Skip to main content

Drug Interactions between emtricitabine / lopinavir / ritonavir / tenofovir and trandolapril / verapamil

This report displays the potential drug interactions for the following 2 drugs:

Edit list (add/remove drugs)

Interactions between your drugs

Moderate

verapamil ritonavir

Applies to: trandolapril / verapamil and emtricitabine / lopinavir / ritonavir / tenofovir

MONITOR: Coadministration with ritonavir may increase the plasma concentrations of drugs that are substrates of the CYP450 3A4 isoenzyme. The mechanism is decreased clearance due to inhibition of CYP450 3A4 activity by ritonavir. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of some coadministered drugs has been reported to increase by 3-fold or more.

MANAGEMENT: Caution is advised if ritonavir must be used concurrently with medications that undergo metabolism by CYP450 3A4, particularly those with a narrow therapeutic range. Dosage adjustments as well as clinical and laboratory monitoring may be appropriate for some drugs whenever ritonavir is added to or withdrawn from therapy.

References

  1. (2001) "Product Information. Norvir (ritonavir)." Abbott Pharmaceutical
  2. (2001) "Product Information. Rapamune (sirolimus)." Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories
  3. Olkkola KT, Palkama VJ, Neuvonen PJ (1999) "Ritonavir's role in reducing fentanyl clearance and prolonging its half-life." Anesthesiology, 91, p. 681-5

Switch to consumer interaction data

Moderate

verapamil lopinavir

Applies to: trandolapril / verapamil and emtricitabine / lopinavir / ritonavir / tenofovir

MONITOR: Lopinavir in combination with ritonavir has been shown to prolong the PR interval of the electrocardiogram in some patients. Theoretically, coadministration with other agents that prolong the PR interval (e.g., beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, atazanavir, digoxin, lacosamide, mefloquine) may result in additive effects and increased risk of conduction disturbances and atrioventricular block. In a study of 39 healthy adults who were administered lopinavir-ritonavir at a therapeutic dosage of 400 mg-100 mg twice daily and a supratherapeutic dosage of 800 mg-200 mg twice daily, mean changes from baseline in the PR interval ranged from 11.6 to 24.4 msec in the 12 hours postdose on treatment day 3 when exposures were approximately 1.5 and 3-fold higher, respectively, than those observed with recommended once-daily or twice-daily dosages of lopinavir-ritonavir at steady state. After baseline correction, the maximum mean difference from placebo in the PR interval was 24.9 msec for the lower dosage and 31.9 msec for the supratherapeutic dosage. Maximum PR interval observed was 286 msec, and no second- or third-degree heart block occurred. There have been postmarketing reports of asymptomatic prolongation of the PR interval in some patients receiving combination antiretroviral therapy containing lopinavir-ritonavir. Second- and third-degree atrioventricular block have occurred rarely in patients with underlying structural heart disease or preexisting conduction system abnormalities and in patients receiving lopinavir-ritonavir with other drugs known to prolong the PR interval.

MANAGEMENT: Caution is advised if lopinavir-ritonavir is used concomitantly with other agents that prolong the PR interval, particularly those that are metabolized by CYP450 3A4 (e.g., calcium channel blockers) because lopinavir-ritonavir is a potent inhibitor of the isoenzyme. The elderly as well as patients with underlying structural heart disease, preexisting conduction system abnormalities, ischemic heart disease, or cardiomyopathies may be at increased risk for developing cardiac conduction disturbances and atrioventricular block associated with the use of lopinavir-ritonavir. Patients should be advised to notify their physician if they experience dizziness, lightheadedness, fainting, or irregular heartbeat.

References

  1. (2001) "Product Information. Kaletra (lopinavir-ritonavir)." Abbott Pharmaceutical

Switch to consumer interaction data

Moderate

ritonavir tenofovir

Applies to: emtricitabine / lopinavir / ritonavir / tenofovir and emtricitabine / lopinavir / ritonavir / tenofovir

MONITOR: Coadministration with ritonavir, with or without lopinavir, has been suggested in postmarketing reports to increase the proximal tubular intracellular concentrations of tenofovir and potentiate the risk of tenofovir-induced nephrotoxicity. The proposed mechanism is ritonavir inhibition of tenofovir renal tubular secretion into the urine via multidrug resistance protein MRP2. Analysis of data from a compassionate access study in which 271 patients with advanced HIV disease received the combination for a mean duration of 63 weeks revealed no clinically significant nephrotoxicity associated with coadministration. However, there have been case reports of renal failure associated with acute tubular necrosis, Fanconi's syndrome, and nephrogenic diabetes insipidus in patients treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in combination with ritonavir. Some patients had incomplete recovery of renal function more than a year after cessation of tenofovir therapy. Ritonavir given in combination with lopinavir has also been reported to modestly increase the plasma concentrations of tenofovir. In contrast, both slight decreases and no change in lopinavir and ritonavir concentrations have been reported.

