Letrozole

Pronunciation

Dosage Form: tablet, film coated

Indications and Usage for Letrozole

Adjuvant Treatment of Early Breast Cancer

Letrozole tablets, USP are indicated for the adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive early breast cancer.

Extended Adjuvant Treatment of Early Breast Cancer

Letrozole tablets, USP are indicated for the extended adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer in postmenopausal women, who have received 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. The effectiveness of Letrozole tablets, USP in extended adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer is based on an analysis of disease-free survival in patients treated with Letrozole tablets, USP for a median of 60 months [see Clinical Studies (14.2, 14.3)].

First and Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer

Letrozole tablets, USP are indicated for first-line treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive or unknown, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Letrozole tablets, USP are also indicated for the treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women with disease progression following antiestrogen therapy [see Clinical Studies (14.4, 14.5)].

Letrozole Dosage and Administration

Recommended Dose

The recommended dose of Letrozole tablets, USP is one 2.5 mg tablet administered once a day, without regard to meals.

Use in Adjuvant Treatment of Early Breast Cancer

In the adjuvant setting, the optimal duration of treatment with Letrozole is unknown. The planned duration of treatment in the study was 5 years with 73% of the patients having completed adjuvant therapy. Treatment should be discontinued at relapse [see Clinical Studies (14.1)].

Use in Extended Adjuvant Treatment of Early Breast Cancer

In the extended adjuvant setting, the optimal treatment duration with Letrozole tablets, USP is not known. The planned duration of treatment in the study was 5 years. In the final updated analysis, conducted at a median follow-up of 62 months, the median treatment duration was 60 months. Seventy-one percent of patients were treated for at least 3 years and 58% of patients completed at least 4.5 years of extended adjuvant treatment. The treatment should be discontinued at tumor relapse [see Clinical Studies (14.2)].

Slideshow: 2013 Drug News Round-Up - Top 20 Stories

Use in First and Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer

In patients with advanced disease, treatment with Letrozole tablets, USP should continue until tumor progression is evident. [see Clinical Studies (14.4, 14.5)].

Use in Hepatic Impairment

No dosage adjustment is recommended for patients with mild to moderate hepatic impairment, although Letrozole tablets, USP blood concentrations were modestly increased in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment due to cirrhosis. The dose of Letrozole tablets, USP in patients with cirrhosis and severe hepatic dysfunction should be reduced by 50% [see Warnings and Precautions (5.3)]. The recommended dose of Letrozole tablets, USP for such patients is 2.5 mg administered every other day. The effect of hepatic impairment on Letrozole tablets, USP exposure in noncirrhotic cancer patients with elevated bilirubin levels has not been determined. 

Use in Renal Impairment

No dosage adjustment is required for patients with renal impairment if creatinine clearance is ≥ 10 mL/min. [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)]. 

Dosage Forms and Strengths

2.5 mg tablets: dark yellow, film-coated, round, biconvex tablets, debossed with “L” on one side and “12” on the other side. 

Contraindications

Letrozole tablets, USP may cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman and the clinical benefit to premenopausal women with breast cancer has not been demonstrated. Letrozole tablets, USP are contraindicated in women who are or may become pregnant. If Letrozole tablets, USP are used during pregnancy, or if the patient becomes pregnant while taking this drug, the patient should be apprised of the potential hazard to a fetus. [see Use in Specific Populations (8.1)] 

Warnings and Precautions

Bone Effects

Use of Letrozole tablets, USP may cause decreases in bone mineral density (BMD). Consideration should be given to monitoring BMD. Results of a substudy to evaluate safety in the adjuvant setting comparing the effect on lumbar spine (L2-L4) bone mineral density (BMD) of adjuvant treatment with Letrozole to that with tamoxifen showed at 24 months a median decrease in lumbar spine BMD of 4.1% in the Letrozole arm compared to a median increase of 0.3% in the tamoxifen arm (difference = 4.4%) (P<0.0001) [see Adverse Reactions (6.1)]. Updated results from the BMD sub-study in the extended adjuvant setting demonstrated that at 2 years patients receiving Letrozole had a median decrease from baseline of 3.8% in hip BMD compared to a median decrease of 2.0% in the placebo group. The changes from baseline in lumbar spine BMD in Letrozole and placebo treated groups were not significantly different [see Adverse Reactions (6.2)].

In the adjuvant trial the incidence of bone fractures at any time after randomization was 13.8% for Letrozole and 10.5% for tamoxifen. The incidence of osteoporosis was 5.1% for Letrozole and 2.7% for tamoxifen [see Adverse Reactions (6.1)]. In the extended adjuvant trial the incidence of bone fractures at any time after randomization was 13.3% for Letrozole and 7.8% for placebo. The incidence of new osteoporosis was 14.5% for Letrozole and 7.8% for placebo [see Adverse Reactions (6.3)].

Cholesterol

Consideration should be given to monitoring serum cholesterol. In the adjuvant trial hypercholesterolemia was reported in 52.3% of Letrozole patients and 28.6% of tamoxifen patients. CTC grade 3-4 hypercholesterolemia was reported in 0.4% of Letrozole patients and 0.1% of tamoxifen patients. Also in the adjuvant setting, an increase of ≥1.5 X ULN in total cholesterol (generally non-fasting) was observed in patients on monotherapy who had baseline total serum cholesterol within the normal range (i.e., <=1.5 X ULN) in 151/1843 (8.2%) on Letrozole vs 57/1840 (3.2%). Lipid lowering medications were required for 25% of patients on Letrozole and 16% on tamoxifen [see Adverse Reactions (6.1)].

Hepatic Impairment

Subjects with cirrhosis and severe hepatic impairment who were dosed with 2.5 mg of Letrozole tablets, USP experienced approximately twice the exposure to Letrozole tablets, USP as healthy volunteers with normal liver function. Therefore, a dose reduction is recommended for this patient population. The effect of hepatic impairment on Letrozole tablets, USP exposure in cancer patients with elevated bilirubin levels has not been determined. [see Dosage and Administration (2.5)].

Fatigue and Dizziness

Because fatigue, dizziness, and somnolence have been reported with the use of Letrozole tablets, USP, caution is advised when driving or using machinery until it is known how the patient reacts to Letrozole tablets, USP use.

Laboratory Test Abnormalities

No dose-related effect of Letrozole tablets, USP on any hematologic or clinical chemistry parameter was evident. Moderate decreases in lymphocyte counts, of uncertain clinical significance, were observed in some patients receiving Letrozole tablets USP, 2.5 mg. This depression was transient in about half of those affected. Two patients on Letrozole tablets, USP developed thrombocytopenia; relationship to the study drug was unclear. Patient withdrawal due to laboratory abnormalities, whether related to study treatment or not, was infrequent.

Adverse Reactions

The most serious adverse reactions from the use of Letrozole tablets, USP are:

  • Bone effects [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1)]
  • Increases in cholesterol [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2)]

Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reactions rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice.

Adjuvant Treatment of Early Breast Cancer

The median treatment duration of adjuvant treatment was 60 months and the median duration of follow-up for safety was 73 months for patients receiving Letrozole tablets, USP and tamoxifen.

Certain adverse reactions were prospectively specified for analysis, based on the known pharmacologic properties and side effect profiles of the two drugs.

Adverse reactions were analyzed irrespective of whether a symptom was present or absent at baseline. Most adverse reactions reported (approximately 75% of patients reporting 1 or more AE) were Grade 1 or Grade 2 applying the Common Toxicity Criteria Version 2.0/ Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. Table 1 describes adverse reactions (Grades 1-4) irrespective of relationship to study treatment in the adjuvant trial for the monotherapy arms analysis (safety population).

Table 1: Patients with Adverse Reactions (CTC Grades 1-4, Irrespective of Relationship to Study Drug) in the Adjuvant Study – Monotherapy Arms Analysis (Median Follow-up 73 Months; Median Treatment 60 Months)

 

Grades 1-4

Grades 3-4

Adverse Reaction

Letrozole tablets, USP
N=2448

n (%)

tamoxifen
N=2447
n (%)

Letrozole tablets, USP
N=2448

n (%)

tamoxifen
N=2447
n (%)

Pts with any adverse event

2310 (94.4)

2214 (90.5)

635 (25.9)

604 (24.7)

Hypercholesterolemia

1280 (52.3)

700 (28.6)

11 ( 0.4)

6 ( 0.2)

Hot Flashes/Flushes

821 (33.5)

929 (38.0)

0 -

0 -

Arthralgia/Arthritis

618 (25.2)

501 (20.4)

85 ( 3.5)

50 ( 2.0)

Night Sweats

357 (14.6)

426 (17.4)

0 -

0 -

Bone Fractures2

338 (13.8)

257 (10.5)

-

-

Weight Increase

317 (12.9)

378 (15.4)

27 ( 1.1)

39 ( 1.6)

Nausea

283 (11.6)

277 (11.3)

6 ( 0.2)

9 ( 0.4)

Bone Fractures1

247 (10.1)

174 ( 7.1)

- -

Fatigue (Lethargy, Malaise, Asthenia)

235 ( 9.6)

