Skip to main content

USPSTF Continues to Recommend Syphilis Screening Early in Pregnancy

By Elana Gotkine HealthDay Reporter

Medically reviewed by Carmen Pope, BPharm. Last updated on May 13, 2025.

via HealthDay

TUESDAY, May 13, 2025 -- The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends screening for syphilis during pregnancy. This recommendation forms the basis of a final recommendation statement published online May 13 in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Gary N. Asher, M.D., M.P.H., from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and colleagues updated the evidence for the benefits and harms of screening and harms of treatment of syphilis during pregnancy to reaffirm the 2018 USPSTF recommendation. The researchers found that no new studies addressed the effectiveness of screening to reduce congenital syphilis or other adverse pregnancy outcomes. Five new studies, with 51,118 participants, addressed the harms of screening, and two, with 130 participants, addressed the harms of treatment. In terms of harms of screening, index test positivity ranged from 1.0 to 4.8 percent, with estimates of false positives varying from 0 to 65 percent. False-positive rates varied substantially using a reverse-sequence, two-step screening process (7 to 65 percent). In terms of treatment harms, 2.5 percent of participants had adverse reactions to standard penicillin provocation or desensitization protocols.

Based on the reaffirmation evidence update, the USPSTF concludes that screening for syphilis infection in pregnancy has a substantial net benefit. Early, universal screening for syphilis infection is recommended; screening should be conducted at the first available opportunity if an individual is not screened early in pregnancy (A recommendation).

"To reverse the uptrend in congenital syphilis, clinicians providing prenatal care must maintain high fidelity to screening guidelines and take responsibility for overcoming the systematic barriers that impede effective syphilis management," write the authors of an accompanying editorial.

Evidence Report

Final Recommendation Statement

Editorial

Disclaimer: Statistical data in medical articles provide general trends and do not pertain to individuals. Individual factors can vary greatly. Always seek personalized medical advice for individual healthcare decisions.

© 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Read this next

CRC as First of Multiple Primary Malignancies Tied to Better Outcomes Than CRC as Only Malignancy

THURSDAY, June 26, 2025 -- Compared with colorectal cancer (CRC) presenting as an isolated primary or second primary malignancy, CRC presenting as the first of multiple primary...

Two-Hour Observation Probably Safe for Most Children With Anaphylaxis

THURSDAY, June 26, 2025 -- For most children who present to an emergency department with an acute allergic reaction requiring epinephrine, a two-hour observation period is...

CT Perfusion and CT Angiography Not Useful as Standalone Tests for Establishing Death by Neurologic Criteria

THURDAY, June 26, 2025 -- Neither computed tomography (CT) perfusion nor CT angiography meet the prespecified validation threshold as an ancillary test for death by neurologic...

More news resources

Subscribe to our newsletter

Whatever your topic of interest, subscribe to our newsletters to get the best of Drugs.com in your inbox.