Skip to main content

Small Clinical Benefit Seen for Race-Aware Over Unaware Risk Predictions

Medically reviewed by Carmen Pope, BPharm. Last updated on Dec 4, 2024.

By Elana Gotkine HealthDay Reporter

TUESDAY, Dec. 3, 2024 -- The clinical benefit of race-aware over race-unaware disease risk predictions is smaller than expected, according to a study published online Dec. 3 in the Annals of Internal Medicine.

Madison Coots, from Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and colleagues present a decision analytic framework for considering the potential benefits of race-aware over race-unaware risk predictions. A cross-sectional study involving U.S. adults was conducted using cardiovascular disease, breast cancer, and lung cancer as case studies. Race-unaware predictions were generated via statistical marginalization, starting with risk predictions from clinically recommended race-aware models. The utility gains of the race-aware over the race-unaware models were estimated based on a simple utility function assuming constant costs of screening and constant benefit of disease detection.

The researchers found that compared with the race-aware predictions as the benchmark, the race-unaware predictions were substantially miscalibrated across racial and ethnic groups. At the population level, the clinical net benefit of race-aware over race-unaware predictions was smaller than anticipated. This result stemmed from two patterns: (1) 95 percent or more of individuals would receive the same decision across all three diseases, irrespective of whether race and ethnicity are included in the risk model; and (2) the net benefit of screening or treatment was relatively small for those who received different decisions because these patients have disease risks close to the decision threshold. Race-aware models may have a more substantial net benefit when used to inform rationing.

"Our results suggest that race-aware risk models yield smaller gains in net benefit over race-unaware models than the improvement in predictions might suggest," the authors write.

Abstract/Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)

Editorial (subscription or payment may be required)

Disclaimer: Statistical data in medical articles provide general trends and do not pertain to individuals. Individual factors can vary greatly. Always seek personalized medical advice for individual healthcare decisions.

© 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Read this next

High-Volume Exercise Tied to Increased Coronary Artery Calcification Score

WEDNESDAY, May 28, 2025 -- Male athletes with high-volume exercise training have a higher burden of calcified plaque than male nonathletes, according to a review published in the...

Odds of Cardiovascular Events Up for RSV Hospitalization Versus COVID-19 Hospitalization

WEDNESDAY, May 28, 2025 -- Patients with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) hospitalization have increased odds of any acute cardiovascular event compared with COVID-19...

Sedentary Behavior in U.S. Adults Declined in Last Decade

WEDNESDAY, May 28, 2025 -- Sedentary behavior among U.S. adults fell between 2013 and 2020 but plateaued after that, according to a research letter published online May 21 in...

More news resources

Subscribe to our newsletter

Whatever your topic of interest, subscribe to our newsletters to get the best of Drugs.com in your inbox.