250 (10.2)

6 ( 0.2)

7 ( 0.3)

Myalgia

217 ( 8.9)

212 ( 8.7)

18 ( 0.7)

14 ( 0.6)

Edema

164 ( 6.7)

160 ( 6.5)

3 ( 0.1)

1 (<0.1)

Weight Decrease

140 ( 5.7)

129 ( 5.3)

8 ( 0.3)

5 ( 0.2)

Vaginal Bleeding

128 ( 5.2)

320 (13.1)

1 (<0.1)

8 ( 0.3)

Back Pain

125 ( 5.1)

136 ( 5.6)

7 ( 0.3)

11 ( 0.4)

Osteoporosis NOS

124 ( 5.1)

66 ( 2.7)

10 ( 0.4)

5 ( 0.2)

Bone Pain

123 ( 5.0)

109 ( 4.5)

6 ( 0.2)

4 ( 0.2)

Depression

119 ( 4.9)

114 ( 4.7)

16 ( 0.7)

14 ( 0.6)

Vaginal Irritation

111 ( 4.5)

77 ( 3.1)

2 (<0.1)

2 (<0.1)

Headache

105 ( 4.3)

94 ( 3.8)

9 ( 0.4)

5 ( 0.2)

Pain in Extremity

103 ( 4.2)

79 ( 3.2)

6 ( 0.2)

4 ( 0.2)

Osteopenia

87 ( 3.6)

74 ( 3.0)

0 -

2 (<0.1)

Dizziness/Light-Headedness

84 ( 3.4)

84 ( 3.4)

1 (<0.1)

6 (0.2)

Alopecia

83 ( 3.4)

84 ( 3.4)

0 -

0 -

Vomiting

80 ( 3.3)

80 ( 3.3)

3 ( 0.1)

5 (0.2)

Cataract

49 ( 2.0)

54 ( 2.2)

16 ( 0.7)

17 ( 0.7)

Constipation

49 ( 2.0)

71 ( 2.9)

3 ( 0.1)

1 (<0.1)

Breast Pain

37 ( 1.5)

43 ( 1.8)

1 (<0.1)

0 -

Anorexia

20 ( 0.8)

20 ( 0.8)

1 (<0.1)

1 (<0.1)

Endometrial Hyperplasia/Cancer 2,3

11/1909 ( 0.6)

70/1943 ( 3.6)

- -

Endometrial Proliferation Disorders

10 (0.3)

71 (1.8)

0 -

14 (0.6)

Endometrial Hyperplasia/Cancer 1,3

6/1909 ( 0.3)

57/1943 (2.9)

-

-

Other Endometrial Disorders

2 (<0.1)

3 ( 0.1)

0 -

0 -

Myocardial Infarction1

24 ( 1.0)

12 ( 0.5)

-

-

Myocardial Infarction2

37 ( 1.5)

25 (1.0)

-

-

Myocardial Ischemia

6 ( 0.2)

9 ( 0.4)

-

-

Cerebrovascular Accident1

52 ( 2.1)

46 ( 1.9)

-

-

Cerebrovascular Accident2

70 ( 2.9)

63 ( 2.6)

-

-

Angina1

26 ( 1.1)

24 ( 1.0)

-

-

Angina2

32 ( 1.3)

31 ( 1.3)

-

-

Thromboembolic Event1

51 ( 2.1)

89 ( 3.6)

-

-

Thromboembolic Event2

71 ( 2.9)

111 ( 4.5)

-

-

Other Cardiovascular1

260 (10.6)

256 (10.5)

-

-

Other Cardiovascular2

312 (12.7)

337 (13.8)

-

-

Second Malignancies1

53 ( 2.2)

78 ( 3.2)

-

-

Second Malignancies2

102 ( 4.2)

119 ( 4.9)

-

-

1 During study treatment, based on Safety Monotherapy population

2 Any time after randomization, including post treatment follow-up

3 Excluding women who had undergone hysterectomy before study entry

Note: Cardiovascular (including cerebrovascular and thromboembolic), skeletal and urogenital/endometrial events and second malignancies were collected life-long. All of these events were assumed to be of CTC grade 3-5 and were not individually graded.

When considering all grades during study treatment, a higher incidence of events was seen for Letrozole tablets, USP regarding fractures (10.1% vs 7.1%), myocardial infarctions (1.0% vs 0.5%), and arthralgia (25.2% vs 20.4%) (Letrozole tablets, USP vs tamoxifen respectively). A higher incidence was seen for tamoxifen regarding thromboembolic events (2.1% vs 3.6%), endometrial hyperplasia/cancer (0.3% vs 2.9%), and endometrial proliferation disorders (0.3% vs 1.8%) (Letrozole tablets, USP vs tamoxifen respectively).

At a median follow up of 73 months, a higher incidence of events was seen for Letrozole tablets, USP (13.8%) than for tamoxifen (10.5%) regarding fractures. A higher incidence was seen for tamoxifen compared to Letrozole tablets, USP regarding thromboembolic events (4.5% vs 2.9%), and endometrial hyperplasia or cancer (2.9% vs 0.4%) (tamoxifen vs Letrozole tablets, USP, respectively).

Bone Study: Results of a phase 3 safety trial in 262 post menopausal women with resected receptor positive early breast cancer in the adjuvant setting comparing the effect on lumbar spine (L2-L4) bone mineral density (BMD) of adjuvant treatment with Letrozole to that with tamoxifen showed at 24 months a median decrease in lumbar spine BMD of 4.1% in the Letrozole arm compared to a median increase of 0.3% in the tamoxifen arm (difference = 4.4%) (P<0.0001). No patients with a normal BMD at baseline became osteoporotic over the 2 years and only 1 patient with osteopenia at baseline (T score of -1.9) developed osteoporosis during the treatment period (assessment by central review). The results for total hip BMD were similar, although the differences between the two treatments were less pronounced. During the 2 year period, fractures were reported by 4 of 103 patients (4%) in the Letrozole arm, and 6 of 97 patients (6%) in the tamoxifen arm.

Lipid Study: In a phase 3 safety trial in 262 post menopausal women with resected receptor positive early breast cancer at 24 months comparing the effects on lipid profiles of adjuvant Letrozole to tamoxifen, 12% of patients on Letrozole had at least one total cholesterol value of a higher CTCAE grade than at baseline compared with 4% of patients on tamoxifen.

Extended Adjuvant Treatment of Early Breast Cancer, Median Treatment Duration of 24 Months

The median duration of extended adjuvant treatment was 24 months and the median duration of follow-up for safety was 28 months for patients receiving Letrozole tablets, USP and placebo.

Table 2 describes the adverse reactions occurring at a frequency of at least 5% in any treatment group during treatment. Most adverse reactions reported were Grade 1 and Grade 2 based on the Common Toxicity Criteria Version 2.0. In the extended adjuvant setting, the reported drug-related adverse reactions that were significantly different from placebo were hot flashes, arthralgia/arthritis, and myalgia.

Table 2: Percentage of Patients with Adverse Reactions

 

Number (%) of Patients with Grade 1-4 Adverse Reaction

Number (%) of Patients with Grade 3-4 Adverse Reaction

 

Letrozole tablets, USP
N=2563

Placebo
N=2573

Letrozole tablets, USP
N=2563

Placebo
N=2573

Any Adverse Reaction
Vascular Disorders
     Flushing
General Disorders
    Asthenia
     Edema NOS
Musculoskeletal Disorders
     Arthralgia
     Arthritis NOS
     Myalgia
     Back Pain
Nervous System Disorders
     Headache
     Dizziness
Skin Disorders
     Sweating Increased
Gastrointestinal Disorders
     Constipation
     Nausea
     Diarrhea NOS
Metabolic Disorders
     Hypercholesterolemia
Reproductive Disorders
    Vaginal Hemorrhage
    Vulvovaginal Dryness
Psychiatric Disorders
     Insomnia
Respiratory Disorders
     Dyspnea
Investigations
Infections and Infestations
Renal Disorders

2232 (87.1)
1375 (53.6)
1273 (49.7)
1154 (45)
862 (33.6)
471 (18.4)
978 (38.2)
565 (22)
173 (6.7)
171 (6.7)
129 (5)
863 (33.7)
516 (20.1)
363 (14.2)
830 (32.4)
619 (24.2)
725 (28.3)
290 (11.3)
221 (8.6)
128 (5)
551 (21.5)
401 (15.6)
303 (11.8)
123 (4.8)
137 (5.3)
320 (12.5)
149 (5.8)
279 (10.9)
140 (5.5)
184 (7.2)
166 (6.5)
130 (5.1)

2174 (84.5)
1230 (47.8)
1114 (43.3)
1090 (42.4)
826 (32.1)
416 (16.2)
836 (32.5)
465 (18.1)
124 (4.8)
122 (4.7)
112 (4.4)
819 (31.8)
508 (19.7)
342 (13.3)
787 (30.6)
577 (22.4)
731 (28.4)
304 (11.8)
212 (8.2)
143 (5.6)
537 (20.9)
398 (15.5)
357 (13.9)
171 (6.6)
127 (4.9)
276 (10.7)
120 (4.7)
260 (10.1)
137 (5.3)
147 (5.7)
163 (6.3)
100 (3.9)

