Skip to main content

Drug Interactions between emtricitabine / lopinavir / ritonavir / tenofovir disoproxil and seladelpar

This report displays the potential drug interactions for the following 2 drugs:

Edit list (add/remove drugs)

Interactions between your drugs

Moderate

ritonavir tenofovir

Applies to: emtricitabine / lopinavir / ritonavir / tenofovir disoproxil and emtricitabine / lopinavir / ritonavir / tenofovir disoproxil

MONITOR: Coadministration with ritonavir, with or without lopinavir, has been suggested in postmarketing reports to increase the proximal tubular intracellular concentrations of tenofovir and potentiate the risk of tenofovir-induced nephrotoxicity. The proposed mechanism is ritonavir inhibition of tenofovir renal tubular secretion into the urine via multidrug resistance protein MRP2. Analysis of data from a compassionate access study in which 271 patients with advanced HIV disease received the combination for a mean duration of 63 weeks revealed no clinically significant nephrotoxicity associated with coadministration. However, there have been case reports of renal failure associated with acute tubular necrosis, Fanconi's syndrome, and nephrogenic diabetes insipidus in patients treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in combination with ritonavir. Some patients had incomplete recovery of renal function more than a year after cessation of tenofovir therapy. Ritonavir given in combination with lopinavir has also been reported to modestly increase the plasma concentrations of tenofovir. In contrast, both slight decreases and no change in lopinavir and ritonavir concentrations have been reported.

MANAGEMENT: Caution is advised if tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is prescribed with ritonavir. Renal function should be monitored regularly, including surveillance for signs of tubulopathy such as glycosuria, acidosis, increases in serum creatinine level, electrolyte disturbances (e.g., hypokalemia, hypophosphatemia), and proteinuria. The same precaution may be applicable during therapy with other protease inhibitors based on their similar pharmacokinetic profile, although clinical data are lacking. Nelfinavir reportedly does not alter the pharmacokinetics of tenofovir, or vice versa. Tenofovir administration should be discontinued promptly if nephropathy develops.

References (8)
  1. (2001) "Product Information. Viread (tenofovir)." Gilead Sciences
  2. Verhelst D, Monge M, Meynard JL, et al. (2002) "Fanconi syndrome and renal failure induced by tenofovir: A first case report." Am J Kidney Dis, 40, p. 1331-3
  3. Creput C, Gonzalez-Canali G, Hill G, Piketty C, Kazatchkine M, Nochy D (2003) "Renal lesions in HIV-1-positive patient treated with tenofovir." AIDS, 17, p. 935-7
  4. Karras A, Lafaurie M, Furco A, et al. (2003) "Tenofovir-related nephrotoxicity in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients: three cases of renal failure, fanconi syndrome, and nephrogenic diabetes insipidus." Clin Infect Dis, 36, p. 1070-3
  5. Kearney BP, Mittan A, Sayre J, et al. (2003) Pharmacokinetic drug interaction and long term safety profile of tenofovir DF and lopinavir/ritonavir. http://www.icaac.org/ICAAC.asp
  6. Rollot F, Nazal EM, Chauvelot-Moachon L, et al. (2003) "Tenofovir-related fanconi syndrome with nephrogenic diabetes insipidus in a patient with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: the role of lopinavir-ritonavir-Didanosine." Clin Infect Dis, 37, E174-6
  7. Zimmermann AE, Pizzoferrato T, Bedford J, Morris A, Hoffman R, Braden G (2006) "Tenofovir-associated acute and chronic kidney disease: a case of multiple drug interactions." Clin Infect Dis, 42, p. 283-90
  8. Kapadia J, Shah S, Desai C, et al. (2013) "Tenofovir induced Fanconi syndrome: a possible pharmacokinetic interaction." Indian J Pharmacol, 45, p. 191-2
Moderate

ritonavir seladelpar

Applies to: emtricitabine / lopinavir / ritonavir / tenofovir disoproxil and seladelpar

MONITOR: Concomitant use with a moderate to potent CYP450 3A4 inhibitor may significantly increase seladelpar's exposure in patients who are CYP450 2C9 poor metabolizers. The proposed mechanism is reduced clearance of seladelpar, which is primarily metabolized via CYP450 2C9 and to a lesser extent via CYP450 3A4 and 2C8. The activity of CYP450 2C9 is decreased in individuals with genetic variants of the isoenzyme. After a single dose of seladelpar (1 mg to 15 mg), dose-normalized systemic exposure (AUC) was 48% higher in CYP450 2C9 poor metabolizers (n=2) and 24% higher in CYP450 2C9 intermediate metabolizers (n=28) compared to normal metabolizers (n=84). However, the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was similar regardless of metabolizer status. These increases in AUC are not considered clinically relevant alone. Similarly, physiologically based pharmacokinetic model simulations predicted that coadministration with the potent CYP450 3A4 inhibitor itraconazole (300 mg daily) and the moderate CYP450 3A4 inhibitor erythromycin (500 mg 4 times daily) increased seladelpar's AUC by 34% and 24% and its Cmax by 18% and 14%, respectively. These changes were also not considered clinically relevant alone. However, use of a concomitant moderate to potent CYP450 3A4 inhibitor in a patient classified as a CYP450 2C9 poor metabolizer may result in clinically significant changes. While in vivo data specific to this scenario are lacking, coadministration with the moderate CYP450 2C9 and 3A4 inhibitor fluconazole (400 mg) increased the AUC of seladelpar (10 mg) by 2.4-fold, which was considered clinically significant.

