Skip to main content

Penicillinase-Resistant Penicillins General Statement (Monograph)

Drug class: Penicillinase-resistant Penicillins
VA class: AM112

Introduction

Penicillinase-resistant penicillins are semisynthetic penicillin antibiotics that are resistant to staphylococcal penicillinases.6 7 9 10 11 15 16 18 168 224 260

Uses for Penicillinase-Resistant Penicillins General Statement

Penicillinase-resistant penicillins are used in the treatment of infections caused by, or suspected of being caused by, susceptible penicillinase-producing staphylococci.1 2 3 4 5 8 12 18 166 168 175 202 212 224 246 247 260 263 Although penicillinase-resistant penicillins have been effective when used in the treatment of infections caused by other susceptible gram-positive aerobic cocci (e.g., Streptococcus pneumoniae, S. pyogenes, nonpenicillinase-producing staphylococci), the drugs are less active than natural penicillins against these gram-positive bacteria in vitro on a weight basis and should not be used in the treatment of infections caused by organisms susceptible to penicillin G and penicillin V.1 2 3 5 12 88 166 168 170 173 224 260 Penicillinase-resistant penicillins have been used for perioperative prophylaxis [off-label]198 254 260 but are not considered drugs of choice for such prophylaxis.257 254

Prior to initiation of therapy with a penicillinase-resistant penicillin, appropriate specimens should be obtained for identification of the causative organism and in vitro susceptibility testing.1 2 3 4 5 224 A penicillinase-resistant penicillin may be used empirically for the treatment of any infection suspected of being caused by susceptible staphylococci, but the drug should be discontinued and appropriate anti-infective therapy substituted if the infection is found to be caused by an organism other than a penicillinase-producing staphylococci susceptible to penicillinase-resistant penicillins.1 2 3 5 202 224 263 If staphylococci resistant to penicillinase-resistant penicillins (oxacillin-resistant staphylococci; previously known as methicillin-resistant staphylococci) are prevalent in the hospital or community, empiric therapy of suspected staphylococcal infections should include vancomycin.8 37 188 189 202 247 263 (See Oxacillin-Resistant Staphylococcal Infections in Uses: Staphylococcal Infections.)

Penicillinase-resistant penicillins should not be used orally for the initial treatment of severe, life-threatening infections,1 2 3 4 5 166 170 224 including meningitis, but may be used as follow-up therapy after parenteral penicillinase-resistant penicillin therapy.2 3 166 170 194 202 224 263

Staphylococcal Infections

Penicillinase-resistant penicillins are the drugs of choice for the treatment of infections caused by susceptible penicillinase-producing staphylococci.8 12 166 168 170 202 246 247 260 263 The drugs have been effective when used in the treatment of upper and lower respiratory tract infections,10 18 88 260 263 skin and skin structure infections,10 18 88 269 bone and joint infections,10 18 54 83 88 168 175 190 213 215 260 263 urinary tract infections,18 88 meningitis,10 18 90 168 170 181 260 bacteremia,10 18 88 168 260 269 277 and endocarditis10 18 29 156 168 177 192 258 260 269 caused by susceptible penicillinase-producing staphylococci. Penicillinase-resistant penicillins also are used in the management of infections related to peripheral vascular and central venous catheters.247 270

Because the majority of clinical isolates of staphylococci, regardless of source, are resistant to natural penicillins,263 a penicillinase-resistant penicillin usually is indicated for initial treatment of infections suspected of being caused by staphylococci.202 247 263 If a staphylococcal infection fails to respond to therapy with a penicillinase-resistant penicillin although in vitro tests indicate that the causative organism is susceptible to the drugs, the presence of undrained abscesses or perivascular infections should be considered.169 202 Anti-infective therapy alone rarely is effective for staphylococcal infections in individuals with undrained abscesses or with infected foreign bodies; surgical intervention may be necessary.263 268 The possibility that the causative organism may be tolerant to penicillins29 30 39 106 191 202 or that the infection may be caused by oxacillin-resistant staphylococci also should be considered since routine in vitro susceptibility tests may not detect penicillin tolerance or resistance to penicillinase-resistant penicillins.29 30 33 39 106 182 (See Spectrum: In Vitro Susceptibility Testing.)

Many clinicians suggest that serum bactericidal titers (SBTs) be used to monitor the adequacy of penicillinase-resistant penicillin therapy in patients with staphylococcal endocarditis or osteomyelitis and to adjust dosage of the drugs.174 178 179 180 190 203 214 230 263 Although the value of SBTs has not been definitely established and there is a wide variation in SBTs depending on the method used, peak SBTs of 1:8 or greater in patients with staphylococcal endocarditis receiving a penicillinase-resistant penicillin generally have been associated with high cure rates.177 178 179 180 214 230 A peak SBT of 1:8 or greater also has been recommended when an oral regimen is used for the treatment of bone or joint infections;263 other clinicians suggest that SBTs in patients with osteomyelitis should be 1:16 or greater.190 193 214

Osteomyelitis

Because acute osteomyelitis, especially in children, frequently is caused by penicillinase-producing S. aureus,174 195 a penicillinase-resistant penicillin usually is included in the empiric regimen pending results of in vitro tests.174 190 195 211 213 263 269 In neonates, the most frequent causes of osteomyelitis are S. aureus, S. agalactiae (group B streptococci), and gram-negative bacilli (e.g., Escherichia coli),263 268 and empiric therapy with a penicillinase-resistant penicillin and a third generation cephalosporin (e.g., cefotaxime) provides coverage against these organisms.263 In older infants and children through 5 years of age, the principal pathogens usually are S. aureus, streptococci, and H. influenzae,263 268 and many clinicians recommend empiric therapy with cefuroxime or a third generation cephalosporin (e.g., ceftriaxone, cefotaxime).263 In adults and children older than 5 years of age, osteomyelitis usually is caused by S. aureus, and a penicillinase-resistant penicillin usually is recommended for empiric therapy in these age groups;263 268 however, if arthritis is present, other pathogens may be involved and a broad-spectrum anti-infective (e.g., cefuroxime, third generation cephalosporin) may be indicated unless gram-positive cocci are demonstrated in synovial fluid samples.263

Many clinicians recommend that acute osteomyelitis in adults or children caused by susceptible penicillinase-producing staphylococci be treated with a parenteral penicillinase-resistant penicillin for 3–8 weeks.169 190 202 263 268 Alternatively, some clinicians recommend that a parenteral penicillinase-resistant penicillin be used initially followed by an oral penicillinase-resistant penicillin.175 190 195 202 263 268 In several controlled studies in children with acute osteomyelitis, penicillinase-resistant penicillin therapy was effective when the drugs were administered parenterally for 5–28 days or until the patient was afebrile for 3 consecutive days, then orally for 3–6 weeks or until the total duration of parenteral and oral therapy was at least 6 weeks.175 190 193 195 214 269

For the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis caused by penicillinase-resistant staphylococci, many clinicians recommend treatment with a parenteral penicillinase-resistant penicillin given for at least 4–6 weeks followed by an oral penicillinase-resistant penicillin given for at least an additional 1–2 months.190 Chronic osteomyelitis also has been treated successfully with high dosages of oral dicloxacillin given for prolonged periods (6 months or longer) either alone or in conjunction with probenecid.83 190 215 260

Endocarditis

IV nafcillin or IV oxacillin is used for the treatment of endocarditis caused by susceptible strains of S. aureus or S. epidermidis and are the drugs of choice for the treatment of endocarditis caused by penicillin-resistant staphylococci.192 258

Because results of in vitro studies indicate that a β-lactam antibiotic used in conjunction with an aminoglycoside results in a more rapidly bactericidal action than the β-lactam antibiotic alone, some clinicians recommend that an aminoglycoside be used in conjunction with an IV penicillinase-resistant penicillin for the initial treatment of S. aureus endocarditis.180 192 258 However, penicillinase-resistant penicillins have been effective when used parenterally alone for 4–6 weeks in the treatment of endocarditis caused by susceptible staphylococci211 and the relative efficacy of concomitant therapy compared with penicillin therapy alone has not been definitely established.106 177 180 192 202 258 Although concomitant therapy with a penicillinase-resistant penicillin and an aminoglycoside may result in accelerated bacteriologic and clinical responses compared with therapy with a penicillinase-resistant penicillin alone, such therapy does not appear to improve survival or reduce valvular damage and may be associated with an increased incidence of adverse effects.177 192 Therefore, many clinicians recommend that treatment of staphylococcal endocarditis be initiated with concomitant therapy177 192 202 but that the aminoglycoside be discontinued after clearance of bacteremia (3–7 days) and the penicillinase-resistant penicillin continued alone for 4–6 weeks.106 177 192 Gentamicin is the aminoglycoside usually recommended for concomitant use with nafcillin or oxacillin for the treatment of staphylococcal endocarditis; however, if the strain is found to be resistant to gentamicin, another aminoglycoside should be substituted based on results of in vitro susceptibility testing.192 258

Endocarditis caused by S. lugdunensis tends to cause a more virulent form of endocarditis than other coagulase-negative staphylococci.259 Most experts recommend that endocarditis caused by S. lugdunensis be treated with standard anti-infective regimens based on in vitro susceptibility test results and that patients be monitored closely for periannular extension or extracardiac spread of the infection.192

Native Valve Endocarditis

For the treatment of native valve endocarditis caused by staphylococci susceptible to penicillinase-resistant penicillins, the American Heart Association (AHA) recommends that adults and pediatric patients receive a 4- to 6-week regimen of IV nafcillin or IV oxacillin given with or without gentamicin.192 258 The AHA states that, although the benefits of concomitant aminoglycoside therapy have not been clearly established in these infections, gentamicin may be given concomitantly for the first 3–5 days of the penicillinase-resistant penicillin regimen.192 258 In those very rare cases when native valve endocarditis is caused by staphylococci susceptible to penicillin (penicillin MIC 0.1 mcg/mL or less), the AHA states that adults may receive a 4–6-week regimen of penicillin G sodium instead of nafcillin or oxacillin.192

The AHA states that limited data suggest that a 2-week regimen of IV nafcillin or IV oxacillin given with an aminoglycoside may be effective in IV drug abusers who have right-sided endocarditis caused by susceptible S. aureus; however, this shorter regimen should not be used in IV drug abusers with evidence of metastatic infection or left-sided endocarditis (mitral or aortic murmur, systemic emboli or cutaneous stigmata, or echocardiographically demonstrated vegetations on mitral or aortic valves).192 In addition, it is unclear whether those with right-sided S. aureus endocarditis and echocardiographically demonstrated vegetations (tricuspid or pulmonic valve), underlying acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), or extensive pulmonary complications of right-sided endocarditis (lung abscess) are appropriate candidates for the 2-week regimen.192

For the treatment of native valve staphylococcal endocarditis in adults and pediatric patients with a history of penicillin hypersensitivity, the AHA recommends a regimen of IV cefazolin or other first generation cephalosporin (cephalosporins should be avoided in patients who have had an immediate-type hypersensitivity reaction to penicillins) given with or without IM or IV gentamicin during the first 3–5 days of therapy or, alternatively, a regimen of IV vancomycin.192 258

Native valve endocarditis caused by oxacillin-resistant staphylococci (previously known as methicillin-resistant staphylococci) usually is treated with a regimen of IV vancomycin.192 258

Endocarditis in the Presence of Prosthetic Valves or Materials

For the treatment of endocarditis caused by staphylococci susceptible to penicillinase-resistant penicillins in adults and pediatric patients with prosthetic valves or other prosthetic material, the AHA recommends a regimen of IV nafcillin or IV oxacillin given with oral rifampin for 6 weeks or longer and with IM or IV gentamicin given for the first 2 weeks.192 258 However, coagulase-negative staphylococci causing prosthetic valve endocarditis usually are resistant to penicillinase-resistant penicillins (especially when endocarditis develops within 1 year after surgery) and, unless results of in vitro testing indicate that the isolates are susceptible to penicillinase-resistant penicillins, coagulase-negative staphylococci involved in prosthetic valve endocarditis should be assumed to be oxacillin-resistant.192

For the treatment of adults and pediatric patients with prosthetic valves or other prosthetic materials who have endocarditis caused by staphylococci resistant to penicillinase-resistant penicillins, the AHA usually recommends a combination regimen of IV vancomycin and oral rifampin given for 6 weeks or longer with IM or IV gentamicin given concomitantly during the first 2 weeks of therapy.192

Infections Related to Intravascular Catheters

Penicillinase-resistant penicillins often are used for the empiric treatment of infections related to peripheral vascular and central venous catheters since these infections usually are caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci (e.g., S. epidermidis), S. aureus, aerobic gram-negative bacilli (e.g., Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas aeruginosa), or Candida albicans.247 270 278 The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), American College of Critical Care Medicine, and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America recommend that the empiric regimen be chosen based on the severity of the patient’s clinical disease, risk factors for infection, and the most likely pathogens associated with the specific intravascular device.270 Unless the hospital or area has a high incidence of oxacillin-resistant staphylococci, these experts recommend use of a penicillinase-resistant penicillin (nafcillin, oxacillin) for empiric therapy of catheter-related infections when S. aureus are suspected.270 If coagulase-negative staphylococci or oxacillin-resistant staphylococci are suspected, vancomycin should be used initially for empiric therapy but the regimen should be changed to a penicillinase-resistant penicillin if the causative organisms is found to be susceptible to the penicillins.270 In severely ill or immunocompromised patients who have suspected catheter-related bloodstream infections, a third or fourth generation cephalosporin (e.g., ceftazidime, cefepime) may be indicated to provide empiric coverage for gram-negative enteric bacilli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.270 Although IV therapy is indicated initially, an oral anti-infective regimen (e.g., oral ciprofloxacin, co-trimoxazole, linezolid) can be substituted once the patient’s condition stabilizes.270 It has been suggested that 10–14 days of anti-infective therapy may be sufficient for the treatment of uncomplicated catheter-related infections caused by S. aureus in immunocompetent patients without underlying valvular heart disease or an intravascular prosthetic device; however, 4–6 weeks of therapy may be necessary when there is persistent bacteremia after catheter removal or evidence of endocarditis or septic thrombosis and 6–8 weeks may be necessary when osteomyelitis is present.270 The recommendations of the IDSA, American College of Critical Care Medicine, and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America should be consulted for more specific information on management of intravascular catheter-related infections, including information on how to obtain diagnostic cultures, indications for catheter removal, and use of local anti-infective lock therapy when the catheter is not removed.270

