Drug Interactions between bismuth subsalicylate / metronidazole / tetracycline and durvalumab
This report displays the potential drug interactions for the following 2 drugs:
- bismuth subsalicylate/metronidazole/tetracycline
- durvalumab
Interactions between your drugs
tetracycline bismuth subsalicylate
Applies to: bismuth subsalicylate / metronidazole / tetracycline and bismuth subsalicylate / metronidazole / tetracycline
ADJUST DOSING INTERVAL: Administration of a bismuth-containing preparation within two to three hours of a tetracycline may significantly decrease serum tetracycline concentrations. Data are available for tetracycline and doxycycline. The proposed mechanism is chelation of tetracycline by bismuth.
MANAGEMENT: Administration of a tetracycline and bismuth-containing preparation should be separated by two to three hours. Patients should be monitored for diminished tetracycline efficacy.
References (4)
- Ericsson CD, Feldman S, Pickering LK, Cleary TG (1982) "Influence of subsalicylate bismuth on absorption of doxycycline." JAMA, 247, p. 2266-7
- Albert KS, Welch RD, DeSante KA, DiSanto AR (1979) "Decreased tetracycline bioavailability caused by a bismuth subsalicylate antidiarrheal mixture." J Pharm Sci, 68, p. 586-8
- (2018) "Product Information. Seysara (sarecycline)." Allergan Inc
- (2018) "Product Information. Nuzyra (omadacycline)." Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
tetracycline durvalumab
Applies to: bismuth subsalicylate / metronidazole / tetracycline and durvalumab
MONITOR: Use of systemic antibiotics during or close to therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein (CTLA)-4 monoclonal antibodies and/or inhibitors of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) may result in reduced clinical efficacy of the ICI. The exact mechanism of this interaction has not been fully characterized, but may be related to alterations in the gut microbiota by the systemic antibiotic, potentially resulting in immune dysregulation and a decreased response to the ICI. A meta-analysis of 6 studies involving nivolumab for the treatment of advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) found that the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were reduced by 1.6 months and 8.8 months, respectively, in patients who were exposed to systemic antibiotics before, during, or after nivolumab therapy. Similarly, a single-site retrospective review of patients (n=291) with advanced cancer (melanoma, NSCLC, or renal cell carcinoma) treated with ICI(s) also revealed poorer clinical outcomes associated with the receipt of systemic antibiotics. This study divided patients into 3 groups: no antibiotics, single course of antibiotics, or cumulative courses of antibiotics (i.e., administration of concurrent or successive antibiotics for >7 days) during the 2 weeks prior to and 6 weeks after ICI treatment. The median PFS (6.3 months vs. 3.7 months vs. 2.8 months, respectively) and median OS (21.7 months vs. 17.7 months vs. 6.3 months, respectively) decreased as the antibiotic use increased, though the difference between no antibiotic use and cumulative courses of antibiotics was the only difference determined to be clinically significant. Additionally, a different retrospective analysis of patients (n=635) with advanced cancer treated with ICIs found that antibiotic use was associated with significantly shorter median OS (8 months vs. 23 months), median PFS (4 months vs. 7 months), as well as a reduction in tumor response (57% vs. 71%) when compared to patients who did not receive antibiotics. In contrast, a retrospective study of patients (n=302) with stage IV NSCLC treated with first-line chemo-immunotherapy combinations (i.e., ICI and cytotoxic chemotherapy) had similar OS, PFS, and objective response rate between those who did and did not receive antibiotics during the 30 days prior to initiating an ICI. The receipt of concurrent systemic antibiotics in this patient population was likewise not associated with changes in OS nor PFS.
MANAGEMENT: Until more information is available, caution and clinical monitoring for reduced efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are advised if systemic antibiotics are indicated prior to, concurrently with, or after an ICI. Antibiotic use should be limited to clinically appropriate indications and durations. Clinicians should consult relevant literature, local and national treatment guidelines, and package labeling for further guidance.
