Drug Interaction Report

MONITOR: The effectiveness of estrogen-containing medications may be impaired by concomitant treatment with antimicrobial agents. During metabolism, the estrogen component is conjugated, resulting in sulfation or glucuronidation of the original estrogenic steroid. The conjugates reach the intestine by way of the bile duct where hydrolytic enzymes of intestinal bacteria break down the conjugates into free, active estrogenic hormone. The active hormone is then available for enterohepatic cycling, which helps to maintain estrogen levels. It is important to note that the progestin component of a combined hormonal product does not undergo this process. It has been suggested that broad-spectrum antibiotics may reduce the effectiveness of estrogen-containing contraceptives because of their potential to reduce the number of intestinal bacteria and thus interfere with enterohepatic cycling of estrogen. Most of the research regarding this possible interaction has been done with oral contraceptives, but all estrogens appear to undergo enterohepatic recirculation so theoretically this interaction is a possibility with estrogen containing medications that are being used for alternative purposes. However, the risk appears to be small, and supportive data are primarily limited to anecdotal evidence from case reports and findings from uncontrolled or poorly controlled studies. Most antimicrobials, with the exception of enzyme inducing medications like the rifamycins and possibly griseofulvin, have not been shown to significantly increase the clearance of oral contraceptive estrogens. It is possible that a small number of women may be more sensitive to the effects of antimicrobials on estrogen disposition in vivo, but risk factors or genetic predispositions have yet to be identified.

MANAGEMENT: If a person is using estrogen for a purpose other than contraception, it is important to note that there is a theoretical possibility of lower levels of systemic estrogen available during treatment with an antibiotic due to interference with enterohepatic cycling. These patients should be counseled to report any changes in efficacy of the hormonal product to their healthcare provider. In the case of contraception specifically, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention do not consider most broad-spectrum antibiotics to significantly interfere with the effectiveness of combined hormonal contraception. However, the manufacturers of certain combined hormonal contraceptives and/or certain antibiotics do recommend using a back-up method of birth control for varying amounts of time; therefore, consulting the product labeling of each medication involved is advised. Some illnesses, as well as some antibiotics, may cause nausea, vomiting, and/or diarrhea. If the patient vomits within a few hours of taking an oral contraceptive pill, consult the product labeling for instructions on what to do in the event of a missed pill. Some authorities recommend a back-up method of birth control if an individual has persistent vomiting or diarrhea.

Coadministration with estrogens may increase or decrease the plasma concentrations and effects of lidocaine. Estrogen can reduce alpha-l-acid glycoprotein (AAG), a plasma protein to which lidocaine has a relatively high binding affinity. Theoretically, a reduction in AAG could result in a higher free fraction of lidocaine, though clinical reports of adverse reactions resulting from this effect do not currently exist. In contrast, a pharmacokinetic study of postmenopausal women on oral hormone therapy (HT) highlighted the opposite effect. Study subjects received oral or transdermal HT with 17-beta-estradiol and micronized progesterone for 6 months with single intravenous lidocaine doses (1 mg/kg) prior to, at 3 months, and at 6 months of HT. At 3 months, lidocaine plasma exposure (AUC) and half-life were reduced by 15% and 15.2%, respectively. Additionally, lidocaine's elimination rate constant increased by 10%. However, no changes in lidocaine's AUC, half-life, or elimination rate constant were observed at 6 months with oral HT or at any point with transdermal HT. The mechanism and clinical significance are not clear, nor is the contribution, if any, of progesterone to this interaction. Clinical and laboratory monitoring may be advised when estrogen-containing products are coadministered with lidocaine.

MONITOR: Grapefruit and grapefruit juice may increase the plasma concentrations of lidocaine, which is primarily metabolized by the CYP450 3A4 and 1A2 isoenzymes to active metabolites (monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX) and glycinexylidide). The proposed mechanism is inhibition of CYP450 3A4-mediated first-pass metabolism in the gut wall by certain compounds present in grapefruit. Inhibition of hepatic CYP450 3A4 may also contribute. The interaction has not been studied with grapefruit juice but has been reported with oral and/or intravenous lidocaine and potent CYP450 3A4 inhibitor, itraconazole, as well as moderate CYP450 3A4 inhibitor, erythromycin. A pharmacokinetic study of 9 healthy volunteers showed that the administration of lidocaine oral (1 mg/kg single dose) with itraconazole (200 mg daily) increased lidocaine systemic exposure (AUC) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax) by 75% and 55%, respectively. However, no changes were observed in the pharmacokinetics of the active metabolite MEGX. In the same study, when the moderate CYP450 3A4 inhibitor erythromycin (500 mg three times a day) was administered, lidocaine AUC and Cmax increased by 60% and 40%, respectively. By contrast, when intravenous lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg infusion over 60 minutes) was administered on the fourth day of treatment with itraconazole (200 mg once a day) no changes in lidocaine AUC or Cmax were observed. However, when lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg infusion over 60 minutes) was coadministered with erythromycin (500 mg three times a day) in the same study, the AUC and Cmax of the active metabolite MEGX significantly increased by 45-60% and 40%, respectively. The observed differences between oral and intravenous lidocaine when coadministered with CYP450 3A4 inhibitors may be attributed to inhibition of CYP450 3A4 in both the gastrointestinal tract and liver affecting oral lidocaine to a greater extent than intravenous lidocaine. In general, the effects of grapefruit products are concentration-, dose- and preparation-dependent, and can vary widely among brands. Certain preparations of grapefruit (e.g., high dose, double strength) have sometimes demonstrated potent inhibition of CYP450 3A4, while other preparations (e.g., low dose, single strength) have typically demonstrated moderate inhibition. While the clinical significance of this interaction is unknown, increased exposure to lidocaine may lead to serious and/or life-threatening reactions including respiratory depression, convulsions, bradycardia, hypotension, arrhythmias, and cardiovascular collapse.