Meningitis and Other CNS Infections

Nafcillin and oxacillin are used parenterally for the treatment of meningitis or ventriculitis caused by susceptible penicillinase-producing staphylococci.10 18 68 73 90 170 181 209 260 IV nafcillin is considered by many clinicians to be the preferred penicillinase-resistant penicillin for the treatment of CNS infections caused by susceptible penicillinase-producing staphylococci because of reportedly greater CSF penetration.68 73 90 170 181 260

Oxacillin-Resistant Staphylococcal Infections

Because oxacillin-resistant staphylococci (ORSA; previously known as methicillin-resistant staphylococci or MRSA) are being reported with increasing frequency (see Resistance: Oxacillin-Resistant Staphylococci), initial therapy for suspected staphylococcal infections should include vancomycin if oxacillin-resistant strains are prevalent in the community or hospital.8 37 171 176 189 202 210 246 247 263 Oxacillin-resistant S. aureus are an important cause of nosocomial infections, especially in patients who are seriously ill, and also have been reported with increasing frequency in community-acquired infections.183 189 247 263 265 281 Patients with lengthy hospitalizations,247 263 premature infants,247 263 280 and individuals with diabetes mellitus,189 peripheral vascular disease,189 or surgical or burn wounds183 189 263 279 are at particularly high risk of acquiring oxacillin-resistant S. aureus and these strains also have been reported frequently in patients with prosthetic valve endocarditis,185 intravascular catheters,210 247 278 infected CSF shunts,210 247 dermatologic disorders,281 renal dysfunction,281 or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection,281 and in granulocytopenic children with cancer.176 219 221 Infections caused by oxacillin-resistant S. aureus or S. epidermidis generally are treated with vancomycin alone37 40 169 171 172 176 184 185 188 189 202 219 221 246 247 263 or vancomycin in conjunction with rifampin184 185 188 202 246 and/or an aminoglycoside.185 188 202 246

Penicillin-Tolerant Staphylococcal Infections

Optimum anti-infective therapy for infections caused by penicillin-tolerant staphylococci has not been established.29 33 106 Because in vitro studies indicate that the bactericidal activity of aminoglycosides and β-lactam antibiotics may be additive or synergistic, some clinicians recommend that an aminoglycoside be used in conjunction with a penicillinase-resistant penicillin in the treatment of severe infections, especially endocarditis, caused by penicillin-tolerant penicillinase-producing staphylococci.33 106 However, the value of concomitant therapy in the treatment of infections caused by penicillin-tolerant staphylococci has not been definitely established.29 106 Results of some studies in patients with endocarditis caused by penicillin-tolerant staphylococci indicate that concomitant therapy with an aminoglycoside and a penicillinase-resistant penicillin generally was no more effective than the penicillinase-resistant penicillin alone;29 106 however, a shorter time to defervescence occurred in patients receiving concomitant therapy.106 177

Perioperative Prophylaxis

Penicillinase-resistant penicillins have been used for perioperative prophylaxis [off-label] to reduce the incidence of infections in patients undergoing certain surgical procedures that are associated with a high incidence of staphylococcal infections,173 198 202 218 220 254 260 but are not considered drugs of choice for such prophylaxis.257 254

Although IV cefazolin usually is the drug of choice for perioperative prophylaxis in patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures (e.g., craniotomy, CSF shunting),254 257 some clinicians suggest that IV nafcillin or IV oxacillin (a single 1-g dose given at induction of anesthesia) may be used as an alternative.254 Vancomycin is preferred in hospitals where staphylococci resistant to penicillinase-resistant penicillins frequently cause wound infection and is recommended for patients allergic to penicillins and cephalosporins.254 257

Nafcillin and oxacillin have been effective when used perioperatively to reduce the incidence of infection in patients undergoing cardiovascular173 198 216 220 or orthopedic surgery,173 198 217 including open heart surgery,198 216 total hip replacement,198 implantation of prosthetic material,198 or hip fracture repair.217 However, penicillinase-resistant penicillins are not generally recommended for perioperative prophylaxis in patients undergoing these procedures.254 257 Many clinicians currently recommend IV cefazolin or IV cefuroxime for perioperative prophylaxis in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery and IV cefazolin in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery; vancomycin is preferred in hospitals where staphylococci resistant to penicillinase-resistant penicillins frequently cause wound infection and is recommended for patients allergic to penicillins and cephalosporins.254 257

Penicillinase-Resistant Penicillins General Statement Dosage and Administration

Administration

Dicloxacillin sodium is administered orally.1 2 Nafcillin sodium3 238 and oxacillin sodium4 5 235 239 are administered by IM injection or by slow IV injection or infusion.

In general, orally administered penicillinase-resistant penicillins should not be used for the initial treatment of severe infections1 2 3 4 5 224 and should not be relied on in patients with nausea, vomiting, gastric dilation, cardiospasm, or intestinal hypermotility.1 2 224 247

Since food interferes with GI absorption of penicillinase-resistant penicillins,10 18 45 48 49 62 72 91 224 the drugs should be administered orally at least 1 hour before or 2 hours after meals.1 2 10 224

Dosage

Dosage adjustments generally are unnecessary when dicloxacillin, nafcillin, or oxacillin is used in patients with renal impairment;84 97 168 206 207 222 223 however, some clinicians suggest that the lower range of the usual dosage of oxacillin be used in these patients.64 87 207 Dosage of nafcillin may need to be adjusted if the drug is used in patients with both impaired renal function and impaired hepatic function.238

Cautions for Penicillinase-Resistant Penicillins General Statement

As with other penicillins, hypersensitivity reactions are among the most frequent adverse reactions to penicillinase-resistant penicillins.18 111 224 The frequency and severity of adverse effects generally are similar among the penicillinase-resistant penicillins,109 224 although hepatotoxicity has been reported most frequently in patients receiving IV oxacillin113 114 116 117 118 224 and adverse renal effects have been reported most frequently in patients receiving IV methicillin (no longer commercially available in the US).7 18 109 134 208 224

Sensitivity Reactions

Hypersensitivity reactions reported with penicillinase-resistant penicillins are similar to those reported with other penicillins;18 109 224 however, severe hypersensitivity reactions have been reported less frequently with penicillinase-resistant penicillins than with natural penicillins.18 Hypersensitivity reactions reported with penicillinase-resistant penicillins include rash (morbilliform, maculopapular, urticarial, or erythematous),1 2 3 4 5 88 109 156 234 fever,3 4 5 18 88 109 156 eosinophilia,1 2 3 5 18 109 111 156 pruritus,1 2 3 5 234 and serum sickness-like reactions3 4 109 with fever, chills, and myalgia.109 Eosinophilia reportedly occurs in 5–38% of patients receiving a penicillinase-resistant penicillin18 109 111 and fever or rash reportedly occurs in 2–6% of patients receiving one of these drugs.18

Acute hemolytic anemia has been reported in one patient who received oral dicloxacillin in conjunction with IV nafcillin;154 however, it is not clear whether this was a hypersensitivity reaction to the drugs since the direct antiglobulin test result in this patient was negative.154

Anaphylaxis has been reported rarely with penicillinase-resistant penicillins.1 3 18 224 If a severe hypersensitivity reaction occurs during therapy with a penicillinase-resistant penicillin, the drug should be discontinued and the patient given appropriate treatment (e.g., epinephrine, corticosteroids, maintenance of an adequate airway, oxygen) as indicated.1 2 3 4 5 224

Hematologic Effects

In addition to eosinophilia and hemolytic anemia (see Cautions: Sensitivity Reactions), other adverse hematologic effects including transient neutropenia,2 3 4 5 79 109 111 138 139 140 141 145 146 147 148 186 224 260 leukopenia,5 136 137 141 granulocytopenia,3 4 136 139 141 143 and thrombocytopenia3 4 5 142 have occurred rarely with penicillinase-resistant penicillins. Agranulocytosis also has been reported rarely with IV nafcillin2 141 144 224 and oxacillin.2 4 260

Although adverse hematologic effects have been reported most frequently in patients receiving high dosages of the drugs parenterally,136 139 140 141 146 147 these reactions have occurred following oral administration.137 140 In most reported cases, leukopenia or neutropenia was evident only after 10 or more days of therapy with a penicillinase-resistant penicillin136 139 140 141 145 146 and resolved 2–7 days following discontinuance of the drug.140 141 145 146 186 In some cases, leukopenia and neutropenia appeared to be hypersensitivity reactions to the drugs since they had a rapid onset after initiation of therapy (within 48 hours) and recurred with subsequent penicillin therapy.61 140 141 142 148 186 In other reported cases, these adverse hematologic effects appeared to result from a dose-related toxic effect on the bone marrow and did not always recur when therapy was initiated with lower dosages of another penicillin.138 139 141 146 147

Prolonged bleeding time, which appeared to result from platelet dysfunction, has been reported rarely with IV nafcillin.135

GI Effects

Some of the most frequent adverse reactions to orally administered penicillinase-resistant penicillins are GI effects224 including nausea,1 2 3 5 10 224 vomiting,1 2 3 5 10 224 260 epigastric distress,1 2 10 88 loose stools,1 2 10 diarrhea,2 5 83 88 224 260 and flatulence.1 2 10 224 These effects rarely are severe enough to require discontinuance of the drugs.10 Black or hairy tongue2 3 5 224 and oral lesions including glossitis3 and stomatitis2 3 224 also have been reported with penicillinase-resistant penicillins.

Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea and colitis (also known as antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis) has been reported rarely with penicillinase-resistant penicillins;18 238 260 C. difficile has been isolated in feces of several children who developed diarrhea while receiving oral dicloxacillin or oral oxacillin (no longer commercially available in the US)149 260 and also has been isolated from patients receiving IV oxacillin.260 Mild cases of colitis may respond to discontinuance of the penicillinase-resistant penicillin alone, but management of moderate to severe cases should include treatment with fluid, electrolyte, protein supplementation, and appropriate anti-infective therapy (e.g., oral metronidazole, oral vancomycin) as indicated.238 248 249 250 251 252

Administration of oral dicloxacillin has rarely resulted in acute hemorrhagic colitis with severe abdominal pain and GI bleeding, but without evidence of C. difficile-associated diarrhea and colitis.152 187

Renal Effects

Acute Interstitial Nephritis

Acute interstitial nephritis, manifested by fever, rash, eosinophilia, macroscopic or microscopic hematuria, azotemia, dysuria, oliguria, proteinuria, pyuria, cylindruria, and eosinophiluria, occurs occasionally with methicillin (no longer commercially available in the US).109 110 123 127 130 131 132 134 208 224 The onset of symptoms varies from 5 days to 5 weeks after initiation of therapy with the drug;123 130 131 132 134 however, renal function can deteriorate rapidly127 131 and failure to recognize the condition may lead to progressive renal failure and death.127 Although azotemia has been reported to persist for several months in some patients130 and permanent renal impairment has been reported rarely,129 interstitial nephritis reported with methicillin therapy generally is reversible following discontinuance of the drug.7 18 61 109 110 123 65 130 131 132 208 224 Interstitial nephritis generally recurs if methicillin is readministered to a patient who developed the adverse effect while receiving the drug previously.119 123 124 128 130 134 In addition, administration of ampicillin, oxacillin, or nafcillin to patients who developed acute interstitial nephritis while receiving methicillin also has resulted in recurrence of the nephritis.119 124 208 260 Administration of corticosteroids has been reported to hasten recovery from methicillin-induced interstitial nephritis in some cases;126 127 134 208 260 however, there are no controlled studies to date that demonstrate that corticosteroids have an effect on resolution of the nephritis.127 134 208

Acute interstitial nephritis has been reported more frequently with methicillin than with currently available penicillins.4 7 18 122 134 208 224 260 Acute interstitial nephritis has been reported in up to 17% of patients receiving IV methicillin,65 most frequently in patients receiving prolonged therapy or methicillin dosages of more than 200 mg/kg daily.130 260 In one study, hematuria occurred in 4–8% of children receiving IV methicillin in dosages of 170–380 mg/kg daily.110 Acute interstitial nephritis also has been reported rarely with IV nafcillin119 128 208 224 and IV oxacillin.126 In addition, acute interstitial nephritis has been reported rarely with other penicillins, including penicillin G,132 162 amoxicillin,208 ampicillin,61 165 208 and carbenicillin,19 125 133 208

Acute interstitial nephritis appears to be a hypersensitivity reaction to penicillins;123 127 129 130 131 134 208 260 however, several possible immunologic mechanisms have been identified.123 126 127 129 131 134 208 The reaction may be mediated by IgG and IgM antibodies specific for the penicilloyl hapten group of the drugs;126 the penicilloyl hapten of methicillin appears to bind to renal structural proteins in the tubular basement membrane which may stimulate an immune response to the antigen-protein complex.126 131 208 260 In addition, circulating antibodies to tubular basement membrane have been detected in a few patients who developed interstitial nephritis during methicillin therapy.123 130 131 Renal biopsy generally indicates severe interstitial disease with edema and a mononuclear cell infiltrate in the tubules;123 132 134 208 the glomeruli are usually normal.132 134 208

Other Adverse Renal Effects

Hypokalemia with excessive urinary loss of potassium has been reported rarely in patients receiving nafcillin in dosages of 200–300 mg/kg daily;120 121 260 in several cases, the hypokalemia resolved when dosage of the drug was reduced to 100–150 mg/kg.120 Although it has been suggested that hypokalemia during penicillin therapy may result from redistribution of potassium within the body,163 hypokalemia appears to be related to the fact that penicillins act as nonabsorbable anions in the distal renal tubules and therefore promote urinary loss of potassium.121

Hepatic Effects

Hepatic dysfunction resembling hepatitis or intrahepatic cholestasis occurs occasionally during therapy with IV oxacillin, especially when high dosage (e.g., 12 g or more daily) is used.113 114 116 117 118 224 234 236 237 260 Hepatotoxicity is manifested by elevations in serum concentrations of alkaline phosphatase,113 117 234 236 AST (SGOT),2 113 114 115 117 118 224 234 236 237 ALT (SGPT),114 115 117 118 234 236 237 and LDH114 115 234 and may be associated with concomitant fever,2 113 114 116 118 224 234 anorexia,113 116 234 nausea,2 113 114 116 118 224 234 vomiting,2 113 114 118 224 234 hepatomegaly,114 eosinophilia,113 114 116 and rash.114 115 If hepatotoxicity occurs during oxacillin therapy, elevations in serum liver enzyme concentrations are generally detectable 2–24 days after initiation of therapy117 271 and effects are generally reversible following discontinuance of the drug.113 114 115 117 234 236 260 In several reported cases, hepatotoxicity resolved and did not recur when therapy was changed to nafcillin.112 115 However, elevations in serum aminotransferase concentrations persisted in at least one patient following discontinuance of oxacillin and initiation of nafcillin therapy.234 It has been suggested that in most reported cases, hepatic dysfunction during oxacillin therapy was the result of a hypersensitivity reaction to the drug.113 114 115 118 234 However, some clinicians suggest that hepatotoxicity may result from a direct, dose-related toxic effect of the drug, since it appears to occur more commonly in patients receiving relatively high dosages of oxacillin.234 236 237 260 Limited evidence suggests that patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection may be at greater risk of developing hepatoxicity than other patients.245 260

