How Would Billing for Secure Messages Impact Patients, Physicians?
By Elana Gotkine HealthDay Reporter
TUESDAY, Oct. 15, 2024 -- The policy of billing for secure messages changes patient expectations and can impact the patient-physician relationship, according to a research letter published online Oct. 15 in the Annals of Internal Medicine.
Jordan M. Alpert, Ph.D., from the Cleveland Clinic, and colleagues examined the perceptions and impact of the policy of billing for secure messages that require medical decision-making and at least five minutes of clinician time. Thirteen of 52 invited patients and 16 of 49 physicians agreed to participate in interviews.
The researchers described the patients' responses as resigned acceptance, with initial negative reaction to the policy, but understanding that people abuse the system and recognizing the service that physicians provide by answering questions. Physicians were hopeful that the policy would reduce the volume of messages and confer recognition for their provision of free care via messaging, feeling that the work of answering questions was taken for granted by patients and the health system. The policy confused patients and physicians, with patients not knowing whether their message would require more than five minutes of a clinician's time and physicians unsure about how to handle billing complexities (e.g., multiple messages from one patient). Changed expectations were noted, with patients expecting rapid, detailed responses if they were billed and physicians expressing concern that patients would withhold important information to avoid being billed. Patients and physicians may modify behaviors to avoid billing, with patients stating that they would call the office rather than use messaging and physicians being aware of the problematic nature of charging patients of low socioeconomic status.
"Health systems may want to review the advantages and disadvantages of similar policies before deciding on an appropriate implementation strategy," the authors write.
Abstract/Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)
Disclaimer: Statistical data in medical articles provide general trends and do not pertain to individuals. Individual factors can vary greatly. Always seek personalized medical advice for individual healthcare decisions.
© 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.
Posted October 2024
Read this next
Random Forest AI Model Superior for Inpatient Mortality Prognostication in Cirrhosis
THURSDAY, July 24, 2025 -- For inpatients with cirrhosis, a machine learning (ML) model using random forest (RF) analysis is superior for prediction of inpatient mortality...
Inflammation and Nutrition-Based Scores Tied to Prognosis of Low-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
THURSDAY, July 24, 2025 -- The Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) and systemic oxidative stress (SOS) score are independently associated with poorer prognosis of low-risk...
Few School Principals Report District-Mandated Mental Health Screening
THURSDAY, July 24, 2025 -- Few school principals report district-mandated mental health screening in schools, according to a study published online July 18 in JAMA Network...
More news resources
- FDA Medwatch Drug Alerts
- Daily MedNews
- News for Health Professionals
- New Drug Approvals
- New Drug Applications
- Drug Shortages
- Clinical Trial Results
- Generic Drug Approvals
Subscribe to our newsletter
Whatever your topic of interest, subscribe to our newsletters to get the best of Drugs.com in your inbox.