Skip to main content

Local Sales Bans on Flavored Tobacco Products in California Cut Use

Medically reviewed by Drugs.com.

By Cara Murez HealthDay Reporter

MONDAY, May 29, 2023 -- Banning flavored tobacco products leads to fewer people using them, according to a new California study that found lower usage in areas that had a full ban.

Residents in areas with a comprehensive sales ban had 30% reduced odds of using flavored tobacco compared to those without a ban, according to researchers from the University of California, Irvine (UCI).

But the study did not find lower use when only a partial sales ban was enacted.

Meanwhile, Prop 31, which upheld a 2020 state law to prohibit retail sales of certain flavored tobacco products, was recently passed in the state, and experts think this will lead to an even greater decline in use of flavored tobacco across California.

Flavored tobacco products are particularly appealing to young people, who are more likely to experiment with them and become regular users.

This could lead to a lifetime of addiction and long-term health problems, according to the study.

These local bans may be working, the study shows.

“The drawback of having differing sales restrictions is a patchwork of local policies where someone who can’t buy flavored tobacco in their town can just cross a city line to buy it in a town that does allow it,” said corresponding author David Timberlake, an associate professor of population health and disease prevention with UCI’s Program in Public Health.

“Our study is one of very few that study flavored tobacco use in banned jurisdictions compared to non-banned jurisdictions," he said in a university news release.

Study co-author Denise Payán, an assistant professor of health, society and behavior at UCI, added, “This will close the gap from the patchwork of local policies and eliminate most partial exemptions.”

More research should examine the impact of the new statewide policy ban on flavored tobacco products on individual buying choices, the authors said.

They also suggested that the variability in the strength of associations of comprehensive and partial bans needs to be examined in other locations, to help influence future policy implementation across the country.

This study, which was published recently in the journal International Journal of Drug Policy, was funded by the University of California’s Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program.

Sources

  • University of California, Irvine, news release, May 22, 2023

Disclaimer: Statistical data in medical articles provide general trends and do not pertain to individuals. Individual factors can vary greatly. Always seek personalized medical advice for individual healthcare decisions.

© 2024 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Read this next

Quit-Smoking Meds Not Working for You? Try Upping the Dose

FRIDAY, May 2, 2024 -- Folks struggling to quit smoking might need a bump up on the dose of medication they’re using to help them stop, according to new clinical trial...

Living Healthy Counters Effects of 'Life-Shortening' Genes

TUESDAY, April 30, 2024 -- Doctors argue that genetics aren’t destiny when it comes to a person’s health, and a study appears to support that notion. A healthy...

Another Teen Vaping Danger: Toxic Lead, Uranium

TUESDAY, April 30, 2023 -- Teens who vape frequently are exposing themselves to harmful metals like lead and uranium, a new study finds. Lead levels in urine are 40% higher among...

More news resources

Subscribe to our newsletter

Whatever your topic of interest, subscribe to our newsletters to get the best of Drugs.com in your inbox.