Although the clinical importance is unclear, asymptomatic and transient increases in serum concentrations of alkaline phosphatase,109 112 234 AST,1 2 109 111 and ALT109 111 112 234 have been reported occasionally with oral dicloxacillin1 2 and parenteral therapy nafcillin.109 111 234

Nervous System Effects

Adverse nervous system effects similar to those reported with penicillin G have been reported rarely with penicillinase-resistant penicillins (e.g., oxacillin),4 153 260 especially when large dosages were administered IV to patients with impaired renal function.153 224 Seizures and clonus occurred in one patient with impaired renal function following IV administration of 12 g of oxacillin daily.153 Neurotoxicity in this patient appeared to be associated with high CSF concentrations of oxacillin since CSF concentrations of the drug were 70 mcg/mL at the time of seizures and 6 mcg/mL 48 hours later when seizures had subsided.153

Local Reactions

IV administration of nafcillin3 79 150 or oxacillin occasionally results in phlebitis79 or thrombophlebitis,3 4 5 224 especially when the drugs are administered to geriatric patients.3 4 5 224 Extravasation of nafcillin can cause potentially severe chemical irritation of perivascular tissues, possibly resulting in ulceration, tissue necrosis, sloughing (including full-thickness skin loss), and gangrene;150 233 260 occasionally, surgical debridement and skin grafting have been necessary,150 233 260 including in several infants and children.150 233 To reduce the risk of thrombophlebitis and other local reactions, the manufacturers suggest that IV nafcillin therapy be used only for short periods of time (24–48 hours) whenever possible,3 and at recommended concentrations. If the patient complains of pain during IV infusion of nafcillin, the infusion should be stopped immediately and the patient evaluated for possible thrombophlebitis or perivascular extravasation. If extravasation is present, some clinicians suggest that local injury can be minimized by prompt infiltration of hyaluronidase at the extravasated site.233 260

Sterile abscesses at the injection site have occurred rarely following IM administration of penicillinase-resistant penicillins.

Precautions and Contraindications

Dicloxacillin,1 2 nafcillin,3 224 and oxacillin4 5 224 are contraindicated in patients who are hypersensitive to any penicillin.

Prior to initiation of therapy with a penicillinase-resistant penicillin, careful inquiry should be made concerning previous hypersensitivity reactions to penicillins, cephalosporins, or other drugs.1 2 3 4 5 224 There is clinical and laboratory evidence of partial cross-allergenicity among penicillins and other β-lactam antibiotics including cephalosporins and cephamycins.1 2 3 4 5 108 155 161 Although it has not been proven that allergic reactions to antibiotics are more frequent in atopic individuals,164 the manufacturers state that penicillinase-resistant penicillins should be used with caution in patients with a history of allergy, particularly to drugs.1 2 3 4 5 224

Renal, hepatic, and hematologic systems should be evaluated periodically during prolonged therapy with a penicillinase-resistant penicillin.1 2 3 4 5 111 166 224 Because adverse hematologic effects have occurred during therapy with penicillinase-resistant penicillins (see Cautions: Hematologic Effects), total and differential white blood cell (WBC) counts should be performed prior to initiation of therapy with the drugs and 1–3 times weekly during therapy.2 4 5 139 140 141 144 146 166 224 Urinalysis should be performed and serum creatinine and BUN concentrations should be determined prior to and periodically during penicillinase-resistant penicillin therapy.2 4 5 166 224 AST (SGOT) and ALT (SGPT) should also be determined periodically during therapy to monitor for hepatotoxicity.2 4 5 224

Prolonged use of penicillinase-resistant penicillins may result in overgrowth of nonsusceptible organisms,1 2 3 4 5 8 88 224 including fungi8 or gram-negative bacteria88 such as Pseudomonas.8 88 Careful observation of the patient during therapy with a penicillinase-resistant penicillin is essential.1 2 3 4 5 If suprainfection or superinfection occurs, the drug should be discontinued and appropriate therapy instituted.1 2 3 4 5 224

Pediatric Precautions

Penicillinase-resistant penicillins should be used with caution in neonates since elimination of penicillins is delayed in this age group.2 3 4 5 224 When penicillinase-resistant penicillins are administered to neonates, serum concentrations of the drugs should be monitored and appropriate reductions in dosage and frequency of administration made when indicated;2 3 4 5 224 organ systems should also be evaluated frequently.2 4 5 224

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity

It is not known if penicillinase-resistant penicillins are mutagenic or carcinogenic in humans.2 4 224

Pregnancy, Fertility, and Lactation

Pregnancy

Safe use of dicloxacillin,1 2 224 nafcillin,3 224 or oxacillin4 5 224 during pregnancy has not been definitely established. Reproduction studies in mice, rats, and rabbits using penicillinase-resistant penicillins have not revealed evidence of harm to the fetus.2 3 4 224 Clinical experience with use of penicillins during pregnancy in humans has not revealed evidence of adverse effects on the fetus.4 224 However, there are no adequate and controlled studies in pregnant women, and penicillinase-resistant penicillins should be used during pregnancy only when clearly needed.2 4 224

Fertility

Reproduction studies in mice, rats, and rabbits using penicillinase-resistant penicillins have not revealed evidence of impaired fertility.2 3 4 224

Lactation

Because dicloxacillin232 and oxacillin4 5 10 100 are distributed into milk, penicillinase-resistant penicillins should be used with caution in nursing women.2 4 224

Drug Interactions

For further information on these and other drug interactions reported with penicillins, see Drug Interactions in the Natural Penicillins General Statement 8:12.16.04. Although not all drug interactions reported with other penicillins have been reported with penicillinase-resistant penicillins, the fact that some of these interactions could occur with the drugs should be considered.

Aminoglycosides

Synergism with Aminoglycosides

In vitro studies indicate that a synergistic bactericidal effect can occur against penicillinase-producing and nonpenicillinase-producing S. aureus susceptible to penicillinase-resistant penicillins when nafcillin or oxacillin is used in conjunction with an aminoglycoside (e.g., gentamicin, tobramycin).21 50 260

Although the clinical importance is unclear, in vitro synergism has also been reported against some strains of oxacillin-resistant S. aureus (previously known as methicillin-resistant S. aureus) when high concentrations of nafcillin or oxacillin were used in conjunction with amikacin, gentamicin, or kanamycin.21 51

Incompatibility with Aminoglycosides

Penicillinase-resistant penicillins, like other penicillins, are physically and/or chemically incompatible with aminoglycosides and can inactivate the drugs in vitro.14 21 61 If concomitant therapy is indicated, in vitro mixing of penicillinase-resistant penicillins and aminoglycosides should be avoided and the drugs should be administered separately.14 61 Penicillinase-resistant penicillins can also inactivate aminoglycosides in vitro in serum samples obtained from patients receiving concomitant therapy with the drugs.197 This could adversely affect results of serum aminoglycoside assays performed on the serum samples.197 (See Laboratory Test Interferences: Serum Aminoglycoside Assays.)

Cyclosporine

Concomitant administration of nafcillin and cyclosporine can result in decreased cyclosporine concentrations.238 243 244 .261 In one patient receiving cyclosporine concomitantly with nafcillin, serum concentrations of cyclosporine decreased to subtherapeutic levels during 2 separate courses of therapy.238 243 244 It has been suggested that nafcillin may increase hepatic metabolism of cyclosporine probably by induction of hepatic microsomal enzymes resulting in decreased serum concentrations of cyclosporine.238 243 244 The manufacturer of nafcillin suggests that cyclosporine concentrations should be monitored if nafcillin is used concomitantly.238 Some clinicians suggest that an alternative anti-infective be used in patients receiving cyclosporine.261

Probenecid

Oral probenecid administered shortly before or simultaneously with penicillinase-resistant penicillins slows the rate of renal tubular secretion of the penicillins and produces higher and prolonged serum concentrations of the drugs.1 2 217 63 224 235 260 In one study, probenecid decreased the volume of distribution of nafcillin by about 20%.63

Rifampin

In vitro studies indicate that antagonism can occur when nafcillin or oxacillin is used in conjunction with rifampin against S. aureus.78 228 However, antagonism between the drugs appears to be dose-dependent and occurs only when high concentrations of the penicillin are present.228 229 In vitro studies indicate that when low concentrations of oxacillin are present, indifference or synergism generally occurs.228 229 Although some clinicians suggest that rifampin not be used concomitantly with penicillins,67 concomitant use of oxacillin and rifampin appears to delay or prevent the emergence of rifampin-resistant strains of S. aureus and the drugs have been used concomitantly with no apparent decrease in activity.228 229

Tetracyclines

Tetracyclines may antagonize the bactericidal effects of penicillins, including penicillinase-resistant penicillins, and concomitant administration of the drugs should be avoided.1 2 235 238

Warfarin

Concomitant administration of nafcillin201 238 240 241 242 or dicloxacillin262 and warfarin has been reported to decrease the hypoprothrombinemic effect of the anticoagulant. In several patients (some of whom were stabilized on warfarin), IV nafcillin (usually given in high dosages of 9–12 g daily) decreased the hypoprothrombinemic effect of the anticoagulant. 201 238 240 241 242 It has been suggested that nafcillin may decrease the serum half-life of warfarin by increasing metabolism of the anticoagulant, probably by induction of hepatic microsomal enzymes.201 240 241 242 Prothrombin time should be monitored carefully during concomitant administration of a penicillinase-resistant penicillin and a coumarin anticoagulant201 238 240 241 and for several weeks after discontinuance of the penicillin,241 242 since in some patients prothrombin time did not return to pretreatment levels until about 30 days after discontinuance of nafcillin.238 241 242 Dosage of the anticoagulant should be adjusted as required when a penicillinase-resistant penicillin is administered to a patient receiving a coumarin anticoagulant.201 238 240 241 242

Laboratory Test Interferences

For more complete information on these and other laboratory test interferences reported with penicillins, see Laboratory Test Interferences in the Natural Penicillins General Statement 8:12.16.04. Although not all laboratory test interferences reported with other penicillins have been reported with penicillinase-resistant penicillins, the possibility that these interferences could occur with the drugs should be considered.

Tests for Urinary and Serum Proteins

Like other penicillins, penicillinase-resistant penicillins interfere with or cause false-positive results in a variety of test methods used to determine urinary or serum proteins.120 157 158 159 160 260 238 Studies using oxacillin158 and nafcillin120 158 159 160 indicate that the drugs cause false-positive or falsely elevated results in turbidimetric methods for urinary and serum proteins that use sulfosalicylic acid or trichloroacetic acid. Nafcillin also interferes with tests for urinary protein that use the biuret reagent159 and can cause slightly increased urinary protein concentrations when the Coomassie brilliant blue method is used.159 Nafcillin does not appear to interfere with tests for urinary protein that use bromphenol-blue (Albustix, Albutest).120

Serum Aminoglycoside Assays

Because penicillinase-resistant penicillins inactivate aminoglycosides in vitro (see Drug Interactions: Aminoglycosides), presence of the drugs in serum samples to be assayed for aminoglycoside concentrations may result in falsely decreased results.197 .

Mechanism of Action

Penicillinase-resistant penicillins have a mechanism of action similar to that of other penicillins.18 20 260

Spectrum

The commercially available penicillinase-resistant penicillins (dicloxacillin, nafcillin, oxacillin) have similar spectra of activity.45 46 47 260 Penicillinase-resistant penicillins are active in vitro against many gram-positive aerobic cocci.9 10 11 15 18 48 260 Because penicillinase-resistant penicillins are not inactivated by most staphylococcal penicillinases, the drugs are active against many penicillinase-producing strains of Staphylococcus aureus and S. epidermidis that are resistant to other commercially available penicillins.15 18 42 45 46 47 48 260 Penicillinase-resistant penicillins also are active in vitro against a few gram-positive aerobic and anaerobic bacilli and some gram-negative cocci; however, the drugs generally are inactive against gram-negative aerobic and anaerobic bacilli.15 18 21 45 48 Penicillinase-resistant penicillins are inactive against mycobacteria, Mycoplasma, Rickettsia, fungi, and viruses.260

In Vitro Susceptibility Testing

Results of in vitro susceptibility tests with penicillinase-resistant penicillins may be affected by inoculum size, period of incubation, pH of the media, or the presence of human serum.45 48 49 199 200 260

Detection of oxacillin-resistant staphylococci (ORSA; previously known as methicillin-resistant staphylococci or MRSA) generally requires use of specialized testing procedures and culture media.2 189 210 255 256 260 267 In vitro, the expression of resistance to penicillinase-resistant penicillins is influenced by temperature, pH, and sodium chloride concentration of the media.210 260 To optimize detection of oxacillin-resistant staphylococci in dilution susceptibility testing, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI; formerly National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards [NCCLS]) recommends addition of 2% sodium chloride to the broth or agar dilution media, use of the direct method of colony suspension (equivalent to a 0.5 McFarland standard), and incubation for 24 hours at 35°C.255 CLSI states that oxacillin is the preferred derivative for in vitro testing since the drug is more resistant to degradation during storage than other penicillinase-resistant penicillins and more likely to detect heteroresistant staphylococci.255 256

Standard in vitro susceptibility tests cannot detect tolerance to penicillinase-resistant penicillins because the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of tolerant and nontolerant strains are generally similar and these tests do not directly measure bactericidal activity.22 23 25 26 28 33 36 182 This fact should be considered when evaluating results of in vitro susceptibility tests.22 23 28 36 For information on tolerance, see Resistance: Tolerance.

