Skip to main content

Drug Interactions between dexamethasone / lidocaine and ipilimumab

This report displays the potential drug interactions for the following 2 drugs:

Edit list (add/remove drugs)

Interactions between your drugs

Moderate

dexAMETHasone ipilimumab

Applies to: dexamethasone / lidocaine and ipilimumab

MONITOR: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) such as programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), programmed death ligand-1 inhibitors (PD-L1), and anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies may be indicated for use in combination in with other immunosuppressive agents, their pharmacodynamic effects and efficacy may be affected by corticosteroids and immunosuppressants. The mechanism of this interaction is related to the immunosuppressive effects of corticosteroids and other immunosuppressants, particularly their inhibition of T-cell activation, which may reduce the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors that rely on a strong immune response to target tumor cells. Additionally, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) from ICIs may indicate a stronger immune response and improved tumor outcomes and treating them with immunosuppressive agents could therefore reduce immune activity and the efficacy of ICIs. For instance, data from the Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry (DTMR) showed that patients with advanced melanoma who experienced severe ICI toxicity had a longer median overall survival (OS) (23 months vs. 15 months), but those needing anti-TNF therapy for steroid-refractory toxicity had worse outcomes (17 months vs. 27 months with steroids alone). In a study of patients with advanced NSCLC (n=640), oral or intravenous corticosteroid use (>/= 10 mg prednisone equivalent per day) at the time of or within 30 days of starting PD-1/PD-L1 blockade with either pembrolizumab, nivolumab, atezolizumab, or durvalumab (n=90) was associated with decreased response and overall poorer outcomes, compared to those who received and discontinued corticosteroid treatment prior to commencing PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Further, an international multicenter cohort study in melanoma patients who developed irAEs with ICI therapy found that higher peak doses of corticosteroids, but not cumulative doses, were associated with worse survival, though the impact of second-line immunosuppressants remains unclear. A prospective observational study using data from a German multicenter skin cancer registry (ADOREG) evaluated patients with unresectable advanced melanoma who received immunosuppressive therapy (IST) (e.g., methylprednisolone, prednisolone, dexamethasone, infliximab, interferon, methotrexate) within 60 days before or within 30 days after the start of an ICI. The initiation of IST before, but not after the start of ICI, was associated with worse progression free survival in patients without brain metastasis, and worse OS in patients with brain metastasis. However, based on available literature, it is difficult to determine whether these effects are due to corticosteroid and/or immunosuppressant use or if they reflect subgroups of patients in studies with poorer prognoses.

MANAGEMENT: Caution and closer monitoring for reduced efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is advised if corticosteroids and/or other immunosuppressants are used concurrently. Based on available literature, the use of immunosuppressants and/or systemic corticosteroids (>=10 mg prednisone equivalent/day) should be avoided at the time of, or within 30 to 60 days of starting therapy with an ICI if clinically possible. Corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressants can generally be safely used for the treatment of immune-mediated reactions after starting an ICI. Some manufacturers advise that corticosteroids may be used as premedication when the ICI is used in combination with chemotherapy, as antiemetic prophylaxis, and/or to alleviate chemotherapy-related adverse effects. Individual product labeling for the ICI in question should be consulted for specific recommendations.

