Drug Interactions between Symfi and UAD Caine

MONITOR: Coadministration of efavirenz with other agents known to induce hepatotoxicity may potentiate the risk of liver injury. Efavirenz has been associated with hepatotoxicity during postmarketing use. Among reported cases of hepatic failure, a few occurred in patients with no preexisting hepatic disease or other identifiable risk factors.

MANAGEMENT: The risk of hepatic injury should be considered when efavirenz is used in combination with other agents that are potentially hepatotoxic (e.g., acetaminophen; alcohol; androgens and anabolic steroids; antituberculous agents; azole antifungal agents; ACE inhibitors; cyclosporine (high dosages); disulfiram; endothelin receptor antagonists; interferons; ketolide and macrolide antibiotics; kinase inhibitors; minocycline; nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents; other HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitors; proteasome inhibitors; retinoids; sulfonamides; tamoxifen; thiazolidinediones; tolvaptan; vincristine; zileuton; anticonvulsants such as carbamazepine, hydantoins, felbamate, and valproic acid; lipid-lowering medications such as fenofibrate, lomitapide, mipomersen, niacin, and statins; herbals and nutritional supplements such as black cohosh, chaparral, comfrey, DHEA, kava, pennyroyal oil, and red yeast rice). Patients should be advised to seek medical attention if they experience potential signs and symptoms of hepatotoxicity such as fever, rash, itching, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, malaise, right upper quadrant pain, dark urine, pale stools, and jaundice. Monitoring of liver function tests should occur before and during treatment, especially in patients with underlying hepatic disease (including hepatitis B or C coinfection) or marked transaminase elevations. The benefit of continued therapy with efavirenz should be considered against the unknown risks of significant liver toxicity in patients who develop persistent elevations of serum transaminases greater than five times the upper limit of normal.

Switch to consumer interaction data

MONITOR: Coadministration of efavirenz with other agents known to induce hepatotoxicity may potentiate the risk of liver injury. Efavirenz has been associated with hepatotoxicity during postmarketing use. Among reported cases of hepatic failure, a few occurred in patients with no preexisting hepatic disease or other identifiable risk factors.

MANAGEMENT: The risk of hepatic injury should be considered when efavirenz is used in combination with other agents that are potentially hepatotoxic (e.g., acetaminophen; alcohol; androgens and anabolic steroids; antituberculous agents; azole antifungal agents; ACE inhibitors; cyclosporine (high dosages); disulfiram; endothelin receptor antagonists; interferons; ketolide and macrolide antibiotics; kinase inhibitors; minocycline; nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents; other HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitors; proteasome inhibitors; retinoids; sulfonamides; tamoxifen; thiazolidinediones; tolvaptan; vincristine; zileuton; anticonvulsants such as carbamazepine, hydantoins, felbamate, and valproic acid; lipid-lowering medications such as fenofibrate, lomitapide, mipomersen, niacin, and statins; herbals and nutritional supplements such as black cohosh, chaparral, comfrey, DHEA, kava, pennyroyal oil, and red yeast rice). Patients should be advised to seek medical attention if they experience potential signs and symptoms of hepatotoxicity such as fever, rash, itching, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, malaise, right upper quadrant pain, dark urine, pale stools, and jaundice. Monitoring of liver function tests should occur before and during treatment, especially in patients with underlying hepatic disease (including hepatitis B or C coinfection) or marked transaminase elevations. The benefit of continued therapy with efavirenz should be considered against the unknown risks of significant liver toxicity in patients who develop persistent elevations of serum transaminases greater than five times the upper limit of normal.

Switch to consumer interaction data

Coadministration with inducers of CYP450 1A2 and/or 3A4 may decrease the plasma concentrations of lidocaine, which is primarily metabolized by these isoenzymes. In four healthy volunteers (2 smokers and 2 nonsmokers), administration of a single 400 mg oral dose of lidocaine following pretreatment with the CYP450 inducer phenobarbital (15 mg/day for 4 weeks, followed by 30 mg/day for 4 weeks) decreased lidocaine systemic exposure (AUC) by 37% and increased its oral clearance by 56% compared to administration of lidocaine alone. In another study, the mean bioavailability of a single 750 mg oral dose of lidocaine in six patients receiving chronic antiepileptic drug therapy (consisting of one or more of the following enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants: phenobarbital, primidone, phenytoin, carbamazepine) was approximately 2.5-fold lower than that reported for six healthy control subjects, while intrinsic clearance was nearly threefold higher. By contrast, the interaction was modest for lidocaine administered intravenously, suggesting induction of primarily hepatic first-pass rather than systemic metabolism of lidocaine. When a single 100 mg dose of lidocaine was given intravenously, mean lidocaine AUC was reduced by less than 10% and serum clearance increased by just 17% in the epileptic patients compared to controls. These changes were not statistically significant. Likewise, mean lidocaine AUC decreased by approximately 11% and plasma clearance increased by 15% when a single 50 mg intravenous dose of lidocaine was administered following pretreatment with the potent CYP450 inducer rifampin (600 mg/day for six days) in ten healthy, nonsmoking male volunteers. Another pharmacokinetic study found that cigarette smoke, an inducer of CYP450 1A2, reduced the bioavailability of lidocaine when administered orally, but had only minor effects on lidocaine administered intravenously. When 4 smokers and 5 non-smokers received 2 doses of lidocaine (100 mg IV followed by 100 mg orally after a 2-day washout period), the smoker's systemic exposure (AUC) of oral lidocaine was 68% lower than non-smokers. The AUC of IV lidocaine was only 9% lower in smokers compared with non-smokers. The clinical impact of smoking on lidocaine has not been studied, however, a loss of efficacy may occur.

Switch to consumer interaction data