Skip to main content

Top Science Journal Suspends Submissions Amid Budget Cuts

Medically reviewed by Carmen Pope, BPharm. Last updated on May 1, 2025.

By I. Edwards HealthDay Reporter

THURSDAY, May 1, 2025 — A well-known U.S. science journal focused on environmental health has stopped accepting new studies, raising alarms among researchers who rely on it heavily.

Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP), a journal funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), announced that it would pause new submissions due to concerns over federal funding cuts, The New York Times reported.

The journal, which has been around for more than 50 years, publishes research on how environmental toxins like air pollution and "forever chemicals" affect human health.

It has always been free to read, and the federal funding has enabled authors to publish without charge.

Joel Kaufman, the top editor at EHP, said the pause owed to a "lack of confidence" that contracts needed to keep the journal running — including for copy-editing and editorial software — would be renewed. He didn't comment on the journal's future.

"If the journal is indeed lost, it is a huge loss," Jonathan Levy, chair of environmental health at Boston University, told The Times. "It’s reducing the ability for people to have good information that can be used to make good decisions."

EHP is among several journals facing threats under the proposed budget for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The draft budget suggests cutting support for two other free journals from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Emerging Infectious Diseases and Preventing Chronic Disease.

These journals are key sources of health research. Emerging Infectious Diseases has helped scientists stay on top of global threats like mpox and Marburg virus.

The news “is very disheartening,” virologist Jason Kindrachuk of the University of Manitoba, told The Times.

The pause dovetails with broader tensions between the federal government and the scientific publishing space.

In recent months, some journals have received letters from federal officials questioning their ethics.

Still, researchers say cutting support for journals like EHP goes against the Trump administration's stated goal of studying chronic disease.

It was among the first "open access" journals, allowing anyone to read its articles for free.

And unlike many journals that charge high publication fees, EHP's government funding made it possible for researchers at small universities to share their work, The Times reported.

“There are multiple layers of irony here,” Levy said.

Sources

  • The New York Times, April 29, 2025

Disclaimer: Statistical data in medical articles provide general trends and do not pertain to individuals. Individual factors can vary greatly. Always seek personalized medical advice for individual healthcare decisions.

© 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Posted May 2025

Read this next

FDA Commissioner: No Major Reorganization, Just Smart Reforms

THURSDAY, May 1, 2025 — Dr. Marty Makary had just finished his last surgery at Johns Hopkins when he stepped into one of the most powerful roles in American public...

Study Finds Flourishing Doesn’t Always Mean Happiness

THURSDAY, May 1, 2025 — Flourishing is more than just being happy, and a new global study finds some countries are doing better than others when it comes to overall...

Do You Have Tinnitus? The Answer Might Be Written In Your Face

THURSDAY, May 1, 2025 — Subtle facial gestures linked to the body’s fight-or-flight response could be used to help diagnose people with tinnitus, a new study...

More news resources

Subscribe to our newsletter

Whatever your topic of interest, subscribe to our newsletters to get the best of Drugs.com in your inbox.