Drug Interactions between IsonaRif and lovastatin / niacin

MONITOR CLOSELY: The risk of hepatotoxicity is greater when rifampin and isoniazid (INH) are given concomitantly, than when either drug is given alone. The proposed mechanism is rifampin's induction of isoniazid hydrolase, an enzyme involved in the conversion of INH to isonicotinic acid and hydrazine. Hydrazine is the proposed toxic metabolite of INH, which has been shown in animal studies to cause steatosis, hepatocyte vacuolation and glutathione depletion. Some studies have also shown that slow acetylators have a two-fold increased risk of developing antituberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity (ATDH) as compared with fast acetylators due to more available INH for direct hydrolysis to hydrazine. Theoretically, a similar reaction may occur with rifabutin and isoniazid. Additional risk factors for developing hepatotoxicity include patients with advanced age, malnutrition, existing hepatic impairment, daily alcohol consumption, female gender, HIV infection, extra-pulmonary tuberculosis and/or patients who are taking other potent CYP450-inducing agents.

MANAGEMENT: Caution and close monitoring should be considered if isoniazid (INH) is coadministered with rifampin or rifabutin. In cases where coadministration is required, careful monitoring of liver function, especially ALT and AST, should be done at baseline and then every 2 to 4 weeks during therapy, or in accordance with individual product labeling. Some manufacturers of INH recommend strongly considering its discontinuation if serum aminotransferase concentrations (AST or SGOT, ALT or SGPT) exceed 3 to 5 times the upper limit of normal. Product labeling for rifampin also recommends the immediate discontinuation of therapy if hepatic damage is suspected. INH product labeling suggests alternate drugs be used if hepatitis is attributed to INH in patients with tuberculosis. However, if INH must be used, it should only be resumed after the patient's symptoms and laboratory abnormalities have cleared. It should also be restarted in very small, gradually increasing doses and immediately withdrawn if there is any indication of recurrent liver involvement. Patients should be counseled to immediately report signs or symptoms consistent with liver damage and notified that prodromal symptoms usually consist of fatigue, weakness, malaise, anorexia, nausea, and/or vomiting.

Switch to consumer interaction data

GENERALLY AVOID: Coadministration with rifampin may significantly decrease the plasma concentrations of lovastatin and simvastatin and their pharmacologically active acid metabolites. The primary mechanism is rifampin induction of intestinal and hepatic CYP450 3A4 metabolism, resulting in reduced bioavailability of simvastatin and lovastatin and their metabolites. Induction of intestinal P-glycoprotein efflux transporters may also contribute. When a single 40 mg dose of simvastatin was administered to 10 healthy nonsmoking volunteers following pretreatment with rifampin 600 mg orally once daily for 5 days, mean simvastatin systemic exposure (AUC) decreased by 87% (range 56% to 94%) and mean simvastatin acid AUC decreased by 93% (range 82% to 97%) compared to pretreatment with placebo. Rifampin also decreased the mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of both by 90%. Although not studied, the interaction is expected to occur at a comparable level with lovastatin due to its similar metabolic profile to simvastatin.

MANAGEMENT: Given the magnitude of interaction, concomitant use of simvastatin, lovastatin, or red yeast rice (which contains lovastatin) with rifampin may result in significantly diminished hypolipidemic efficacy and should be avoided if possible. Pravastatin may be a suitable substitution, as it is not a substrate of CYP450 enzymes or P-glycoprotein. One study reported only a 31% decrease in the mean AUC of single-dose pravastatin following pretreatment with rifampin, and the interaction did not occur in all subjects.

Switch to consumer interaction data

ADJUST DOSE: Severe myopathy and rhabdomyolysis have been reported with concomitant use of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (i.e., statins) and niacin. The mechanism is unknown; however, the development of myopathy has been associated with both the administration of statins alone and lipid-modifying dosages of niacin (1 g/day or more) alone. Certain populations may be more susceptible to the interaction. In a double-blind, randomized cardiovascular outcomes trial for simvastatin, the incidence of myopathy was found to be higher in patients of Chinese descent (0.43%) compared to patients not of Chinese descent (0.03%) taking 40 mg simvastatin and lipid-modifying dosages of a niacin-containing product. The cause of the increased risk is unknown, and it is also unknown if the increased risk applies to other Asian populations or to other statins when given to Chinese patients.

MANAGEMENT: Concomitant use of statins with lipid-modifying dosages of niacin (1 g/day or more) should be approached cautiously and only if the benefit of further alterations in lipid levels is anticipated to outweigh the potential risks. Addition of niacin to statin therapy typically provides little additional reduction in LDL cholesterol, but further reductions of triglycerides and increases in HDL cholesterol may be attained. If the combination is prescribed, lower dosages of the statin should be considered. Coadministration of simvastatin with high doses of niacin (1 g/day or more) is not recommended in Chinese patients due to an increased risk of myopathy. Lovastatin labeling recommends that the dosage not exceed 20 mg daily when prescribed with lipid-modifying dosages of niacin. All patients should be advised to promptly report any unexplained muscle pain, tenderness or weakness, particularly if accompanied by fever, malaise and/or dark colored urine. Therapy should be discontinued if creatine kinase is markedly elevated in the absence of strenuous exercise or if myopathy is otherwise suspected or diagnosed.

Switch to consumer interaction data

MONITOR: The risk of peripheral neuropathy may be increased during concurrent use of two or more agents that are associated with this adverse effect. Patient risk factors include diabetes and age older than 60 years. In some cases, the neuropathy may progress or become irreversible despite discontinuation of the medications.

