Skip to main content

Melphalan/Hepatic Delivery System Beneficial for Metastatic Uveal Melanoma

By Elana Gotkine HealthDay Reporter

Medically reviewed by Carmen Pope, BPharm. Last updated on April 24, 2025.

via HealthDay

THURSDAY, April 24, 2025 -- For patients with unresectable metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM), the drug/device combination melphalan/hepatic delivery system (HDS) is efficacious and has a favorable risk-benefit profile compared with best alternative care (BAC), according to a study published online April 7 in the Annals of Surgical Oncology.

Jonathan S. Zager, M.D., from the Moffit Cancer Center in Tampa, Florida, and colleagues randomly assigned 85 eligible patients with unresectable mUM to receive melphalan/HDS 3 mg/kg ideal body weight once every six to eight weeks for a maximum of six cycles or BAC (43 and 42 patients, respectively); 72 patients actually received study treatment (40 and 32 patients, respectively). The study design was amended to a single-arm melphalan/HDS study, and all efficacy analyses of the randomized study were treated as exploratory.

The researchers observed numerical differences consistently favoring the melphalan/HDS arm versus BAC in exploratory analyses of efficacy end points (median overall survival, 18.5 versus 14.5 months; median progression-free survival, 9.1 versus 3.3 months; objective response rate, 27.5 versus 9.4 percent; disease control rate, 80.0 versus 46.9 percent). Serious adverse events occurred in 51.2 and 21.9 percent of patients receiving melphalan/HDS and BAC, respectively. Thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, leukopenia, and febrile neutropenia were the most common serious adverse events in patients receiving melphalan/HDS (19.5, 9.8, 9.8, and 7.3 percent, respectively), while in patients receiving BAC, cholecystitis, nausea, and vomiting were the most common serious adverse events (6.3 percent each). There were no treatment-related deaths reported.

"This therapy offers a treatment option for patients with this rare condition which is associated with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options," the authors write.

Several authors disclosed ties to the pharmaceutical industry; the study was funded by Delcath Systems.

Abstract/Full Text

Disclaimer: Statistical data in medical articles provide general trends and do not pertain to individuals. Individual factors can vary greatly. Always seek personalized medical advice for individual healthcare decisions.

© 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Read this next

Mismatch Repair Germline Pathogenic Variants Could Predispose to Uveal Melanoma

FRIDAY, June 20, 2025 -- Mismatch repair (MMR) germline alterations are enriched among patients with uveal melanoma (UM), according to a study published online June 18 in JAMA...

AI Model Can Aid Physicians in Skin Cancer Diagnoses

TUESDAY, June 17, 2025 -- The PanDerm artificial intelligence (AI) model improves skin cancer diagnosis when used by doctors, according to a research article published online June...

AACR: Pretrained Machine Learning Models Help Diagnose Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer

TUESDAY, April 29, 2025 -- Leveraging whole slide embedding from pretrained foundation models (FMs) improves nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) diagnosis, according to a study...

More news resources

Subscribe to our newsletter

Whatever your topic of interest, subscribe to our newsletters to get the best of Drugs.com in your inbox.