Skip to main content

Drug Interactions between mercaptopurine and streptococcus salivarius

This report displays the potential drug interactions for the following 2 drugs:

Edit list (add/remove drugs)

Interactions between your drugs

Moderate

mercaptopurine streptococcus salivarius

Applies to: mercaptopurine and streptococcus salivarius

MONITOR: Probiotic use during immunosuppressant or intense antineoplastic therapy may theoretically increase the risk of infections from the live microorganisms contained in probiotic products. Patients may be immunosuppressed if they have recently received or are receiving alkylating agents, antimetabolites, radiation, some antirheumatic agents, high dosages of corticosteroids or adrenocorticotropic agents, or long-term topical or inhaled corticosteroids. Although probiotics are generally considered safe, with minimal to low pathogenicity, infections such as bacteremia and endocarditis with various strains commonly found in probiotics (e.g., lactobacilli, bifidobacteria, Bacillus subtilis) have been rarely reported, primarily in critically ill patients or patients with significant underlying medical conditions such as malignancy, organ transplantation, AIDS, valvular heart disease, diabetes mellitus, recent surgery, or compromised immune system. Lactobacillus bacteremia has also been reported following endoscopy. In addition, cases of lactobacillus pneumonia and liver abscess, as well as Saccharomyces fungemia, pneumonia, liver abscess, peritonitis and vaginitis, have been described in the medical literature.

MANAGEMENT: Caution is advised when probiotics are used during immunosuppressant or intense antineoplastic therapy. It may be advisable to avoid using probiotics, particularly products containing saccharomyces boulardii, in patients who are significantly immunosuppressed unless benefits are anticipated to outweigh the potential risk of infection.

References (12)
  1. Salminen MK, Rautelin H, Tynkkynen S, et al. (2004) "Lactobacillus bacteremia, clinical significance, and patient outcome, with special focus on probiotic L. rhamnosus GG." Clin Infect Dis, 38, p. 62-9
  2. Salminen MK, Tynkkynen S, Rautelin H, et al. (2002) "Lactobacillus bacteremia during a rapid increase in probiotic use of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in Finland." Clin Infect Dis, 35, p. 1155-60
  3. Rautio M, Jousimies-Somer H, Kauma H, et al. (1999) "Liver abscess due to a Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain indistinguishable from L. rhamnosus strain GG." Clin Infect Dis, 28, p. 1159-60
  4. Schlegel L, Lemerle S, Geslin P (1998) "Lactobacillus species as opportunistic pathogens in immunocompromised patients." Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 17, p. 887-8
  5. Saxelin M, Chuang NH, Chassy B, et al. (1996) "Lactobacilli and bacteremia in southern Finland, 1989-1992" Clin Infect Dis, 22, p. 564-6
  6. Husni RN, Gordon SM, Washington JA, Longworth DL (1997) "Lactobacillus bacteremia and endocarditis: review of 45 cases." Clin Infect Dis, 25, p. 1048-55
  7. Oggioni MR, Pozzi G, Valensin PE, Galieni P, Bigazzi C (1998) "Recurrent septicemia in an immunocompromised patient due to probiotic strains of Bacillus subtilis." J Clin Microbiol, 36, p. 325-6
  8. Mackay AD, Taylor MB, Kibbler CC, Hamilton-Miller JM (1999) "Lactobacillus endocarditis caused by a probiotic organism." Clin Microbiol Infect, 5, p. 290-2
  9. Borriello SP, Hammes WP, Holzapfel W, et al. (2003) "Safety of probiotics that contain lactobacilli or bifidobacteria." Clin Infect Dis, 36, p. 775-80
  10. Lolis N, Veldekis D, Moraitou H, et al. (2008) "Saccharomyces boulardii fungaemia in an intensive care unit patient treated with caspofungin." Crit Care, 12, epub
  11. Boyle RJ, Robins-Browne RM, Tang ML (2006) "Probiotic use in clinical practice: what are the risks?" Am J Clin Nutr, 83, p. 1256-64
  12. Pruccoli G, Silvestro E, Napoleone CP, Aidala E, Garazzino S, Scolfaro C (2024) Are probiotics safe? Bifidobacterium bacteremia in a child with severe heart failure. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333853508_Are_probiotics_safe_Bifidobacterium_bacteremia_in_a_child_with_severe_heart_failure