MANAGEMENT: If concomitant use of a moderate to potent CYP450 3A4 inhibitor is clinically necessary during treatment with seladelpar, caution and determining the patient's CYP450 2C9 genotype may be advisable. Patients who are classified as poor CYP450 2C9 metabolizers should be monitored more closely for adverse reactions (e.g., abnormal liver function tests) during coadministration. Should adverse reactions occur, treatment with seladelpar may need to be held or permanently discontinued as indicated by the manufacturer. The labeling of the inhibitor should also be consulted as some inhibitors may continue to have effects on CYP450 3A4 even after the agent has been discontinued.

References (2)
  1. (2024) "Product Information. Livdelzi (seladelpar)." Gilead Sciences
  2. Cymabay Therapeutics Inc (2024) Center for drug evaluation and research. Application Number: 217899Orig1s000 integrated review. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2024/217899Orig1s000IntegratedR.pdf
Moderate

lopinavir tenofovir

Applies to: emtricitabine / lopinavir / ritonavir / tenofovir disoproxil and emtricitabine / lopinavir / ritonavir / tenofovir disoproxil

MONITOR: Coadministration with ritonavir, with or without lopinavir, has been suggested in postmarketing reports to increase the proximal tubular intracellular concentrations of tenofovir and potentiate the risk of tenofovir-induced nephrotoxicity. The proposed mechanism is ritonavir inhibition of tenofovir renal tubular secretion into the urine via multidrug resistance protein MRP2. Analysis of data from a compassionate access study in which 271 patients with advanced HIV disease received the combination for a mean duration of 63 weeks revealed no clinically significant nephrotoxicity associated with coadministration. However, there have been case reports of renal failure associated with acute tubular necrosis, Fanconi's syndrome, and nephrogenic diabetes insipidus in patients treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in combination with ritonavir. Some patients had incomplete recovery of renal function more than a year after cessation of tenofovir therapy. Ritonavir given in combination with lopinavir has also been reported to modestly increase the plasma concentrations of tenofovir. In contrast, both slight decreases and no change in lopinavir and ritonavir concentrations have been reported.

MANAGEMENT: Caution is advised if tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is prescribed with ritonavir. Renal function should be monitored regularly, including surveillance for signs of tubulopathy such as glycosuria, acidosis, increases in serum creatinine level, electrolyte disturbances (e.g., hypokalemia, hypophosphatemia), and proteinuria. The same precaution may be applicable during therapy with other protease inhibitors based on their similar pharmacokinetic profile, although clinical data are lacking. Nelfinavir reportedly does not alter the pharmacokinetics of tenofovir, or vice versa. Tenofovir administration should be discontinued promptly if nephropathy develops.

References (8)
  1. (2001) "Product Information. Viread (tenofovir)." Gilead Sciences
  2. Verhelst D, Monge M, Meynard JL, et al. (2002) "Fanconi syndrome and renal failure induced by tenofovir: A first case report." Am J Kidney Dis, 40, p. 1331-3
  3. Creput C, Gonzalez-Canali G, Hill G, Piketty C, Kazatchkine M, Nochy D (2003) "Renal lesions in HIV-1-positive patient treated with tenofovir." AIDS, 17, p. 935-7
  4. Karras A, Lafaurie M, Furco A, et al. (2003) "Tenofovir-related nephrotoxicity in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients: three cases of renal failure, fanconi syndrome, and nephrogenic diabetes insipidus." Clin Infect Dis, 36, p. 1070-3
  5. Kearney BP, Mittan A, Sayre J, et al. (2003) Pharmacokinetic drug interaction and long term safety profile of tenofovir DF and lopinavir/ritonavir. http://www.icaac.org/ICAAC.asp
  6. Rollot F, Nazal EM, Chauvelot-Moachon L, et al. (2003) "Tenofovir-related fanconi syndrome with nephrogenic diabetes insipidus in a patient with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: the role of lopinavir-ritonavir-Didanosine." Clin Infect Dis, 37, E174-6
  7. Zimmermann AE, Pizzoferrato T, Bedford J, Morris A, Hoffman R, Braden G (2006) "Tenofovir-associated acute and chronic kidney disease: a case of multiple drug interactions." Clin Infect Dis, 42, p. 283-90
  8. Kapadia J, Shah S, Desai C, et al. (2013) "Tenofovir induced Fanconi syndrome: a possible pharmacokinetic interaction." Indian J Pharmacol, 45, p. 191-2

