Drug Interactions between dexamethasone / lidocaine and letermovir

MONITOR: Coadministration with moderate and potent inhibitors of CYP450 3A4 may increase the plasma concentrations of lidocaine, which is primarily metabolized by CYP450 3A4 and 1A2 isoenzymes to active metabolites (monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX) and glycinexylidide). In addition, antiarrhythmic calcium channel blockers that also inhibit CYP450 3A4 (e.g., diltiazem, verapamil) may have additive negative inotropic effects on the heart when coadministered with lidocaine. A pharmacokinetic study of 9 healthy volunteers showed that the administration of lidocaine oral (1 mg/kg single dose) with itraconazole (200 mg daily), a combined potent CYP450 3A4 and P-gp inhibitor, increased lidocaine systemic exposure (AUC) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax) by 75% and 55%, respectively. However, no changes were observed in the pharmacokinetics of the active metabolite MEGX. In the same study, when the moderate CYP450 3A4 inhibitor erythromycin (500 mg three times a day) was administered, lidocaine AUC and Cmax increased by 60% and 40%, respectively. By contrast, when intravenous lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg infusion over 60 minutes) was administered on the fourth day of treatment with itraconazole (200 mg once a day) no changes in lidocaine AUC or Cmax were observed. However, when lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg infusion over 60 minutes) was coadministered with erythromycin (500 mg three times a day) in the same study, the AUC and Cmax of the active metabolite MEGX significantly increased by 45-60% and 40%, respectively. The observed differences between oral and intravenous lidocaine when coadministered with CYP450 3A4 inhibitors may be attributed to inhibition of CYP450 3A4 in both the gastrointestinal tract and liver affecting oral lidocaine to a greater extent than intravenous lidocaine. While the clinical significance of this interaction is unknown, increased exposure to lidocaine may lead to serious and/or life-threatening reactions including respiratory depression, convulsions, bradycardia, hypotension, arrhythmias and cardiovascular collapse.

MANAGEMENT: Caution and clinical monitoring are advised if lidocaine must be used concomitantly with moderate and potent CYP450 3A4 inhibitors. Monitoring of pharmacologic response and plasma lidocaine levels may be advised whenever a potent CYP450 3A4 inhibitor is added to or withdrawn from therapy, and the lidocaine dosage adjusted as necessary.

MONITOR: Coadministration with letermovir may increase the plasma concentrations of drugs that are substrates of CYP450 2C8, CYP450 3A4, and/or organic anion transporting polypeptide protein (OATP) 1B1 and 1B3. Letermovir has been shown to be a reversible inhibitor of CYP450 2C8 in vitro, although its effect on CYP450 2C8 substrates has not been evaluated clinically. Letermovir is also a time-dependent inhibitor and inducer of CYP450 3A4 in vitro. According to the product labeling, midazolam peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and systemic exposure (AUC) increased by an average of 1.7- and 2.3-fold, respectively, when a single 2 mg oral dose of midazolam was coadministered with letermovir 480 mg orally once daily. The Cmax did not change when midazolam 1 mg was administered intravenously with letermovir 240 mg orally once daily, but AUC increased by 1.5-fold and concentration at 24 hours postdose (C24hr) increased by 2.7-fold. The increased AUC of midazolam, a CYP450 3A4 probe substrate, indicates that net effect of letermovir on the isoenzyme is moderate inhibition. In addition, letermovir is an inhibitor of the hepatic uptake transporters, OATP 1B1 and 1B3. When a single 20 mg dose of atorvastatin, a CYP450 3A4 and OATP1B1/1B3 substrate, was coadministered with letermovir 480 mg orally once daily, atorvastatin Cmax, AUC and C24hr increased by an average of 2.2-, 3.3- and 3.6-fold, respectively. Additional use of cyclosporine is likely to further increase the magnitude of these interactions, since it is an inhibitor of CYP450 3A4 and a strong inhibitor of OATP 1B1 and 1B3.

MANAGEMENT: Caution is advised when letermovir is used concurrently with drugs that are substrates of CYP450 2C8, CYP450 3A4, and/or OATP 1B1 and 1B3, particularly those with a narrow therapeutic range. Dosage adjustments as well as clinical and laboratory monitoring may be appropriate for some drugs whenever letermovir is added to or withdrawn from therapy. Moreover, clinicians should be aware that the magnitude of CYP450 3A- and OATP1B1/3-mediated drug interactions with coadministered drugs may be different when letermovir is used with cyclosporine. The combined effect of the two drugs on CYP450 3A4 may be similar to that of a strong CYP450 3A4 inhibitor, hence clinicians should refer to the prescribing information for dosing recommendations of the CYP450 3A4 substrate with a strong CYP450 3A4 inhibitor. Similarly, letermovir and cyclosporine may demonstrate some additive effects on OATP1B1 inhibition, although cyclosporine by itself is already a strong OATP1B1/3 inhibitor.

Coadministration with inducers of CYP450 1A2 and/or 3A4 may decrease the plasma concentrations of lidocaine, which is primarily metabolized by these isoenzymes. In four healthy volunteers (2 smokers and 2 nonsmokers), administration of a single 400 mg oral dose of lidocaine following pretreatment with the CYP450 inducer phenobarbital (15 mg/day for 4 weeks, followed by 30 mg/day for 4 weeks) decreased lidocaine systemic exposure (AUC) by 37% and increased its oral clearance by 56% compared to administration of lidocaine alone. In another study, the mean bioavailability of a single 750 mg oral dose of lidocaine in six patients receiving chronic antiepileptic drug therapy (consisting of one or more of the following enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants: phenobarbital, primidone, phenytoin, carbamazepine) was approximately 2.5-fold lower than that reported for six healthy control subjects, while intrinsic clearance was nearly threefold higher. By contrast, the interaction was modest for lidocaine administered intravenously, suggesting induction of primarily hepatic first-pass rather than systemic metabolism of lidocaine. When a single 100 mg dose of lidocaine was given intravenously, mean lidocaine AUC was reduced by less than 10% and serum clearance increased by just 17% in the epileptic patients compared to controls. These changes were not statistically significant. Likewise, mean lidocaine AUC decreased by approximately 11% and plasma clearance increased by 15% when a single 50 mg intravenous dose of lidocaine was administered following pretreatment with the potent CYP450 inducer rifampin (600 mg/day for six days) in ten healthy, nonsmoking male volunteers. Another pharmacokinetic study found that cigarette smoke, an inducer of CYP450 1A2, reduced the bioavailability of lidocaine when administered orally, but had only minor effects on lidocaine administered intravenously. When 4 smokers and 5 non-smokers received 2 doses of lidocaine (100 mg IV followed by 100 mg orally after a 2-day washout period), the smoker's systemic exposure (AUC) of oral lidocaine was 68% lower than non-smokers. The AUC of IV lidocaine was only 9% lower in smokers compared with non-smokers. The clinical impact of smoking on lidocaine has not been studied, however, a loss of efficacy may occur.