MANAGEMENT: Caution is advised during concomitant use of agents with neurotoxic effects. Patients should be monitored closely for symptoms of neuropathy such as burning, tingling, pain, or numbness in the hands and feet. Since the development of peripheral neuropathy may be dose-related for many drugs, the recommended dosages should generally not be exceeded. Consideration should be given to dosage reduction or immediate discontinuation of these medications in patients who develop peripheral neuropathy to limit further damage. If feasible, therapy should generally be reinstituted only after resolution of neuropathy symptoms or return of symptoms to baseline status. In some cases, permanent dosage reductions may be required.

Switch to consumer interaction data

MONITOR: Coadministration of rifampin with agents known to induce hepatotoxicity may potentiate the risk of liver injury. There are various possible mechanisms related to rifampin-associated hepatotoxicity described in product labeling and medical literature, however no consensus has been made. These include increased mitochondrial oxidative stress, apoptotic liver cell injury (in rodent studies), the development of cholestasis, hepatic lipid accumulation, and elevated toxic metabolites caused by rifampin-mediated induction of cytochrome P450 enzymes. Cases of drug-induced liver injury (including fatal cases) have been reported within the first few days to months following rifampin treatment initiation. Additional data suggests that 1-2% of patients receiving rifampin monotherapy for tuberculosis prophylaxis experience hepatotoxicity. The severity of hepatotoxicity from rifampin ranges from asymptomatic elevations in liver enzymes, jaundice and/or hyperbilirubinemia, and symptomatic self-limiting hepatitis to fulminant liver failure and death. In most cases, liver function recovers upon on discontinuation of rifampin treatment, however, progression to acute liver failure requiring liver transplantation is possible. Known risk factors that may predispose the patient to rifampin related hepatotoxicity include: coadministration with other hepatotoxic agents, alcoholism, existing liver disease, malnutrition, extensive liver tuberculosis, liver adenocarcinoma and biliary tract neoplasm. Clinical data have been reported with concurrent use of rifampin with other antituberculosis agents (e.g. isoniazid, pyrazinamide), acetaminophen, antiretroviral agents (e.g., saquinavir/ritonavir) and halothane. Data with other hepatotoxic agents are limited.

MANAGEMENT: Caution and close clinical monitoring should be considered if rifampin is coadministered with other hepatotoxic medications. In addition, the manufacturer recommends patients with impaired liver function only be given rifampin in cases of necessity and then under strict medical supervision. Some authorities consider rifampin treatment in patients with existing liver injury contraindicated (Canada). In cases where coadministration of rifampin with hepatotoxic agents is required, careful monitoring of liver function, especially ALT and AST, should be done prior to therapy and then every 2 to 4 weeks during therapy. If hepatic damage is suspected, rifampin should be immediately discontinued. Furthermore, if hepatitis is attributed to rifampin in patients with tuberculosis, alternative agents should be considered. Patients should be instructed to contact their physician immediately if they experience symptoms such as itching, weakness, loss of appetite, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, yellowing of the eyes or skin or dark urine.

Switch to consumer interaction data

MONITOR: Coadministration of isoniazid (INH) with other agents known to induce hepatotoxicity may potentiate the risk of liver injury. INH-associated hepatotoxicity is believed to be due to an accumulation of toxic metabolites and may also be partly immune mediated, though the exact mechanisms are not universally agreed upon. INH is metabolized by N-acetyltransferase and CYP450 2E1. The rate of INH's acetylation is genetically determined and generally classified as slow or rapid, with slow acetylators characterized by a relative lack of N-acetyltransferase. While the rate of acetylation does not significantly alter INH's effectiveness, it can lead to higher blood levels of INH and an increase of adverse reactions. In addition, INH is an in vitro inhibitor of several CYP450 isoenzymes (2C9, 2C19, 2E1, and 3A4). Coadministration of hepatotoxic drugs eliminated by one or more of these pathways may lead to elevated concentrations of the concomitant drug and increase the risk of hepatotoxicity. Most of the INH-associated hepatitis cases occur during the first 3 months of treatment, but may occur at any time and have been reported to be severe or even fatal. INH is reported in medical literature to cause clinically apparent acute liver injury with jaundice in 0.5% to 1% and fatality in 0.05% to 0.1% of recipients. A United States Public Health Service Surveillance Study of 13,838 people taking INH reported 8 deaths among 174 cases of hepatitis. Risk factors for INH related liver injury may include: age > 35 years, female gender, postpartum period, daily consumption of alcohol, injection drug user, slow acetylator phenotype, malnutrition, HIV infection, pre-existing liver disease, extra-pulmonary tuberculosis, and concomitant use of hepatotoxic medications. Clinical data have been reported with concurrent use of acetaminophen, alcohol, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, and rifampin.

MANAGEMENT: Coadministration of isoniazid (INH) with other hepatotoxic medications should be done with caution and close clinical monitoring. Some authorities recommend avoiding concurrent use when possible. If coadministration is needed, baseline and monthly liver function testing as well as monthly interviewing of the patient to check for signs and symptoms of adverse effects is recommended. More frequent testing may be advisable in patients at increased risk of INH-associated liver injury. Some manufacturers of INH recommend strongly considering its discontinuation if serum aminotransferase concentrations (AST or SGOT, ALT or SGPT) exceed 3 to 5 times the upper limit of normal. Patients should be counseled to immediately report signs or symptoms consistent with liver damage and notified that prodromal symptoms usually consist of fatigue, weakness, malaise, anorexia, nausea, and/or vomiting. If hepatic damage is suspected, INH should be immediately discontinued as continuation may lead to more severe damage. If hepatitis is attributed to INH in patients with tuberculosis, alternative drugs should be used. However, if INH must be used, it should only be resumed after the patient's symptoms and laboratory abnormalities have cleared. It should also be restarted in very small, gradually increasing doses and immediately withdrawn if there is any indication of recurrent liver involvement. Consultation with product labeling and relevant guidelines is advisable.

Switch to consumer interaction data