Drug and food interactions

Moderate

ritonavir food

Applies to: emtricitabine / lopinavir / ritonavir / tenofovir disoproxil

ADJUST DOSING INTERVAL: Administration with food may modestly affect the bioavailability of ritonavir from the various available formulations. When the oral solution was given under nonfasting conditions, peak ritonavir concentrations decreased 23% and the extent of absorption decreased 7% relative to fasting conditions. Dilution of the oral solution (within one hour of dosing) with 240 mL of chocolate milk or a nutritional supplement (Advera or Ensure) did not significantly affect the extent and rate of ritonavir absorption. When a single 100 mg dose of the tablet was administered with a high-fat meal (907 kcal; 52% fat, 15% protein, 33% carbohydrates), approximately 20% decreases in mean peak concentration (Cmax) and systemic exposure (AUC) were observed relative to administration after fasting. Similar decreases in Cmax and AUC were reported when the tablet was administered with a moderate-fat meal. In contrast, the extent of absorption of ritonavir from the soft gelatin capsule formulation was 13% higher when administered with a meal (615 KCal; 14.5% fat, 9% protein, and 76% carbohydrate) relative to fasting.

MANAGEMENT: Ritonavir should be taken with meals to enhance gastrointestinal tolerability.

References (1)
  1. (2001) "Product Information. Norvir (ritonavir)." Abbott Pharmaceutical
Moderate

lopinavir food

Applies to: emtricitabine / lopinavir / ritonavir / tenofovir disoproxil

ADJUST DOSING INTERVAL: Food significantly increases the bioavailability of lopinavir from the oral solution formulation of lopinavir-ritonavir. Relative to fasting, administration of lopinavir-ritonavir oral solution with a moderate-fat meal (500 to 682 Kcal; 23% to 25% calories from fat) increased lopinavir peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and systemic exposure (AUC) by 54% and 80%, respectively, whereas administration with a high-fat meal (872 Kcal; 56% from fat) increased lopinavir Cmax and AUC by 56% and 130%, respectively. No clinically significant changes in Cmax and AUC were observed following administration of lopinavir-ritonavir tablets under fed conditions versus fasted conditions. Relative to fasting, administration of a single 400 mg-100 mg dose (two 200 mg-50 mg tablets) with a moderate-fat meal (558 Kcal; 24.1% calories from fat) increased lopinavir Cmax and AUC by 17.6% and 26.9%, respectively, while administration with a high-fat meal (998 Kcal; 51.3% from fat) increased lopinavir AUC by 18.9% but not Cmax. Relative to fasting, ritonavir Cmax and AUC also increased by 4.9% and 14.9%, respectively, with the moderate-fat meal and 10.3% and 23.9%, respectively, with the high-fat meal.

MANAGEMENT: Lopinavir-ritonavir oral solution should be taken with meals to enhance bioavailability and minimize pharmacokinetic variability. Lopinavir-ritonavir tablets may be taken without regard to meals.

References (1)
  1. (2001) "Product Information. Kaletra (lopinavir-ritonavir)." Abbott Pharmaceutical
Minor

tenofovir food

Applies to: emtricitabine / lopinavir / ritonavir / tenofovir disoproxil

Food enhances the oral absorption and bioavailability of tenofovir, the active entity of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. According to the product labeling, administration of the drug following a high-fat meal increased the mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of tenofovir by approximately 14% and 40%, respectively, compared to administration in the fasting state. However, administration with a light meal did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of tenofovir compared to administration in the fasting state. Food delays the time to reach tenofovir Cmax by approximately 1 hour. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate may be administered without regard to meals.

References (1)
  1. (2001) "Product Information. Viread (tenofovir)." Gilead Sciences

Therapeutic duplication warnings

No warnings were found for your selected drugs.

Therapeutic duplication warnings are only returned when drugs within the same group exceed the recommended therapeutic duplication maximum.


Report options

Drug Interaction Classification

These classifications are only a guideline. The relevance of a particular drug interaction to a specific individual is difficult to determine. Always consult your healthcare provider before starting or stopping any medication.
Major Highly clinically significant. Avoid combinations; the risk of the interaction outweighs the benefit.
Moderate Moderately clinically significant. Usually avoid combinations; use it only under special circumstances.
Minor Minimally clinically significant. Minimize risk; assess risk and consider an alternative drug, take steps to circumvent the interaction risk and/or institute a monitoring plan.
Unknown No interaction information available.

Further information

Always consult your healthcare provider to ensure the information displayed on this page applies to your personal circumstances.