MANAGEMENT: Caution is advised if tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is prescribed with ritonavir. Renal function should be monitored regularly, including surveillance for signs of tubulopathy such as glycosuria, acidosis, increases in serum creatinine level, electrolyte disturbances (e.g., hypokalemia, hypophosphatemia), and proteinuria. The same precaution may be applicable during therapy with other protease inhibitors based on their similar pharmacokinetic profile, although clinical data are lacking. Nelfinavir reportedly does not alter the pharmacokinetics of tenofovir, or vice versa. Tenofovir administration should be discontinued promptly if nephropathy develops.

References

  1. (2001) "Product Information. Viread (tenofovir)." Gilead Sciences
  2. Verhelst D, Monge M, Meynard JL, et al. (2002) "Fanconi syndrome and renal failure induced by tenofovir: A first case report." Am J Kidney Dis, 40, p. 1331-3
  3. Creput C, Gonzalez-Canali G, Hill G, Piketty C, Kazatchkine M, Nochy D (2003) "Renal lesions in HIV-1-positive patient treated with tenofovir." AIDS, 17, p. 935-7
  4. Karras A, Lafaurie M, Furco A, et al. (2003) "Tenofovir-related nephrotoxicity in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients: three cases of renal failure, fanconi syndrome, and nephrogenic diabetes insipidus." Clin Infect Dis, 36, p. 1070-3
  5. Kearney BP, Mittan A, Sayre J, et al. (2003) Pharmacokinetic drug interaction and long term safety profile of tenofovir DF and lopinavir/ritonavir. http://www.icaac.org/ICAAC.asp
  6. Rollot F, Nazal EM, Chauvelot-Moachon L, et al. (2003) "Tenofovir-related fanconi syndrome with nephrogenic diabetes insipidus in a patient with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: the role of lopinavir-ritonavir-Didanosine." Clin Infect Dis, 37, E174-6
  7. Zimmermann AE, Pizzoferrato T, Bedford J, Morris A, Hoffman R, Braden G (2006) "Tenofovir-associated acute and chronic kidney disease: a case of multiple drug interactions." Clin Infect Dis, 42, p. 283-90
  8. Kapadia J, Shah S, Desai C, et al. (2013) "Tenofovir induced Fanconi syndrome: a possible pharmacokinetic interaction." Indian J Pharmacol, 45, p. 191-2
View all 8 references

Switch to consumer interaction data

Moderate

lopinavir tenofovir

Applies to: emtricitabine / lopinavir / ritonavir / tenofovir and emtricitabine / lopinavir / ritonavir / tenofovir

MONITOR: Coadministration with ritonavir, with or without lopinavir, has been suggested in postmarketing reports to increase the proximal tubular intracellular concentrations of tenofovir and potentiate the risk of tenofovir-induced nephrotoxicity. The proposed mechanism is ritonavir inhibition of tenofovir renal tubular secretion into the urine via multidrug resistance protein MRP2. Analysis of data from a compassionate access study in which 271 patients with advanced HIV disease received the combination for a mean duration of 63 weeks revealed no clinically significant nephrotoxicity associated with coadministration. However, there have been case reports of renal failure associated with acute tubular necrosis, Fanconi's syndrome, and nephrogenic diabetes insipidus in patients treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in combination with ritonavir. Some patients had incomplete recovery of renal function more than a year after cessation of tenofovir therapy. Ritonavir given in combination with lopinavir has also been reported to modestly increase the plasma concentrations of tenofovir. In contrast, both slight decreases and no change in lopinavir and ritonavir concentrations have been reported.

MANAGEMENT: Caution is advised if tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is prescribed with ritonavir. Renal function should be monitored regularly, including surveillance for signs of tubulopathy such as glycosuria, acidosis, increases in serum creatinine level, electrolyte disturbances (e.g., hypokalemia, hypophosphatemia), and proteinuria. The same precaution may be applicable during therapy with other protease inhibitors based on their similar pharmacokinetic profile, although clinical data are lacking. Nelfinavir reportedly does not alter the pharmacokinetics of tenofovir, or vice versa. Tenofovir administration should be discontinued promptly if nephropathy develops.

