Skip to main content

Drug Interactions between cannabidiol and Tarka

This report displays the potential drug interactions for the following 2 drugs:

Edit list (add/remove drugs)

Interactions between your drugs

Moderate

trandolapril cannabidiol

Applies to: Tarka (trandolapril / verapamil) and cannabidiol

MONITOR: Coadministration of cannabidiol with other agents known to induce hepatotoxicity may potentiate the risk of liver injury. Cannabidiol causes dose-related elevations of liver transaminases, both alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST). In controlled studies, the incidence of ALT elevations above 3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) was 13% with cannabidiol versus 1% with placebo, and 17% in patients taking cannabidiol 20 mg/kg/day compared to 1% taking 10 mg/kg/day. Less than 1% of cannabidiol-treated patients had ALT or AST levels greater than 20 times the ULN. Some cases required hospitalization. In clinical trials, serum transaminase elevations typically occurred within the first two months of treatment initiation, but up to 18 months were reported in some cases, particularly in patients taking concomitant valproate. Resolution occurred with discontinuation or dosage reduction of cannabidiol and/or concomitant valproate in about two-thirds of the cases. In about one-third of the cases, transaminase elevations resolved during continued cannabidiol treatment, without dose reduction. The majority of ALT elevations occurred in patients taking concomitant valproate. Concomitant use of clobazam also increased the incidence of transaminase elevations, but to a lesser extent. In cannabidiol-treated patients, the incidence of ALT elevations greater than 3 times the ULN was 30% in patients taking both concomitant valproate and clobazam, 21% in patients taking concomitant valproate (without clobazam), 4% in patients taking concomitant clobazam (without valproate), and 3% in patients taking neither drug. Insufficient data are available to assess the risk of concomitant administration of other hepatotoxic drugs. Finally, patients with baseline transaminase levels above the ULN also had higher rates of transaminase elevations during cannabidiol treatment. In patients taking 20 mg/kg/day in controlled trials, the frequency of treatment-emergent ALT elevations greater than 3 times the ULN was 30% when ALT was above the ULN at baseline, compared to 12% when ALT was within the normal range at baseline. No patient taking cannabidiol 10 mg/kg/day experienced ALT elevations greater than 3 times the ULN when ALT was above the ULN at baseline, compared with 2% of patients in whom ALT was within the normal range at baseline.

MANAGEMENT: Caution is advised if cannabidiol is used in patients who are currently receiving or have recently received treatment with other hepatotoxic agents, and vice versa. Serum transaminases and total bilirubin levels should be obtained prior to initiating cannabidiol, and patients with elevated baseline transaminase levels above 3 times the ULN accompanied by elevations in bilirubin above 2 times the ULN should be evaluated. Repeat levels should be obtained at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after initiation of cannabidiol treatment, and periodically thereafter or as clinically indicated (e.g., within 1 month following changes in cannabidiol dosage or addition of/changes in medications that are known to impact the liver). Consider more frequent monitoring of serum transaminases and bilirubin in patients who are taking valproate or who have elevated liver enzymes at baseline. Patients who develop clinical signs or symptoms suggestive of hepatic dysfunction (e.g., unexplained nausea, vomiting, right upper quadrant abdominal pain, fatigue, anorexia, jaundice, dark urine) should have serum transaminases and total bilirubin measured promptly, and cannabidiol treatment interrupted or discontinued as appropriate. Cannabidiol should be discontinued in patients with elevations of transaminase levels greater than 3 times the ULN and bilirubin levels greater than 2 times the ULN. Patients with sustained transaminase elevations of greater than 5 times the ULN should also have treatment discontinued. Patients with prolonged elevations of serum transaminases should be evaluated for other possible causes. Also consider dosage adjustment or discontinuation of any coadministered medication that is known to affect the liver.

References

  1. Cerner Multum, Inc. "UK Summary of Product Characteristics."
  2. (2018) "Product Information. Epidiolex (cannabidiol)." Greenwich Biosciences LLC

Switch to consumer interaction data

Minor

verapamil trandolapril

Applies to: Tarka (trandolapril / verapamil) and Tarka (trandolapril / verapamil)

Calcium channel blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors may have additive hypotensive effects. While these drugs are often safely used together, careful monitoring of the systemic blood pressure is recommended during coadministration, especially during the first one to three weeks of therapy.

