Drug Interactions between mephenytoin and Xylocaine Duo-Trach Kit

MONITOR: Grapefruit and grapefruit juice may increase the plasma concentrations of lidocaine, which is primarily metabolized by the CYP450 3A4 and 1A2 isoenzymes to active metabolites (monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX) and glycinexylidide). The proposed mechanism is inhibition of CYP450 3A4-mediated first-pass metabolism in the gut wall by certain compounds present in grapefruit. Inhibition of hepatic CYP450 3A4 may also contribute. The interaction has not been studied with grapefruit juice but has been reported with oral and/or intravenous lidocaine and potent CYP450 3A4 inhibitor, itraconazole, as well as moderate CYP450 3A4 inhibitor, erythromycin. A pharmacokinetic study of 9 healthy volunteers showed that the administration of lidocaine oral (1 mg/kg single dose) with itraconazole (200 mg daily) increased lidocaine systemic exposure (AUC) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax) by 75% and 55%, respectively. However, no changes were observed in the pharmacokinetics of the active metabolite MEGX. In the same study, when the moderate CYP450 3A4 inhibitor erythromycin (500 mg three times a day) was administered, lidocaine AUC and Cmax increased by 60% and 40%, respectively. By contrast, when intravenous lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg infusion over 60 minutes) was administered on the fourth day of treatment with itraconazole (200 mg once a day) no changes in lidocaine AUC or Cmax were observed. However, when lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg infusion over 60 minutes) was coadministered with erythromycin (500 mg three times a day) in the same study, the AUC and Cmax of the active metabolite MEGX significantly increased by 45-60% and 40%, respectively. The observed differences between oral and intravenous lidocaine when coadministered with CYP450 3A4 inhibitors may be attributed to inhibition of CYP450 3A4 in both the gastrointestinal tract and liver affecting oral lidocaine to a greater extent than intravenous lidocaine. In general, the effects of grapefruit products are concentration-, dose- and preparation-dependent, and can vary widely among brands. Certain preparations of grapefruit (e.g., high dose, double strength) have sometimes demonstrated potent inhibition of CYP450 3A4, while other preparations (e.g., low dose, single strength) have typically demonstrated moderate inhibition. While the clinical significance of this interaction is unknown, increased exposure to lidocaine may lead to serious and/or life-threatening reactions including respiratory depression, convulsions, bradycardia, hypotension, arrhythmias, and cardiovascular collapse.

MONITOR: Certain foods and behaviors that induce CYP450 1A2 may reduce the plasma concentrations of lidocaine. The proposed mechanism is induction of hepatic CYP450 1A2, one of the isoenzymes responsible for the metabolic clearance of lidocaine. Cigarette smoking is known to be a CYP450 1A2 inducer. In one pharmacokinetic study of 4 smokers and 5 non-smokers who received 2 doses of lidocaine (100 mg IV followed by 100 mg orally after a 2-day washout period), the smokers' systemic exposure (AUC) of oral lidocaine was 68% lower than non-smokers. The AUC of IV lidocaine was only 9% lower in smokers compared with non-smokers. Other CYP450 1A2 inducers include cruciferous vegetables (e.g., broccoli, brussels sprouts) and char-grilled meat. Therefore, eating large or variable amounts of these foods could also reduce lidocaine exposure. The clinical impact of smoking and/or the ingestion of foods that induce CYP450 1A2 on lidocaine have not been studied, however, a loss of efficacy may occur.

MANAGEMENT: Caution is recommended if lidocaine is to be used in combination with grapefruit and grapefruit juice. Monitoring for lidocaine toxicity and plasma lidocaine levels may also be advised, and the lidocaine dosage adjusted as necessary. Patients who smoke and/or consume cruciferous vegetables may be monitored for reduced lidocaine efficacy.

Switch to consumer interaction data

ADJUST DOSING INTERVAL: Phenytoin bioavailability may decrease to subtherapeutic levels when the suspension is given concomitantly with enteral feedings. The mechanism may be related to phenytoin binding to substances in the enteral formula (e.g., calcium, protein) and/or binding to the tube lumen. Data have been conflicting and some studies have reported no changes in phenytoin levels, while others have reported significant reductions.

MONITOR: Acute consumption of alcohol may increase plasma phenytoin levels. Chronic consumption of alcohol may decrease plasma phenytoin levels. The mechanism of this interaction is related to induction of phenytoin metabolism by ethanol during chronic administration. Other hydantoin derivatives may be similarly affected by ethanol.

MANAGEMENT: Some experts have recommended interrupting the feeding for 2 hours before and after the phenytoin dose, giving the phenytoin suspension diluted in water, and flushing the tube with water after administration; however, this method may not entirely avoid the interaction and is not always clinically feasible. Patients should be closely monitored for clinical and laboratory evidence of altered phenytoin efficacy and levels upon initiation and discontinuation of enteral feedings. Dosage adjustments or intravenous administration may be required until therapeutic serum levels are obtained. In addition, patients receiving phenytoin therapy should be warned about the interaction between phenytoin and ethanol and they should be advised to notify their physician if they experience worsening of seizure control or symptoms of toxicity, including drowsiness, visual disturbances, change in mental status, nausea, or ataxia.

Switch to consumer interaction data