Drug Interactions between amoxicillin / clarithromycin / lansoprazole and Verzenio

GENERALLY AVOID: Coadministration with potent inhibitors of CYP450 3A4 may significantly increase the plasma concentrations of abemaciclib and its pharmacologically active metabolites, all of which are substrates of the isoenzyme. According to the product labeling, abemaciclib systemic exposure (AUC) is predicted to increase by up to 16-fold when administered with the potent CYP450 3A4 inhibitor ketoconazole. In cancer patients, administration of a single 50 mg dose of abemaciclib (one third the approved recommended dose of 150 mg) with another potent CYP450 3A4 inhibitor, clarithromycin (500 mg twice daily), increased the relative potency-adjusted unbound AUC of abemaciclib plus its active metabolites by 2.5-fold relative to abemaciclib administered alone.

MANAGEMENT: When used with potent CYP450 3A4 inhibitors other than ketoconazole (which is not recommended), patients who would otherwise be on abemaciclib 200 mg or 150 mg twice daily should have their dosage reduced to 100 mg twice daily In patients who have already had a dosage reduction to 100 mg twice daily due to adverse reactions, a further reduction of the abemaciclib dosage to 50 mg twice daily is recommended. Following discontinuation of the potent CYP450 3A4 inhibitor, abemaciclib dosage should be increased (after 3 to 5 half-lives of the inhibitor) to the dosage that was used before starting the inhibitor.

Switch to consumer interaction data

MONITOR: Coadministration with clarithromycin may increase the plasma concentrations of lansoprazole. The proposed mechanism is clarithromycin inhibition of intestinal (first-pass) and hepatic metabolism of lansoprazole via CYP450 3A4. Although lansoprazole is primarily metabolized by CYP450 2C19 in the liver, 3A4-mediated metabolism is the predominant pathway in individuals who are 2C19-deficient (approximately 3% to 5% of the Caucasian and 17% to 20% of the Asian population). Additionally, inhibition of P-glycoprotein intestinal efflux transporter by clarithromycin may also contribute to the interaction, resulting in increased bioavailability of lansoprazole. In 18 healthy volunteers--six each of homozygous extensive metabolizers (EMs), heterozygous EMs, and poor metabolizers (PMs) of CYP450 2C19--clarithromycin (400 mg orally twice a day for 6 days) increased the peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of a single 60 mg oral dose of lansoprazole by 1.47, 1.71- and 1.52-fold, respectively, and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) by 1.55-, 1.74- and 1.80-fold, respectively, in each of these groups compared to placebo. The AUC ratio of lansoprazole to lansoprazole sulphone, which is considered an index of CYP450 3A4 activity, was significantly increased by clarithromycin in all three groups. However, elimination half-life of lansoprazole was prolonged by 1.54-fold only in PMs. Mild diarrhea was reported in two subjects and mild abdominal disturbance in six subjects during clarithromycin coadministration. These side effects continued until day 6 and ameliorated the day after discontinuation of clarithromycin, whereas no adverse events were reported during placebo administration or after lansoprazole plus placebo. In another study, clarithromycin induced dose-dependent increases in the plasma concentration of lansoprazole in a group of 20 patients receiving treatment for H. pylori eradication. Mean 3-hour plasma lansoprazole concentration was 385 ng/mL for the control subjects who received lansoprazole 30 mg and amoxicillin 750 mg twice a day for 7 days; 696 ng/mL for patients coadministered clarithromycin 200 mg twice a day; and 947 ng/mL for patients coadministered clarithromycin 400 mg twice a day.

MANAGEMENT: Although lansoprazole is generally well tolerated, caution may be advised during coadministration with clarithromycin, particularly if higher dosages of one or both drugs are used. Dosage adjustment may be necessary in patients who experience excessive adverse effects of lansoprazole.

Switch to consumer interaction data

Although some in vitro data indicate synergism between macrolide antibiotics and penicillins, other in vitro data indicate antagonism. When these drugs are given together, neither has predictable therapeutic efficacy. Data are available for erythromycin, although theoretically this interaction could occur with any macrolide. Except for monitoring of the effectiveness of antibiotic therapy, no special precautions appear to be necessary.

Switch to consumer interaction data