419 (16.3)
59 (2.3)
3 (0.1)
30 (1.2)
16 (0.6)
4 (0.2)
71 (2.8)
25 (1)
10 (0.4)
8 (0.3)
8 (0.3)
65 (2.5)
18 (0.7)
9 (0.4)
17 (0.7)
1 (<0.1)
43 (1.7)
6 (0.2)
3 (0.1)
12 (0.5)
24 (0.9)
2 (<0.1)
9 (0.4)
2 (<0.1)
0 –
21 (0.8)
2 (<0.1)
30 (1.2)
21 (0.8)
13 (0.5)
40 (1.6)
12 (0.5)

389 (15.1)
74 (2.9)
0 –
28 (1.1)
7 (0.3)
3 (0.1)
50 (1.9)
20 (0.8)
5 (0.2)
6 (0.2)
7 (0.3)
58 (2.3)
17 (0.7)
6 (0.2)
16 (0.6)
0 –
42 (1.6)
2 (<0.1)
10 (0.4)
8 (0.3)
32 (1.2)
5 (0.2)
8 (0.3)
5 (0.2)
0 –
16 (0.6)
2 (<0.1)
28 (1.1)
18 (0.7)
13 (0.5)
33 (1.3)
6 (0.2)

Based on a median follow-up of patients for 28 months, the incidence of clinical fractures from the core randomized study in patients who received Letrozole tablets, USP was 5.9% (152) and placebo was 5.5% (142). The incidence of self-reported osteoporosis was higher in patients who received Letrozole tablets, USP 6.9% (176) than in patients who received placebo 5.5% (141). Bisphosphonates were administered to 21.1% of the patients who received Letrozole tablets, USP and 18.7% of the patients who received placebo.

The incidence of cardiovascular ischemic events from the core randomized study was comparable between patients who received Letrozole tablets, USP 6.8% (175) and placebo 6.5% (167).

A patient-reported measure that captures treatment impact on important symptoms associated with estrogen deficiency demonstrated a difference in favor of placebo for vasomotor and sexual symptom domains.

Bone Sub-study: [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1)].

Lipid Sub-study: In the extended adjuvant setting, based on a median duration of follow-up of 62 months, there was no significant difference between Letrozole tablets, USP and placebo in total cholesterol or in any lipid fraction at any time over 5 years. Use of lipid lowering drugs or dietary management of elevated lipids was allowed. [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2)].

Updated Analysis, Extended Adjuvant Treatment of Early Breast Cancer, Median Treatment Duration of 60 Months

The extended adjuvant treatment trial was unblinded early [see Adverse Reactions (6.2)]. At the updated (final analysis), overall the side effects seen were consistent to those seen at a median treatment duration of 24 months.

During treatment or within 30 days of stopping treatment (median duration of treatment 60 months) a higher rate of fractures was observed for Letrozole tablets, USP (10.4%) compared to placebo (5.8%), as also a higher rate of osteoporosis (Letrozole tablets, USP 12.2% vs placebo 6.4%).

Based on 62 months median duration of follow-up in the randomized Letrozole arm in the Safety population the incidence of new fractures at any time after randomization was 13.3% for Letrozole and 7.8% for placebo. The incidence of new osteoporosis was 14.5% for Letrozole and 7.8% for placebo.

During treatment or within 30 days of stopping treatment (median duration of treatment 60 months) the incidence of cardiovascular events was 9.8% for Letrozole tablets, USP and 7.0% for placebo.

Based on 62 months median duration of follow-up in the randomized Letrozole arm in the Safety population the incidence of cardiovascular disease at any time after randomization was 14.4% for Letrozole and 9.8% for placebo.

Lipid sub-study: In the extended adjuvant setting, based on a median duration of follow-up of 62 months, there was no significant difference between Letrozole tablets, USP and placebo in total cholesterol or in any lipid fraction over 5 years. Use of lipid lowering drugs or dietary management of elevated lipids was allowed. [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2)].

First-Line Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer

A total of 455 patients were treated for a median time of exposure of 11 months. The incidence of adverse reactions was similar for Letrozole tablets, USP and tamoxifen. The most frequently reported adverse reactions were bone pain, hot flushes, back pain, nausea, arthralgia and dyspnea. Discontinuations for adverse reactions other than progression of tumor occurred in 10/455 (2%) of patients on Letrozole tablets, USP and in 15/455 (3%) of patients on tamoxifen.

Adverse reactions, regardless of relationship to study drug, that were reported in at least 5% of the patients treated with Letrozole tablets USP, 2.5 mg or tamoxifen 20 mg in the first-line treatment study are shown in Table 3.

Table 3: Percentage (%) of Patients with Adverse Reactions

Adverse Reaction

Letrozole tablets, USP
2.5 mg
(N=455)
%

Tamoxifen
20 mg
(N=455)
%

General Disorders
     Fatigue
     Chest Pain
     Edema Peripheral
     Pain NOS
     Weakness
Investigations
     Weight Decreased
Vascular Disorders
    Hot Flushes
     Hypertension
Gastrointestinal Disorders
     Nausea
     Constipation
     Diarrhea
     Vomiting
Infections/Infestations
     Influenza
     Urinary Tract Infection NOS
Injury, Poisoning and Procedural Complications
     Post-Mastectomy Lymphedema
Metabolism and Nutrition Disorders
     Anorexia
Musculoskeletal and Connective Tissue Disorders
     Bone Pain
     Back Pain
     Arthralgia
     Pain in Limb
Nervous System Disorders
     Headache NOS
Psychiatric Disorders
     Insomnia
Reproductive System and Breast Disorders
     Breast Pain
Respiratory, Thoracic and Mediastinal Disorders
     Dyspnea
     Cough
     Chest Wall Pain

 
13
8
5
5
6

7

19
8

17
10
8
7

6
6

7

4

22
18
16
10

8

7

7

18
13
6

 
13
9
6
7
4

5

16
4

17
11
4
8

4
3

7

6

21
19
15
8

7

4

7

17
13
6

Other less frequent (≤ 2%) adverse reactions considered consequential for both treatment groups, included peripheral thromboembolic events, cardiovascular events, and cerebrovascular events. Peripheral thromboembolic events included venous thrombosis, thrombophlebitis, portal vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Cardiovascular events included angina, myocardial infarction, myocardial ischemia, and coronary heart disease. Cerebrovascular events included transient ischemic attacks, thrombotic or hemorrhagic strokes and development of hemiparesis.

Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer

Study discontinuations in the megestrol acetate comparison study for adverse reactions other than progression of tumor were 5/188 (2.7%) on Letrozole tablets USP, 0.5 mg, in 4/174 (2.3%) on Letrozole tablets USP, 2.5 mg, and in 15/190 (7.9%) on megestrol acetate. There were fewer thromboembolic events at both Letrozole tablets, USP doses than on the megestrol acetate arm (0.6% vs 4.7%). There was also less vaginal bleeding (0.3% vs 3.2%) on Letrozole tablets, USP than on megestrol acetate. In the aminoglutethimide comparison study, discontinuations for reasons other than progression occurred in 6/193 (3.1%) on 0.5 mg Letrozole tablets, USP, 7/185 (3.8%) on 2.5 mg Letrozole tablets, USP, and 7/178 (3.9%) of patients on aminoglutethimide.

Comparisons of the incidence of adverse reactions revealed no significant differences between the high and low dose Letrozole tablets, USP groups in either study. Most of the adverse reactions observed in all treatment groups were mild to moderate in severity and it was generally not possible to distinguish adverse reactions due to treatment from the consequences of the patient’s metastatic breast cancer, the effects of estrogen deprivation, or intercurrent illness.

Adverse reactions, regardless of relationship to study drug, that were reported in at least 5% of the patients treated with Letrozole tablets USP, 0.5 mg, Letrozole tablets USP, 2.5 mg, megestrol acetate, or aminoglutethimide in the two controlled trials are shown in Table 4.

Table 4: Percentage (%) of Patients with Adverse Reactions

Adverse Reaction

Pooled Letrozole tablets, USP
2.5 mg
(N=359)
%

Pooled Letrozole tablets, USP
0.5 mg
(N=380)
%

megestrol acetate
160 mg
(N=189)
%

aminoglutethimide
500 mg
(N=178)
%

Body as a Whole

     

   Fatigue

8

6

11

3

   Chest Pain

6

3

7

3

   Peripheral Edema1

5

5

8

3

   Asthenia

4

5

4

5

   Weight Increase

2

2

9

3

Cardiovascular

     

   Hypertension

5

7

5

6

Digestive System

   

   Nausea

13

15

9

14

   Vomiting

7

7

5

9

   Constipation

6

7

9

7

   Diarrhea

6

5

3

4

   Pain-Abdominal

6

5

9

8

   Anorexia

5

3

5

5

   Dyspepsia

3

4

6

5

Infections/Infestations

 

   Viral Infection

6

5

6

3

Lab Abnormality

   Hypercholesterolemia

3

3

0

6

Musculoskeletal System

   Musculoskeletal2

21

22

30

14

   Arthralgia

8

8

8

3

Nervous System

   Headache

9

12

9

7

   Somnolence

3

2

2

9

   Dizziness

3

5

7

3

Respiratory System

   Dyspnea

7

9

16

5

   Coughing

6

5

7

5

Skin and Appendages

   Hot Flushes

6

5

4

3

   Rash3

5

4

3

12

   Pruritus

1

2

5

3

1 Includes peripheral edema, leg edema, dependent edema, edema

2 Includes musculoskeletal pain, skeletal pain, back pain, arm pain, leg pain

3 Includes rash, erythematous rash, maculopapular rash, psoriasiform rash, vesicular rash

Other less frequent (<5%) adverse reactions considered consequential and reported in at least 3 patients treated with Letrozole tablets, USP, included hypercalcemia, fracture, depression, anxiety, pleural effusion, alopecia, increased sweating and vertigo.