References

  1. (2001) "Product Information. Viread (tenofovir)." Gilead Sciences
  2. Verhelst D, Monge M, Meynard JL, et al. (2002) "Fanconi syndrome and renal failure induced by tenofovir: A first case report." Am J Kidney Dis, 40, p. 1331-3
  3. Creput C, Gonzalez-Canali G, Hill G, Piketty C, Kazatchkine M, Nochy D (2003) "Renal lesions in HIV-1-positive patient treated with tenofovir." AIDS, 17, p. 935-7
  4. Karras A, Lafaurie M, Furco A, et al. (2003) "Tenofovir-related nephrotoxicity in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients: three cases of renal failure, fanconi syndrome, and nephrogenic diabetes insipidus." Clin Infect Dis, 36, p. 1070-3
  5. Kearney BP, Mittan A, Sayre J, et al. (2003) Pharmacokinetic drug interaction and long term safety profile of tenofovir DF and lopinavir/ritonavir. http://www.icaac.org/ICAAC.asp
  6. Rollot F, Nazal EM, Chauvelot-Moachon L, et al. (2003) "Tenofovir-related fanconi syndrome with nephrogenic diabetes insipidus in a patient with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: the role of lopinavir-ritonavir-Didanosine." Clin Infect Dis, 37, E174-6
  7. Zimmermann AE, Pizzoferrato T, Bedford J, Morris A, Hoffman R, Braden G (2006) "Tenofovir-associated acute and chronic kidney disease: a case of multiple drug interactions." Clin Infect Dis, 42, p. 283-90
  8. Kapadia J, Shah S, Desai C, et al. (2013) "Tenofovir induced Fanconi syndrome: a possible pharmacokinetic interaction." Indian J Pharmacol, 45, p. 191-2
View all 8 references

Switch to consumer interaction data

Minor

verapamil trandolapril

Applies to: trandolapril / verapamil and trandolapril / verapamil

Calcium channel blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors may have additive hypotensive effects. While these drugs are often safely used together, careful monitoring of the systemic blood pressure is recommended during coadministration, especially during the first one to three weeks of therapy.

References

  1. Kaplan NM (1991) "Amlodipine in the treatment of hypertension." Postgrad Med J, 67 Suppl 5, s15-9
  2. DeQuattro V (1991) "Comparison of benazepril and other antihypertensive agents alone and in combination with the diuretic hydrochlorothiazide." Clin Cardiol, 14, iv28-32;
  3. Sun JX, Cipriano A, Chan K, John VA (1994) "Pharmacokinetic interaction study between benazepril and amlodipine in healthy subjects." Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 47, p. 285-9
  4. Di Somma S, et al. (1992) "Antihypertensive effects of verapamil, captopril and their combination at rest and during dynamic exercise." Arzneimittelforschung, 42, p. 103
View all 4 references

