press. 2018; 27:62-65. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29447001

1209. Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, Rich R et al. Pharmacologic treatment of hypertension in adults aged 60 years or older to higher versus lower blood pressure targets: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Academy of Family Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2017; 166:430-437. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28135725

1210. SPRINT Research Group, Wright JT, Williamson JD et al. A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373:2103-16. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26551272

1216. Taler SJ. Initial treatment of hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378:636-644. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29443671

1220. Cifu AS, Davis AM. Prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults. JAMA. 2017; 318:2132-2134. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29159416

1222. Bell KJL, Doust J, Glasziou P. Incremental benefits and harms of the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association high blood pressure guideline. JAMA Intern Med. 2018; 178:755-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29710197

1223. LeFevre M. ACC/AHA hypertension guideline: what is new? what do we do?. Am Fam Physician. 2018; 97(6):372-3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29671534

1224. Brett AS. New hypertension guideline is released. From NEJM Journal Watch website. Accessed 2018 Jun 18. https://www.jwatch.org/na45778/2017/12/28/nejm-journal-watch-general-medicine-year-review-2017

1229. Ioannidis JPA. Diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines and in the real world. JAMA. 2018; 319(2):115-6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29242891

1235. Mann SJ. Redefining beta-blocker use in hypertension: selecting the right beta-blocker and the right patient. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2017; 11(1):54-65. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28057444

a. AHFS Drug Information 2018. McEvoy GK, ed. Nadolol. Bethesda, MD: American Society of Health-System Pharmacists; 2018:.

Medical Disclaimer