Skip to main content

Drug Interactions between fingolimod and Isoptin SR

This report displays the potential drug interactions for the following 2 drugs:

Edit list (add/remove drugs)

Interactions between your drugs

Major

verapamil fingolimod

Applies to: Isoptin SR (verapamil) and fingolimod

MONITOR CLOSELY: The risk of severe bradycardia and atrioventricular (AV) block may be increased during initiation of fingolimod treatment in patients receiving other drugs that slow heart rate or AV conduction such as beta-blockers, certain calcium channel blockers (e.g., diltiazem, verapamil), and digitalis. Fingolimod can cause a decrease in heart rate during initiation of therapy that is apparent within an hour of the first dose and maximal at approximately 6 hours postdose in most cases, but occasionally up to 20 hours after the first dose. Further, but smaller decreases in heart rate may occur after the second dose, although heart rate eventually returns to baseline within one month of chronic treatment. The mean decrease in heart rate in patients receiving fingolimod 0.5 mg at 6 hours after the first dose was approximately 13 beats per minute (bpm). Heart rates below 40 bpm were rarely observed. In controlled clinical trials, adverse reactions of symptomatic bradycardia (hypotension, dizziness, fatigue, palpitations, chest pain) following the first dose were reported in 0.5% of patients receiving fingolimod 0.5 mg, compared to no patient on placebo. Initiation of fingolimod treatment has also resulted in transient AV conduction delays. First- and second-degree AV block (prolonged PR interval on ECG) following the first dose were each reported in 0.1% of patients receiving fingolimod 0.5 mg, compared to no patient on placebo. In a study of 698 patients with available 24-hour Holter monitoring data after their first dose, second degree AV blocks, usually Mobitz type I (Wenckebach), were reported in 3.7% of patients receiving fingolimod 0.5 mg and 2% of patients receiving placebo. Bradycardia and conduction abnormalities were usually transient and asymptomatic, and resolved within the first 24 hours on treatment, but they occasionally required treatment with atropine or isoproterenol.

MANAGEMENT: Fingolimod has not been adequately studied in patients receiving beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, or digitalis. The possibility of switching to alternative agents that do not slow heart rate or AV conduction should be evaluated by the physician before initiating fingolimod. In patients who cannot switch, overnight continuous ECG monitoring after the first dose is recommended in accordance with the product labeling. The same precautions are applicable if, after the first month of treatment, fingolimod is discontinued for more than two weeks and then restarted, since the effects on heart rate and AV conduction may recur on reintroduction of fingolimod. Within the first 2 weeks of treatment, first-dose procedures are also recommended after interruption of one day or more; during week 3 and 4 of treatment, first-dose procedures are recommended after treatment interruption of more than 7 days. The first dose should always be administered in a setting where resources to appropriately manage symptomatic bradycardia are available.

References

  1. (2010) "Product Information. Gilenya (fingolimod)." Novartis Pharmaceuticals
  2. FDA. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2012) FDA Drug Safety Communication: Revised recommendations for cardiovascular monitoring and use of multiple sclerosis drug Gilenya (fingolimod). http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm303192.htm#data

Switch to consumer interaction data

Drug and food interactions

Moderate

verapamil food

Applies to: Isoptin SR (verapamil)