First and Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer

In the combined analysis of the first- and second-line metastatic trials and post-marketing experiences other adverse reactions that were reported were cataract, eye irritation, palpitations, cardiac failure, tachycardia, dysesthesia (including hypesthesia/paresthesia), arterial thrombosis, memory impairment, irritability, nervousness, urticaria, increased urinary frequency, leukopenia, stomatitis cancer pain, pyrexia, vaginal discharge, appetite increase, dryness of skin and mucosa (including dry mouth), and disturbances of taste and thirst.

Postmarketing Experience

Cases of blurred vision, increased hepatic enzymes, angioedema, anaphylactic reactions, toxic epidermal necrolysis, erythema multiforme, and hepatitis have been reported. Cases of carpal tunnel syndrome and trigger finger have been identified during post approval use of Letrozole tablets, USP.

Drug Interactions

Tamoxifen

Coadministration of Letrozole tablets, USP and tamoxifen 20 mg daily resulted in a reduction of Letrozole plasma levels of 38% on average. Clinical experience in the second-line breast cancer trials indicates that the therapeutic effect of Letrozole tablets, USP therapy is not impaired if Letrozole tablets, USP are administered immediately after tamoxifen.

Cimetidine

A pharmacokinetic interaction study with cimetidine showed no clinically significant effect on Letrozole pharmacokinetics.

Warfarin

An interaction study with warfarin showed no clinically significant effect of Letrozole on warfarin pharmacokinetics.

Other anticancer agents

There is no clinical experience to date on the use of Letrozole tablets, USP in combination with other anticancer agents.

USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS

Pregnancy

Pregnancy Category X [see Contraindications (4)]. Letrozole tablets, USP may cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman and the clinical benefit to premenopausal women with breast cancer has not been demonstrated. Letrozole tablets, USP are contraindicated in women who are or may become pregnant. If this drug is used during pregnancy, or if the patient becomes pregnant while taking this drug, the patient should be apprised of the potential hazard to a fetus.

Letrozole tablets, USP caused adverse pregnancy outcomes, including congenital malformations, in rats and rabbits at doses much smaller than the daily maximum recommended human dose (MRHD) on a mg/m2 basis. Effects included increased post-implantation pregnancy loss and resorptions, fewer live fetuses, and fetal malformations affecting the renal and skeletal systems. Animal data and Letrozole’s mechanism of action raise concerns that Letrozole could be a human teratogen as well.

Reproduction studies in rats showed embryo and fetal toxicity at Letrozole doses during organogenesis equal to or greater than 1/100 the daily maximum recommended human dose (MHRD) (mg/m2 basis). Adverse effects included: intrauterine mortality; increased resorptions and postimplantation loss; decreased numbers of live fetuses; and fetal anomalies including absence and shortening of renal papilla, dilation of ureter, edema and incomplete ossification of frontal skull and metatarsals. Letrozole doses 1/10 the daily MHRD (mg/m2 basis) caused fetal domed head and cervical/centrum vertebral fusion. In rabbits, Letrozole caused embryo and fetal toxicity at doses about 1/100,000 and 1/10,000 the daily MHRD respectively (mg/m2 basis). Fetal anomalies included incomplete ossification of the skull, sternebrae, and fore- and hind legs. [see Nonclinical Toxicology (13.2)].

Physicians should discuss the need for adequate contraception with women who are recently menopausal. Contraception should be used until postmenopausal status is clinically well established. 

Nursing Mothers

It is not known if Letrozole is excreted in human milk. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk and because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants from Letrozole, a decision should be made whether to discontinue nursing or to discontinue the drug, taking into account the importance of the drug to the mother. 

Pediatric Use

The safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients have not been established. 

Geriatric Use

The median age of patients in all studies of first-line and second-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer was 64-65 years. About 1/3 of the patients were ≥ 70 years old. In the first-line study, patients ≥ 70 years of age experienced longer time to tumor progression and higher response rates than patients <70.

For the extended adjuvant setting, more than 5,100 postmenopausal women were enrolled in the clinical study. In total, 41% of patients were aged 65 years or older at enrollment, while 12% were 75 or older. In the extended adjuvant setting, no overall differences in safety or efficacy were observed between these older patients and younger patients, and other reported clinical experience has not identified differences in responses between the elderly and younger patients, but greater sensitivity of some older individuals cannot be ruled out.

In the adjuvant setting, more than 8,000 postmenopausal women were enrolled in the clinical study. In total, 36 % of patients were aged 65 years or older at enrollment, while 12% were 75 or older. More adverse reactions were generally reported in elderly patients irrespective of study treatment allocation. However, in comparison to tamoxifen, no overall differences with regards to the safety and efficacy profiles were observed between elderly patients and younger patients. 

Overdosage

Isolated cases of Letrozole tablets, USP overdose have been reported. In these instances, the highest single dose ingested was 62.5 mg or 25 tablets. While no serious adverse reactions were reported in these cases, because of the limited data available, no firm recommendations for treatment can be made. However, emesis could be induced if the patient is alert. In general, supportive care and frequent monitoring of vital signs are also appropriate. In single-dose studies, the highest dose used was 30 mg, which was well tolerated; in multiple-dose trials, the largest dose of 10 mg was well tolerated.

Lethality was observed in mice and rats following single oral doses that were equal to or greater than 2,000 mg/kg (about 4,000 to 8,000 times the daily maximum recommended human dose on a mg/m2 basis); death was associated with reduced motor activity, ataxia and dyspnea. Lethality was observed in cats following single IV doses that were equal to or greater than 10 mg/kg (about 50 times the daily maximum recommended human dose on a mg/m2 basis); death was preceded by depressed blood pressure and arrhythmias.

Letrozole Description

Letrozole tablets, USP for oral administration contains 2.5 mg of Letrozole, USP, a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (inhibitor of estrogen synthesis). It is chemically described as 4,4′-(1H-1,2,4-Triazol-1-ylmethylene)dibenzonitrile, and its structural formula is

Letrozole is a white to yellowish crystalline powder, practically odorless, freely soluble in dichloromethane, slightly soluble in ethanol, and practically insoluble in water. It has a molecular weight of 285.31, empirical formula C17H11N5, and a melting range of 184°C to 185°C.

Letrozole tablets, USP are available as 2.5 mg tablets for oral administration.

Inactive Ingredients: Mannitol, microcrystalline cellulose, lactose monohydrate, sodium starch glycolate, magnesium stearate, polyvinyl alcohol, polyethylene glycol, titanium dioxide, talc, iron oxide yellow.

Letrozole - Clinical Pharmacology

Mechanism of Action

The growth of some cancers of the breast is stimulated or maintained by estrogens. Treatment of breast cancer thought to be hormonally responsive (i.e., estrogen and/or progesterone receptor positive or receptor unknown) has included a variety of efforts to decrease estrogen levels (ovariectomy, adrenalectomy, hypophysectomy) or inhibit estrogen effects (antiestrogens and progestational agents). These interventions lead to decreased tumor mass or delayed progression of tumor growth in some women.

In postmenopausal women, estrogens are mainly derived from the action of the aromatase enzyme, which converts adrenal androgens (primarily androstenedione and testosterone) to estrone and estradiol. The suppression of estrogen biosynthesis in peripheral tissues and in the cancer tissue itself can therefore be achieved by specifically inhibiting the aromatase enzyme.

Letrozole is a nonsteroidal competitive inhibitor of the aromatase enzyme system; it inhibits the conversion of androgens to estrogens. In adult nontumor- and tumor-bearing female animals, Letrozole is as effective as ovariectomy in reducing uterine weight, elevating serum LH, and causing the regression of estrogen-dependent tumors. In contrast to ovariectomy, treatment with Letrozole does not lead to an increase in serum FSH. Letrozole selectively inhibits gonadal steroidogenesis but has no significant effect on adrenal mineralocorticoid or glucocorticoid synthesis.

Letrozole inhibits the aromatase enzyme by competitively binding to the heme of the cytochrome P450 subunit of the enzyme, resulting in a reduction of estrogen biosynthesis in all tissues. Treatment of women with Letrozole significantly lowers serum estrone, estradiol and estrone sulfate and has not been shown to significantly affect adrenal corticosteroid synthesis, aldosterone synthesis, or synthesis of thyroid hormones.