References (6)
- Kostine M, Mauric E, Tison A, et al. (2021) "Baseline co-medications may alter the anti-tumoural effect of checkpoint inhibitors as well as the risk of immune-related adverse events." Eur J Cancer, 157, p. 474-84
- Huo GW, Zuo R, Song Y, et al. (2021) "Effect of antibiotic use on the efficacy of nivolumab in the treatment of advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis." Open Med (Wars), 16, p. 728-36
- Tinsley N, Zhou C, Tan G, et al. (2020) "Cumulative antibiotic use significantly decreases efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced cancer." Oncologist, 25, p. 55-63
- Cortellini A, Ricciuti B, Facchinetti F, et al. (2021) "Antibiotic-exposed patients with non-small-cell lung cancer preserve efficacy outcomes following first-line chemo-immunotherapy." Ann Oncol, 32, p. 1391-9
- Hakozaki T, richard c, Elkrief A, et al. (2020) "The gut microbiome associates with immune checkpoint inhibition outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer." Cancer Immunol Res, 8, p. 1243-50
- Wu HJ, Wu E (2012) "The role of gut microbiota in immune homeostasis and autoimmunity." Gut Microbes, 3, p. 4-14
metroNIDAZOLE durvalumab
Applies to: bismuth subsalicylate / metronidazole / tetracycline and durvalumab
MONITOR: Use of systemic antibiotics during or close to therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein (CTLA)-4 monoclonal antibodies and/or inhibitors of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) may result in reduced clinical efficacy of the ICI. The exact mechanism of this interaction has not been fully characterized, but may be related to alterations in the gut microbiota by the systemic antibiotic, potentially resulting in immune dysregulation and a decreased response to the ICI. A meta-analysis of 6 studies involving nivolumab for the treatment of advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) found that the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were reduced by 1.6 months and 8.8 months, respectively, in patients who were exposed to systemic antibiotics before, during, or after nivolumab therapy. Similarly, a single-site retrospective review of patients (n=291) with advanced cancer (melanoma, NSCLC, or renal cell carcinoma) treated with ICI(s) also revealed poorer clinical outcomes associated with the receipt of systemic antibiotics. This study divided patients into 3 groups: no antibiotics, single course of antibiotics, or cumulative courses of antibiotics (i.e., administration of concurrent or successive antibiotics for >7 days) during the 2 weeks prior to and 6 weeks after ICI treatment. The median PFS (6.3 months vs. 3.7 months vs. 2.8 months, respectively) and median OS (21.7 months vs. 17.7 months vs. 6.3 months, respectively) decreased as the antibiotic use increased, though the difference between no antibiotic use and cumulative courses of antibiotics was the only difference determined to be clinically significant. Additionally, a different retrospective analysis of patients (n=635) with advanced cancer treated with ICIs found that antibiotic use was associated with significantly shorter median OS (8 months vs. 23 months), median PFS (4 months vs. 7 months), as well as a reduction in tumor response (57% vs. 71%) when compared to patients who did not receive antibiotics. In contrast, a retrospective study of patients (n=302) with stage IV NSCLC treated with first-line chemo-immunotherapy combinations (i.e., ICI and cytotoxic chemotherapy) had similar OS, PFS, and objective response rate between those who did and did not receive antibiotics during the 30 days prior to initiating an ICI. The receipt of concurrent systemic antibiotics in this patient population was likewise not associated with changes in OS nor PFS.
MANAGEMENT: Until more information is available, caution and clinical monitoring for reduced efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are advised if systemic antibiotics are indicated prior to, concurrently with, or after an ICI. Antibiotic use should be limited to clinically appropriate indications and durations. Clinicians should consult relevant literature, local and national treatment guidelines, and package labeling for further guidance.
