Skip to main content

Drug Interactions between dostarlimab and nalidixic acid

This report displays the potential drug interactions for the following 2 drugs:

Edit list (add/remove drugs)

Interactions between your drugs

Moderate

nalidixic acid dostarlimab

Applies to: nalidixic acid and dostarlimab

MONITOR: Use of systemic antibiotics during or close to therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein (CTLA)-4 monoclonal antibodies and/or inhibitors of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) may result in reduced clinical efficacy of the ICI. The exact mechanism of this interaction has not been fully characterized, but may be related to alterations in the gut microbiota by the systemic antibiotic, potentially resulting in immune dysregulation and a decreased response to the ICI. A meta-analysis of 6 studies involving nivolumab for the treatment of advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) found that the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were reduced by 1.6 months and 8.8 months, respectively, in patients who were exposed to systemic antibiotics before, during, or after nivolumab therapy. Similarly, a single-site retrospective review of patients (n=291) with advanced cancer (melanoma, NSCLC, or renal cell carcinoma) treated with ICI(s) also revealed poorer clinical outcomes associated with the receipt of systemic antibiotics. This study divided patients into 3 groups: no antibiotics, single course of antibiotics, or cumulative courses of antibiotics (i.e., administration of concurrent or successive antibiotics for >7 days) during the 2 weeks prior to and 6 weeks after ICI treatment. The median PFS (6.3 months vs. 3.7 months vs. 2.8 months, respectively) and median OS (21.7 months vs. 17.7 months vs. 6.3 months, respectively) decreased as the antibiotic use increased, though the difference between no antibiotic use and cumulative courses of antibiotics was the only difference determined to be clinically significant. Additionally, a different retrospective analysis of patients (n=635) with advanced cancer treated with ICIs found that antibiotic use was associated with significantly shorter median OS (8 months vs. 23 months), median PFS (4 months vs. 7 months), as well as a reduction in tumor response (57% vs. 71%) when compared to patients who did not receive antibiotics. In contrast, a retrospective study of patients (n=302) with stage IV NSCLC treated with first-line chemo-immunotherapy combinations (i.e., ICI and cytotoxic chemotherapy) had similar OS, PFS, and objective response rate between those who did and did not receive antibiotics during the 30 days prior to initiating an ICI. The receipt of concurrent systemic antibiotics in this patient population was likewise not associated with changes in OS nor PFS.

MANAGEMENT: Until more information is available, caution and clinical monitoring for reduced efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are advised if systemic antibiotics are indicated prior to, concurrently with, or after an ICI. Antibiotic use should be limited to clinically appropriate indications and durations. Clinicians should consult relevant literature, local and national treatment guidelines, and package labeling for further guidance.

References (6)
  1. Kostine M, Mauric E, Tison A, et al. (2021) "Baseline co-medications may alter the anti-tumoural effect of checkpoint inhibitors as well as the risk of immune-related adverse events." Eur J Cancer, 157, p. 474-84
  2. Huo GW, Zuo R, Song Y, et al. (2021) "Effect of antibiotic use on the efficacy of nivolumab in the treatment of advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis." Open Med (Wars), 16, p. 728-36
  3. Tinsley N, Zhou C, Tan G, et al. (2020) "Cumulative antibiotic use significantly decreases efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced cancer." Oncologist, 25, p. 55-63
  4. Cortellini A, Ricciuti B, Facchinetti F, et al. (2021) "Antibiotic-exposed patients with non-small-cell lung cancer preserve efficacy outcomes following first-line chemo-immunotherapy." Ann Oncol, 32, p. 1391-9
  5. Hakozaki T, richard c, Elkrief A, et al. (2020) "The gut microbiome associates with immune checkpoint inhibition outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer." Cancer Immunol Res, 8, p. 1243-50
  6. Wu HJ, Wu E (2012) "The role of gut microbiota in immune homeostasis and autoimmunity." Gut Microbes, 3, p. 4-14

Drug and food interactions

Moderate

nalidixic acid food

Applies to: nalidixic acid

ADJUST DOSING INTERVAL: Oral preparations that contain magnesium, aluminum, or calcium may significantly decrease the gastrointestinal absorption of nalidixic acid. Absorption may also be reduced by sucralfate, which contains aluminum, as well as other polyvalent cations such as iron and zinc. The mechanism is chelation of nalidixic acid by polyvalent cations, forming a complex that is poorly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract.

MANAGEMENT: When coadministration cannot be avoided, nalidixic acid should be dosed at least 2 hours before or 2 hours after polyvalent cation-containing products to minimize the potential for interaction.