Switch to consumer interaction data

Drug and food interactions

Moderate

verapamil food

Applies to: trandolapril / verapamil

GENERALLY AVOID: Consumption of large quantities of grapefruit juice may be associated with significantly increased plasma concentrations of oral verapamil. The mechanism is inhibition of CYP450 3A4-mediated first-pass metabolism in the gut wall by certain compounds present in grapefruits. One study reported no significant effect of a single administration of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of verapamil in ten hypertensive patients receiving chronic therapy. In another study conducted in nine healthy male volunteers, administration of 120 mg oral verapamil twice daily for 3 days following pretreatment with 200 mL grapefruit juice twice daily for 5 days resulted in a 57% increase in S-verapamil peak plasma concentration (Cmax), a 36% increase in S-verapamil systemic exposure (AUC), a 40% increase in R-verapamil Cmax, and a 28% increase in R-verapamil AUC compared to administration following orange juice. Elimination half-life and renal clearance of both S- and R-verapamil were not affected by grapefruit juice, and there were no significant effects on blood pressure, heart rate, or PR interval. A third study reported a 1.63-fold increase in Cmax and a 1.45-fold increase in AUC of (R,S)-verapamil in 24 young, healthy volunteers given verapamil sustained-release 120 mg twice daily for 7 days with 250 mL grapefruit juice four times daily on days 5 through 7. Two subjects developed PR interval prolongation of more than 350 ms during grapefruit juice coadministration. A high degree of interindividual variability has been observed in these studies. The interaction was also suspected in a case report of a 42-year-old woman who developed complete heart block, hypotension, hypoxic respiratory failure, severe anion gap metabolic acidosis, and hyperglycemia following accidental ingestion of three verapamil sustained-release 120 mg tablets over a span of six hours. The patient's past medical history was remarkable only for migraine headaches, for which she was receiving several medications including verapamil. Prior to admission, the patient had a 2-week history of poorly controlled migraine, and the six hours preceding hospitalization she suffered from worsening headache and palpitations progressing to altered sensorium. An extensive workup revealed elevated verapamil and norverapamil levels more than 4.5 times above the upper therapeutic limits. These levels also far exceeded those reported in the medical literature for patients taking verapamil 120 mg every 6 hours, or 480 mg in a 24-hour period. The patient recovered after receiving ventilator and vasopressor support. Upon questioning, it was discovered that the patient had been drinking large amounts of grapefruit juice (3 to 4 liters total) the week preceding her admission due to nausea. No other sources or contributing factors could be found for the verapamil toxicity.

MANAGEMENT: Patients treated with oral verapamil should avoid the consumption of large amounts of grapefruit or grapefruit juice to prevent any undue fluctuations in serum drug levels. Patients should be advised to seek medical attention if they experience edema or swelling of the lower extremities; sudden, unexplained weight gain; difficulty breathing; chest pain or tightness; or hypotension as indicated by dizziness, fainting, or orthostasis.

References

  1. McAllister RG, Jr (1982) "Clinical pharmacology of slow channel blocking agents." Prog Cardiovasc Dis, 25, p. 83-102
  2. (2001) "Product Information. Covera-HS (verapamil)." Searle
  3. Zaidenstein R, Dishi V, Gips M, Soback S, Cohen N, Weissgarten J, Blatt A, Golik A (1998) "The effect of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of orally administered verapamil." Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 54, p. 337-40
  4. Ho PC, Ghose K, Saville D, Wanwimolruk S (2000) "Effect of grapefruit juice on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of verapamil enantiomers in healthy volunteers." Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 56, p. 693-8
  5. Fuhr U, Muller-Peltzer H, Kern R, et al. (2002) "Effects of grapefruit juice and smoking on verapamil concentrations in steady state." Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 58, p. 45-53
  6. Bailey DG, Dresser GK (2004) "Natural products and adverse drug interactions." Can Med Assoc J, 170, p. 1531-2
  7. Bailey DG, Malcolm J, Arnold O, Spence JD (2004) "Grapefruit juice-drug interactions. 1998." Br J Clin Pharmacol, 58, S831-40; discussion S841-3
  8. Arayne MS, Sultana N, Bibi Z (2005) "Review: grape fruit juice - drug interactions." Pak J Pharm Sci, 18, p. 45-57
  9. Pillai U, Muzaffar J, Sandeep S, Yancey A (2009) "Grapefruit juice and verapamil: a toxic cocktail." South Med J, 102, p. 308-9
View all 9 references

Switch to consumer interaction data

Moderate

ritonavir food

Applies to: emtricitabine / lopinavir / ritonavir / tenofovir

ADJUST DOSING INTERVAL: Administration with food may modestly affect the bioavailability of ritonavir from the various available formulations. When the oral solution was given under nonfasting conditions, peak ritonavir concentrations decreased 23% and the extent of absorption decreased 7% relative to fasting conditions. Dilution of the oral solution (within one hour of dosing) with 240 mL of chocolate milk or a nutritional supplement (Advera or Ensure) did not significantly affect the extent and rate of ritonavir absorption. When a single 100 mg dose of the tablet was administered with a high-fat meal (907 kcal; 52% fat, 15% protein, 33% carbohydrates), approximately 20% decreases in mean peak concentration (Cmax) and systemic exposure (AUC) were observed relative to administration after fasting. Similar decreases in Cmax and AUC were reported when the tablet was administered with a moderate-fat meal. In contrast, the extent of absorption of ritonavir from the soft gelatin capsule formulation was 13% higher when administered with a meal (615 KCal; 14.5% fat, 9% protein, and 76% carbohydrate) relative to fasting.

MANAGEMENT: Ritonavir should be taken with meals to enhance gastrointestinal tolerability.

