USPSTF Guidelines of Little Value for Estimating Preeclampsia Risk in Those at Moderate Risk
By Elana Gotkine HealthDay Reporter
WEDNESDAY, July 23, 2025 -- Moderate U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) preeclampsia risk factors have little value for estimating the risk for preeclampsia, according to a study published online July 17 in JAMA Network Open.
Thomas F. McElrath, M.D., Ph.D., from Brigham & Women's Hospital in Boston, and colleagues examined which characteristics in the USPSTF guidelines on preeclampsia risk assessment accurately estimate preeclampsia risk status and the association of preeclampsia risk with aspirin prophylaxis (AP) in an observational cohort study involving pregnant participants aged 18 years or older with a singleton pregnancy less than 22 weeks' gestation.
Overall, 88.8 percent of 5,684 participants had an increased risk for preeclampsia (70.3 percent at moderate risk; 18.5 percent at high risk). The researchers found that 43.1 percent of participants received an AP recommendation. The overall rate of preeclampsia was 12.1 percent; rates were 3.0, 10.5, and 23.5 percent for those at low, moderate, and high risk, respectively, according to USPSTF categories. Nulliparity was associated with an increased risk for preeclampsia, and advanced maternal age was associated with a reduced risk among those with two or more moderate risk factors, but no high risk factors (relative risks, 1.48 and 0.79, respectively); no associations were seen for obesity or Black race. Overall, 82.0 percent of participants with any high risk factors were recommended AP, while 85.9 percent of those at low risk were not recommended AP. In contrast, 23.8 and 50.4 percent of those with one and two or more moderate risk factors, respectively, were recommended AP.
"Moderate risk factors, in the absence of high risk factors, had no or low value for estimating the risk of developing preeclampsia, leading to nonspecific recommendation of AP in the moderate-risk category," the authors write.
Several authors disclosed ties to the pharmaceutical and medical technology industries.
Disclaimer: Statistical data in medical articles provide general trends and do not pertain to individuals. Individual factors can vary greatly. Always seek personalized medical advice for individual healthcare decisions.
© 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.
Posted July 2025
Read this next
Random Forest AI Model Superior for Inpatient Mortality Prognostication in Cirrhosis
THURSDAY, July 24, 2025 -- For inpatients with cirrhosis, a machine learning (ML) model using random forest (RF) analysis is superior for prediction of inpatient mortality...
Inflammation and Nutrition-Based Scores Tied to Prognosis of Low-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
THURSDAY, July 24, 2025 -- The Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) and systemic oxidative stress (SOS) score are independently associated with poorer prognosis of low-risk...
Few School Principals Report District-Mandated Mental Health Screening
THURSDAY, July 24, 2025 -- Few school principals report district-mandated mental health screening in schools, according to a study published online July 18 in JAMA Network...
More news resources
- FDA Medwatch Drug Alerts
- Daily MedNews
- News for Health Professionals
- New Drug Approvals
- New Drug Applications
- Drug Shortages
- Clinical Trial Results
- Generic Drug Approvals
Subscribe to our newsletter
Whatever your topic of interest, subscribe to our newsletters to get the best of Drugs.com in your inbox.