Skip to main content

Judge Declares Wyoming's Abortion Bans Unconstitutional

Medically reviewed by Carmen Pope, BPharm. Last updated on Nov 19, 2024.

By Robin Foster HealthDay Reporter

TUESDAY, Nov. 19, 2024 -- Two Wyoming abortion bans, including the first state law to prohibit the use of abortion pills, violate the state's constitution, a judge ruled Monday.

In her decision, Judge Melissa Owens, of Teton County District Court, wrote that both a ban on medication abortion and a broader ban on all methods of abortion “impede the fundamental right to make health care decisions for an entire class of people, pregnant women,” the New York Times reported.

“The abortion statutes suspend a woman’s right to make her own health care decisions during the entire term of a pregnancy and are not reasonable or necessary to protect the health and general welfare of the people,” Owens added in her ruling.

The decision blocks both laws permanently, although the state is expected to appeal the ruling, the Times reported. The state attorney general’s office and the governor’s office could not be reached for comment Monday night, the newspaper added.

What legal precedent did Owens turn to in making her decision?

An amendment to the state's constitution, sparked by concerns over the Affordable Care Act and approved by an overwhelming majority of the state’s voters in 2012, guarantees adults the right to make their own health care decisions, the Times reported.

Still, the state argued in court last year that even though doctors and other health providers must be involved in abortions, there were many instances in which abortion was not “health care” because “it’s not restoring the woman’s body from pain, physical disease or sickness,” the Times reported.

The state also argued that the 2012 constitutional amendment did not apply to abortion because terminating a pregnancy affected not just the woman making the decision, but the fetus as well.

However, Owens rejected both of those arguments soundly in her ruling.

“The state did not present any evidence refuting or challenging the extensive medical testimony presented by the plaintiffs,” she wrote.

Dr. Giovannina Anthony, an obstetrician-gynecologist and abortion provider who was one of the plaintiffs in the case, told the Times she was “grateful and relieved that the judge agreed that abortion is health care and that abortion bans violate the rights of pregnant women. This is not the end of the fight in Wyoming, but for now we can continue to provide evidence-based care without fear of a prison sentence.”

Sources

  • New York Times

Disclaimer: Statistical data in medical articles provide general trends and do not pertain to individuals. Individual factors can vary greatly. Always seek personalized medical advice for individual healthcare decisions.

© 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Posted November 2024

Read this next

Nebraska First State to Ban Soda, Energy Drinks From SNAP Program

WEDNESDAY, May 21, 2025 — Nebraska is the first state to get federal approval to ban the purchase of soda and energy drinks under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance...

Deaths Waiting For Lung Donation Have Dropped Under New Guidelines

WEDNESDAY, May 21, 2025 — New guidelines for allocating donated lungs are saving more lives, a new study says. By prioritizing medical urgency, the guidelines caused a...

9 In 10 U.S. Teens Have Been Cyberbullied

WEDNESDAY, May 21, 2025 -- Cyberbullying is widespread among U.S. teens and is linked to post-traumatic stress symptoms in middle- and high-school students, a new study...

More news resources

Subscribe to our newsletter

Whatever your topic of interest, subscribe to our newsletters to get the best of Drugs.com in your inbox.