References

  1. (2001) "Product Information. Norvir (ritonavir)." Abbott Pharmaceutical

Switch to consumer interaction data

Moderate

trandolapril food

Applies to: trandolapril / verapamil

GENERALLY AVOID: Moderate-to-high dietary intake of potassium can cause hyperkalemia in some patients who are using angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. In some cases, affected patients were using a potassium-rich salt substitute. ACE inhibitors can promote hyperkalemia through inhibition of the renin-aldosterone-angiotensin (RAA) system.

MANAGEMENT: It is recommended that patients who are taking ACE inhibitors be advised to avoid moderately high or high potassium dietary intake. Particular attention should be paid to the potassium content of salt substitutes.

References

  1. (2002) "Product Information. Vasotec (enalapril)." Merck & Co., Inc
  2. Good CB, McDermott L (1995) "Diet and serum potassium in patients on ACE inhibitors." JAMA, 274, p. 538
  3. Ray K, Dorman S, Watson R (1999) "Severe hyperkalaemia due to the concomitant use of salt substitutes and ACE inhibitors in hypertension: a potentially life threatening interaction." J Hum Hypertens, 13, p. 717-20

Switch to consumer interaction data

Moderate

lopinavir food

Applies to: emtricitabine / lopinavir / ritonavir / tenofovir

ADJUST DOSING INTERVAL: Food significantly increases the bioavailability of lopinavir from the oral solution formulation of lopinavir-ritonavir. Relative to fasting, administration of lopinavir-ritonavir oral solution with a moderate-fat meal (500 to 682 Kcal; 23% to 25% calories from fat) increased lopinavir peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and systemic exposure (AUC) by 54% and 80%, respectively, whereas administration with a high-fat meal (872 Kcal; 56% from fat) increased lopinavir Cmax and AUC by 56% and 130%, respectively. No clinically significant changes in Cmax and AUC were observed following administration of lopinavir-ritonavir tablets under fed conditions versus fasted conditions. Relative to fasting, administration of a single 400 mg-100 mg dose (two 200 mg-50 mg tablets) with a moderate-fat meal (558 Kcal; 24.1% calories from fat) increased lopinavir Cmax and AUC by 17.6% and 26.9%, respectively, while administration with a high-fat meal (998 Kcal; 51.3% from fat) increased lopinavir AUC by 18.9% but not Cmax. Relative to fasting, ritonavir Cmax and AUC also increased by 4.9% and 14.9%, respectively, with the moderate-fat meal and 10.3% and 23.9%, respectively, with the high-fat meal.

MANAGEMENT: Lopinavir-ritonavir oral solution should be taken with meals to enhance bioavailability and minimize pharmacokinetic variability. Lopinavir-ritonavir tablets may be taken without regard to meals.

References

  1. (2001) "Product Information. Kaletra (lopinavir-ritonavir)." Abbott Pharmaceutical

Switch to consumer interaction data

Moderate

verapamil food

Applies to: trandolapril / verapamil

GENERALLY AVOID: Verapamil may increase the blood concentrations and intoxicating effects of ethanol. The exact mechanism of interaction is unknown but may involve verapamil inhibition of ethanol metabolism. In 10 healthy, young volunteers, verapamil (80 mg orally every 8 hours for 6 days) increased the mean peak blood concentration (Cmax) and the 12-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of ethanol (0.8 g/kg single oral dose) by 17% and 30%, respectively, compared to placebo. Verapamil AUCs were positively correlated to increased ethanol blood AUC values. Subjectively (i.e. each subject's perception of intoxication as measured on a visual analog scale), verapamil also significantly increased the area under the ethanol effect versus time curve but did not change the peak effect or time to peak effect.

MANAGEMENT: Patients treated with verapamil should be counseled to avoid alcohol consumption.

References

  1. Bauer LA, Schumock G, Horn J, Opheim K (1992) "Verapamil inhibits ethanol elimination and prolongs the perception of intoxication." Clin Pharmacol Ther, 52, p. 6-10
  2. (2001) "Product Information. Isoptin (verapamil)." Knoll Pharmaceutical Company

Switch to consumer interaction data

Moderate

verapamil food

Applies to: trandolapril / verapamil

MONITOR: Calcium-containing products may decrease the effectiveness of calcium channel blockers by saturating calcium channels with calcium. Calcium chloride has been used to manage acute severe verapamil toxicity.

