Drug Interactions between ifosfamide and mercaptopurine

GENERALLY AVOID: Grapefruit and/or grapefruit juice may reduce the efficacy of ifosfamide, whose anticancer effect is dependent on its activation to the 4-hydroxyifosfamide metabolite via CYP450 3A4. The proposed mechanism is inhibition of CYP450 3A4 metabolism by certain compounds present in grapefruit. There are no data available about the effects of grapefruit on ifosfamide. However, in a small study, 8 patients with incurable malignancies received ifosfamide 3 g/m2 by infusion with the potent CYP450 3A4 inhibitor ketoconazole 200 mg orally twice daily for 4 days starting 1 day before the ifosfamide infusion. Ketoconazole decreased the clearance of ifosfamide by 11%, decreased systemic exposure (AUC) of the active metabolite 4-hydroxyifosfamide by 30%, and increased the AUC of the inactive but potentially neurotoxic metabolite 2-dechloroethylifosfamide by 23%, as compared to control. Because pharmacokinetic interactions involving grapefruit juice are often subject to a high degree of interpatient variability, the extent to which a given patient may be affected is difficult to predict.

GENERALLY AVOID: Alcohol may potentiate the neurotoxic effects of ifosfamide. Use in combination may result in additive central nervous system depression and/or impairment of judgment, thinking, and psychomotor skills. In addition, ifosfamide therapy may cause gastrointestinal disorders and alcohol consumption may increase nausea and vomiting.

MANAGEMENT: Given the potential for reduced efficacy of ifosfamide and increased risk of neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity it may be advisable for patients to avoid consumption of grapefruit, grapefruit juice, or supplements that contain grapefruit during treatment with ifosfamide. In addition, patients receiving ifosfamide should be warned of the increased risk of neurotoxicity, nausea and vomiting when used in combination with alcohol. Patients should avoid or limit the consumption of alcohol during treatment with ifosfamide.

ADJUST DOSING INTERVAL: The oral bioavailability of mercaptopurine (6-MP) is highly variable and may be affected by administration with food or dairy products. The mechanism by which food may impact the absorption of 6-MP has not been fully established, but cow's milk specifically has been found to contain a high concentration of xanthine oxidase, the enzyme responsible for first-pass metabolism of 6-MP to the inactive metabolite 6-thiouric acid. Incubation with cow's milk at 37 C induced a 30% catabolism of 6-MP within 30 minutes in one investigation. However, food or dairy intake with 6-MP in study patients has yielded variable results. In a study conducted in 17 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), oral 6-MP 75 mg/m2 administered 15 minutes after a standardized breakfast including 250 mL of milk resulted in a prolonged Tmax and a lower Cmax and AUC compared with 6-MP administration in the fasting state (mean Tmax: 2.3 hours vs. 1.2 hours; mean Cmax: 0.63 uM vs. 0.98 uM; mean AUC: 105 uM vs. 143 uM, respectively). In a different study, oral 6-MP 31.2 to 81.1 mg/m2 administered to 7 subjects with ALL 15 minutes after a standard breakfast consisting of orange juice, cereal, and toast also trended towards longer Tmax and lower Cmax values compared to 6-MP administration after an overnight fast, although the differences were not statistically significant. Two subjects had blood samples that were all below the limit of detection (20 ng/mL) following administration in the fed state. Likewise, a study of 15 pediatric patients reported non-significant 20% to 22% decreases in the Cmax and AUC of 6-MP when administered after a standardized breakfast containing both milk and cheese compared to administration after fasting, but in contrast to the two earlier studies, Tmax was decreased from 1.8 to 1.1 hours. Another study of 10 children with ALL or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma given an average oral 6-MP dose of 63 mg/m2 revealed substantial interpatient variations in the effect of food intake on 6-MP plasma levels, with Cmax changes ranging from 67% decrease to 81% increase and AUC changes ranging from 53% decrease to 86% increase relative to administration following fasting. Collectively for the group, however, there was no statistically significant difference in mean Tmax, Cmax, or AUC between the fed and fasting states. In this study, patients were fed what they normally ate at home rather than a standardized breakfast, which may have contributed to the inconsistent results. The clinical significance of the data and observations from these studies has not been determined. An interaction with milk was suspected in a four-year-old male with ALL who experienced persistent elevations of peripheral blood counts during maintenance with 6-MP and methotrexate despite increasing doses of 6-MP up to 160% of the calculated dosage for his body surface area (75 mg/m2). Cessation of concomitant milk ingestion allowed for the 6-MP dosage to return to 75 mg/m2 and resulted in control of peripheral blood counts within a week. Other data do not support a clinically relevant interaction with food or dairy products. In a prospective study of 441 patients aged 2 to 20 years receiving 6-MP for ALL maintenance, investigators found no significant association between relapse risk and 6-MP ingestion habits including administration with food versus never with food and administration with milk/dairy versus never with milk/dairy. Among the 56.2% of patients who were considered adherent by the study, there was also no significant association between red cell thioguanine nucleotide (active metabolite) levels and taking 6-MP with food versus without or taking with milk/dairy versus without. However, taking 6-MP with milk/dairy was associated with a 1.9-fold increased risk for nonadherence. These results suggest that taking 6-MP with food or milk/dairy products may not influence clinical outcome but may hinder patient adherence. Poor 6-MP adherence has been associated with an increased risk of childhood ALL relapse.

MANAGEMENT: To minimize variability in absorption and systemic exposure, the timing of mercaptopurine administration should be standardized in relation to food intake (i.e., always with food or always on an empty stomach). Some authorities suggest avoiding concomitant administration with milk or dairy products, although the clinical relevance of their effects on mercaptopurine bioavailability has not been established. As a precaution, patients may consider taking mercaptopurine at least 1 hour before or 2 hours after milk or dairy ingestion if they are able to do so without compromising treatment adherence.