References (6)
- Kostine M, Mauric E, Tison A, et al. (2021) "Baseline co-medications may alter the anti-tumoural effect of checkpoint inhibitors as well as the risk of immune-related adverse events." Eur J Cancer, 157, p. 474-84
- Huo GW, Zuo R, Song Y, et al. (2021) "Effect of antibiotic use on the efficacy of nivolumab in the treatment of advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis." Open Med (Wars), 16, p. 728-36
- Tinsley N, Zhou C, Tan G, et al. (2020) "Cumulative antibiotic use significantly decreases efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced cancer." Oncologist, 25, p. 55-63
- Cortellini A, Ricciuti B, Facchinetti F, et al. (2021) "Antibiotic-exposed patients with non-small-cell lung cancer preserve efficacy outcomes following first-line chemo-immunotherapy." Ann Oncol, 32, p. 1391-9
- Hakozaki T, richard c, Elkrief A, et al. (2020) "The gut microbiome associates with immune checkpoint inhibition outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer." Cancer Immunol Res, 8, p. 1243-50
- Wu HJ, Wu E (2012) "The role of gut microbiota in immune homeostasis and autoimmunity." Gut Microbes, 3, p. 4-14
Drug and food interactions
metroNIDAZOLE food
Applies to: bismuth subsalicylate / metronidazole / tetracycline
CONTRAINDICATED: Use of alcohol or products containing alcohol during nitroimidazole therapy may result in a disulfiram-like reaction in some patients. There have been a few case reports involving metronidazole, although data overall are not convincing. The presumed mechanism is inhibition of aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) by metronidazole in a manner similar to disulfiram. Following ingestion of alcohol, inhibition of ALDH results in increased concentrations of acetaldehyde, the accumulation of which can produce an unpleasant physiologic response referred to as the 'disulfiram reaction'. Symptoms include flushing, throbbing in head and neck, throbbing headache, respiratory difficulty, nausea, vomiting, sweating, thirst, chest pain, palpitation, dyspnea, hyperventilation, tachycardia, hypotension, syncope, weakness, vertigo, blurred vision, and confusion. Severe reactions may result in respiratory depression, cardiovascular collapse, arrhythmia, myocardial infarction, acute congestive heart failure, unconsciousness, convulsions, and death. However, some investigators have questioned the disulfiram-like properties of metronidazole. One study found neither elevations in blood acetaldehyde nor objective or subjective signs of a disulfiram-like reaction to ethanol in six subjects treated with metronidazole (200 mg three times a day for 5 days) compared to six subjects who received placebo.
MANAGEMENT: Because clear evidence is lacking concerning the safety of ethanol use during nitroimidazole therapy, patients should be apprised of the potential for interaction. Consumption of alcoholic beverages and products containing propylene glycol is specifically contraindicated during and for at least 3 days after completion of metronidazole and benznidazole therapy according to their product labeling.
References (9)
- Giannini AJ, DeFrance DT (1983) "Metronidazole and alcohol: potential for combinative abuse." J Toxicol Clin Toxicol, 20, p. 509-15
- Alexander I (1985) "Alcohol-antabuse syndrome in patients receiving metronidazole during gynaecological treatment." Br J Clin Pract, 39, p. 292-3
- Harries DP, Teale KF, Sunderland G (1990) "Metronidazole and alcohol: potential problems." Scott Med J, 35, p. 179-80
- (2001) "Product Information. Flagyl (metronidazole)." Searle
- Edwards DL, Fink PC, Van Dyke PO (1986) "Disulfiram-like reaction associated with intravenous trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and metronidazole." Clin Pharm, 5, p. 999-1000
- Williams CS, Woodcock KR (2000) "Do ethanol and metronidazole interact to produce a disulfiram-like reaction?." Ann Pharmacother, 34, p. 255-7
- Visapaa JP, Tillonen JS, Kaihovaara PS, Salaspuro MP (2002) "Lack of disulfiram-like reaction with metronidazole and ethanol." Ann Pharmacother, 36, p. 971-4
- Krulewitch CJ (2003) "An unexpected adverse drug effect." J Midwifery Womens Health, 48, p. 67-8
- (2017) "Product Information. Benznidazole (benznidazole)." Everett Laboratories Inc
tetracycline food
Applies to: bismuth subsalicylate / metronidazole / tetracycline
ADJUST DOSING INTERVAL: Administration with food, particularly dairy products, significantly reduces tetracycline absorption. The calcium content of these foods forms nonabsorbable chelates with tetracycline.