References (1)
  1. "Product Information. Neggram (nalidixic acid)." Sanofi Winthrop Pharmaceuticals
Moderate

nalidixic acid food

Applies to: nalidixic acid

MONITOR: Coadministration with certain quinolones may increase the plasma concentrations and pharmacologic effects of caffeine due to inhibition of the CYP450 1A2 metabolism of caffeine. Quinolones that may inhibit CYP450 1A2 include ciprofloxacin, enoxacin, grepafloxacin, nalidixic acid, norfloxacin, pipemidic acid, and pefloxacin (not all commercially available). In healthy volunteers, enoxacin (100 to 400 mg twice daily) increased systemic exposure (AUC) of caffeine by 2- to 5-fold and reduced its clearance by approximately 80%. Pipemidic acid (400 to 800 mg twice daily) increased AUC of caffeine by 2- to 3-fold and reduced its clearance by approximately 60%. Ciprofloxacin (250 to 750 mg twice daily) increased AUC and elimination half-life of caffeine by 50% to over 100%, and reduced its clearance by 30% to 50%. Norfloxacin 400 mg twice daily increased caffeine AUC by 16%, while 800 mg twice daily increased caffeine AUC by 52% and reduced its clearance by 35%. Pefloxacin (400 mg twice daily) has been shown to reduce caffeine clearance by 47%.

MANAGEMENT: Patients using caffeine-containing products should be advised that increased adverse effects such as headache, tremor, restlessness, nervousness, insomnia, tachycardia, and blood pressure increases may occur during coadministration with quinolones that inhibit CYP450 1A2. Caffeine intake should be limited when taking high dosages of these quinolones. If an interaction is suspected, other quinolones such as gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, levofloxacin, lomefloxacin, moxifloxacin, and ofloxacin may be considered, since they are generally believed to have little or no effect on CYP450 1A2 or have been shown not to interact with caffeine.

References (17)
  1. Polk RE (1989) "Drug-drug interactions with ciprofloxacin and other fluoroquinolones." Am J Med, 87, s76-81
  2. Healy DP, Polk RE, Kanawati L, Rock DT, Mooney ML (1989) "Interaction between oral ciprofloxacin and caffeine in normal volunteers." Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 33, p. 474-8
  3. Harder S, Fuhr U, Staib AH, Wolf T (1989) "Ciprofloxacin-caffeine: a drug interaction established using in vivo and in vitro investigations." Am J Med, 87, p. 89-91
  4. Carbo ML, Segura J, De la Torre R, et al. (1989) "Effect of quinolones on caffeine disposition." Clin Pharmacol Ther, 45, p. 234-40
  5. (1993) "Product Information. Penetrax (enoxacin)." Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Collegeville, PA.
  6. Mahr G, Sorgel F, Granneman GR, et al. (1992) "Effects of temafloxacin and ciprofloxacin on the pharmacokinetics of caffeine." Clin Pharmacokinet, 22, p. 90-7
  7. (2002) "Product Information. Cipro (ciprofloxacin)." Bayer
  8. (2001) "Product Information. Noroxin (norfloxacin)." Merck & Co., Inc
  9. Staib AH, Stille W, Dietlein G, et al. (1987) "Interaction between quinolones and caffeine." Drugs, 34 Suppl 1, p. 170-4
  10. Stille W, Harder S, Micke S, et al. (1987) "Decrease of caffeine elimination in man during co-administration of 4-quinolones." J Antimicrob Chemother, 20, p. 729-34
  11. Harder S, Staib AH, Beer C, Papenburg A, Stille W, Shah PM (1988) "4-Quinolones inhibit biotransformation of caffeine." Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 35, p. 651-6
  12. Nicolau DP, Nightingale CH, Tessier PR, et al. (1995) "The effect of fleroxacin and ciprofloxacin on the pharmacokinetics of multiple dose caffeine." Drugs, 49 Suppl 2, p. 357-9
  13. (2001) "Product Information. Raxar (grepafloxacin)." Glaxo Wellcome
  14. Carrillo JA, Benitez J (2000) "Clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions between dietary caffeine and medications." Clin Pharmacokinet, 39, p. 127-53
  15. Fuhr U, Wolff T, Harder S, Schymanski P, Staib AH (1990) "Quinolone inhibition of cytochrome P-450 dependent caffeine metabolism in human liver microsomes." Drug Metab Dispos, 18, p. 1005-10
  16. Kinzig-Schippers M, Fuhr U, Zaigler M, et al. (1999) "Interaction of pefloxacin and enoxacin with the human cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP1A2." Clin Pharmacol Ther, 65, p. 262-74
  17. Healy DP, Schoenle JR, Stotka J, Polk RE (1991) "Lack of interaction between lomefloxacin and caffeine in normal volunteers." Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 35, p. 660-4

Therapeutic duplication warnings

No warnings were found for your selected drugs.

Therapeutic duplication warnings are only returned when drugs within the same group exceed the recommended therapeutic duplication maximum.


Report options

Drug Interaction Classification

These classifications are only a guideline. The relevance of a particular drug interaction to a specific individual is difficult to determine. Always consult your healthcare provider before starting or stopping any medication.
Major Highly clinically significant. Avoid combinations; the risk of the interaction outweighs the benefit.
Moderate Moderately clinically significant. Usually avoid combinations; use it only under special circumstances.
Minor Minimally clinically significant. Minimize risk; assess risk and consider an alternative drug, take steps to circumvent the interaction risk and/or institute a monitoring plan.
Unknown No interaction information available.

Further information

Always consult your healthcare provider to ensure the information displayed on this page applies to your personal circumstances.