Pharmacodynamics

In postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer, daily doses of 0.1 mg to 5 mg Letrozole tablets, USP suppress plasma concentrations of estradiol, estrone, and estrone sulfate by 75% to 95% from baseline with maximal suppression achieved within two-three days. Suppression is dose-related, with doses of 0.5 mg and higher giving many values of estrone and estrone sulfate that were below the limit of detection in the assays. Estrogen suppression was maintained throughout treatment in all patients treated at 0.5 mg or higher.

Letrozole is highly specific in inhibiting aromatase activity. There is no impairment of adrenal steroidogenesis. No clinically-relevant changes were found in the plasma concentrations of cortisol, aldosterone, 11-deoxycortisol, 17-hydroxy-progesterone, ACTH or in plasma renin activity among postmenopausal patients treated with a daily dose of Letrozole tablets, USP 0.1 mg to 5 mg. The ACTH stimulation test performed after 6 and 12 weeks of treatment with daily doses of 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2.5, and 5 mg did not indicate any attenuation of aldosterone or cortisol production. Glucocorticoid or mineralocorticoid supplementation is, therefore, not necessary.

No changes were noted in plasma concentrations of androgens (androstenedione and testosterone) among healthy postmenopausal women after 0.1, 0.5, and 2.5 mg single doses of Letrozole tablets, USP or in plasma concentrations of androstenedione among postmenopausal patients treated with daily doses of 0.1 mg to 5 mg. This indicates that the blockade of estrogen biosynthesis does not lead to accumulation of androgenic precursors. Plasma levels of LH and FSH were not affected by Letrozole in patients, nor was thyroid function as evaluated by TSH levels, T3 uptake, and T4 levels.

Pharmacokinetics

Absorption and Distribution: Letrozole is rapidly and completely absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and absorption is not affected by food. It is metabolized slowly to an inactive metabolite whose glucuronide conjugate is excreted renally, representing the major clearance pathway. About 90% of radiolabeled Letrozole is recovered in urine. Letrozole’s terminal elimination half-life is about 2 days and steady-state plasma concentration after daily 2.5 mg dosing is reached in 2-6 weeks. Plasma concentrations at steady state are 1.5 to 2 times higher than predicted from the concentrations measured after a single dose, indicating a slight non-linearity in the pharmacokinetics of Letrozole upon daily administration of 2.5 mg. These steady-state levels are maintained over extended periods, however, and continuous accumulation of Letrozole does not occur. Letrozole is weakly protein bound and has a large volume of distribution (approximately 1.9 L/kg).

Metabolism and Excretion: Metabolism to a pharmacologically-inactive carbinol metabolite (4,4′-methanol-bisbenzonitrile) and renal excretion of the glucuronide conjugate of this metabolite is the major pathway of Letrozole clearance. Of the radiolabel recovered in urine, at least 75% was the glucuronide of the carbinol metabolite, about 9% was two unidentified metabolites, and 6% was unchanged Letrozole.

In human microsomes with specific CYP isozyme activity, CYP3A4 metabolized Letrozole to the carbinol metabolite while CYP2A6 formed both this metabolite and its ketone analog. In human liver microsomes, Letrozole strongly inhibited CYP2A6 and moderately inhibited CYP2C19.

Pediatric, Geriatric and Race: In the study populations (adults ranging in age from 35 to >80 years), no change in pharmacokinetic parameters was observed with increasing age. Differences in Letrozole pharmacokinetics between adult and pediatric populations have not been studied. Differences in Letrozole pharmacokinetics due to race have not been studied.

Renal Impairment: In a study of volunteers with varying renal function (24-hour creatinine clearance: 9 to 116 mL/min), no effect of renal function on the pharmacokinetics of single doses of 2.5 mg of Letrozole tablets, USP was found. In addition, in a study of 347 patients with advanced breast cancer, about half of whom received 2.5 mg Letrozole tablets, USP and half 0.5 mg Letrozole tablets, USP, renal impairment (calculated creatinine clearance: 20 to 50 mL/min) did not affect steady-state plasma Letrozole concentrations.

Hepatic Impairment: In a study of subjects with mild to moderate non-metastatic hepatic dysfunction (e.g., cirrhosis, Child-Pugh classification A and B), the mean AUC values of the volunteers with moderate hepatic impairment were 37% higher than in normal subjects, but still within the range seen in subjects without impaired function.

In a pharmacokinetic study, subjects with liver cirrhosis and severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh classification C, which included bilirubins about 2-11 times ULN with minimal to severe ascites) had two-fold increase in exposure (AUC) and 47% reduction in systemic clearance. Breast cancer patients with severe hepatic impairment are thus expected to be exposed to higher levels of Letrozole than patients with normal liver function receiving similar doses of this drug. [see Dosage and Administration (2.5)].

Nonclinical Toxicology

Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility

A conventional carcinogenesis study in mice at doses of 0.6 to 60 mg/kg/day (about 1 to 100 times the daily maximum recommended human dose on a mg/m2 basis) administered by oral gavage for up to 2 years revealed a dose-related increase in the incidence of benign ovarian stromal tumors. The incidence of combined hepatocellular adenoma and carcinoma showed a significant trend in females when the high dose group was excluded due to low survival. In a separate study, plasma AUC0-12hr levels in mice at 60 mg/kg/day were 55 times higher than the AUC0-24hr level in breast cancer patients at the recommended dose. The carcinogenicity study in rats at oral doses of 0.1 to 10 mg/kg/day (about 0.4 to 40 times the daily maximum recommended human dose on a mg/m2 basis) for up to 2 years also produced an increase in the incidence of benign ovarian stromal tumors at 10 mg/kg/day. Ovarian hyperplasia was observed in females at doses equal to or greater than 0.1 mg/kg/day. At 10 mg/kg/day, plasma AUC0-24hr levels in rats were 80 times higher than the level in breast cancer patients at the recommended dose. The benign ovarian stromal tumors observed in mice and rats were considered to be related to the pharmacological inhibition of estrogen synthesis and may be due to increased luteinizing hormone resulting from the decrease in circulating estrogen.

Letrozole tablets, USP were not mutagenic in in vitro tests (Ames and E. coli bacterial tests) but were observed to be a potential clastogen in in vitro assays (CHO K1 and CCL 61 Chinese hamster ovary cells). Letrozole was not clastogenic in vivo (micronucleus test in rats).

Studies to investigate the effect of Letrozole on fertility have not been conducted; however, repeated dosing caused sexual inactivity in females and atrophy of the reproductive tract in males and females at doses of 0.6, 0.1 and 0.03 mg/kg in mice, rats and dogs, respectively (about one, 0.4 and 0.4 the daily maximum recommended human dose on a mg/m2 basis, respectively). Oral administration of Letrozole to female rats starting 2 weeks before mating until pregnancy day 6 resulted in decreases in the incidence of successful mating and pregnancy at equal to or greater than 0.03 mg/kg/day (approximately 0.1 times the recommended human dose on a mg/m2 basis). An increase in pre-implantation loss was observed at doses equal to or greater than 0.003 mg/kg/day (approximately 0.01 times the recommended human dose on a mg/m2 basis).

Letrozole administered to young (postnatal day 7) rats for 12 weeks duration at 0.003, 0.03, 0.3 mg/kg/day by oral gavage, resulted in adverse skeletal/growth effects (bone maturation, bone mineral density) and neuroendocrine and reproductive developmental perturbations of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis at exposures less than exposure anticipated at the clinical dose of 2.5 mg/day. Decreased fertility was accompanied by hypertrophy of the hypophysis and testicular changes that included degeneration of the seminiferous tubular epithelium and atrophy of the female reproductive tract. Young rats in this study were allowed to recover following discontinuation of Letrozole treatment for 42 days. Histopathological changes were not reversible at clinically relevant exposures.

Animal Toxicology and/or Pharmacology

Reproductive Toxicology: Reproduction studies in rats at Letrozole doses equal to or greater than 0.003 mg/kg (about 1/100 the daily maximum recommended human dose on a mg/m2 basis) administered during the period of organogenesis, have shown that Letrozole is embryotoxic and fetotoxic, as indicated by intrauterine mortality, increased resorption, increased postimplantation loss, decreased numbers of live fetuses and fetal anomalies including absence and shortening of renal papilla, dilation of ureter, edema and incomplete ossification of frontal skull and metatarsals. Letrozole was teratogenic in rats. A 0.03 mg/kg dose (about 1/10 the daily maximum recommended human dose on a mg/m2 basis) caused fetal domed head and cervical/centrum vertebral fusion.

Letrozole is embryotoxic at doses equal to or greater than 0.002 mg/kg and fetotoxic when administered to rabbits at 0.02 mg/kg (about 1/100,000 and 1/10,000 the daily maximum recommended human dose on a mg/m2 basis, respectively). Fetal anomalies included incomplete ossification of the skull, sternebrae, and fore- and hind legs.