GENERALLY AVOID: Consumption of large quantities of grapefruit juice may be associated with significantly increased plasma concentrations of oral verapamil. The mechanism is inhibition of CYP450 3A4-mediated first-pass metabolism in the gut wall by certain compounds present in grapefruits. One study reported no significant effect of a single administration of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of verapamil in ten hypertensive patients receiving chronic therapy. In another study conducted in nine healthy male volunteers, administration of 120 mg oral verapamil twice daily for 3 days following pretreatment with 200 mL grapefruit juice twice daily for 5 days resulted in a 57% increase in S-verapamil peak plasma concentration (Cmax), a 36% increase in S-verapamil systemic exposure (AUC), a 40% increase in R-verapamil Cmax, and a 28% increase in R-verapamil AUC compared to administration following orange juice. Elimination half-life and renal clearance of both S- and R-verapamil were not affected by grapefruit juice, and there were no significant effects on blood pressure, heart rate, or PR interval. A third study reported a 1.63-fold increase in Cmax and a 1.45-fold increase in AUC of (R,S)-verapamil in 24 young, healthy volunteers given verapamil sustained-release 120 mg twice daily for 7 days with 250 mL grapefruit juice four times daily on days 5 through 7. Two subjects developed PR interval prolongation of more than 350 ms during grapefruit juice coadministration. A high degree of interindividual variability has been observed in these studies. The interaction was also suspected in a case report of a 42-year-old woman who developed complete heart block, hypotension, hypoxic respiratory failure, severe anion gap metabolic acidosis, and hyperglycemia following accidental ingestion of three verapamil sustained-release 120 mg tablets over a span of six hours. The patient's past medical history was remarkable only for migraine headaches, for which she was receiving several medications including verapamil. Prior to admission, the patient had a 2-week history of poorly controlled migraine, and the six hours preceding hospitalization she suffered from worsening headache and palpitations progressing to altered sensorium. An extensive workup revealed elevated verapamil and norverapamil levels more than 4.5 times above the upper therapeutic limits. These levels also far exceeded those reported in the medical literature for patients taking verapamil 120 mg every 6 hours, or 480 mg in a 24-hour period. The patient recovered after receiving ventilator and vasopressor support. Upon questioning, it was discovered that the patient had been drinking large amounts of grapefruit juice (3 to 4 liters total) the week preceding her admission due to nausea. No other sources or contributing factors could be found for the verapamil toxicity.

MANAGEMENT: Patients treated with oral verapamil should avoid the consumption of large amounts of grapefruit or grapefruit juice to prevent any undue fluctuations in serum drug levels. Patients should be advised to seek medical attention if they experience edema or swelling of the lower extremities; sudden, unexplained weight gain; difficulty breathing; chest pain or tightness; or hypotension as indicated by dizziness, fainting, or orthostasis.

References

  1. McAllister RG, Jr (1982) "Clinical pharmacology of slow channel blocking agents." Prog Cardiovasc Dis, 25, p. 83-102
  2. (2001) "Product Information. Covera-HS (verapamil)." Searle
  3. Zaidenstein R, Dishi V, Gips M, Soback S, Cohen N, Weissgarten J, Blatt A, Golik A (1998) "The effect of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of orally administered verapamil." Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 54, p. 337-40
  4. Ho PC, Ghose K, Saville D, Wanwimolruk S (2000) "Effect of grapefruit juice on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of verapamil enantiomers in healthy volunteers." Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 56, p. 693-8
  5. Fuhr U, Muller-Peltzer H, Kern R, et al. (2002) "Effects of grapefruit juice and smoking on verapamil concentrations in steady state." Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 58, p. 45-53
  6. Bailey DG, Dresser GK (2004) "Natural products and adverse drug interactions." Can Med Assoc J, 170, p. 1531-2
  7. Bailey DG, Malcolm J, Arnold O, Spence JD (2004) "Grapefruit juice-drug interactions. 1998." Br J Clin Pharmacol, 58, S831-40; discussion S841-3
  8. Arayne MS, Sultana N, Bibi Z (2005) "Review: grape fruit juice - drug interactions." Pak J Pharm Sci, 18, p. 45-57
  9. Pillai U, Muzaffar J, Sandeep S, Yancey A (2009) "Grapefruit juice and verapamil: a toxic cocktail." South Med J, 102, p. 308-9
View all 9 references

Switch to consumer interaction data

Moderate

verapamil food

Applies to: Isoptin SR (verapamil)

GENERALLY AVOID: Verapamil may increase the blood concentrations and intoxicating effects of ethanol. The exact mechanism of interaction is unknown but may involve verapamil inhibition of ethanol metabolism. In 10 healthy, young volunteers, verapamil (80 mg orally every 8 hours for 6 days) increased the mean peak blood concentration (Cmax) and the 12-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of ethanol (0.8 g/kg single oral dose) by 17% and 30%, respectively, compared to placebo. Verapamil AUCs were positively correlated to increased ethanol blood AUC values. Subjectively (i.e. each subject's perception of intoxication as measured on a visual analog scale), verapamil also significantly increased the area under the ethanol effect versus time curve but did not change the peak effect or time to peak effect.

MANAGEMENT: Patients treated with verapamil should be counseled to avoid alcohol consumption.