MONITOR: Certain foods and behaviors that induce CYP450 1A2 may reduce the plasma concentrations of lidocaine. The proposed mechanism is induction of hepatic CYP450 1A2, one of the isoenzymes responsible for the metabolic clearance of lidocaine. Cigarette smoking is known to be a CYP450 1A2 inducer. In one pharmacokinetic study of 4 smokers and 5 non-smokers who received 2 doses of lidocaine (100 mg IV followed by 100 mg orally after a 2-day washout period), the smokers' systemic exposure (AUC) of oral lidocaine was 68% lower than non-smokers. The AUC of IV lidocaine was only 9% lower in smokers compared with non-smokers. Other CYP450 1A2 inducers include cruciferous vegetables (e.g., broccoli, brussels sprouts) and char-grilled meat. Therefore, eating large or variable amounts of these foods could also reduce lidocaine exposure. The clinical impact of smoking and/or the ingestion of foods that induce CYP450 1A2 on lidocaine have not been studied, however, a loss of efficacy may occur.

MANAGEMENT: Caution is recommended if lidocaine is to be used in combination with grapefruit and grapefruit juice. Monitoring for lidocaine toxicity and plasma lidocaine levels may also be advised, and the lidocaine dosage adjusted as necessary. Patients who smoke and/or consume cruciferous vegetables may be monitored for reduced lidocaine efficacy.

MONITOR: Coadministration of ethinyl estradiol may increase the plasma concentrations of drugs that are primarily metabolized by CYP450 1A2. In a study of 30 healthy volunteers administered the CYP450 1A2 substrate tizanidine, the systemic exposure (AUC) of tizanidine was 3.9 times greater in women using an oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol.

MANAGEMENT: Patients should be monitored for increased adverse effects of the CYP450 1A2 substrate during concomitant use with ethinyl estradiol. Product labeling for the specific CYP450 1A2 substrate should be consulted for additional recommendations.

MONITOR: Smoking cessation may lead to elevated plasma concentrations and enhanced pharmacologic effects of drugs that are substrates of CYP450 1A2 (and possibly CYP450 1A1) and/or certain drugs with a narrow therapeutic index (e.g., flecainide, pentazocine). One proposed mechanism is related to the loss of CYP450 1A2 and 1A1 induction by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in tobacco smoke; when smoking cessation agents are initiated and smoking stops, the metabolism of certain drugs may decrease leading to increased plasma concentrations. The mechanism by which smoking cessation affects narrow therapeutic index drugs that are not known substrates of CYP450 1A2 or 1A1 is unknown. The clinical significance of this interaction is unknown as clinical data are lacking.

MANAGEMENT: Until more information is available, caution is advisable if smoking cessation agents are used concomitantly with drugs that are substrates of CYP450 1A2 or 1A1 and/or those with a narrow therapeutic range. Patients receiving smoking cessation agents may require periodic dose adjustments and closer clinical and laboratory monitoring of medications that are substrates of CYP450 1A2 or 1A1.

Coadministration with grapefruit juice may increase the bioavailability of oral estrogens. The proposed mechanism is inhibition of CYP450 3A4-mediated first-pass metabolism in the gut wall induced by certain compounds present in grapefruits. In a small, randomized, crossover study, the administration of ethinyl estradiol with grapefruit juice (compared to herbal tea) increased peak plasma drug concentration (Cmax) by 37% and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) by 28%. Based on these findings, grapefruit juice is unlikely to affect the overall safety profile of ethinyl estradiol. However, as with other drug interactions involving grapefruit juice, the pharmacokinetic alterations are subject to a high degree of interpatient variability. Also, the effect on other estrogens has not been studied.

The central nervous system effects and blood levels of ethanol may be increased in patients taking oral contraceptives, although data are lacking and reports are contradictory. The mechanism may be due to enzyme inhibition. Consider counseling women about this interaction which is unpredictable.