References (29)
  1. Arbour KC, Mezquita L, Long N, et al. (2018) "Impact of Baseline Steroids on Efficacy of Programmed Cell Death-1 and Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Blockade in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer." J Clin Oncol, 36, p. 2872-2878
  2. (2020) "Product Information. Novoeight (antihemophilic factor)." Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals Inc
  3. Horvat TZ, Adel NG, Dand TO, et al. (2015) "Immune-related adverse events, need for systemic immunosuppression, and effects on survival and time to treatment failure in patients with melanoma treated with ipilimumab at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center." J Clin Oncol, 33, p. 3193-8
  4. Jove M, Vilarino N, Nadal E (2019) "Impact of baseline steroids on efficacy of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer." Transl Lung Cancer Res, 8, S364-8
  5. Scott SC, Pennell NA (2018) "Early use of systemic corticosteroids in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with nivolumab." J Thorac Oncol, 13, p. 1771-5
  6. Fuca G, Galli G, Poggi M, et al. (2019) "Modulation of peripheral blood immune cells by early use of steroids and its association with clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors." ESMO Open, 4, e000457
  7. (2022) "Product Information. Imfinzi (durvalumab)." AstraZeneca Pty Ltd
  8. (2023) "Product Information. Yervoy (ipilimumab)." Bristol-Myers Squibb, SUPPL-129
  9. (2021) "Product Information. Yervoy (ipilimumab)." Bristol-Myers Squibb Australia Pty Ltd, V15.0
  10. (2022) "Product Information. Yervoy (ipilimumab)." Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals Ltd
  11. (2023) "Product Information. Libtayo (cemiplimab)." Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, SUPPL-16
  12. (2023) "Product Information. Libtayo (cemiplimab)." Sanofi-Aventis Australia Pty Ltd, lib-ccdsv7-piv4-05ju
  13. (2023) "Product Information. Libtayo (cemiplimab)." Sanofi
  14. (2023) "Product Information. Tecentriq (atezolizumab)." Genentech, SUPPL-51
  15. (2023) "Product Information. Imfinzi (durvalumab)." Astra-Zeneca Pharmaceuticals, SUPPL-42
  16. (2023) "Product Information. Opdualag (nivolumab-relatlimab)." (Obsolete) Bristol-Myers Squibb Australia Pty Ltd, 2
  17. (2022) "Product Information. Opdualag (nivolumab-relatlimab)." Bristol-Myers Squibb
  18. (2024) "Product Information. Keytruda (pembrolizumab)." Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, SUPPL-160
  19. (2024) "Product Information. Keytruda (pembrolizumab)." Merck Sharp & Dohme (Australia) Pty Ltd
  20. (2024) "Product Information. Keytruda (pembrolizumab)." Merck Sharp & Dohme (UK) Ltd
  21. (2024) "Product Information. Tecentriq (atezolizumab)." Roche Products Pty Ltd
  22. (2024) "Product Information. Tecentriq Hybreza (atezolizumab-hyaluronidase)." Genentech
  23. Kochanek C, Gilde C, Zimmer L, et al (2024) Effects of an immunosuppressive therapy on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibition in metastatic melanoma - An analysis of the prospective skin cancer registry ADOREG https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959804923008109#:~:text=Immuno
  24. Verheijden RJ, Burgers FH, Janssen J, et al (2024) Corticosteroids and other immunosuppressants for immune-related adverse events and checkpoint inhibitor effectiveness in melanoma https://www.ejcancer.com/article/S0959-8049(24)00828-1/fulltext#:~:text=Recent%20studies%20indicate%20an%20association,secon
  25. Verheijden RJ, May AM, Black CU, et al. (2024) Association of anti-TNF with decreased survival in steroid refractory ipilimumab and anti-PD1-treated patients in the dutch melanoma treatment registry https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31988197/
  26. (2024) "Product Information. Tecentriq (atezolizumab)." Roche Products Ltd
  27. (2024) "Product Information. Imfinzi (durvalumab)." AstraZeneca UK Ltd
  28. Kostine M, Mauric E, Tison A, et al. (2021) "Baseline co-medications may alter the anti-tumoural effect of checkpoint inhibitors as well as the risk of immune-related adverse events." Eur J Cancer, 157, p. 474-84
  29. BeiGene AUS (2025) Australian product information Tevimbra (tislelizumab (rch)) https://www.ebs.tga.gov.au/ebs/picmi/picmirepository.nsf/pdf?OpenAgent=&id=CP-2024-PI-02006-1&d=20250108172310101&d=20250108172310101.&d=20250130172310101
Minor

lidocaine dexAMETHasone

Applies to: dexamethasone / lidocaine and dexamethasone / lidocaine

Coadministration with inducers of CYP450 1A2 and/or 3A4 may decrease the plasma concentrations of lidocaine, which is primarily metabolized by these isoenzymes. In four healthy volunteers (2 smokers and 2 nonsmokers), administration of a single 400 mg oral dose of lidocaine following pretreatment with the CYP450 inducer phenobarbital (15 mg/day for 4 weeks, followed by 30 mg/day for 4 weeks) decreased lidocaine systemic exposure (AUC) by 37% and increased its oral clearance by 56% compared to administration of lidocaine alone. In another study, the mean bioavailability of a single 750 mg oral dose of lidocaine in six patients receiving chronic antiepileptic drug therapy (consisting of one or more of the following enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants: phenobarbital, primidone, phenytoin, carbamazepine) was approximately 2.5-fold lower than that reported for six healthy control subjects, while intrinsic clearance was nearly threefold higher. By contrast, the interaction was modest for lidocaine administered intravenously, suggesting induction of primarily hepatic first-pass rather than systemic metabolism of lidocaine. When a single 100 mg dose of lidocaine was given intravenously, mean lidocaine AUC was reduced by less than 10% and serum clearance increased by just 17% in the epileptic patients compared to controls. These changes were not statistically significant. Likewise, mean lidocaine AUC decreased by approximately 11% and plasma clearance increased by 15% when a single 50 mg intravenous dose of lidocaine was administered following pretreatment with the potent CYP450 inducer rifampin (600 mg/day for six days) in ten healthy, nonsmoking male volunteers. Another pharmacokinetic study found that cigarette smoke, an inducer of CYP450 1A2, reduced the bioavailability of lidocaine when administered orally, but had only minor effects on lidocaine administered intravenously. When 4 smokers and 5 non-smokers received 2 doses of lidocaine (100 mg IV followed by 100 mg orally after a 2-day washout period), the smoker's systemic exposure (AUC) of oral lidocaine was 68% lower than non-smokers. The AUC of IV lidocaine was only 9% lower in smokers compared with non-smokers. The clinical impact of smoking on lidocaine has not been studied, however, a loss of efficacy may occur.

