Drug Interactions between AccessPak for HIV PEP Expanded with Kaletra and Gengraf

MONITOR CLOSELY: Coadministration with protease inhibitors (PIs), especially ritonavir, may significantly increase the blood concentrations of cyclosporine. The risk of nephro- and neurotoxicity associated with cyclosporine may be increased. The mechanism involves PI inhibition of CYP450 3A4, the isoenzyme responsible for the intestinal and hepatic metabolism of cyclosporine. Enhanced cyclosporine oral bioavailability due to PI inhibition of intestinal P-glycoprotein efflux transporter may also contribute. In an HIV+ renal transplant patient whose treatment regimen included cyclosporine (150 mg twice a day) prednisone, zidovudine and lamivudine, trough cyclosporine levels that had been stable in the 150 to 200 mcg/L range rose to 580 mcg/L three days after saquinavir therapy (1200 mg three times a day) was added. The patient reported fatigue, headache, and gastrointestinal discomfort. The dosage of both cyclosporine and saquinavir were subsequently reduced by 50%, which yielded a systemic exposure (AUC) of cyclosporine approximating that measured when cyclosporine was given at the original dose before saquinavir. However, saquinavir AUC was 11 times that reported in historical controls.

MANAGEMENT: Caution is advised if cyclosporine is used in combination with protease inhibitors. Cyclosporine blood levels and renal function should be checked frequently and the dosage adjusted accordingly, particularly following initiation or discontinuation of PI therapy in patients who are stabilized on their cyclosporine regimen. Patients should be advised to notify their physician if they experience possible signs of cyclosporine toxicity such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, dizziness, fatigue, headache, tremors, and convulsions. Patients treated with saquinavir should also be monitored for potential PI toxicity and the dosage adjusted accordingly.

Switch to consumer interaction data

GENERALLY AVOID: Coadministration of tenofovir with other nephrotoxic agents may increase the risk of renal impairment due to additive effects on the kidney. Additionally, renal impairment secondary to the use of these agents may reduce the clearance of tenofovir, which is primarily eliminated by a combination of glomerular filtration and active tubular secretion. The use of tenofovir has been associated with dose-related nephrotoxicity including acute renal failure and Fanconi syndrome characterized by renal tubular injury with severe hypophosphatemia, possibly as a result of mitochondrial toxicity. Cases of acute renal failure after initiation of high-dose or multiple nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents have been reported in HIV-infected patients with risk factors for renal dysfunction who appeared stable on tenofovir therapy. Some patients required hospitalization and renal replacement therapy. Available clinical data seem to suggest a lower risk of nephrotoxicity with tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF) than with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), presumably due to lower tenofovir systemic exposure following administration of TAF relative to TDF. Whereas TDF is metabolized in plasma to tenofovir and phosphorylated intracellularly to the active moiety tenofovir diphosphate, TAF is largely metabolized and phosphorylated intracellularly, resulting in substantially higher intracellular concentrations of tenofovir diphosphate and lower plasma levels of tenofovir at the therapeutic dose of 25 mg compared to TDF 300 mg. It has been further reported that tenofovir is actively transported into the proximal renal tubular cell by organic anion transporters (OAT) 1 and 3, but that TAF is not a substrate for these transporters and thus less likely to cause tubular injury. There have been no cases of Fanconi syndrome or proximal renal tubulopathy in clinical trials of various TAF-containing products according to the manufacturers.

MANAGEMENT: The use of tenofovir in patients who have recently received or are receiving treatment with other potentially nephrotoxic agents (e.g., aminoglycosides; polypeptide, glycopeptide, and polymyxin antibiotics; amphotericin B; aminosalicylates; antiviral agents such as acyclovir, adefovir, cidofovir, foscarnet, and ganciclovir; antineoplastics such as aldesleukin, cisplatin, clofarabine, ifosfamide, streptozocin, and high intravenous dosages of methotrexate; chelating agents such as deferasirox, deferoxamine, edetate disodium, and edetate calcium disodium; immunosuppressants such as cyclosporine, everolimus, sirolimus, and tacrolimus; intravenous bisphosphonates; intravenous pentamidine; high dosages and/or chronic use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents; gallium nitrate; lithium; penicillamine) should be avoided if possible. Renal function tests including serum creatinine, serum phosphorous, estimated creatinine clearance, urine glucose, and urine protein should be performed prior to and during therapy with tenofovir. Patients with renal insufficiency at baseline or during treatment may require dosage adjustment in accordance with the manufacturer's product labeling. Persistent or worsening bone pain, pain in extremities, fractures, and/or muscular pain or weakness may also be manifestations of proximal renal tubulopathy and should prompt an evaluation of renal function in at-risk patients.