Disk Diffusion Tests

When the disk-diffusion procedure is used to test in vitro susceptibility to penicillinase-resistant penicillins, a disk containing 1 mcg of oxacillin may be used and results can be applied to all currently available penicillinase-resistant penicillins (dicloxacillin, nafcillin, oxacillin).256 CLSI states that an oxacillin disk is preferred since it is more resistant to degradation in storage and because it is more likely to detect heteroresistant staphylococci.256 Although a disk containing 1 mcg of nafcillin may be used to determine susceptibility of S. aureus, interpretive criteria have not been established for testing other staphylococci using a nafcillin disk.256

When disk-diffusion susceptibility testing is performed according to CLSI standardized procedures using the 1-mcg oxacillin disk or the 1-mcg nafcillin disk, S. aureus with growth inhibition zones of 13 mm or greater are susceptible to penicillinase-resistant penicillins, those with zones of 11–12 mm have intermediate susceptibility, and those with zones of 10 mm or less are resistant to the drugs.256 S. aureus with intermediate susceptibility to penicillinase-resistant penicillins should be tested further using the oxacillin-salt agar screening test.256

When the disk-diffusion procedure is performed according to CLSI standardized procedures using the 1-mcg oxacillin disk, coagulase-negative staphylococci with growth inhibition zones of 18 mm or greater are susceptible to penicillinase-resistant penicillins and those with zones of 17 mm or less are resistant to the drugs.256 Interpretive criteria for coagulase-negative staphylococci correlate with the presence or absence of the mecA gene that encodes resistance to penicillinase-resistant penicillins in S. epidermidis.256 These criteria may overcall resistance for other coagulase-negative staphylococci (e.g., S. lugdunensis, S. saprophyticus).256 For serious infections with coagulase-negative staphylococci other than S. epidermidis, testing for mecA or the protein expressed by mecA (penicillin-binding protein 2a [PBP 2a]) may be appropriate for strains having zone diameters in the intermediate or resistant range.256 Isolates that are shown to carry mecA or produce PBP 2a should be reported as oxacillin resistant.256

Dilution Susceptibility Tests

When dilution susceptibility testing (agar or broth dilution) is performed according to CLSI standardized procedures using oxacillin or nafcillin, S. aureus with MICs of 2 mcg/mL or less are susceptible to penicillinase-resistant penicillins and those with MICs of 4 mcg/mL or greater are resistant to the drugs.255

When dilution susceptibility testing is performed according to CLSI standardized procedures using oxacillin, coagulase-negative staphylococci with MICs of 0.25 mcg/mL or less are susceptible to penicillinase-resistant penicillins and those with MICS of 0.5 mcg/mL or greater are resistant to the drugs.255 Interpretive criteria for coagulase-negative staphylococci correlate with the presence or absence of the mecA gene that encodes resistance to penicillinase-resistant penicillins in S. epidermidis.255 These criteria may overcall resistance for other coagulase-negative staphylococci (e.g., S. lugdunensis, S. saprophyticus).255 For serious infections with coagulase-negative staphylococci other than S. epidermidis, testing for mecA or PBP 2a may be appropriate for strains having MICs of 0.5–2 mcg/mL.255 Staphylococcal isolates that are shown to carry mecA or that produce PBP 2a should be reported as oxacillin resistant.255

Gram-Positive Aerobic Bacteria

Gram-Positive Aerobic Cocci

Penicillinase-resistant penicillins are active in vitro against many gram-positive aerobic cocci including penicillinase-producing and nonpenicillinase-producing strains of S. aureus18 21 42 46 47 48 260 and S. epidermidis.18 21 42 47 260 267 In addition to S. epidermidis, the drugs are active in vitro against some other coagulase-negative staphylococci including some strains of S. haemolyticus,196 267 S. hominis,196 267 S. lugdunensis,264 S. saprophyticus196 S. schleiferi,267 S. simulans,196 267 and S. warneri.196 267 However, many strains of coagulase-negative staphylococci are resistant to penicillinase-resistant penicillins. 267

Penicillinase-resistant penicillins are active in vitro against Streptococcus pyogenes (group A β-hemolytic streptococci), S. agalactiae (group B streptococci), groups C and G streptococci,21 42 46 47 48 49 260 S. pneumoniae,18 21 42 45 46 47 48 49 260 and some viridans streptococci.18 21 42 48 Enterococci, including E. faecalis (formerly S. faecalis), usually are resistant to the drugs.9 18 21 47 48 260

Nonpenicillinase-producing strains of S. aureus usually are inhibited in vitro by dicloxacillin,10 18 46 nafcillin,10 18 21 48 or oxacillin10 18 21 concentrations of 0.1–0.8 mcg/mL and penicillinase-producing strains of S. aureus usually are inhibited by concentrations of 0.3–1.6 mcg/mL.10 18 21 45 46 47 48 Susceptible strains of S. epidermidis usually are inhibited by oxacillin concentrations of 0.125 mcg/mL or less.267

With the exception of penicillinase-producing staphylococci, penicillinase-resistant penicillins generally are less active in vitro on a weight basis than natural penicillins against susceptible gram-positive cocci.6 15 18 45 260 The MIC90 (minimum inhibitory concentration of the drug at which 90% of strains tested are inhibited) of dicloxacillin,18 47 nafcillin,18 47 or oxacillin21 42 reported for most susceptible S. pneumoniae and groups A, B, C, and G streptococci is 0.1–0.4 mcg/mL. Viridans streptococci generally are inhibited in vitro by penicillinase-resistant penicillin concentrations of 0.1–1.6 mcg/mL.10 18 42 48

Gram-Positive Aerobic Bacilli

Penicillinase-resistant penicillins are active in vitro against a few gram-positive aerobic bacilli.21 Corynebacterium diphtheriae reportedly is inhibited in vitro by oxacillin concentrations of 1.6–3.1 mcg/mL.21 In vitro, oxacillin concentrations of 0.01–0.03 mcg/mL inhibit some strains of Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae.21

Gram-Negative Aerobic Bacteria

Neisseria

Although penicillinase-resistant penicillins generally are less active in vitro on a weight basis than natural penicillins against gram-negative aerobic cocci, the drugs are active in vitro against some strains of Neisseria meningitidis10 11 15 18 21 45 48 204 and N. gonorrhoeae.10 11 18 21 41 45 48 204

N. meningitidis generally requires dicloxacillin,18 nafcillin,10 18 21 48 or oxacillin10 18 21 concentrations of 0.5–8 mcg/mL for in vitro inhibition.10 18 21 45 48 Penicillinase-producing and nonpenicillinase-producing strains of N. gonorrhoeae generally are inhibited in vitro by penicillinase-resistant penicillin concentrations of 1.6–12.5 mcg/mL.10 18 21 41 45 48 204

Haemophilus

Some strains of Haemophilus influenzae reportedly are inhibited in vitro by nafcillin48 concentrations of 1–12.5 mcg/mL; however, most strains of the organism are resistant to penicillinase-resistant penicillins.10 18 45

Other Gram-Negative Aerobes

Pasteurella multocida, an organism that can be aerobic or facultatively anaerobic, reportedly is inhibited in vitro by dicloxacillin, nafcillin, or oxacillin concentrations of 3.1–12.5 mcg/mL.43

Penicillinase-resistant penicillins generally are inactive against other gram-negative aerobic bacilli including Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas.9 10 15 18 21 45 48

Anaerobic Bacteria

Some gram-positive anaerobic bacteria, including some strains of Actinomyces,21 Clostridium,18 Peptococcus,18 and Peptostreptococcus,18 are inhibited in vitro by penicillinase-resistant penicillins; however, penicillinase-resistant penicillins are less active against these organisms than other penicillins.21 Gram-negative anaerobic bacteria, including Bacteroides, generally are resistant to penicillinase-resistant penicillins.18 21

Spirochetes

Penicillinase-resistant penicillins have some activity against spirochetes, although less than that of the natural penicillins.15

Resistance

Complete cross-resistance generally occurs among penicillinase-resistant penicillins.49 168 260 Minor differences in the degree of resistance to the various penicillinase-resistant penicillins have been reported in results of in vitro susceptibility tests; however, resistance to any penicillinase-resistant penicillin should be interpreted as resistance to all currently available penicillinase-resistant penicillins.1 2 3 4 5 224

Oxacillin-Resistant Staphylococci

Although in the past both penicillinase-producing and nonpenicillinase-producing staphylococci generally were susceptible to penicillinase-resistant penicillins, staphylococci resistant to penicillinase-resistant penicillins have been reported with increasing frequency.11 18 37 40 183 210 247 265 281 Historically, staphylococci resistant to penicillinase-resistant penicillins have been referred to as methicillin-resistant staphylococci and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus have been referred to as MRSA; however, methicillin is no longer commercially available in the US and oxacillin has become the preferred drug for testing in vitro susceptibility to penicillinase-resistant penicillins.255 256 Therefore, although the prior terminology may still be used, staphylococci resistant to penicillinase-resistant penicillins are now being referred to as oxacillin-resistant staphylococci and oxacillin-resistant S. aureus are being referred to as ORSA.255 256

In the US, up to 50% of clinical isolates of S. aureus11 18 37 40 183 189 265 281 and up to 80% of clinical isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci7 10 11 12 27 176 186 210 265 are oxacillin-resistant. Approximately 63–79% of S. epidermidis isolates from patients with prosthetic valve endocarditis or infected CNS shunts reportedly are oxacillin-resistant.185 210 Data obtained from some US hospitals between 1998–1999 indicated that about 35% of clinical isolates of S. aureus from hospitalized patients and about 23% from outpatients were oxacillin-resistant strains and 64–74% of coagulase-negative staphylococci from hospitalized patients and about 44% from outpatients were oxacillin-resistant strains.265 Surveillance data from 33 US hospitals during 2000 indicate that 45.7% of S. aureus isolates obtained from hospitalized patients and 28.9% of isolates obtained from outpatients were resistant to penicillinase-resistant penicillins.281

Resistance to penicillinase-resistant penicillins is intrinsic and usually is mediated by the presence of the mecA gene that encodes a specific penicillin-binding protein (PBP 2a) that has a low affinity for and is not inhibited by β-lactam antibiotics.10 18 34 167 189 266 269 Resistant to penicillinase-resistant penicillins may also occur as the result of penicillinase production or modification of existing PBPs.10 18 34 167 189 266 269

Isolates of oxacillin-resistant staphylococci, especially coagulase-negative staphylococci, generally are heterogeneous and only a small portion of the cells may demonstrate resistance in vitro.11 210 260 266 267 269 Therefore detection of oxacillin resistance is complex and resistant isolates may not always be detected by routine in vitro susceptibility testing.210 267 (See Spectrum: In Vitro Susceptibility Testing.)

In addition to being cross-resistant to all currently available penicillins, oxacillin-resistant staphylococci generally are resistant to other β-lactam antibiotics including first, second, or third generation cephalosporins.10 27 37 49 167 172 183 184 205 210 These strains also generally are resistant to tetracyclines, chloramphenicol, macrolides, and clindamycin and may be resistant to aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones.21 37 172 184 189 210 269 However, most strains of oxacillin-resistant staphylococci are susceptible to vancomycin12 37 40 171 172 184 210 or co-trimoxazole37 172 and may be susceptible to rifampin.37 171 172 176 184

Tolerance

Tolerance to the bactericidal effects of penicillinase-resistant penicillins has been reported in 30–63%29 32 33 39 106 260 of clinical isolates of S. aureus.25 26 27 29 30 33 38 39 77 182 191 260 Tolerance to the bactericidal effects of oxacillin has also been reported rarely inS. epidermidis.38 Most staphylococci susceptible to penicillinase-resistant penicillins have an MBC (minimum bactericidal concentration) of the drugs that is 1–4 times greater than the MIC of the drugs;18 23 25 28 29 269 however, bacteria with an MBC that is 16 or more times greater than the MIC of the drugs are generally considered tolerant to penicillinase-resistant penicillins.18 23 25 26 28 29 106 269 Results of some studies indicate that all isolates of S. aureus contain a small percentage of tolerant strains and that high MBCs are only detectable when a substantial percentage of tolerant organisms is present.106

The clinical importance of tolerance has not been fully elucidated.20 22 23 24 28 29 30 33 106 260 269 In vitro, bacteria tolerant to penicillinase-resistant penicillins may be inhibited by the drugs but are either not killed or are killed at a slower rate than bacteria that are not tolerant.15 18 20 23 24 25 26 29 39 106 260 Infections caused by tolerant bacteria may persist during therapy although in vitro susceptibility tests indicate that the organisms are susceptible to the drugs.20 22 23 24 28 29 30 33 106 260 The presence of tolerant staphylococci in serious infections where rapid and complete bactericidal activity is important (e.g., endocarditis, bacteremia) could result in a less favorable response to penicillinase-resistant penicillin therapy.30 31 33 36 39 260 Therefore, although the value of concomitant therapy has not been definitely established, some clinicians suggest that a rapidly bactericidal anti-infective (e.g., an aminoglycoside) be used in conjunction with a penicillinase-resistant penicillin for the treatment of severe infections caused by tolerant staphylococci.33 106 260 (See Penicillin-Tolerant Staphylococcal Infections in Uses: Staphylococcal Infections.)

Tolerance appears to occur in strains that have a deficiency in an autolytic enzyme on their cell surface that is necessary for the bactericidal effect of penicillins or may be the result of the presence of an autolysin inhibitor.15 18 20 23 24 26 28 29 35 106 260 Staphylococci that are tolerant to penicillinase-resistant penicillins may also be cross-tolerant to some cephalosporins and/or vancomycin.23 39

Resistance in Gram-Negative Bacteria

Gram-negative bacteria generally are intrinsically resistant to penicillinase-resistant penicillins because the bulky side chains of the drugs, which help to protect these derivatives from hydrolysis by penicillinases, also prevent the drugs from penetrating the outer membrane of most gram-negative bacteria.11 15 16 18 105

Penicillinase-Resistant Penicillins General Statement Pharmacokinetics

For more specific information on the pharmacokinetics of dicloxacillin, nafcillin, and oxacillin, see Pharmacokinetics in the individual monographs in 8:12.16.12.

In all studies described in the pharmacokinetics section, penicillinase-resistant penicillins were administered as sodium salts. Dosages and concentrations of dicloxacillin sodium, nafcillin sodium, and oxacillin sodium are expressed in terms of their bases.

Absorption

Like other penicillins, absorption of orally administered penicillinase-resistant penicillins occurs mainly in the duodenum7 9 18 86 and upper jejunum86 and the rate and extent of absorption depend on the particular penicillin derivative,7 9 18 66 dosage form administered,72 76 gastric and intestinal pH,6 7 9 61 81 and presence of food in the GI tract.9 11 18 45 48 49 61 62 72 91 224

Isoxazolyl penicillins (cloxacillin [no longer commercially available in the US], dicloxacillin, oxacillin) are acid stable and are rapidly but incompletely absorbed from the GI tract.2 13 70 86 88 98 103 In healthy, fasting adults, approximately 35–76% of an orally administered dose of dicloxacillin13 18 52 72 98 or 30–35% of an orally administered dose of oxacillin (oral dosage forms no longer commercially available in the US)9 13 18 52 66 is absorbed from the GI tract.