Clinical Studies

Updated Adjuvant Treatment of Early Breast Cancer

In a multicenter study enrolling over 8,000 postmenopausal women with resected, receptor-positive early breast cancer, one of the following treatments was randomized in a double-blind manner:

Option 1:
A. tamoxifen for 5 years
B. Letrozole tablets, USP for 5 years
C. tamoxifen for 2 years followed by Letrozole tablets, USP for 3 years
D. Letrozole tablets, USP for 2 years followed by tamoxifen for 3 years

Option 2:
A. tamoxifen for 5 years
B. Letrozole tablets, USP for 5 years

The study in the adjuvant setting, BIG 1-98 was designed to answer two primary questions: whether Letrozole tablets, USP for 5 years was superior to tamoxifen for 5 years (Primary Core Analysis) and whether switching endocrine treatments at 2 years was superior to continuing the same agent for a total of 5 years (Sequential Treatments Analysis). Selected baseline characteristics for the study population are shown in Table 5.

The primary endpoint of this trial was disease-free survival (DFS) (i.e., interval between randomization and earliest occurrence of a local, regional, or distant recurrence, or invasive contralateral breast cancer, or death from any cause). The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), systemic disease-free survival (SDFS), invasive contralateral breast cancer, time to breast cancer recurrence (TBR) and time to distant metastasis (TDM).

The Primary Core Analysis (PCA) included all patients and all follow-up in the monotherapy arms in both randomization options, but follow-up in the two sequential treatments arms was truncated 30 days after switching treatments. The PCA was conducted at a median treatment duration of 24 months and a median follow-up of 26 months. Letrozole tablets, USP were superior to tamoxifen in all endpoints except overall survival and contralateral breast cancer [e.g., DFS: hazard ratio, HR 0.79; 95% CI (0.68, 0.92); P=0.002; SDFS: HR 0.83; 95% CI (0.70, 0.97); TDM: HR 0.73; 95% CI (0.60, 0.88); OS: HR 0.86; 95% CI (0.70, 1.06).

In 2005, based on recommendations by the independent Data Monitoring Committee, the tamoxifen arms were unblinded and patients were allowed to complete initial adjuvant therapy with Letrozole tablets, USP (if they had received tamoxifen for at least 2 years) or to start extended adjuvant treatment with Letrozole tablets, USP (if they had received tamoxifen for at least 4.5 years) if they remained alive and disease-free. In total, 632 patients crossed to Letrozole tablets, USP or another aromatase inhibitor. Approximately 70% (448) of these 632 patients crossed to Letrozole tablets, USP to complete initial adjuvant therapy and most of these crossed in years 3 to 4. All of these patients were in Option 1. A total of 184 patients started extended adjuvant therapy with Letrozole tablets, USP (172 patients) or with another aromatase inhibitor (12 patients). To explore the impact of this selective crossover, results from analyses censoring follow-up at the date of the selective crossover (in the tamoxifen arm) are presented for the Monotherapy Arms Analysis (MAA).

The PCA allowed the results of Letrozole tablets, USP for 5 years compared with tamoxifen for 5 years to be reported in 2005 after a median follow-up of only 26 months. The design of the PCA is not optimal to evaluate the effect of Letrozole tablets, USP after a longer time (because follow-up was truncated in two arms at around 25 months). The Monotherapy Arms Analysis (ignoring the two sequential treatment arms) provided follow-up equally as long in each treatment and did not over-emphasize early recurrences as the PCA did. The MAA thus provides the clinically appropriate updated efficacy results in answer to the first primary question, despite the confounding of the tamoxifen reference arm by the selective crossover to Letrozole tablets, USP. The updated results for the MAA are summarized in Table 6. Median follow-up for this analysis is 73 months.

The Sequential Treatments Analysis (STA) addresses the second primary question of the study. The primary analysis for the Sequential Treatments Analysis (STA) was from switch (or equivalent time-point in monotherapy arms) + 30 days (STA-S) with a two-sided test applied to each pair-wise comparison at the 2.5% level. Additional analyses were conducted from randomization (STA-R) but these comparisons (added in light of changing medical practice) were under-powered for efficacy.

Table 5: Adjuvant Study - Patient and Disease Characteristics (ITT Population)

 

Primary Core Analysis (PCA)

Monotherapy Arms Analysis (MAA)

Characteristic

Letrozole tablets, USP
N=4003
n (%)

tamoxifen
N=4007
n (%)

Letrozole tablets, USP
N=2463

n (%)

tamoxifen
N=2459

n (%)

Age (median, years)

61

61

61

61

Age range (years)

38-89

39-90

38-88

39-90

Hormone receptor status (%)

 

 

 

 

   ER+ and/or PgR+

99.7

99.7

99.7

99.7

   Both unknown

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

Nodal status (%)

 

 

 

 

   Node negative

52

52

50

52

   Node positive

41

41

43

41

   Nodal status unknown

7

7

7

7

Prior adjuvant chemotherapy (%)

24

24

24

24

Table 6: Updated Adjuvant Study Results - Monotherapy Arms Analysis (Median Follow-up 73 Months)

 

 

Letrozole tablets, USP
N=2463

tamoxifen
N=2459

Hazard ratio

 

 

 

Events (%)

5-year rate

Events (%)

5-year rate

(95% CI)

P

Disease-free survival1

ITT

445 (18.1)

87.4

500 (20.3)

84.7

0.87 (0.76, 0.99)

0.03

Censor

445

87.4

483

84.2

0.84 (0.73, 0.95)

   0 positive nodes

ITT

165

92.2

189

90.3

0.88 (0.72, 1.09)

   1-3 positive nodes

ITT

151

85.6

163

83.0

0.85 (0.68, 1.06)

   >=4 positive nodes

ITT

123

71.2

142

62.6

0.81 (0.64, 1.03)

   Adjuvant chemotherapy

ITT

119

86.4

150

80.6

0.77 (0.60, 0.98)

   No chemotherapy

ITT

326

87.8

350

86.1

0.91 (0.78, 1.06)

Systemic DFS2

ITT

401

88.5

446

86.6

0.88 (0.77,1.01)

Time to distant metastasis3

ITT

257

92.4

298

90.1

0.85 (0.72, 1.00)

   Adjuvant chemotherapy

ITT

84

-

109

-

0.75 (0.56-1.00)

   No chemotherapy

ITT

173

-

189

-

0.90 (0.73,1.11)

Distant DFS4

ITT

385

89.0

432

87.1

0.87 (0.76,1.00)

Contralateral breast cancer

ITT

34

99.2

44

98.6

0.76 (0.49, 1.19)

Overall survival

ITT

303

91.8

343

90.9

0.87 (0.75, 1.02)

Censor

303

91.8

338

90.1

0.82 (0.70, 0.96)

   0 positive nodes

ITT

107

95.2

121

94.8

0.90 (0.69.1.16)

   1-3 positive nodes

ITT

99

90.8

114

90.6

0.81(0.62,1.06)

   >=4 positive nodes

ITT

92

80.2

104

73.6

0.86 (0.65, 1.14)

   Adjuvant chemotherapy

ITT

76

91.5

96

88.4

0.79 (0.58, 1.06)

   No chemotherapy

ITT

227

91.9

247

91.8

0.91 (0.76, 1.08)

Definition of:

1 Disease-free survival: Interval from randomization to earliest event of invasive loco-regional recurrence, distant metastasis, invasive contralateral breast cancer, or death without a prior event

2 Systemic disease-free survival: Interval from randomization to invasive regional recurrence, distant metastasis, or death without a prior cancer event

3 Time to distant metastasis: Interval from randomization to distant metastasis

4 Distant disease-free survival: Interval from randomization to earlier event of relapse in a distant site or death from any cause

ITT analysis ignores selective crossover in tamoxifen arms

Censored analysis censors follow-up at the date of selective crossover in 632 patients who crossed to Letrozole tablets, USP or another aromatase inhibitor after the tamoxifen arms were unblinded in 2005

Figure 1 shows the Kaplan-Meier curves for Disease-Free Survival Monotherapy Analysis

DFS events defined as loco-regional recurrence, distant metastasis, invasive contralateral breast cancer, or death from any cause (i.e., definition excludes second non-breast primary cancers).

The medians of overall survival for both arms were not reached for the Monotherapy Arms Analysis (MAA). There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival. The hazard ratio for survival in the Letrozole tablets, USP arm compared to the tamoxifen arm was 0.87, with 95% CI (0.75, 1.02) (see Table 6).

There were no significant differences in DFS, OS, SDFS, and Distant DFS from switch in the Sequential Treatments Analysis with respect to either monotherapy (e.g., [Tamoxifen 2 years followed by] Letrozole tablets, USP 3 years versus tamoxifen beyond 2 years, DFS HR 0.89; 97.5% CI 0.68, 1.15 and [Letrozole tablets, USP 2 years followed by] tamoxifen 3 years versus Letrozole tablets, USP beyond 2 years, DFS HR 0.93; 97.5% CI 0.71, 1.22).

There were no significant differences in DFS, OS, SDFS, and Distant DFS from randomization in the Sequential Treatments Analyses.