References (4)
  1. Heinonen J, Takki S, Jarho L (1970) "Plasma lidocaine levels in patients treated with potential inducers of microsomal enzymes." Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 14, p. 89-95
  2. Perucca E, Richens A (1979) "Reduction of oral bioavailability of lignocaine by induction of first pass metabolism in epileptic patients." Br J Clin Pharmacol, 8, p. 21-31
  3. Perucca E, Ruprah M, Richens A, Park BK, Betteridge DJ, Hedges AM (1981) "Effect of low-dose phenobarbitone on five indirect indices of hepatic microsomal enzyme induction and plasma lipoproteins in normal subjects." Br J Clin Pharmacol, 12, p. 592-6
  4. Reichel C, Skodra T, Nacke A, Spengler U, Sauerbruch T (1998) "The lignocaine metabolite (MEGX) liver function test and P-450 induction in humans." Br J Clin Pharmacol, 46, p. 535-9

Drug and food interactions

Moderate

lidocaine food

Applies to: dexamethasone / lidocaine

MONITOR: Grapefruit and grapefruit juice may increase the plasma concentrations of lidocaine, which is primarily metabolized by the CYP450 3A4 and 1A2 isoenzymes to active metabolites (monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX) and glycinexylidide). The proposed mechanism is inhibition of CYP450 3A4-mediated first-pass metabolism in the gut wall by certain compounds present in grapefruit. Inhibition of hepatic CYP450 3A4 may also contribute. The interaction has not been studied with grapefruit juice but has been reported with oral and/or intravenous lidocaine and potent CYP450 3A4 inhibitor, itraconazole, as well as moderate CYP450 3A4 inhibitor, erythromycin. A pharmacokinetic study of 9 healthy volunteers showed that the administration of lidocaine oral (1 mg/kg single dose) with itraconazole (200 mg daily) increased lidocaine systemic exposure (AUC) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax) by 75% and 55%, respectively. However, no changes were observed in the pharmacokinetics of the active metabolite MEGX. In the same study, when the moderate CYP450 3A4 inhibitor erythromycin (500 mg three times a day) was administered, lidocaine AUC and Cmax increased by 60% and 40%, respectively. By contrast, when intravenous lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg infusion over 60 minutes) was administered on the fourth day of treatment with itraconazole (200 mg once a day) no changes in lidocaine AUC or Cmax were observed. However, when lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg infusion over 60 minutes) was coadministered with erythromycin (500 mg three times a day) in the same study, the AUC and Cmax of the active metabolite MEGX significantly increased by 45-60% and 40%, respectively. The observed differences between oral and intravenous lidocaine when coadministered with CYP450 3A4 inhibitors may be attributed to inhibition of CYP450 3A4 in both the gastrointestinal tract and liver affecting oral lidocaine to a greater extent than intravenous lidocaine. In general, the effects of grapefruit products are concentration-, dose- and preparation-dependent, and can vary widely among brands. Certain preparations of grapefruit (e.g., high dose, double strength) have sometimes demonstrated potent inhibition of CYP450 3A4, while other preparations (e.g., low dose, single strength) have typically demonstrated moderate inhibition. While the clinical significance of this interaction is unknown, increased exposure to lidocaine may lead to serious and/or life-threatening reactions including respiratory depression, convulsions, bradycardia, hypotension, arrhythmias, and cardiovascular collapse.