Drug and food interactions

Moderate

mercaptopurine food

Applies to: mercaptopurine

ADJUST DOSING INTERVAL: The oral bioavailability of mercaptopurine (6-MP) is highly variable and may be affected by administration with food or dairy products. The mechanism by which food may impact the absorption of 6-MP has not been fully established, but cow's milk specifically has been found to contain a high concentration of xanthine oxidase, the enzyme responsible for first-pass metabolism of 6-MP to the inactive metabolite 6-thiouric acid. Incubation with cow's milk at 37 C induced a 30% catabolism of 6-MP within 30 minutes in one investigation. However, food or dairy intake with 6-MP in study patients has yielded variable results. In a study conducted in 17 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), oral 6-MP 75 mg/m2 administered 15 minutes after a standardized breakfast including 250 mL of milk resulted in a prolonged Tmax and a lower Cmax and AUC compared with 6-MP administration in the fasting state (mean Tmax: 2.3 hours vs. 1.2 hours; mean Cmax: 0.63 uM vs. 0.98 uM; mean AUC: 105 uM vs. 143 uM, respectively). In a different study, oral 6-MP 31.2 to 81.1 mg/m2 administered to 7 subjects with ALL 15 minutes after a standard breakfast consisting of orange juice, cereal, and toast also trended towards longer Tmax and lower Cmax values compared to 6-MP administration after an overnight fast, although the differences were not statistically significant. Two subjects had blood samples that were all below the limit of detection (20 ng/mL) following administration in the fed state. Likewise, a study of 15 pediatric patients reported non-significant 20% to 22% decreases in the Cmax and AUC of 6-MP when administered after a standardized breakfast containing both milk and cheese compared to administration after fasting, but in contrast to the two earlier studies, Tmax was decreased from 1.8 to 1.1 hours. Another study of 10 children with ALL or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma given an average oral 6-MP dose of 63 mg/m2 revealed substantial interpatient variations in the effect of food intake on 6-MP plasma levels, with Cmax changes ranging from 67% decrease to 81% increase and AUC changes ranging from 53% decrease to 86% increase relative to administration following fasting. Collectively for the group, however, there was no statistically significant difference in mean Tmax, Cmax, or AUC between the fed and fasting states. In this study, patients were fed what they normally ate at home rather than a standardized breakfast, which may have contributed to the inconsistent results. The clinical significance of the data and observations from these studies has not been determined. An interaction with milk was suspected in a four-year-old male with ALL who experienced persistent elevations of peripheral blood counts during maintenance with 6-MP and methotrexate despite increasing doses of 6-MP up to 160% of the calculated dosage for his body surface area (75 mg/m2). Cessation of concomitant milk ingestion allowed for the 6-MP dosage to return to 75 mg/m2 and resulted in control of peripheral blood counts within a week. Other data do not support a clinically relevant interaction with food or dairy products. In a prospective study of 441 patients aged 2 to 20 years receiving 6-MP for ALL maintenance, investigators found no significant association between relapse risk and 6-MP ingestion habits including administration with food versus never with food and administration with milk/dairy versus never with milk/dairy. Among the 56.2% of patients who were considered adherent by the study, there was also no significant association between red cell thioguanine nucleotide (active metabolite) levels and taking 6-MP with food versus without or taking with milk/dairy versus without. However, taking 6-MP with milk/dairy was associated with a 1.9-fold increased risk for nonadherence. These results suggest that taking 6-MP with food or milk/dairy products may not influence clinical outcome but may hinder patient adherence. Poor 6-MP adherence has been associated with an increased risk of childhood ALL relapse.

MANAGEMENT: To minimize variability in absorption and systemic exposure, the timing of mercaptopurine administration should be standardized in relation to food intake (i.e., always with food or always on an empty stomach). Some authorities suggest avoiding concomitant administration with milk or dairy products, although the clinical relevance of their effects on mercaptopurine bioavailability has not been established. As a precaution, patients may consider taking mercaptopurine at least 1 hour before or 2 hours after milk or dairy ingestion if they are able to do so without compromising treatment adherence.

References (11)
  1. lafolie p, bjork o, hayder s, ahstrom l, Peterson C (1989) "Variability of 6-mercaptopurine pharmacokinetics during oral maintenance therapy of children with acute leukemia." Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother, 6, p. 259-65
  2. (2024) "Product Information. Mercaptopurine (mercaptopurine)." Quinn Pharmaceutical. LLC
  3. (2024) "Product Information. Allmercap (mercaptOPURine)." Link Medical Products Pty Ltd T/A Link Pharmaceuticals
  4. (2024) "Product Information. Xaluprine (mercaptopurine)." Nova Laboratories Ltd
  5. (2023) "Product Information. Mercaptopurine (mercaptopurine)." Sterimax Inc
  6. Landier W, Hageman L, Chen Y, et al. (2017) "Mercaptopurine ingestion habits, red cell thioguanine nucleotide levels, and relapse risk in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report from the Children's Oncology Group Study AALL03N1." J Clin Oncol, 35, p. 1730-6
  7. rivard ge, Lin KT, Leclerc JM, David M (1989) "Milk could decrease the bioavailability of 6-mercaptopurine." Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol, 11, p. 402-6
  8. Burton NK, barnett mj, Aherne GW, et al. (1986) "The effect of food on the oral administration of 6-mercaptopurine." Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 18, p. 90-1
  9. Riccardi R, Balis FM, ferrara p, et al. (1986) "Influence of food intake on bioavailability of oral 6-mercaptopurine in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia." Pediatr Hematol Oncol, 3, p. 319-24
  10. Lonnerholm G, Kreuger A, Lindstrom B, et al. (1989) "Oral mercaptopurine in childhood leukemia: influence of food intake on bioavailability." Pediatr Hematol Oncol, 6, p. 105-12
  11. Sofianou-Katsoulis A, Khakoo G, Kaczmarski R, et al. (2006) "Reduction in bioavailability of 6-mercaptopurine on simultaneous administration with cow's milk." Pediatr Hematol Oncol, 23, p. 485-7

Therapeutic duplication warnings

No warnings were found for your selected drugs.

Therapeutic duplication warnings are only returned when drugs within the same group exceed the recommended therapeutic duplication maximum.


Report options

Drug Interaction Classification

These classifications are only a guideline. The relevance of a particular drug interaction to a specific individual is difficult to determine. Always consult your healthcare provider before starting or stopping any medication.
Major Highly clinically significant. Avoid combinations; the risk of the interaction outweighs the benefit.
Moderate Moderately clinically significant. Usually avoid combinations; use it only under special circumstances.
Minor Minimally clinically significant. Minimize risk; assess risk and consider an alternative drug, take steps to circumvent the interaction risk and/or institute a monitoring plan.
Unknown No interaction information available.

Further information

Always consult your healthcare provider to ensure the information displayed on this page applies to your personal circumstances.