Switch to consumer interaction data

MONITOR: Coadministration with ritonavir, with or without lopinavir, has been suggested in postmarketing reports to increase the proximal tubular intracellular concentrations of tenofovir and potentiate the risk of tenofovir-induced nephrotoxicity. The proposed mechanism is ritonavir inhibition of tenofovir renal tubular secretion into the urine via multidrug resistance protein MRP2. Analysis of data from a compassionate access study in which 271 patients with advanced HIV disease received the combination for a mean duration of 63 weeks revealed no clinically significant nephrotoxicity associated with coadministration. However, there have been case reports of renal failure associated with acute tubular necrosis, Fanconi's syndrome, and nephrogenic diabetes insipidus in patients treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in combination with ritonavir. Some patients had incomplete recovery of renal function more than a year after cessation of tenofovir therapy. Ritonavir given in combination with lopinavir has also been reported to modestly increase the plasma concentrations of tenofovir. In contrast, both slight decreases and no change in lopinavir and ritonavir concentrations have been reported.

MANAGEMENT: Caution is advised if tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is prescribed with ritonavir. Renal function should be monitored regularly, including surveillance for signs of tubulopathy such as glycosuria, acidosis, increases in serum creatinine level, electrolyte disturbances (e.g., hypokalemia, hypophosphatemia), and proteinuria. The same precaution may be applicable during therapy with other protease inhibitors based on their similar pharmacokinetic profile, although clinical data are lacking. Nelfinavir reportedly does not alter the pharmacokinetics of tenofovir, or vice versa. Tenofovir administration should be discontinued promptly if nephropathy develops.

Switch to consumer interaction data

MONITOR: Coadministration with ritonavir, with or without lopinavir, has been suggested in postmarketing reports to increase the proximal tubular intracellular concentrations of tenofovir and potentiate the risk of tenofovir-induced nephrotoxicity. The proposed mechanism is ritonavir inhibition of tenofovir renal tubular secretion into the urine via multidrug resistance protein MRP2. Analysis of data from a compassionate access study in which 271 patients with advanced HIV disease received the combination for a mean duration of 63 weeks revealed no clinically significant nephrotoxicity associated with coadministration. However, there have been case reports of renal failure associated with acute tubular necrosis, Fanconi's syndrome, and nephrogenic diabetes insipidus in patients treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in combination with ritonavir. Some patients had incomplete recovery of renal function more than a year after cessation of tenofovir therapy. Ritonavir given in combination with lopinavir has also been reported to modestly increase the plasma concentrations of tenofovir. In contrast, both slight decreases and no change in lopinavir and ritonavir concentrations have been reported.

MANAGEMENT: Caution is advised if tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is prescribed with ritonavir. Renal function should be monitored regularly, including surveillance for signs of tubulopathy such as glycosuria, acidosis, increases in serum creatinine level, electrolyte disturbances (e.g., hypokalemia, hypophosphatemia), and proteinuria. The same precaution may be applicable during therapy with other protease inhibitors based on their similar pharmacokinetic profile, although clinical data are lacking. Nelfinavir reportedly does not alter the pharmacokinetics of tenofovir, or vice versa. Tenofovir administration should be discontinued promptly if nephropathy develops.

Switch to consumer interaction data

Coadministration with inhibitors of CYP450 3A4 may increase the plasma concentrations of lopinavir, which is primarily metabolized by the isoenzyme. The magnitude and clinical significance of this interaction are unknown, particularly when in the presence of ritonavir as a pharmacokinetic booster. Limited data indicate that ketoconazole, a potent CYP450 3A4 inhibitor, does not substantially alter the plasma concentrations of lopinavir administered as lopinavir-ritonavir in a 4:1 ratio.

Switch to consumer interaction data