Extended Adjuvant Treatment of Early Breast Cancer, Median Treatment Duration of 24 Months

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of Letrozole tablets, USP was performed in over 5,100 postmenopausal women with receptor-positive or unknown primary breast cancer who were disease free after 5 years of adjuvant treatment with tamoxifen.

The planned duration of treatment for patients in the study was 5 years, but the trial was terminated early because of an interim analysis showing a favorable Letrozole tablets, USP effect on time without recurrence or contralateral breast cancer. At the time of unblinding, women had been followed for a median of 28 months, 30% of patients had completed 3 or more years of follow-up and less than 1% of patients had completed 5 years of follow-up.

Selected baseline characteristics for the study population are shown in Table 7.

Table 7: Selected Study Population Demographics (Modified ITT Population)

Baseline Status

Letrozole tablets, USP
N=2582

Placebo
N=2586

Hormone Receptor Status (%)

 

 

   ER+ and/or PgR+

98

98

   Both Unknown

2

2

Nodal Status (%)

 

 

   Node Negative

50

50

   Node Positive

46

46

   Nodal Status Unknown

4

4

Chemotherapy

46

46

Table 8 shows the study results. Disease-free survival was measured as the time from randomization to the earliest event of loco-regional or distant recurrence of the primary disease or development of contralateral breast cancer or death. DFS by hormone receptor status, nodal status and adjuvant chemotherapy were similar to the overall results. Data were premature for an analysis of survival.

Table 8: Extended Adjuvant Study Results
 

Letrozole tablets, USP
N = 2582

Placebo
N = 2586

Hazard Ratio
(95% CI)

P-Value

Disease Free Survival (DFS)1 Events

122 (4.7%)

193 (7.5%)

0.62 (0.49, 0.78)2

0.00003

   Local Breast Recurrence

9

22

   Local Chest Wall Recurrence

2

8

   Regional Recurrence

7

4

   Distant Recurrence

55

92

0.61 (0.44 - 0.84)

0.003

   Contralateral Breast Cancer

19

29

   Deaths Without Recurrence or Contralateral Breast Cancer

30

38

     

CI = confidence interval for hazard ratio. Hazard ratio of less than 1.0 indicates difference in favor of Letrozole tablets, USP (lesser risk of recurrence); hazard ratio greater than 1.0 indicates difference in favor of placebo (higher risk of recurrence with Letrozole tablets, USP).

1 First event of loco-regional recurrence, distant relapse, contralateral breast cancer or death from any cause

2 Analysis stratified by receptor status, nodal status and prior adjuvant chemotherapy (stratification factors as at randomization). P-value based on stratified logrank test.

Updated Analyses of Extended Adjuvant Treatment of Early Breast Cancer, Median Treatment Duration of 60 Months

 

Table 9: Update of Extended Adjuvant Study Results
 

Letrozole tablets, USP
N = 2582
(%)

Placebo
N = 2586
(%)

Hazard Ratio1
(95% CI)

P-Value2

Disease Free Survival (DFS) events3

344 (13.3)

402 (15.5)

0.89 (0.77, 1.03)

0.12

Breast cancer recurrence

209

286

0.75 (0.63, 0.89)

0.001

(Protocol definition of DFS events4)

   Local Breast Recurrence

15

44

   Local Chest Wall Recurrence

6

14

   Regional Recurrence

10

8

   Distant Recurrence

140

167

   Distant Recurrence (first or subsequent events)

142

169

0.88 (0.70,1.10)

0.246

   Contralateral Breast Cancer

37

53

   Deaths Without Recurrence or Contralateral Breast Cancer

135

116

       

1 Adjusted by receptor status, nodal status and prior chemotherapy

2 Stratified logrank test, stratified by receptor status, nodal status and prior chemotherapy

3 DFS events defined as earliest of loco-regional recurrence, distant metastasis, contralateral breast cancer or death from any cause, and ignoring switches to Letrozole tablets, USP in 60% of the placebo arm.

4 Protocol definition does not include deaths from any cause

Updated analyses were conducted at a median follow-up of 62 months. In the Letrozole tablets, USP arm, 71% of the patients were treated for a least 3 years and 58% of patients completed at least 4.5 years of extended adjuvant treatment. After the unblinding of the study at a median follow-up of 28 months, approximately 60% of the selected patients in the placebo arm opted to switch to Letrozole tablets, USP.

In this updated analysis shown in Table 9, Letrozole tablets, USP significantly reduced the risk of breast cancer recurrence or contralateral breast cancer compared with placebo (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.63, 0.89; P=0.001). However, in the updated DFS analysis (interval between randomization and earliest event of loco-regional recurrence, distant metastasis, contralateral breast cancer, or death from any cause) the treatment difference was heavily diluted by 60% of the patients in the placebo arm switching to Letrozole tablets, USP and accounting for 64% of the total placebo patient-years of follow-up. Ignoring these switches, the risk of DFS event was reduced by a non-significant 11% (HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.77, 1.03). There was no significant difference in distant disease-free survival or overall survival.

First-Line Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer

A randomized, double-blind, multinational trial compared Letrozole tablets USP, 2.5 mg with tamoxifen 20 mg in 916 postmenopausal patients with locally advanced (Stage IIIB or loco-regional recurrence not amenable to treatment with surgery or radiation) or metastatic breast cancer. Time to progression (TTP) was the primary endpoint of the trial. Selected baseline characteristics for this study are shown in Table 10.

Table 10: Selected Study Population Demographics

Baseline Status

Letrozole tablets, USP
N=458

tamoxifen
N=458

Stage of Disease

   IIIB

6%

7%

   IV

93%

92%

Receptor Status

   ER and PgR Positive

38%

41%

   ER or PgR Positive

26%

26%

   Both Unknown

34%

33%

   ER or PgR/Other Unknown

<1%

0

Previous Antiestrogen Therapy

   Adjuvant

19%

18%

   None

81%

82%

Dominant Site of Disease

   Soft Tissue

25%

25%

   Bone

32%

29%

   Viscera

43%

46%

Letrozole tablets, USP were superior to tamoxifen in TTP and rate of objective tumor response (see Table 11).

Table 11 summarizes the results of the trial, with a total median follow-up of approximately 32 months. (All analyses are unadjusted and use 2-sided P-values.)

Table 11: Results of First-Line Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer

Letrozole tablets, USP
2.5 mg
N=453

tamoxifen
20 mg
N=454

Hazard or Odds
Ratio (95% CI)
P-Value (2-Sided)

Median Time to Progression

9.4 months

6.0 months

0.72 (0.62, 0.83)1

P<0.0001

Objective Response Rate

   (CR + PR)

145 (32%)

95 (21%)

1.77 (1.31, 2.39)2

P=0.0002

   (CR)

42 (9%)

15 (3%)

2.99 (1.63, 5.47)2

P=0.0004

Duration of Objective Response

   Median

18 months

16 months

(N=145)

(N=95)

Overall Survival

35 months

32 months

(N=458)

(N=458)

P=0.51363

1 Hazard ratio

2 Odds ratio

3 Overall logrank test

Figure 2 shows the Kaplan-Meier curves for TTP.

Table 12 shows results in the subgroup of women who had received prior antiestrogen adjuvant therapy, Table 13, results by disease site and Table 14, the results by receptor status.

Table 12: Efficacy in Patients Who Received Prior Antiestrogen Therapy

Variable

Letrozole tablets, USP
2.5 mg
N=84

tamoxifen
20 mg
N=83

Median Time to Progression (95% CI)

8.9 months (6.2, 12.5)

5.9 months (3.2, 6.2)

   Hazard Ratio for TTP (95% CI)

0.60 (0.43, 0.84)

Objective Response Rate

   (CR + PR)

22 (26%)

7 (8%)

   Odds Ratio for Response (95% CI)

3.85 (1.50, 9.60)

Hazard ratio less than 1 or odds ratio greater than 1 favors Letrozole tablets, USP; hazard ratio greater than 1 or odds ratio less than 1 favors tamoxifen.

Table 13: Efficacy by Disease Site

Letrozole tablets, USP
2.5 mg

tamoxifen
20 mg

Dominant Disease Site

Soft Tissue:

N=113

N=115

   Median TTP

12.1 months

6.4 months

   Objective Response Rate

50%

34%

Bone:

N=145

N=131

   Median TTP

9.5 months

6.3 months

   Objective Response Rate

23%

15%

Viscera:

N=195

N=208

   Median TTP

8.3 months

4.6 months

   Objective Response Rate

28%

17%

Table 14: Efficacy by Receptor Status

Variable

Letrozole tablets, USP
2.5 mg

tamoxifen
20 mg

Receptor Positive

N=294

N=305

   Median Time to Progression (95% CI)

9.4 months (8.9, 11.8)

6.0 months (5.1, 8.5)

   Hazard Ratio for TTP (95% CI)

0.69 (0.58, 0.83)

   Objective Response Rate (CR+PR)

97 (33%)

66 (22%)

   Odds Ratio for Response (95% CI)

1.78 (1.20, 2.60)

Receptor Unknown

N=159

N=149

   Median Time to Progression (95% CI)

9.2 months (6.1, 12.3)

6.0 months (4.1, 6.4)

   Hazard Ratio for TTP (95% CI)

0.77 (0.60, 0.99)

   Objective Response Rate (CR+PR)

48 (30%)

29 (20%)

   Odds Ratio for Response (95% CI)

1.79 (1.10, 3.00)

 

Hazard ratio less than 1 or odds ratio greater than 1 favors Letrozole tablets, USP; hazard ratio greater than 1 or odds ratio less than 1 favors tamoxifen.

