Drug Interactions between atovaquone / proguanil and dostarlimab
This report displays the potential drug interactions for the following 2 drugs:
- atovaquone/proguanil
- dostarlimab
Interactions between your drugs
atovaquone dostarlimab
Applies to: atovaquone / proguanil and dostarlimab
MONITOR: Use of systemic antibiotics during or close to therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein (CTLA)-4 monoclonal antibodies and/or inhibitors of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) may result in reduced clinical efficacy of the ICI. The exact mechanism of this interaction has not been fully characterized, but may be related to alterations in the gut microbiota by the systemic antibiotic, potentially resulting in immune dysregulation and a decreased response to the ICI. A meta-analysis of 6 studies involving nivolumab for the treatment of advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) found that the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were reduced by 1.6 months and 8.8 months, respectively, in patients who were exposed to systemic antibiotics before, during, or after nivolumab therapy. Similarly, a single-site retrospective review of patients (n=291) with advanced cancer (melanoma, NSCLC, or renal cell carcinoma) treated with ICI(s) also revealed poorer clinical outcomes associated with the receipt of systemic antibiotics. This study divided patients into 3 groups: no antibiotics, single course of antibiotics, or cumulative courses of antibiotics (i.e., administration of concurrent or successive antibiotics for >7 days) during the 2 weeks prior to and 6 weeks after ICI treatment. The median PFS (6.3 months vs. 3.7 months vs. 2.8 months, respectively) and median OS (21.7 months vs. 17.7 months vs. 6.3 months, respectively) decreased as the antibiotic use increased, though the difference between no antibiotic use and cumulative courses of antibiotics was the only difference determined to be clinically significant. Additionally, a different retrospective analysis of patients (n=635) with advanced cancer treated with ICIs found that antibiotic use was associated with significantly shorter median OS (8 months vs. 23 months), median PFS (4 months vs. 7 months), as well as a reduction in tumor response (57% vs. 71%) when compared to patients who did not receive antibiotics. In contrast, a retrospective study of patients (n=302) with stage IV NSCLC treated with first-line chemo-immunotherapy combinations (i.e., ICI and cytotoxic chemotherapy) had similar OS, PFS, and objective response rate between those who did and did not receive antibiotics during the 30 days prior to initiating an ICI. The receipt of concurrent systemic antibiotics in this patient population was likewise not associated with changes in OS nor PFS.
MANAGEMENT: Until more information is available, caution and clinical monitoring for reduced efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are advised if systemic antibiotics are indicated prior to, concurrently with, or after an ICI. Antibiotic use should be limited to clinically appropriate indications and durations. Clinicians should consult relevant literature, local and national treatment guidelines, and package labeling for further guidance.
References (6)
- Kostine M, Mauric E, Tison A, et al. (2021) "Baseline co-medications may alter the anti-tumoural effect of checkpoint inhibitors as well as the risk of immune-related adverse events." Eur J Cancer, 157, p. 474-84
- Huo GW, Zuo R, Song Y, et al. (2021) "Effect of antibiotic use on the efficacy of nivolumab in the treatment of advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis." Open Med (Wars), 16, p. 728-36
- Tinsley N, Zhou C, Tan G, et al. (2020) "Cumulative antibiotic use significantly decreases efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced cancer." Oncologist, 25, p. 55-63
- Cortellini A, Ricciuti B, Facchinetti F, et al. (2021) "Antibiotic-exposed patients with non-small-cell lung cancer preserve efficacy outcomes following first-line chemo-immunotherapy." Ann Oncol, 32, p. 1391-9
- Hakozaki T, richard c, Elkrief A, et al. (2020) "The gut microbiome associates with immune checkpoint inhibition outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer." Cancer Immunol Res, 8, p. 1243-50
- Wu HJ, Wu E (2012) "The role of gut microbiota in immune homeostasis and autoimmunity." Gut Microbes, 3, p. 4-14
Drug and food interactions
atovaquone food
Applies to: atovaquone / proguanil
ADJUST DOSING INTERVAL: Food, particularly high-fat food, significantly enhances the oral absorption and bioavailability of atovaquone. In 16 healthy volunteers, administration of a single 750 mg dose of atovaquone suspension following a standard breakfast (23 g fat: 610 kCal) resulted in an approximately 3.4-fold increase in the mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and a 2.5-fold increase in the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of atovaquone compared to administration following an overnight fast. In a study consisting of 19 HIV-infected volunteers receiving atovaquone suspension 500 mg/day, Cmax and AUC of atovaquone increased by 72% and 66%, respectively, in the fed state relative to the fasting state.
MANAGEMENT: To ensure maximal oral absorption, atovaquone products (suspension, tablet, or in combination with proguanil) should be administered with a meal or milky drink, or enteral nutrition at the same time(s) each day. Because plasma atovaquone concentrations have been shown to correlate with the likelihood of successful treatment and in some cases, survival, alternative therapies may be appropriate for patients who have difficulty taking atovaquone with food.
References (3)
- (2001) "Product Information. Mepron (atovaquone)." Glaxo Wellcome
- (2001) "Product Information. Malarone (atovaquone-proguanil)." Glaxo Wellcome
- Wohlt PD, Zheng L, Gunderson S, Balzar SA, Johnson BD, Fish JT (2009) "Recommendations for the use of medications with continuous enteral nutrition." Am J Health Syst Pharm, 66, p. 1438-67
Therapeutic duplication warnings
No warnings were found for your selected drugs.
Therapeutic duplication warnings are only returned when drugs within the same group exceed the recommended therapeutic duplication maximum.
See also
Drug Interaction Classification
Highly clinically significant. Avoid combinations; the risk of the interaction outweighs the benefit. | |
Moderately clinically significant. Usually avoid combinations; use it only under special circumstances. | |
Minimally clinically significant. Minimize risk; assess risk and consider an alternative drug, take steps to circumvent the interaction risk and/or institute a monitoring plan. | |
No interaction information available. |
Further information
Always consult your healthcare provider to ensure the information displayed on this page applies to your personal circumstances.
Check Interactions
To view an interaction report containing 4 (or more) medications, please sign in or create an account.
Save Interactions List
Sign in to your account to save this drug interaction list.