References

  1. Bauer LA, Schumock G, Horn J, Opheim K (1992) "Verapamil inhibits ethanol elimination and prolongs the perception of intoxication." Clin Pharmacol Ther, 52, p. 6-10
  2. (2001) "Product Information. Isoptin (verapamil)." Knoll Pharmaceutical Company

Switch to consumer interaction data

Moderate

verapamil food

Applies to: Isoptin SR (verapamil)

MONITOR: Calcium-containing products may decrease the effectiveness of calcium channel blockers by saturating calcium channels with calcium. Calcium chloride has been used to manage acute severe verapamil toxicity.

MANAGEMENT: Management consists of monitoring the effectiveness of calcium channel blocker therapy during coadministration with calcium products.

References

  1. Henry M, Kay MM, Viccellio P (1985) "Cardiogenic shock associated with calcium-channel and beta blockers: reversal with intravenous calcium chloride." Am J Emerg Med, 3, p. 334-6
  2. Moller IW (1987) "Cardiac arrest following intravenous verapamil combined with halothane anaesthesia." Br J Anaesth, 59, p. 522-6
  3. Oszko MA, Klutman NE (1987) "Use of calcium salts during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for reversing verapamil-associated hypotension." Clin Pharm, 6, p. 448-9
  4. Schoen MD, Parker RB, Hoon TJ, et al. (1991) "Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics and electrocardiographic effects of intravenous verapamil with intravenous calcium chloride pretreatment in normal subjects." Am J Cardiol, 67, p. 300-4
  5. O'Quinn SV, Wohns DH, Clarke S, Koch G, Patterson JH, Adams KF (1990) "Influence of calcium on the hemodynamic and anti-ischemic effects of nifedipine observed during treadmill exercise testing." Pharmacotherapy, 10, p. 247
  6. Woie L, Storstein L (1981) "Successful treatment of suicidal verapamil poisoning with calcium gluconate." Eur Heart J, 2, p. 239-42
  7. Morris DL, Goldschlager N (1983) "Calcium infusion for reversal of adverse effects of intravenous verapamil." JAMA, 249, p. 3212-3
  8. Guadagnino V, Greengart A, Hollander G, Solar M, Shani J, Lichstein E (1987) "Treatment of severe left ventricular dysfunction with calcium chloride in patients receiving verapamil." J Clin Pharmacol, 27, p. 407-9
  9. Luscher TF, Noll G, Sturmer T, Huser B, Wenk M (1994) "Calcium gluconate in severe verapamil intoxication." N Engl J Med, 330, p. 718-20
  10. Bar-Or D, Gasiel Y (1981) "Calcium and calciferol antagonise effect of verapamil in atrial fibrillation." Br Med J (Clin Res Ed), 282, p. 1585-6
  11. Lipman J, Jardine I, Roos C, Dreosti L (1982) "Intravenous calcium chloride as an antidote to verapamil-induced hypotension." Intensive Care Med, 8, p. 55-7
  12. McMillan R (1988) "Management of acute severe verapamil intoxication." J Emerg Med, 6, p. 193-6
  13. Perkins CM (1978) "Serious verapamil poisoning: treatment with intravenous calcium gluconate." Br Med J, 2, p. 1127
  14. Moroni F, Mannaioni PF, Dolara A, Ciaccheri M (1980) "Calcium gluconate and hypertonic sodium chloride in a case of massive verapamil poisoning." Clin Toxicol, 17, p. 395-400
View all 14 references

Switch to consumer interaction data

Therapeutic duplication warnings

No warnings were found for your selected drugs.

Therapeutic duplication warnings are only returned when drugs within the same group exceed the recommended therapeutic duplication maximum.


Report options

Loading...
QR code containing a link to this page

Drug Interaction Classification

These classifications are only a guideline. The relevance of a particular drug interaction to a specific individual is difficult to determine. Always consult your healthcare provider before starting or stopping any medication.
Major Highly clinically significant. Avoid combinations; the risk of the interaction outweighs the benefit.
Moderate Moderately clinically significant. Usually avoid combinations; use it only under special circumstances.
Minor Minimally clinically significant. Minimize risk; assess risk and consider an alternative drug, take steps to circumvent the interaction risk and/or institute a monitoring plan.
Unknown No interaction information available.

Further information

Always consult your healthcare provider to ensure the information displayed on this page applies to your personal circumstances.