Figure 3 shows the Kaplan-Meier curves for survival.

Legend: Randomized Letrozole tablets, USP: n=458, events 57%, median overall survival 35 months (95% CI 32 to 38 months)

Randomized tamoxifen: n=458, events 57%, median overall survival 32 months (95% CI 28 to 37 months)

Overall logrank P=0.5136 (i.e., there was no significant difference between treatment arms in overall survival).

The median overall survival was 35 months for the Letrozole tablets, USP group and 32 months for the tamoxifen group, with a P-value 0.5136. Study design allowed patients to cross over upon progression to the other therapy. Approximately 50% of patients crossed over to the opposite treatment arm and almost all patients who crossed over had done so by 36 months. The median time to crossover was 17 months (Letrozole tablets, USP to tamoxifen) and 13 months (tamoxifen to Letrozole tablets, USP). In patients who did not cross over to the opposite treatment arm, median survival was 35 months with Letrozole tablets, USP (n=219, 95% Cl 29 to 43 months) vs 20 months with tamoxifen (n=229, 95% Cl 16 to 26 months).

Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer

Letrozole tablets, USP were initially studied at doses of 0.1 mg to 5.0 mg daily in six non-comparative Phase I/II trials in 181 postmenopausal estrogen/progesterone receptor positive or unknown advanced breast cancer patients previously treated with at least antiestrogen therapy. Patients had received other hormonal therapies and also may have received cytotoxic therapy. Eight (20%) of forty patients treated with Letrozole tablets USP, 2.5 mg daily in Phase I/II trials achieved an objective tumor response (complete or partial response).

Two large randomized, controlled, multinational (predominantly European) trials were conducted in patients with advanced breast cancer who had progressed despite antiestrogen therapy. Patients were randomized to Letrozole tablets USP, 0.5 mg daily, Letrozole tablets USP, 2.5 mg daily, or a comparator (megestrol acetate 160 mg daily in one study; and aminoglutethimide 250 mg b.i.d. with corticosteroid supplementation in the other study). In each study over 60% of the patients had received therapeutic antiestrogens, and about one-fifth of these patients had an objective response. The megestrol acetate controlled study was double-blind; the other study was open label. Selected baseline characteristics for each study are shown in Table 15.

Table 15: Selected Study Population Demographics

Parameter

megestrol acetate study

aminoglutethimide study

No. of Participants

552

557

Receptor Status

   ER/PR Positive

57%

56%

   ER/PR Unknown

43%

44%

Previous Therapy

   Adjuvant Only

33%

38%

   Therapeutic +/- Adj.

66%

62%

Sites of Disease

   Soft Tissue

56%

50%

   Bone

50%

55%

   Viscera

40%

44%

Confirmed objective tumor response (complete response plus partial response) was the primary endpoint of the trials. Responses were measured according to the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) criteria and verified by independent, blinded review. All responses were confirmed by a second evaluation 4 to 12 weeks after the documentation of the initial response.

Table 16 shows the results for the first trial, with a minimum follow-up of 15 months, that compared Letrozole tablets USP, 0.5 mg, Letrozole tablets USP, 2.5 mg, and megestrol acetate 160 mg daily. (All analyses are unadjusted.)

Table 16: Megestrol Acetate Study Results
 

Letrozole tablets, USP
0.5 mg
N=188

Letrozole tablets, USP
2.5 mg
N=174

megestrol acetate
N=190

Objective Response

(CR + PR)

22 (11.7%)

41 (23.6%)

31 (16.3%)

Median Duration of Response

552 days

(Not reached)

561 days

Median Time to Progression

154 days

170 days

168 days

Median Survival

633 days

730 days

659 days

Odds Ratio for Response

Letrozole tablets, USP 2.5: Letrozole tablets, USP 0.5=2.33
(95% CI: 1.32, 4.17); P=0.004*

Letrozole tablets, USP 2.5: megestrol=1.58
(95% CI: 0.94, 2.66); P=0.08*

Relative Risk of Progression

Letrozole tablets, USP 2.5: Letrozole tablets, USP 0.5=0.81
(95% CI: 0.63, 1.03); P=0.09*

Letrozole tablets, USP 2.5: megestrol=0.77
(95% CI: 0.60, 0.98); P=0.03*

* two-sided P-value

The Kaplan-Meier curves for progression for the megestrol acetate study are shown in Figure 4.

The results for the study comparing Letrozole tablets, USP to aminoglutethimide, with a minimum follow-up of 9 months, are shown in Table 17. (Unadjusted analyses are used.)

Table 17: Aminoglutethimide Study Results

 

Letrozole tablets, USP
0.5 mg
N=193

Letrozole tablets, USP
2.5 mg
N=185

aminoglutethimide
N=179

Objective Response

(CR + PR)

34 (17.6%)

34 (18.4%)

22 (12.3%)

Median Duration of Response

619 days

706 days

450 days

Median Time to Progression

103 days

123 days

112 days

Median Survival

636 days

792 days

592 days

Odds Ratio for Response

Letrozole tablets, USP 2.5: Letrozole tablets, USP 0.5=1.05
(95% CI: 0.62, 1.79);
P=0.85*

Letrozole tablets, USP 2.5: aminoglutethimide=1.61
(95% CI: 0.90, 2.87);
P=0.11*

Relative Risk of Progression

Letrozole tablets, USP 2.5: Letrozole tablets, USP 0.5=0.86
(95% CI: 0.68, 1.11);
P=0.25*

Letrozole tablets, USP 2.5: aminoglutethimide=0.74
(95% CI: 0.57, 0.94);
P=0.02*

* 2-sided P-value

The Kaplan-Meier curves for progression for the aminoglutethimide study is shown in Figure 5.

How Supplied/Storage and Handling

Letrozole tablets, USP contain 2.5 mg of Letrozole, USP. Letrozole tablets USP, 2.5 mg are dark yellow, film-coated, round, biconvex tablets, debossed with “L” on one side and “12” on the other side.

They are supplied as follows:

Bottles of 30, NDC 0527-1712-30

Store at 20° to 25°C (68° to 77°F) [see USP Controlled Room Temperature].

Dispense in a tight container as defined in the USP with a child-resistant closure.

Patient Counseling Information

Information for Patients

Pregnancy: Letrozole tablets, USP are contraindicated in women of premenopausal endocrine status. The physician needs to discuss the necessity of adequate contraception with women who have the potential to become pregnant including women who are perimenopausal or who recently became postmenopausal, until their postmenopausal status is fully established.

Fatigue and Dizziness: Since fatigue and dizziness have been observed with the use of Letrozole tablets, USP and somnolence was uncommonly reported, caution is advised when driving or using machinery.

Bone Effects: Consideration should be given to monitoring bone mineral density.

Manufactured by:
Lannett Company, Inc.
Philadelphia, PA 19136

Made in the USA

10-607

PRINCIPAL DISPLAY PANEL

NDC 0527-1712-30

Lannett

Letrozole
TABLETS, USP

2.5 mg

Rx Only

30 TABLETS

Letrozole 
Letrozole tablet, film coated
Product Information
Product Type HUMAN PRESCRIPTION DRUG LABEL Item Code (Source) NDC:0527-1712
Route of Administration ORAL DEA Schedule     
Active Ingredient/Active Moiety
Ingredient Name Basis of Strength Strength
Letrozole (Letrozole) Letrozole 2.5 mg
Inactive Ingredients
Ingredient Name Strength
MANNITOL  
CELLULOSE, MICROCRYSTALLINE  
LACTOSE MONOHYDRATE  
SODIUM STARCH GLYCOLATE TYPE A POTATO  
MAGNESIUM STEARATE  
POLYVINYL ALCOHOL  
POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL 3350  
TITANIUM DIOXIDE  
TALC  
FERRIC OXIDE YELLOW  
Product Characteristics
Color YELLOW (Dark yellow) Score no score
Shape ROUND Size 6mm
Flavor Imprint Code L;12
Contains         
Packaging
# Item Code Package Description
1 NDC:0527-1712-30 30 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BOTTLE
Marketing Information
Marketing Category Application Number or Monograph Citation Marketing Start Date Marketing End Date
ANDA ANDA202048 10/29/2014
Labeler - Lannett Company, Inc. (002277481)
Establishment
Name Address ID/FEI Operations
Lannett Company, Inc. 002277481 MANUFACTURE(0527-1712)
Establishment
Name Address ID/FEI Operations
Lannett Company, Inc. 829757603 ANALYSIS(0527-1712), LABEL(0527-1712), MANUFACTURE(0527-1712), PACK(0527-1712)
Revised: 11/2014
 
Lannett Company, Inc.
Hide
(web3)