Following oral administration of a single oral dose of dicloxacillin2 9 18 45 46 72 76 80 or oxacillin9 10 18 44 49 80 88 100 103 in healthy, fasting adults, peak serum concentrations of the drugs usually are attained within 30 minutes to 2 hours;2 9 18 45 46 48 49 70 72 76 80 86 88 91 100 101 serum concentrations of the drugs then decline rapidly and generally are low or undetectable 4–6 hours after the dose.18 45 46 47 49 70 72 80 88 91 100 101 In one study in healthy, fasting adults, oral administration of a single 500-mg dose of dicloxacillin or oxacillin as capsules resulted in peak serum concentrations of the drugs ranging from 5–7 mcg/mL, 7.5–14.4 mcg/mL, or 10–17 mcg/mL, respectively.6

Presence of food in the GI tract generally decreases the rate and extent of absorption of penicillinase-resistant penicillins.2 9 10 11 18 45 48 49 61 62 72 91 224

Oxacillin49 88 100 is rapidly absorbed from IM injection sites. Following IM administration of single 1-g doses of oxacillin in adults, peak serum concentrations of the drug range from 6–18 mcg/mL13 81 88 100 101 and generally are attained within 30–60 minutes;9 13 18 48 49 64 81 88 97 100 101 serum concentrations then decline rapidly and are low or undetectable 4–6 hours after the dose.18 48 49 81 100 101 Rapid IV injection of a single 500-mg or 1-g dose of nafcillin69 89 or oxacillin69 88 generally results in peak serum concentrations of the drugs that range from 26–63 mcg/mL immediately following injection; however, serum concentrations of the drugs are low or undetectable 2–3 hours later.13 18 69 81 88 89

Distribution

Penicillinase-resistant penicillins are widely distributed following absorption from the GI tract or injection sites.18 93 The volume of distribution of oxacillin reportedly is 0.39–0.43 L/kg in healthy adults.65 231 The volume of distribution of nafcillin reportedly ranges from 0.57–1.55 L/kg in adults,60 97 0.85–0.91 L/kg in children 1 month to 14 years of age,79 and 0.24–0.53 L/kg in neonates.74 Nafcillin has a greater volume of distribution than other currently available penicillins, presumably because it is sequestered in the liver.69 79 Concomitant administration of oral probenecid may decrease the volume of distribution of nafcillin.63 (See Drug Interactions: Probenecid.)

Penicillinase-resistant penicillins are readily distributed into ascitic,18 224 synovial,10 18 54 55 75 pleural,2 3 5 10 18 224 and pericardial fluids.3 18 224 The drugs also are distributed into kidneys, liver,93 gallbladder,93 bone,18 53 56 75 93 211 260 bile,2 4 5 10 52 64 86 93 100 224 skin,93 intestines,93 prostate,81 93 tonsils,93 and muscle.93 Unlike natural penicillins, therapeutic concentrations of penicillinase-resistant penicillins may be attained in bone following parenteral administration of the drugs.18 53 56 75 93 211 Following IM or IV administration of oxacillin, bone concentrations of the drug reportedly may be 5–23% of concurrent serum concentrations.53 75 211 Penicillinase-resistant penicillins are distributed into bile in varying degrees.2 52 64 93 100 224 260 Small amounts of isoxazolyl penicillins are distributed into bile;100 however, concentrations of nafcillin13 52 69 93 in bile generally are equal to or greater than concurrent serum concentrations of the drugs. Biliary concentrations of the drugs are proportional to hepatobiliary function and may be negligible if biliary obstruction is present.13 52 Only negligible concentrations of nafcillin52 273 or oxacillin274 275 276 are attained in aqueous humor following oral, IM, or IV administration.52 273 274 224 275 276

Like natural penicillins, only minimal concentrations of penicillinase-resistant penicillins are attained in CSF following oral, IM, or IV administration in patients with uninflamed meninges.2 4 5 18 52 68 73 90 92 100 151 224 Slightly higher concentrations of the drugs are attained in CSF in patients with inflamed meninges.4 5 52 68 73 90 151 In one study in patients receiving nafcillin doses of 95–200 mg/kg every 4–6 hours, CSF concentrations of nafcillin were 1.9–30% of concurrent serum concentrations in specimens obtained 1–2 hours after administration of the drug.68 In one study in rabbits with meningitis, CSF concentrations of nafcillin or oxacillin averaged 1.4–2% or 1–2.8%, respectively, of concurrent serum concentrations of the drugs.227

The degree of protein binding varies among penicillinase-resistant penicillins;6 7 8 9 11 52 58 59 224 protein binding of the isoxazolyl penicillins increases with the number of chlorine atoms present on the heterocyclic side chains of the drugs.15 46 105 Dicloxacillin is 95–99%,2 6 7 8 9 13 46 52 58 59 224 nafcillin is 70–90%,7 8 9 52 58 59 224 and oxacillin is 89–94%6 7 8 9 52 58 59 224 bound to serum proteins. The drugs bind mainly to serum albumin.2 10 11 52 224

All currently available penicillinase-resistant penicillins readily cross the placenta.2 4 5 10 18 95 99 100 The drugs distribute into amniotic fluid.2 224 Fetal serum concentrations of oxacillin100 or dicloxacillin99 reportedly range from 0–26% of concurrent maternal serum concentrations. Dicloxacillin232 and oxacillin5 10 100 are distributed into milk. Although specific information on the distribution of nafcillin into milk is not available, this penicillinase-resistant penicillin is probably also distributed into milk.18 224

Elimination

In adults with normal renal function, serum half-lives of dicloxacillin2 13 18 52 61 64 98 102 and oxacillin5 13 18 52 61 64 69 are similar and range from 0.3–0.9 hours.2 13 18 52 61 64 69 72 81 82 92 98 224 Nafcillin has a slightly longer serum half-life than other penicillinase-resistant penicillins and the serum half-life of the drug in adults with normal renal and hepatic function ranges from 0.5–1.5 hours.52 60 61 97 224

The penicillinase-resistant penicillins are metabolized to varying degrees;9 10 13 18 52 66 85 86 89 260 nafcillin is the most extensively metabolized.18 52 89 Penicillinase-resistant penicillins are partially metabolized by hydrolysis of the β-lactam ring to penicilloic acids which are microbiologically inactive.13 18 66 86 104 Although it has been suggested that following oral administration this hydrolysis occurs partly in the GI tract prior to absorption, the drugs appear to undergo metabolism mainly in the liver following oral or parenteral administration.66 86 The extent of inactivation of isoxazolyl penicillins decreases with halogen substitution, and oxacillin is metabolized to a greater extent than is dicloxacillin.15 66 105 260 In one study following oral administration of single 500-mg oral doses of the drugs, 49% of oxacillin absorbed from the GI tract (oral dosage forms no longer commercially available in the US) was hydrolyzed to penicilloic acids whereas only 10% of dicloxacillin absorbed were hydrolyzed to penicilloic acids.66 In this study, there was no evidence of 6-APA in urine following oral administration of oxacillin.66 Isoxazolyl penicillins also appear to be hydroxylated to a small extent to microbiologically active metabolites which are excreted in urine.9 85 86 The hydroxyl metabolite of dicloxacillin and oxacillin are slightly less active than the parent drugs.85

Isoxazolyl penicillins and their metabolites are rapidly excreted in urine mainly by tubular secretion and glomerular filtration.2 5 6 10 13 18 81 85 86 97 224 260 These drugs also are partly excreted in feces via biliary elimination.18 52 86 224 260 Although small amounts of nafcillin are excreted in urine, the drug is eliminated mainly via bile18 52 84 89 97 and undergoes enterohepatic circulation.84 Following oral administration of a single 500-mg dose of the drugs in adults with normal renal function, 33–49% of the dicloxacillin dose66 76 or 17–70% of the oxacillin dose5 47 66 100 is excreted in urine as unchanged drug and active metabolites within 6 hours. Only about 27–31% of a single IM or IV dose of nafcillin is excreted in urine as unchanged drug and active metabolites within 12 hours.48 97 Approximately 40–70% of a single IM dose of oxacillin is excreted in urine within 6 hours as unchanged drug and active metabolites.5 100

Serum clearance of oxacillin in adults with normal renal function has been reported to be 380 mL/minute per 1.73 m2.69 Nafcillin has a serum clearance of 410–583 mL/minute per 1.73 m2 in adults with normal renal and hepatic function.69 89

Unlike most other penicillins, the serum half-lives of nafcillin,18 84 97 dicloxacillin,18 52 98 102 and oxacillin69 87 are only slightly prolonged in patients with renal impairment.13 18 52 57 64 69 71 82 87 98 102 This presumably results from the fact that nafcillin is excreted mainly by nonrenal mechanisms and isoxazolyl penicillins undergo extensive biotransformation to inactive metabolites.52 The serum half-lives of nafcillin18 52 69 84 97 and the isoxazolyl penicillins13 18 52 57 64 69 71 82 98 102 in patients with renal impairment reportedly range from 0.5–2.8 hours. In one study in patients with cirrhosis, the t½α of nafcillin averaged 0.26 hours, the t½β of the drug averaged 1.2 hours, and serum clearance of the drug averaged 291.5 mL/minute.89

Serum concentrations of nafcillin3 74 94 95 96 and isoxazolyl penicillins18 96 225 226 generally are higher and the serum half-lives more prolonged in neonates than in older children. The serum half-lives of the drugs generally are inversely proportional to birthweight, gestational age, and chronologic age.74 94 225 226 This appears to result partly from immature mechanisms for conjugation of the drugs in the liver94 and immature mechanisms for renal tubular secretion.94 The serum half-life of oxacillin is 1.6 hours in neonates 8–15 days of age and 1.2 hours in neonates 20–21 days of age.260 In one study, the serum half-life of nafcillin ranged from 2.2–5.5 hours in neonates 3 weeks of age or younger and 1.2–2.3 hours in neonates 4–9 weeks of age.74

Oral probenecid administered shortly before or with penicillinase-resistant penicillins competitively inhibits renal tubular secretion of the penicillins and produces higher and prolonged serum concentrations of the drugs.2 18 45 48 81 100 101 (See Drug Interactions: Probenecid.)

Studies using dicloxacillin indicate that patients with cystic fibrosis eliminate the drug up to 3 times faster than healthy individuals because of increased tubular secretion.107 260 This effect may be clinically important since use of usual dosages of penicillinase-resistant penicillins in cystic fibrosis patients may result in lower serum concentrations of the drugs than expected.107

Dicloxacillin,7 13 18 52 64 71 nafcillin,7 52 64 84 97 and oxacillin18 52 57 64 87 are only minimally removed by hemodialysis18 52 64 82 84 87 168 or peritoneal dialysis.7 18 57 64 71

Chemistry and Stability

Chemistry

Penicillinase-resistant penicillins are semisynthetic penicillin derivatives produced by acylation of 6-aminopenicillanic acid (6-APA).6 7 9 10 11 15 16 18 Penicillinase-resistant penicillins have bulky side chains at R on the penicillin nucleus that result in steric hindrance around the α-carbon of the acylamino group and help to prevent attachment of staphylococcal penicillinases to the β-lactam ring.6 9 10 11 15 16 105

Penicillinase-resistant penicillins commercially available in the US include dicloxacillin,1 2 nafcillin,3 238 and oxacillin.4 5 235 239 Nafcillin is a naphthyl analog of methicillin (no longer commercially available in the US) and has slightly increased acid stability and antibacterial activity compared with methicillin.16 Dicloxacillin, oxacillin, and cloxacillin (no longer commercially available in the US) are isoxazolyl penicillins;1 2 9 10 16 45 46 47 105 260 these penicillinase-resistant penicillins have heterocyclic side chains that result in slightly greater acid stability compared with nafcillin.16 105 260 Oxacillin, cloxacillin, and dicloxacillin differ structurally only in the presence of 0, 1, and 2 chlorine atoms, respectively.15 45 46 47 102 260 The addition of chlorine generally increases in vitro antibacterial activity on a weight basis and increases absorption from the GI tract, serum half-life, and protein binding.13 15 46 102 105

Penicillinase-resistant penicillins are commercially available as sodium salts.1 2 3 4 5 Potency of the drugs generally is expressed in terms of the bases.1 2 3 4 5 253 In general, penicillinase-resistant penicillins occur as white to off-white crystalline powders and are freely soluble in water and soluble in alcohol.253

Stability

Penicillinase-resistant penicillins generally are stable in the dry state at room temperature for several years;14 however, the drugs are stable only for short periods of time in solution14 unless frozen.14 Stability of the drugs is pH and temperature dependent.6 14 17 Nafcillin and oxacillin generally are stable at pH 5–8.6 14 Other penicillinase-resistant penicillins are more resistant than nafcillin and oxacillin to acid-catalyzed hydrolysis and generally are stable in the presence of acidic gastric secretions following oral administration.2 11 105

Nafcillin and oxacillin are potentially physically and/or chemically incompatible with some drugs, including aminoglycosides, but the compatibility depends on the specific drug and several other factors (e.g., concentration of the drugs, specific diluents used, resulting pH, temperature).14 17 Oxacillin14 is especially susceptible to inactivation in solutions containing dextrose, which appears to have a catalytic effect on hydrolysis of the drug.14 For a more complete discussion of the stability of dicloxacillin, nafcillin, and oxacillin and solutions of the drugs, see Chemistry and Stability: Stability in the individual monographs in 8:12.16.12.

AHFS DI Essentials™. © Copyright 2025, Selected Revisions January 1, 2009. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc., 4500 East-West Highway, Suite 900, Bethesda, Maryland 20814.

† Off-label: Use is not currently included in the labeling approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.

References

1. Apothecon. Dicloxacillin sodium capsules, USP prescribing information. Princeton, NJ; 1995 Apr.

2. Teva Pharmaceuticals. Dicloxacillin sodium capsules, USP prescribing information. Sellersville, PA; 1997 Jul.

3. Apothecon. Nafcillin sodium for injection, USP for intramuscular or intravenous injection prescribing information. Bristol, TN; 1990 Oct.

4. Apothecon. Oxacillin sodium for injection, USP pharmacy bulk package prescribing information. Princeton, NJ; 1998 Mar.

5. Apothecon. Oxacillin sodium for injection for intramuscular or intravenous injection prescribing information. Princeton, NJ; 2001 Jan.

6. Hou JP, Poole JW. β-Lactam antibiotics: their physiochemical properties and biological activities in relation to structure. J Pharm Sci. 1971; 60:503-27. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4336386

7. Neu HC. Penicillins: microbiology, pharmacology, and clinical use. In: Kagan BM, ed. Antimicrobial therapy. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1980:20-34.

8. Wilkowske CJ. The penicillins. Mayo Clin Proc. 1977; 52:616-24. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/242733

9. Rolinson GN, Sutherland R. Semisynthetic penicillins. Adv Pharmacol Chemother. 1973; 11:152-220.

10. Marcy SM, Klein JO. The isoxazolyl penicillins: oxacillin, cloxacillin, and dicloxacillin. Med Clin North Am. 1970; 52:1127-43.