MONITOR: Certain foods and behaviors that induce CYP450 1A2 may reduce the plasma concentrations of lidocaine. The proposed mechanism is induction of hepatic CYP450 1A2, one of the isoenzymes responsible for the metabolic clearance of lidocaine. Cigarette smoking is known to be a CYP450 1A2 inducer. In one pharmacokinetic study of 4 smokers and 5 non-smokers who received 2 doses of lidocaine (100 mg IV followed by 100 mg orally after a 2-day washout period), the smokers' systemic exposure (AUC) of oral lidocaine was 68% lower than non-smokers. The AUC of IV lidocaine was only 9% lower in smokers compared with non-smokers. Other CYP450 1A2 inducers include cruciferous vegetables (e.g., broccoli, brussels sprouts) and char-grilled meat. Therefore, eating large or variable amounts of these foods could also reduce lidocaine exposure. The clinical impact of smoking and/or the ingestion of foods that induce CYP450 1A2 on lidocaine have not been studied, however, a loss of efficacy may occur.

MANAGEMENT: Caution is recommended if lidocaine is to be used in combination with grapefruit and grapefruit juice. Monitoring for lidocaine toxicity and plasma lidocaine levels may also be advised, and the lidocaine dosage adjusted as necessary. Patients who smoke and/or consume cruciferous vegetables may be monitored for reduced lidocaine efficacy.

References (7)
  1. Huet PM, LeLorier J (1980) "Effects of smoking and chronic hepatitis B on lidocaine and indocyanine green kinetics" Clin Pharmacol Ther, 28, p. 208-15
  2. (2024) "Product Information. Lidocaine Hydrochloride (lidocaine)." Hospira Inc.
  3. (2015) "Product Information. Lidocaine Hydrochloride (lidocaine)." Hospira Healthcare Corporation
  4. (2022) "Product Information. Lidocaine Hydrochloride (lidocaine)." Hameln Pharma Ltd
  5. (2022) "Product Information. Xylocaine HCl (lidocaine)." Aspen Pharmacare Australia Pty Ltd
  6. Isohanni MH, Neuvonen PJ, Olkkola KT (2024) Effect of erythromycin and itraconazole on the pharmacokinetics of oral lignocaine https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10193676/
  7. Isohanni MH, Neuvonen PJ, Olkkola KT (2024) Effect of erythromycin and itraconazole on the pharmacokinetics of intravenous lignocaine https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9832299/
Moderate

lidocaine food

Applies to: dexamethasone / lidocaine

MONITOR: Smoking cessation may lead to elevated plasma concentrations and enhanced pharmacologic effects of drugs that are substrates of CYP450 1A2 (and possibly CYP450 1A1) and/or certain drugs with a narrow therapeutic index (e.g., flecainide, pentazocine). One proposed mechanism is related to the loss of CYP450 1A2 and 1A1 induction by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in tobacco smoke; when smoking cessation agents are initiated and smoking stops, the metabolism of certain drugs may decrease leading to increased plasma concentrations. The mechanism by which smoking cessation affects narrow therapeutic index drugs that are not known substrates of CYP450 1A2 or 1A1 is unknown. The clinical significance of this interaction is unknown as clinical data are lacking.

MANAGEMENT: Until more information is available, caution is advisable if smoking cessation agents are used concomitantly with drugs that are substrates of CYP450 1A2 or 1A1 and/or those with a narrow therapeutic range. Patients receiving smoking cessation agents may require periodic dose adjustments and closer clinical and laboratory monitoring of medications that are substrates of CYP450 1A2 or 1A1.

References (4)
  1. (2024) "Product Information. Cytisine (cytisinicline)." Consilient Health Ltd
  2. jeong sh, Newcombe D, sheridan j, Tingle M (2015) "Pharmacokinetics of cytisine, an a4 b2 nicotinic receptor partial agonist, in healthy smokers following a single dose." Drug Test Anal, 7, p. 475-82
  3. Vaughan DP, Beckett AH, Robbie DS (1976) "The influence of smoking on the intersubject variation in pentazocine elimination." Br J Clin Pharmacol, 3, p. 279-83
  4. Zevin S, Benowitz NL (1999) "Drug interactions with tobacco smoking: an update" Clin Pharmacokinet, 36, p. 425-38

Therapeutic duplication warnings

No warnings were found for your selected drugs.

Therapeutic duplication warnings are only returned when drugs within the same group exceed the recommended therapeutic duplication maximum.


Report options

Drug Interaction Classification

These classifications are only a guideline. The relevance of a particular drug interaction to a specific individual is difficult to determine. Always consult your healthcare provider before starting or stopping any medication.
Major Highly clinically significant. Avoid combinations; the risk of the interaction outweighs the benefit.
Moderate Moderately clinically significant. Usually avoid combinations; use it only under special circumstances.
Minor Minimally clinically significant. Minimize risk; assess risk and consider an alternative drug, take steps to circumvent the interaction risk and/or institute a monitoring plan.
Unknown No interaction information available.

Further information

Always consult your healthcare provider to ensure the information displayed on this page applies to your personal circumstances.