MANAGEMENT: Tetracycline should be administered one hour before or two hours after meals.
References (2)
- (2001) "Product Information. Achromycin (tetracycline)." Lederle Laboratories
- (2001) "Product Information. Declomycin (demeclocycline)." Lederle Laboratories
tetracycline food
Applies to: bismuth subsalicylate / metronidazole / tetracycline
GENERALLY AVOID: The bioavailability of oral tetracyclines and iron salts may be significantly decreased during concurrent administration. Therapeutic failure may result. The proposed mechanism is chelation of tetracyclines by the iron cation, forming an insoluble complex that is poorly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract. In ten healthy volunteers, simultaneous oral administration of ferrous sulfate 200 mg and single doses of various tetracyclines (200 mg to 500 mg) resulted in reductions in the serum levels of methacycline and doxycycline by 80% to 90%, oxytetracycline by 50% to 60%, and tetracycline by 40% to 50%. In another study, 300 mg of ferrous sulfate reduced the absorption of tetracycline by 81% and that of minocycline by 77%. Conversely, the absorption of iron has been shown to be decreased by up to 78% in healthy subjects and up to 65% in patients with iron depletion when ferrous sulfate 250 mg was administered with tetracycline 500 mg. Available data suggest that administration of iron 3 hours before or 2 hours after a tetracycline largely prevents the interaction with most tetracyclines except doxycycline. Due to extensive enterohepatic cycling, iron binding may occur with doxycycline even when it is given parenterally. It has also been shown that when iron is administered up to 11 hours after doxycycline, serum concentrations of doxycycline may still be reduced by 20% to 45%.
MANAGEMENT: Coadministration of a tetracycline with any iron-containing product should be avoided if possible. Otherwise, patients should be advised to stagger the times of administration by at least three to four hours, although separating the doses may not prevent the interaction with doxycycline.
References (11)
- Neuvonen PJ (1976) "Interactions with the absorption of tetracyclines." Drugs, 11, p. 45-54
- Gothoni G, Neuvonen PJ, Mattila M, Hackman R (1972) "Iron-tetracycline interaction: effect of time interval between the drugs." Acta Med Scand, 191, p. 409-11
- Venho VM, Salonen RO, Mattila MJ (1978) "Modification of the pharmacokinetics of doxycycline in man by ferrous sulphate or charcoal." Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 14, p. 277-80
- (2002) "Product Information. Minocin (minocycline)." Lederle Laboratories
- Campbell NR, Hasinoff BB (1991) "Iron supplements: a common cause of drug interactions." Br J Clin Pharmacol, 31, p. 251-5
- Bateman FJ (1970) "Effects of tetracyclines." Br Med J, 4, p. 802
- Neuvonen PJ, Gothoni G, Hackman R, Bjorksten K (1970) "Interference of iron with the absorption of tetracyclines in man." Br Med J, 4, p. 532-4
- Greenberger NJ (1971) "Absorption of tetracyclines: interference by iron." Ann Intern Med, 74, p. 792-3
- Neuvonen PJ, Penttila O (1974) "Effect of oral ferrous sulphate on the half-life of doxycycline in man." Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 7, p. 361-3
- (2018) "Product Information. Seysara (sarecycline)." Allergan Inc
- (2018) "Product Information. Nuzyra (omadacycline)." Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Therapeutic duplication warnings
No warnings were found for your selected drugs.
Therapeutic duplication warnings are only returned when drugs within the same group exceed the recommended therapeutic duplication maximum.
See also
Drug Interaction Classification
Highly clinically significant. Avoid combinations; the risk of the interaction outweighs the benefit. | |
Moderately clinically significant. Usually avoid combinations; use it only under special circumstances. | |
Minimally clinically significant. Minimize risk; assess risk and consider an alternative drug, take steps to circumvent the interaction risk and/or institute a monitoring plan. | |
No interaction information available. |
Further information
Always consult your healthcare provider to ensure the information displayed on this page applies to your personal circumstances.
Check Interactions
To view an interaction report containing 4 (or more) medications, please sign in or create an account.
Save Interactions List
Sign in to your account to save this drug interaction list.