11. Ball AP, Gray JA, Murdoch JM. Antibacterial drugs today: Part I. Drugs. 1975; 10:1-55. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1100345

12. Barza M. Antimicrobial spectrum, pharmacology and therapeutic use of antibiotics. Part 2: penicillins. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1977; 34:57-67. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/318800

13. Bergan T. Penicillins. In: Schonfeld H, ed. Antibiotics and chemotherapy. Vol 25. Basel: S. Karger; 1978:1-122.

14. Trissel LA. Handbook on injectable drugs. 12th ed. Bethesda, MD: American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc; 2003.

15. Selwyn S. The mechanisms and range of activity of penicillins and cephalosporins. In: Selwyn S, ed. The beta-lactam antibiotics: penicillins and cephalosporins in perspective. London: Hodder and Stoughton; 1980:56-90.

16. Wolff ME, ed. Burger’s medicinal chemistry. 4th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1980:84-157.

17. Jeglum EL, Winter E, Kotos M. Nafcillin sodium incompatibility with acidic solutions. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1981; 38:462-3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7282668

18. Neu HC. Antistaphylococcal penicillins. Med Clin North Am. 1982; 66:51-60. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7038340

19. Neu HC. Carbenicillin and ticarcillin. Med Clin North Am. 1982; 66:61-77. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7038341

20. Tipper DJ. Mode of action of β-lactam antibiotics. Rev Infect Dis. 1979; 1:39-53. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/400939

21. Lorian V, ed. Antibiotics in laboratory medicine. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1980:298-341, 418-73, 607-722.

22. Peterson LR, Denny AE, Gerding DN et al. Determination of tolerance to antibiotic bactericidal activity on Kirby-Bauer susceptibility plates. Am J Clin Pathol. 1980; 74:645-50. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6969542

23. Sabath LD. Mechanisms of resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics in strains of Staphylococcus aureus . Ann Intern Med. 1982; 97:339-44. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6981367

24. Horne D, Tomasz A. pH-Dependent penicillin tolerance of group B streptococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981; 20:128-35. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7025749 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC181644/

25. Bradley JJ, Mayhall CG, Dalton HP. Incidence and characteristics of antibiotic-tolerant strains of Staphylococcus aureus . Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978; 13:1052-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/249263 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC352390/

26. Raynor RH, Scott DF, Best GK. Oxacillin-induced lysis of Staphylococcus aureus . Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979; 16:134-40. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/258576 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC352810/

27. Grieco MH. Antibiotic resistance. Med Clin North Am. 1982; 66:25-37. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7038332

28. Kim KS, Anthony BF. Penicillin tolerance in group B streptococci isolated from infected neonates. J Infect Dis. 1981; 144:411-9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7031141

29. Rajashekaraiah KR, Rice T, Tao VS et al. Clinical significance of tolerant strains of Staphylococcus aureus in patients with endocarditis. Ann Intern Med. 1980; 93:796-801. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6905714

30. Denny AE, Peterson LR, Gerding DN et al. Serious staphylococcal infections with strains tolerant to bactericidal antibiotics. Arch Intern Med. 1979; 139:1026-31. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/475520

31. Steinbrecher UP. Serious infection in an adult due to penicillin-tolerant group B streptococcus. Arch Intern Med. 1981; 141:1714-5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7030251

32. Rozenberg-Arska M, Fabius GT, Beens-Dekkers AA et al. Antibiotic sensitivity and synergism of penicillin-tolerant Staphylococcus aureus . Chemotherapy. 1979; 25:352-5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/260698

33. Hilty MD, Venglarcik JS, Best GK. Oxacillin-tolerant staphylococcal bacteremia in children. J Pediatr. 1980; 96:1035-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6900061

34. Richmond MH. β-Lactam antibiotics and β-lactamases: two sides of a continuing story. Rev Infect Dis. 1979; 1:30-6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/400938

35. Tomasz A. Penicillin tolerance and the control of murein hydrolases. In: Salton M, Shockman GD, eds. β-Lactam antibiotics: mode of action, new developments, and future prospects. New York: Academic Press; 1981:227-41.

36. Holloway Y, Dankert J, Hess J. Penicillin tolerance and bacterial endocarditis. Lancet. 1980; 1:589. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6102299

37. Peacock JE, Marsik FJ, Wenzel RP. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: introduction and spread within a hospital. Ann Intern Med. 1980; 93:526-32. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6904159

38. Arthur JD, Bass JW, Keiser JF et al. Nafcillin-tolerant Staphylococcus epidermidis endocarditis. JAMA. 1982; 247:487-8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6915109

39. Sabath LD, Wheeler N, Laverdiere M et al. A new type of penicillin resistance of Staphylococcus aureus . Lancet. 1977; 1:443-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/65561

40. Anon. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1981; 30:557-9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6795434

41. Hall WH, Schierl EA, Maccani JE. Comparative susceptibility of penicillinase-positive and -negative Neisseria gonorrhoeae to 30 antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979; 15:562-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/111617 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC352711/

42. Cherubin CE, Corrado ML, Sierra MF. Susceptibility of gram-positive cocci to various antibiotics, including cefotaxime, moxalactam, and n-formimidoyl thienamycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981; 20:553-5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6282200 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC181744/

43. Stevens DL, Higbee JW, Oberhofer TR et al. Antibiotic susceptibilities of human isolates of Pasteurella multocida . Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979; 16:322-4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/507787 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC352853/

44. McAllister TA. Piperacillin against clinical isolates: antimicrobial profile and clinical role. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1982; 9(Suppl B):75-84. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6460736

45. Kislak JW, Eickhoff TC, Finland M. Cloxacillin: activity in vitro, and absorption and urinary excretion in normal young men. Am J Med Sci. 1965; 249:636-46. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14297286

46. Gravenkemper CF, Bennett JV, Brodie JL et al. Dicloxacillin: in vitro and pharmacologic comparisons with oxacillin and cloxacillin. Arch Intern Med. 1965; 116:340-5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14325906

47. Hammerstrom CF, Cox F, McHenry MC et al. Clinical, laboratory, and pharmacological studies of dicloxacillin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1966:69-74.

48. Klein JO, Finland M. Nafcillin: antibacterial action in vitro and absorption and excretion in normal young men. Am J Med Sci. 1963; 246:44-60.

49. Kirby WM, Rosenfeld LS, Brodie J. Oxacillin: laboratory and clinical evaluation. JAMA. 1962; 181:739-44. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14456243

50. Watanakunakorn C, Glotzbecker C. Enhancement of the effects of anti-staphylococcal antibiotics by aminoglycosides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1974; 6:802-6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4451352 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC444739/

51. Hemmer RJ, Vaudaux P, Waldvogel FA. Methicillin potentiates the effect of gentamicin on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979; 15:34-41. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/426504 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC352596/

52. Barza M, Weinstein L. Pharmacokinetics of the penicillins in man. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1976; 1:297-308. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/797501

53. Tetzlaff TR, Howard JB, McCracken GH et al. Antibiotic concentrations in pus and bone in children with osteomyelitis. J Pediatr. 1978; 92:135-40. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/619056

54. Nelson JD, Howard JB, Shelton S. Oral antibiotic therapy for skeletal infections of children. J Pediatr. 1978; 92:131-4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/619055

55. Nelson JD. Antibiotic concentrations in septic joint effusions. N Engl J Med. 1971; 284:349-53. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5539915

56. Kolczun MC, Nelson CL, McHenry MC et al. Antibiotic concentrations in human bone. J Bone Joint Surg. 1974; 56A:305-9.

57. Ruedy J. The effects of peritoneal dialysis on the physiological disposition of oxacillin, ampicillin and tetracycline in patients with renal disease. Can Med Assoc J. 1966; 94:257-61. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5903164 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1935278/

58. Kunin CM. Clinical pharmacology of the new penicillins: the importance of serum protein binding in determining antimicrobial activity and concentrations in serum. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1966; 7:166-79. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4956690

59. Kunin CM. Clinical significance of protein binding of the penicillins. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1967; 145:282-90. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4998178

60. Morselli PL, Franco-Morselli R, Bossi L. Clinical pharmacokinetics in newborns and infants: age-related differences and therapeutic implications. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1980; 5:485-527. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7002417

61. Selwyn S. Applied pharmacology, adverse effects and drug interactions. In: Selwyn S, ed. The beta-lactam antibiotics: penicillins and cephalosporins in perspective. London: Hodder and Stoughton; 1980:91-126.

62. Melander A. Influence of food on the bioavailability of drugs. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1978:3:337-51.

63. Gibaldi M, Schwartz MA. Apparent effect of probenecid on the distribution of penicillins in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1968; 9:345-9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5649987

64. Giusti DL. A review of the clinical use of antimicrobial agents in patients with renal and hepatic insufficiency: the penicillins. Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1973; 7:62-74.

65. Dittert LW, Griffen WO, LaPiana JC et al. Pharmacokinetic interpretation of penicillin levels in serum and urine after intravenous administration. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1969:42-8.

66. Cole M, Kening MD, Hewitt VA. Metabolism of penicillins to penicilloic acids and 6-aminopenicillanic acid in man and its significance in assessing penicillin absorption. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1973; 3:463-8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4364176 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC444435/

67. Plaut ME, O’Connell CJ, Pabico RC et al. Penicillin handling in normal and azotemic patients. J Lab Clin Med. 1969; 74:13-8.

68. Kane JG, Parker RH, Jordan GW et al. Nafcillin concentration in cerebrospinal fluid during treatment of staphylococcal infections. Ann Intern Med. 1977; 87:309-11. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/900676

69. Kind AC, Tupasi TE, Standiford HC et al. Mechanisms responsible for plasma levels of nafcillin lower than those of oxacillin. Arch Intern Med. 1970; 125:685-90. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5437893

70. Bunn PA, Milicich S. Laboratory and clinical studies with cloxacillin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1963:220-7.

71. Deresinski SC, Stevens DA. Clinical evaluation of parenteral dicloxacillin. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 1975; 18:151-63. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/809231

72. Doluisio JT, LaPiana JC, Wilkinson GR et al. Pharmacokinetic interpretation of dicloxacillin levels in serum after extravascular administration. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1969:49-55.

73. Yogev R, Schultz WE, Rosenman SB. Penetrance of nafcillin into human ventricular fluid: correlation with ventricular pleocytosis and glucose levels. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981; 19:545-8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7247377 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC181474/

74. Banner W, Gooch WM, Burckart G et al. Pharmacokinetics of nafcillin in infants with low birth weights. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980; 17:691-4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7396459 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC283854/

75. Fitzgerald RH, Kelly PJ, Snyder RJ et al. Penetration of methicillin, oxacillin, and cephalothin into bone and synovial tissue. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978; 14:723-6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/727762 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC352540/

76. DeFelice EA. Serum levels, urinary recovery, and safety of dicloxacillin, a new semisynthetic penicillin, in normal volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol. 1967; (Sep-Oct):275-7.

77. Goessens WH, Fontijne P, Michel MF. Factors influencing detection of tolerance in Staphylococcus aureus . Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982; 22:364-8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6923712 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC183749/

78. Watanakunakorn C, Tisone JC. Antagonism between nafcillin or oxacillin and rifampin against Staphylococcus aureus . Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982; 22:920-2. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7181497 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC185687/

79. Feldman WE, Nelson JD, Stanberry LR. Clinical and pharmacokinetic evaluation of nafcillin in infants and children. Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 1978; 93:1029-33.

80. Bass JW, Bruhn FW, Merritt WT et al. Comparison of oral penicillinase-resistant penicillins: contrasts between agents and assays. South Med J. 1982; 75:408-10. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7041278

81. Cronk GA, Morigi EM. Absorption, excretion and distribution of dimethoxyphenyl penicillin. Symposium on new dimethoxyphenyl penicillin. 1970 Sep 7.

82. Nauta EH, Mattie H, Goslings WR. Pharmacokinetics of cloxacillin in patients on chronic intermittent haemodialysis and in healthy subjects. Chemotherapy. 1973; 19:261-71. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4595633

83. Hedstrom SA. Treatment of chronic staphylococcal osteomyelitis with cloxacillin and dicloxacillin—a comparative study in 12 patients. Scand J Infect Dis. 1975; 7:55-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1145134

84. Diaz CR, Kane JG, Parker RH et al. Pharmacokinetics of nafcillin in patients with renal failure. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1977; 12:98-101. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/883823 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC352160/

85. Thijssen HH, Mattie H. Active metabolites of isoxazolylpenicillins in humans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976; 10:441-6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/825029 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC429767/

86. Hellstrom K, Rosen A, Swahn A. Fate of35S-cloxacillin in man. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1974; 7:125-31. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4852027

87. Bulger RJ, Lindholm DD, Murray JS et al. Effect of uremia on methicillin and oxacillin blood levels. JAMA. 1964; 187:83-6.

88. Rutenburg AM, Greenberg HL. Oxacillin in staphylococcal infections: clinical evaluation of oral and parenteral administration. JAMA. 1964; 187:127-32.

89. Marshall JP, Salt WB, Elam RO et al. Disposition of nafcillin in patients with cirrhosis and extrahepatic biliary obstruction. Gastroenterology. 1977; 73:1388-92. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/913979

90. Ruiz DE, Warner JF. Nafcillin treatment of Staphylococcus aureus meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976; 9:554-5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1259413 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC429571/

91. Watanakunakorn C. Absorption of orally administered nafcillin in normal healthy volunteers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1977; 11:1007-9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/879745 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC352119/

92. Fossieck BE, Kane JG, Diaz CR et al. Nafcillin entry into human cerebrospinal fluid. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1977; 11:965-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/879761 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC352111/

93. Nunes H, Pecora CC, Judy K et al. Turnover and distribution of nafcillin in tissues and body fluids of surgical patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1964:237-49.

94. O’Connor WJ, Warren GH, Mandal PS et al. Serum concentrations of nafcillin in newborn infants and children. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1964:188-91.

95. O’Connor WJ, Warren GH, Edrada LS et al. Serum concentrations of sodium nafcillin in infants during the perinatal period. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1965:220-2.

96. Grossman M, Ticknor W. Serum levels of ampicillin, cephalothin, cloxacillin, and nafcillin in the newborn infant. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1965:214-9.

97. Rudnick M, Morrison G, Walker B et al. Renal failure, hemodialysis, and nafcillin kinetics. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1976; 20:413-23. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/975716

98. Nauta EH, Mattie H. Dicloxacillin and cloxacillin: pharmacokinetics in healthy and hemodialysis subjects. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1976; 20:98-108. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1277730

99. Depp R, Kind AC, Kirby WM et al. Transplacental passage of methicillin and dicloxacillin into the fetus and amniotic fluid. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1970; 107:1054-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5429971

100. Prigot A, Froix CJ, Rubin E. Absorption, diffusion, and excretion of a new penicillin, oxacillin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1962:402-10.