MANAGEMENT: Management consists of monitoring the effectiveness of calcium channel blocker therapy during coadministration with calcium products.

References

  1. Henry M, Kay MM, Viccellio P (1985) "Cardiogenic shock associated with calcium-channel and beta blockers: reversal with intravenous calcium chloride." Am J Emerg Med, 3, p. 334-6
  2. Moller IW (1987) "Cardiac arrest following intravenous verapamil combined with halothane anaesthesia." Br J Anaesth, 59, p. 522-6
  3. Oszko MA, Klutman NE (1987) "Use of calcium salts during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for reversing verapamil-associated hypotension." Clin Pharm, 6, p. 448-9
  4. Schoen MD, Parker RB, Hoon TJ, et al. (1991) "Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics and electrocardiographic effects of intravenous verapamil with intravenous calcium chloride pretreatment in normal subjects." Am J Cardiol, 67, p. 300-4
  5. O'Quinn SV, Wohns DH, Clarke S, Koch G, Patterson JH, Adams KF (1990) "Influence of calcium on the hemodynamic and anti-ischemic effects of nifedipine observed during treadmill exercise testing." Pharmacotherapy, 10, p. 247
  6. Woie L, Storstein L (1981) "Successful treatment of suicidal verapamil poisoning with calcium gluconate." Eur Heart J, 2, p. 239-42
  7. Morris DL, Goldschlager N (1983) "Calcium infusion for reversal of adverse effects of intravenous verapamil." JAMA, 249, p. 3212-3
  8. Guadagnino V, Greengart A, Hollander G, Solar M, Shani J, Lichstein E (1987) "Treatment of severe left ventricular dysfunction with calcium chloride in patients receiving verapamil." J Clin Pharmacol, 27, p. 407-9
  9. Luscher TF, Noll G, Sturmer T, Huser B, Wenk M (1994) "Calcium gluconate in severe verapamil intoxication." N Engl J Med, 330, p. 718-20
  10. Bar-Or D, Gasiel Y (1981) "Calcium and calciferol antagonise effect of verapamil in atrial fibrillation." Br Med J (Clin Res Ed), 282, p. 1585-6
  11. Lipman J, Jardine I, Roos C, Dreosti L (1982) "Intravenous calcium chloride as an antidote to verapamil-induced hypotension." Intensive Care Med, 8, p. 55-7
  12. McMillan R (1988) "Management of acute severe verapamil intoxication." J Emerg Med, 6, p. 193-6
  13. Perkins CM (1978) "Serious verapamil poisoning: treatment with intravenous calcium gluconate." Br Med J, 2, p. 1127
  14. Moroni F, Mannaioni PF, Dolara A, Ciaccheri M (1980) "Calcium gluconate and hypertonic sodium chloride in a case of massive verapamil poisoning." Clin Toxicol, 17, p. 395-400
View all 14 references

Switch to consumer interaction data

Minor

tenofovir food

Applies to: emtricitabine / lopinavir / ritonavir / tenofovir

Food enhances the oral absorption and bioavailability of tenofovir, the active entity of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. According to the product labeling, administration of the drug following a high-fat meal increased the mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of tenofovir by approximately 14% and 40%, respectively, compared to administration in the fasting state. However, administration with a light meal did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of tenofovir compared to administration in the fasting state. Food delays the time to reach tenofovir Cmax by approximately 1 hour. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate may be administered without regard to meals.

References

  1. (2001) "Product Information. Viread (tenofovir)." Gilead Sciences

Switch to consumer interaction data

Therapeutic duplication warnings

No warnings were found for your selected drugs.

Therapeutic duplication warnings are only returned when drugs within the same group exceed the recommended therapeutic duplication maximum.


Report options

Loading...
QR code containing a link to this page

Drug Interaction Classification

These classifications are only a guideline. The relevance of a particular drug interaction to a specific individual is difficult to determine. Always consult your healthcare provider before starting or stopping any medication.
Major Highly clinically significant. Avoid combinations; the risk of the interaction outweighs the benefit.
Moderate Moderately clinically significant. Usually avoid combinations; use it only under special circumstances.
Minor Minimally clinically significant. Minimize risk; assess risk and consider an alternative drug, take steps to circumvent the interaction risk and/or institute a monitoring plan.
Unknown No interaction information available.

Further information

Always consult your healthcare provider to ensure the information displayed on this page applies to your personal circumstances.