101. Whitehous AC, Morgan JG, Schumacher J et al. Blood levels and antistaphylococcal titers produced in human subjects by a penicillinase-resistant penicillin, nafcillin, compared with similar penicillins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1962:384-92.

102. Rosenblatt JE, Kind AC, Brodie JL et al. Mechanisms responsible for the blood level differences of isoxazolyl penicillins: oxacillin, cloxacillin, and dicloxacillin. Arch Intern Med. 1968; 121:345-8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5645708

103. Bunn PA, Amrerg J. Initial clinical and laboratory experiences with methyl phenyl isoxazolyl penicillin (P-12). NY State J Med. 1961; 61:4158-62.

104. Graber H, Perenyi T, Arr M et al. On human biotransformation of some penicillins. Int J Clin Pharmacol. 1976; 14:284-9.

105. Martin AR. Antibiotics. In: Doerge RF, ed. Wilson and Gisvold’s textbook of organic medicinal and pharmaceutical chemistry. 8th ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Company; 1982:228-47.

106. Kaye D. The clinical significance of tolerance of Staphylococcus aureus . Ann Intern Med. 1980; 93:924-5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7004294

107. Jusko WJ, Mosovich LL, Gerbracht LM et al. Enhanced renal excretion of dicloxacillin in patients with cystic fibrosis. Pediatrics. 1975; 56:1038-44. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1196754

108. Idsoe O, Guthe T, Willcox RR et al. Nature and extent of penicillin side-reactions, with particular reference to fatalities from anaphylactic shock. Bull World Health Organ. 1968; 38:159-88. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5302296 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2554321/

109. Kitzing W, Nelson JD, Mohs E. Comparative toxicities of methicillin and nafcillin. Am J Dis Child. 1981; 135:52-5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7006381

110. Yow MD, Taber LH, Barrett FF. A ten-year assessment of methicillin-associated side effects. Pediatrics. 1976; 58:329-34. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/958759

111. Nahata MC, DeBolt SL, Powell DA. Adverse effects of methicillin, nafcillin and oxacillin in pediatric patients. Dev Pharmacol Ther. 1982; 4:117-23. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7172968

112. Olans RN, Weiner LB. Reversible oxacillin hepatotoxicity. J Pediatr. 1976; 89:835-8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/978335

113. Dismukes WE. Oxacillin-induced hepatic dysfunction. JAMA. 1973; 226:861-3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4800332

114. Onorato IM, Axelrod JL. Hepatitis from intravenous high-dose oxacillin therapy: findings in an adult inpatient population. Ann Intern Med. 1978; 89:497-500. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/697229

115. Taylor C, Corrigan K, Steen S et al. Oxacillin and hepatitis. Ann Intern Med. 1979; 90:857-8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/434706

116. Goldstein LI, Granoff M, Waisman J. Hepatic injury due to oxacillin administration. Am J Gastroenterol. 1978; 70:171-4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/717369

117. Pollack AA, Berger SA, Simberkoff MS et al. Hepatitis associated with high-dose oxacillin therapy. Arch Intern Med. 1978; 138:915-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/646563

118. Bruckstein AH, Attia AA. Oxacillin hepatitis: two patients with liver biopsy, and review of the literature. Am J Med. 1978; 64:519-22. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/637061

119. Bodendorfer TW. Nafcillin-induced interstitial nephritis. JAMA. 1980; 244:2609. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7431606

120. Andreoli SP, Kleiman MB, Glick MR et al. Nafcillin, pseudoproteinuria, and hypokalemic alkalosis. J Pediatr. 1980; 97:841-2. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7431181

121. Mohr JA, Clark RM, Waack TC et al. Nafcillin-associated hypokalemia. JAMA. 1979: 242:544.

122. Chudwin DS, Chesney PJ, Mischler EH et al. Hematuria associated with carbenicillin and other semisynthetic penicillins. Am J Dis Child. 1979; 133:98-9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/760523

123. Terr AI. Allergic interstitial nephritis. West J Med. 1981; 135:45-6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18748905 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1272914/

124. Alexander MR, Ensey R. Methicillin nephritis. Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1974; 8:115-7.

125. Appel GB, Woda BA, Neu HC et al. Acute interstitial nephritis associated with carbenicillin therapy. Arch Intern Med. 1978; 138:1265-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/677983

126. Tillman DB, Oill PA, Guze LB. Oxacillin nephritis. Arch Intern Med. 1980; 140:1552. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7436655

127. Linton AL, Clark WF, Driedger AA et al. Acute interstitial nephritis due to drugs: review of the literature with a report of nine cases. Ann Intern Med. 1980; 93:735-41. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7212486

128. Parry MF, Ball WD, Conte JE et al. Nafcillin nephritis. JAMA. 1974; 227:324-5.

129. Border WA, Lehman DH, Egan JD et al. Antitubular basement-membrane antibodies in methicillin-associated interstitial nephritis. N Engl J Med. 1974; 291:381-4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4211170

130. Chesney RW, Chesney PJ. Methicillin-associated interstitial nephritis: clinical rarity or common entity? Clin Pediatr. 1976; 15:1013-7.

131. Bennett WM, Plamp C, Porter GA. Drug-related syndromes in clinical nephrology. Ann Intern Med. 1977; 87:582-90. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/921091

132. Baldwin DS, Levine BB, McCluskey RT et al. Renal failure and interstitial nephritis due to penicillin and methicillin. N Engl J Med. 1968; 279:1245-52. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4176988

133. Roselle GA, Clyne DH, Kauffman CA. Carbenicillin nephrotoxicity. South Med J. 1978; 71:84-6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/622610

134. Galpin JE, Shinaberger JH, Stanley TM et al. Acute interstitial nephritis due to methicillin. Am J Med. 1978; 65:756-65. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/707534

135. Alexander DP, Russo ME, Fohrman DE et al. Nafcillin-induced platelet dysfunction and bleeding. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983; 23:59-62. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6830209 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC184617/

136. Brook I. Leukopenia and granulocytopenia after oxacillin therapy. South Med J. 1977; 70:565-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/860144

137. Westerman EL, Bradshaw MW, Williams TW. Agranulocytosis during therapy with orally administered cloxacillin. Am J Clin Pathol. 1978; 69:559-60. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/655134

138. Ortbals DW, Marr JJ. Profound neutropenia caused by oxacillin. South Med J. 1980; 73:745-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7394597

139. Couchonnal GJ, Hinthorn DR, Hodges GR et al. Nafcillin-associated granulocytopenia. South Med J. 1978; 71:1356-8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/715483

140. Carpenter J. Neutropenia induced by semisynthetic penicillin. South Med J. 1980; 73:745-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7394597

141. Homayouni H, Gross PA, Setia U et al. Leukopenia due to penicillin and cephalosporin homologues. Arch Intern Med. 1979; 139:827-8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/454076

142. Schiffer CA, Weinstein HJ, Wiernik PH. Methicillin-associated thrombocytopenia. Ann Intern Med. 1976; 85:338-9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1066981

143. Levitt BH, Gottlieb AJ, Rosenberg IR et al. Bone marrow depression due to methicillin, a semisynthetic penicillin. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1964; 5:301-6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14168519

144. Markowitz SM, Rothkopf M, Holden FD et al. Nafcillin-induced agranulocytosis. JAMA. 1975; 232:1150-2. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1173618

145. Sandberg M, Tuazon CU, Sheagren JN. Neutropenia probably resulting from nafcillin. JAMA. 1975; 232:1152-4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1173619

146. Greene GR, Cohen E. Nafcillin-induced neutropenia in children. Pediatrics. 1978; 61:94-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/263880

147. Chu JY, O’Connor DM, Schmidt RR. The mechanism of oxacillin-induced neutropenia. J Pediatr. 1977; 90:668-9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/839399

148. Weitzman SA, Stossel TP. Drug-induced immunological neutropenia. Lancet. 1978; 2:1068-71. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/82086

149. Brook I. Isolation of toxin producing Clostridium difficile from two children with oxacillin- and dicloxacillin-associated diarrhea. Pediatrics. 1980; 65:1154-6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7375240

150. Tilden SJ, Craft JC, Cano R et al. Cutaneous necrosis associated with intravenous nafcillin therapy. Am J Dis Child. 1980; 134:1046-8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7435462

151. Richards ML, Prince RA, Kenaley KA et al. Antimicrobial penetration into cerebrospinal fluid. Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1981; 15:341-68. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7023900

152. Fox VL. Gastrointestinal bleeding due to oral dicloxacillin therapy for osteomyelitis. Pediatrics. 1979; 63:676-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/312487

153. Malone AJ, Field S, Rosman J et al. Neurotoxic reaction to oxacillin. N Engl J Med. 1977; 296:453. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/401945

154. Spitzer TR. Penicillin induced haemolytic anaemia with negative direct antiglobulin test. Lancet. 1981; 1:1361-2. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6113325

155. Isbister JP. Penicillin allergy: a review of the immunological and clinical aspects. Med J Aust. 1971; 1:1067-74. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4398272

156. Masur H, Murray HW, Roberts RB. Nafcillin therapy for Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978; 14:457-61. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/708023 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC352481/

157. Muir A, Hensley WJ. Pseudoproteinuria due to penicillins, in the turbidometric measurement of proteins with trichloroacetic acid. Clin Chem. 1979; 25:1662-3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/466794

158. Line DE, Adler S, Fraley DS et al. Massive pseudoproteinuria caused by nafcillin. JAMA. 1976; 235:1259. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/946235

159. Glick MR, Kleiman MB, Moorehead WR et al. Nafcillin may cause a subtle pseudoproteinuria. Clin Chem. 1981; 27:506-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7471409

160. Felice-Johnson J, Nappi JM. Nafcillin interference with quantitative protein urinalysis. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1981; 38:1360-1. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7282724

161. Sullivan TJ, Wedner HJ, Shatz GS et al. Skin testing to detect penicillin allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1981; 68:171-80. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6267115

162. Cook FV, Farrar WE, Kreutner A. Hemorrhagic cystitis and ureteritis, and interstitial nephritis associated with administration of penicillin G. J Urol. 1979; 122:110-1. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37350

163. Tattersall MH, Battersby G, Spiers AS. Antibiotics and hypokalaemia. Lancet. 1972; 1:630-1. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4110324

164. Ettlin R, Hoigne R, Bruppacher R et al. Atopy and adverse drug reactions. Int Arch Aller Appl Immunol. 1981; 66(Suppl 1):93-5.

165. Ruley EJ, Lisi LM. Interstitial nephritis and renal failure due to ampicillin. J Pediatr. 1974; 84:878-81. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4826628

166. Kunin CM. Penicillinase-resistant penicillins. JAMA. 1977; 237:1605-6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/576661

167. Wenzel RP. The emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Ann Intern Med. 1982; 97:440-2. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7114639

168. Chambers HF. Penicillins. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, eds. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s principles and practice of infectious diseases. 5th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2000: 261-74.

169. Hermans PE. General principles of antimicrobial therapy. Mayo Clin Proc. 1977; 52:603-10. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20538

170. Eichenwald HF, McCracken GH. Antimicrobial therapy in infants and children. Part I. Review of antimicrobial agents. J Pediatr. 1978; 93:336-56.

171. Sorrell TC, Packham DR, Shanker S et al. Vancomycin therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Ann Intern Med. 1982; 97:344-50. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7114631

172. Watanakunakorn C. Treatment of infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Ann Intern Med. 1982; 97:376-8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7114635

173. Simon HJ. Current status of methicillin, oxacillin, and cloxacillin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1964:280-4.

174. Ahronheim GA. Common bacterial infections in infancy and childhood. Part 5. Infections of the skeletal system. Drugs. 1978; 16:210-8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/308004

175. Bryson YJ, Connor JD, LeClerc M et al. High-dose dicloxacillin treatment of acute staphylococcal osteomyelitis in children. J Pediatr. 1979; 94:673-5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/430319

176. Wade JC, Schimpff SC, Newman KA et al. Staphylococcus epidermidis: an increasing cause of infection in patients with granulocytopenia. Ann Intern Med. 1982; 97:503-8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7125409

177. Korzeniowski O, Sande MA et al. Combination antimicrobial therapy for Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis in patients addicted to parenteral drugs and in nonaddicts. Ann Intern Med. 1982; 97:496-503. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6751182

178. Parker RH, Fossieck BE. Intravenous followed by oral antimicrobial therapy for staphylococcal endocarditis. Ann Intern Med. 1980; 93:832-4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7447189

179. Bayer AS. Staphylococcal bacteremia and endocarditis: state of the art. Arch Intern Med. 1982; 142:1169-77. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6807232

180. Sande MA, Scheld WM. Combination antibiotic therapy of bacterial endocarditis. Ann Intern Med. 1980; 92:390-5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6986829

181. Bell WE. Treatment of bacterial infections of the central nervous system. Ann Neurol. 1981; 9:313-27. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7013653

182. Venglarcik JS, Blair LL, Dunkle LM. pH-Dependent oxacillin tolerance of Staphylococcus aureus . Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983; 23:232-5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6551162 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC186027/

183. Thompson L, Cabezudo I, Wenzel RP. Epidemiology of nosocomial infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Ann Intern Med. 1982; 97:309-17. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7114627

184. Anon. Treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Med Lett Drug Ther. 1982; 24:107-8.

185. Karchmer AW, Archer GL, Dismukes WE. Staphylococcus epidermidis causing prosthetic valve endocarditis: microbiologic and clinical observations as guides to therapy. Ann Intern Med. 1983; 98:447-55. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6838067

186. Rouveix B, Lassoued K, Vittecog D et al. Neutropenia due to β lactamine antibiotics. BMJ. 1983; 287:1832-4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6423036 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1550016/

187. Gould PC, Khawaja FI, Rosenthal WS. Antibiotic-associated hemorrhagic colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1982; 77:491-3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6979926

188. Lowy FD, Hammer SM. Staphylococcus epidermidis infections. Ann Intern Med. 1983; 99:834-9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6360002

189. Hashisaki PA, Jacobson JA. Characteristics, control, and treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Clin Pharm. 1982; 1:343-8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6764394

190. Armstrong EP, Rush DR. Treatment of osteomyelitis. Clin Pharm. 1983; 2:213-24. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6349907

191. Musher DM, Fletcher T. Tolerant Staphylococcus aureus causing vertebral osteomyelitis. Arch Intern Med. 1982; 142:632-4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6917742

192. Wilson WR, Karchmer AW, Dajani AS et al and the Committee on Rheumatic Fever et al. Antibiotic treatment of adults with infective endocarditis due to streptococci, enterococci, staphylococci, and HACEK microorganisms. JAMA. 1995; 274:1706-13. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7474277

193. Dunkle LM, Brock N. Long-term follow-up of ambulatory management of osteomyelitis. Clin Pediatr. 1982; 21:650-5.

194. Carney DN, Parker RH, Fossieck BE. Staphylococcal bacteremia in cancer patients: intravenous and oral antimicrobial therapy. South Med J. 1982; 75:143-6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7036355

195. Kaplan SL, Mason EO, Feigin RD. Clindamycin versus nafcillin or methicillin in the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis in children. South Med J. 1982; 75:138-42. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7036354

196. Parsons RL, Hossack G, Paddock G. The absorption of antibiotics in adult patients with coeliac disease. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1975; 1:39-50. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1176375

197. Riff LJ, Thomason JL. Comparative aminoglycoside inactivation by β-lactam antibiotics: effect of a cephalosporin and six penicillins on five aminoglycosides. J Antibiot. 1982; 35:850-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7174538

198. Guglielmo BJ, Hohn DC, Koo PJ et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical procedures: a critical analysis of the literature. Arch Surg. 1983; 118:943-55. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6347124

199. Elwell A, Wise R. The β-lactamase stability of acylureidopenicillins. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1982; 10:560-1. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6219088

200. Bakhtiar M, Selwyn S. Inactivation of isoxazolyl penicillins by β-lactamases. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1982; 10:561-4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6984445

201. Qureshi GD, Reinders TP, Somori GJ et al. Warfarin resistance with nafcillin therapy. Ann Intern Med. 1984; 100:527-9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6703546

202. Sheagren JN. Staphylococcus aureus—the persistent pathogen (second of two parts). N Engl J Med. 1984; 310:1437-42. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6371536

203. Jordan GW, Kawachi MM. Analysis of serum bactericidal activity in endocarditis, osteomyelitis, and other bacterial infections. Medicine (Baltimore). (Baltimore). 1981; 60:49-61.

204. Hall WH, Opfer BJ. Influence of inoculum size on comparative susceptibilities of penicillinase-positive and -negative Neisseria gonorrhoeae to 31 antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984; 26:192-5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6435514 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC284117/

205. Frongillo RF, Bianchi P, Moretti A et al. Cross-resistance between methicillin and cephalosporins for staphylococci; a general assumption not true for cefamandole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984; 25:666-8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6563877 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC185613/

206. Cheigh JS. Drug administration in renal failure. Am J Med. 1977; 62:555-63. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/851131

207. Appel GB, Neu HC. The nephrotoxicity of antimicrobial agents (first of three parts). N Engl J Med. 1977; 296:663-70. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/402574

208. Appel GB. A decade of penicillin related acute interstitial nephritis—more questions and answers. Clin Nephrol. 1980; 13:151-4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7379365

209. Overturf GD, Wehrle PF. Bacterial meningitis: which regimen? Drugs. 1979; 18:65-73.

210. Archer GL. Antimicrobial susceptibility and selection of resistance among Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates recovered from patients with infections of indwelling foreign devices. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978; 14:353-9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/708013 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC352464/

211. Waldvogel FA, Vasey H. Osteomyelitis: the past decade. N Engl J Med. 1980; 303:360-70. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6993944

212. Waldvogel FA, Medoff G, Swarts MN. Osteomyelitis: a review of clinical features, therapeutic considerations and unusual aspects. First of three parts. N Engl J Med. 1970; 282:198-206. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4902833

213. Waldvogel FA, Medoff G, Swarts MN. Osteomyelitis: a review of clinical features, therapeutic considerations and unusual aspects. Second of three parts. N Engl J Med. 1970; 282:260-6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4903106

214. Prober CG, Yeager AS. Use of the serum bactericidal titer to assess the adequacy of oral antibiotic therapy in the treatment of acute hematogenous osteomyelitis. J Pediatr. 1979; 95:131-5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/113517

215. Bell SM. Further observations on the value of oral penicillin in chronic staphylococcal osteomyelitis. Med J Aust. 1976; 2:591-3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/826770

216. Hill DG, Yates AK. Prophylactic antibiotics in open heart surgery. N Z Med J. 1975; 81:414-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1057738

217. Boyd RJ, Burke JF, Colton T. A double-blind clinical trial of prophylactic antibiotics in hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg. 1973; 55:1251-8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4585947

218. Pollard JP, Hughes SP, Scott JE et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in total hip replacement. Br Med J. 1979; 1:707-9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/373841 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1598803/

219. Fulginiti VA. Staphylococcus epidermidis septicemia in children: an emerging and difficult problem. JAMA. 1984; 252:1054. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6748211

220. Myerowitz PD, Caswell K, Lindsay WG et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for open-heart surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1977; 73:625-9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/839852

221. Friedman LE, Brown AE, Miller DR et al. Staphylococcus epidermidis septicemia in children with leukemia and lymphoma. Am J Dis Child. 1984; 1338:715-9.

222. Bennett WM, Aronoff GR, Morrison G et al. Drug prescribing in renal failure: dosing guidelines for adults. Am J Kidney Dis. 1983; 3:155-93. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6356890

223. Jackson EA, McLeod DC. Pharmacokinetics and dosing of antimicrobial agents in renal impairment, part ii. AM J Hosp Pharm. 1974; 31:137-48. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4815846

224. US Food and Drug Administration. Penicillinase-resistant penicillin human prescription drugs class labeling guideline for professional labeling. [Notice of availability published in: Fed Regist. 1982; 47:41636.] Available from: Professional Labeling Branch, Division of Drug Advertising and Labeling, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD.

225. Ritschel WA. Biological half-lives of drugs. Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1970; 4:332-47.

226. Sereni F, Principi N. Developmental pharmacology. Ann Rev Pharmacol. 1968; 8:453-66. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4953092

227. Strausbaugh LJ, Murray TW, Sande MA. Comparative penetration of six antibiotics into the cerebrospinal fluid of rabbits with experimental staphylococcal meningitis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1980; 6:363-71. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7400069

228. Van Der Auwera P, Klastersky J. In vitro study of the combination of rifampin with oxacillin against Staphylococcus aureus . Rev Infect Dis. 1983; 5(suppl 3):S509-14.

229. Van Der Auwera P, Meunier-Carpentier F, Klastersky J. Clinical study of combination therapy with oxacillin and rifampin for staphylococcal infections. Rev Infect Dis. 1983; 5(Suppl 3):S515-22.

230. Weinstein MP, Stratton CW, Ackley A et al. Multicenter collaborative evaluation of a standardized serum bactericidal test as a prognostic indicator in infective endocarditis. Am J Med. 1985; 78:262-9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3881943

231. Barza M, Weinstein L. Some determinants of the distribution of penicillins and cephalosporins in the body: practical and theoretical considerations. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1974; 235:613-20. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4527978

232. Matsuda S. Transfer of antibiotics into maternal milk. Biol Res Pregnancy. 1984; 5:57-60.

233. Zenk KE, Dungy CI, Greene GR. Nafcillin extravasation injury: use of hyaluronidase as an antidote. Am J Dis Child. 1981; 135:1113-4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7315807

234. Miller WI, Souney PF, Chang JT. Hepatic dysfunction following nafcillin and cephalothin therapy in a patient with a history of oxacillin hepatitis. Clin Pharm. 1983; 2:465-8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6627877

235. Apothecon. Oxacillin for injection (for intravenous injection only) in ADD-Vantage drug delivery system prescribing information. Princeton, NJ; 2001 Jan.

236. Pollock AA, Berger SA, Simberkoff MS et al. Hepatitis associated with high-dose oxacillin therapy. Arch Intern Med. 1978; 138:915-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/646563

237. Halloran TJ, Clague MD. Hepatitis associated with high-dose oxacillin therapy. Arch Intern Med. 1979; 139:376-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/426588

238. Baxter. Nafcillin injection, USP in plastic container for intravenous use only Galaxy container prescribing information. Deerfield, IL; 2001 Apr.

239. Baxter. Oxacillin injection, USP in plastic container for intravenous use only Galaxy container prescribing information. Deerfield, IL; 1998 Sept.

240. Davis RL, Berman W Jr., Wernly JA et al. Warfarin-nafcillin interaction. J Pediatr. 1991; 118:300-3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1993965

241. Fraser GL, Miller M, Kane K. Warfarin resistance associated with nafcillin therapy. Am J Med. 1989; 87:237-8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2757063

242. Shovick VA, Rihn TL. Decreased hypothrombinemic response to warfarin secondary to the warfarin-nafcillin interaction. DICP. 1991; 25:598-9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1877267

243. Sands M, Brown RB. Interactions of cyclosporine with antimicrobial agents. Rev Infect Dis. 1989; 11:691-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2682943

244. Veremis SA, Maddux MS, Pollak R et al. Subtherapeutic cyclosporine concentrations during nafcillin therapy. Transplantation. 1987; 43:913-5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3296360

245. Saliba B. Oxacillin hepatotoxicity in HIV-infected patients. Ann Intern Med. 1994; 120:1048. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8185140

246. Anon. The choice of antibacterial drugs. Med Lett Drugs Ther. 2001; 43:69-78. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11518876

247. Committee on Infectious Diseases, American Academy of Pediatrics. 2000 Red book: report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 25th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 1997:514-26.

248. Johnson S, Gerding DN. Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. Clin Infect Dis. 1998; 26:1027-36. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9597221

249. Gerding DN, Johnson S, Peterson LR et al for the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of American. Position paper on Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea and colitis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1995; 16:459-77. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7594392

250. Fekety R for the American College of Gastroenterology Practice Parameters Committee. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea and colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997; 92:739-50 (IDIS 386628) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9149180

251. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists Commission on Therapeutics. ASHP therapeutic position statement on the preferential use of metronidazole for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 1998; 55:1407-11. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9659970

252. Wilcox MH. Treatment of Clostridium difficile infection. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1998; 41(Suppl C):41-6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9630373

253. The United States pharmacopeia, 26th rev, and The national formulary, 21st ed. Rockville, MD: The United States Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc; 2003:597-8,1261-3,1355-7,2571-2.

254. American Society Health-System Pharmacists. ASHP therapeutic guidelines on antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 1999; 56:1839-88. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10511234

255. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. MIC testing supplemental tables; M100-S13 (M7). Wayne, PA:NCCLS; 2003 Jan.

256. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Disk diffusion supplemental tables; M100-S13 (M2). Wayne, PA:NCCLS; 2003 Jan.

257. Anon. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Med Lett Drugs Ther. 2001; 43:92-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11689761

258. Ferrieri P, Gewitz MH, Gerber MA et al and the Committee on Rheumatic Fever et al. Unique features of infective endocarditis in childhood. Circulation. 2002; 105:2115-27. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11980694

259. Bayer AS, Bolger AF, Tauber KA et al and the Ad Hoc Writing Group of the Committee on Rheumatic Fever et al. Diagnosis and management of infective endocarditis and its complications. Circulation. 1998; 98:2936-48. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9860802

260. Kucers A, Crowe S, Grayson ML et al, eds. The use of antibiotics. A clinical review of antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral drugs. 5th ed. Jordan Hill, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1997: 3-226.

261. Jahansouz F, Kriett JM, Smith CM et al. Potentiation of cyclosporine nephrotoxicity by nafcillin in lung transplant recipients. Transplantation. 1993; 55:1045-8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8497878

262. Taylor AT, Pritchard DC, Goldstein AO et al. Continuation of warfarin-nafcillin interaction during dicloxacillin therapy. J Fam Prac. 1994; 39:182-5.

263. Behrman RE, Kliegman RM, Jenson HB, eds. Nelson textbook of pediatrics. 16th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company: 2000.

264. Herchline TE, Barnishan J, Ayers LW et al. Penicillinase production and in vitro susceptibilities of Staphylococcus lugdunensis . Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990; 34:2434-35. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2088201 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC172078/

265. Herchline TE, Fridkin SK, Hill HA et al. Temporal changes in prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in 23 US hospitals. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002; 8:697-701. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12095437 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2730337/

266. Finan JE, Rosato AE, Dickinson TM et al. Conversion of oxacillin-resistant staphylococci from heterotypic to homotypic resistance expression. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002; 46:24-30. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11751106 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC126971/

267. Hussain Z, Stoakes L, Massey V et al. Correlation of oxacillin MIC with mecA gene carriage in coagulase-negative staphylococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000; 38:752-4.

268. Mader JT, Calhoun J. Osteomyelitis. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, eds. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s principles and practice of infectious diseases. 5th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2000: 1182-96.

269. Waldvogel FA. Staphylococcus aureus (including staphylococcal toxic shock). In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, eds. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s principles and practice of infectious diseases. 5th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2000: 2069-92.

270. Mermel LA, Farr BM, Sherertz J et al. Guidelines for the management of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2001; 32:1249-72. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11303260

271. Michelson PA. Reversible high dose oxacillin-associated liver injury. Can J Hosp Pharm. 1981; 34:83-4.

272. Nauta EH, Mattie H, Goslings WR. Effect of probenecid on the apparent volume of distribution and elimination of cloxacillin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1974; 6:300-3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15830476 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC444640/

273. MacIlwaine WA, Sande MA, Mandell GL. Penetration of antistaphylococcal antibiotics into the human eye. Am J Ophthalmol. 1974; 77:589-92. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4819459

274. Havener WH. Ocular pharmacology. 4th ed. St. Louis: The CV Mosby Company; 1978:144-58.

275. Records RE. Human intraocular penetration of sodium oxacillin. Arch Ophthalmol. 1967; 77:693-5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6022741

276. Records RE, Ellis PP. The intraocular penetration of ampicillin, methicillin, and oxacillin. Am J Ophthalmol. 1967; 64:135-43. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6028624

277. Jensen AG, Wachmann CH, Espersen F et al. Treatment and outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. A prospective study of 278 cases. Arch Intern Med. 2002; 162:25-32. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11784216

278. Oncö S, Ozsö H, Yildirim A et al. Central venous catheter related infections: risk factors and the effect of glycopeptide antibiotics. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2003; 2:3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12643811 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC151687/

279. Santucci SG, Gobara S, Santos CR et al. Infections in a burn intensive care unit: experience of seven years. J Hosp Infect. 2003; 53:6-13. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12495679

280. Tseng YC, Chiu YC, Wang JH et al. Nosocomial bloodstream infection in a neonatal intensive care unit of a medical center: a three-year review. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2002; 35:168-72. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12380789

281. Jones ME, Mayfield DC, Thornsberry C et al. Prevalence of oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus among inpatients and outpatients in the United States during 2000. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002; 46:4104-5.