References

  1. Kaplan NM (1991) "Amlodipine in the treatment of hypertension." Postgrad Med J, 67 Suppl 5, s15-9
  2. DeQuattro V (1991) "Comparison of benazepril and other antihypertensive agents alone and in combination with the diuretic hydrochlorothiazide." Clin Cardiol, 14, iv28-32;
  3. Sun JX, Cipriano A, Chan K, John VA (1994) "Pharmacokinetic interaction study between benazepril and amlodipine in healthy subjects." Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 47, p. 285-9
  4. Di Somma S, et al. (1992) "Antihypertensive effects of verapamil, captopril and their combination at rest and during dynamic exercise." Arzneimittelforschung, 42, p. 103
View all 4 references

Switch to consumer interaction data

Minor

verapamil cannabidiol

Applies to: Tarka (trandolapril / verapamil) and cannabidiol

Cannabidiol is a substrate for CYP450 3A4 and CYP450 2C19. Cannabidiol is metabolized in the liver and the gut (primarily in the liver) by CYP450 2C19 and CYP450 3A4 enzymes, and UGT1A7, UGT1A9, and UGT2B7 isoforms. Coadministration of cannabidiol with itraconazole (a potent inhibitor of CYP450 3A4) increased cannabidiol exposure by less than 10%; exposure to fluconazole (a potent CYP450 2C19 inhibitor) was increased to less than 20%. Both values are not considered clinically meaningful.

References

  1. Cerner Multum, Inc. "UK Summary of Product Characteristics."
  2. (2018) "Product Information. Epidiolex (cannabidiol)." Greenwich Biosciences LLC

Switch to consumer interaction data

Drug and food interactions

Moderate

verapamil food

Applies to: Tarka (trandolapril / verapamil)

GENERALLY AVOID: Consumption of large quantities of grapefruit juice may be associated with significantly increased plasma concentrations of oral verapamil. The mechanism is inhibition of CYP450 3A4-mediated first-pass metabolism in the gut wall by certain compounds present in grapefruits. One study reported no significant effect of a single administration of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of verapamil in ten hypertensive patients receiving chronic therapy. In another study conducted in nine healthy male volunteers, administration of 120 mg oral verapamil twice daily for 3 days following pretreatment with 200 mL grapefruit juice twice daily for 5 days resulted in a 57% increase in S-verapamil peak plasma concentration (Cmax), a 36% increase in S-verapamil systemic exposure (AUC), a 40% increase in R-verapamil Cmax, and a 28% increase in R-verapamil AUC compared to administration following orange juice. Elimination half-life and renal clearance of both S- and R-verapamil were not affected by grapefruit juice, and there were no significant effects on blood pressure, heart rate, or PR interval. A third study reported a 1.63-fold increase in Cmax and a 1.45-fold increase in AUC of (R,S)-verapamil in 24 young, healthy volunteers given verapamil sustained-release 120 mg twice daily for 7 days with 250 mL grapefruit juice four times daily on days 5 through 7. Two subjects developed PR interval prolongation of more than 350 ms during grapefruit juice coadministration. A high degree of interindividual variability has been observed in these studies. The interaction was also suspected in a case report of a 42-year-old woman who developed complete heart block, hypotension, hypoxic respiratory failure, severe anion gap metabolic acidosis, and hyperglycemia following accidental ingestion of three verapamil sustained-release 120 mg tablets over a span of six hours. The patient's past medical history was remarkable only for migraine headaches, for which she was receiving several medications including verapamil. Prior to admission, the patient had a 2-week history of poorly controlled migraine, and the six hours preceding hospitalization she suffered from worsening headache and palpitations progressing to altered sensorium. An extensive workup revealed elevated verapamil and norverapamil levels more than 4.5 times above the upper therapeutic limits. These levels also far exceeded those reported in the medical literature for patients taking verapamil 120 mg every 6 hours, or 480 mg in a 24-hour period. The patient recovered after receiving ventilator and vasopressor support. Upon questioning, it was discovered that the patient had been drinking large amounts of grapefruit juice (3 to 4 liters total) the week preceding her admission due to nausea. No other sources or contributing factors could be found for the verapamil toxicity.

MANAGEMENT: Patients treated with oral verapamil should avoid the consumption of large amounts of grapefruit or grapefruit juice to prevent any undue fluctuations in serum drug levels. Patients should be advised to seek medical attention if they experience edema or swelling of the lower extremities; sudden, unexplained weight gain; difficulty breathing; chest pain or tightness; or hypotension as indicated by dizziness, fainting, or orthostasis.

References

  1. McAllister RG, Jr (1982) "Clinical pharmacology of slow channel blocking agents." Prog Cardiovasc Dis, 25, p. 83-102
  2. (2001) "Product Information. Covera-HS (verapamil)." Searle
  3. Zaidenstein R, Dishi V, Gips M, Soback S, Cohen N, Weissgarten J, Blatt A, Golik A (1998) "The effect of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of orally administered verapamil." Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 54, p. 337-40
  4. Ho PC, Ghose K, Saville D, Wanwimolruk S (2000) "Effect of grapefruit juice on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of verapamil enantiomers in healthy volunteers." Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 56, p. 693-8
  5. Fuhr U, Muller-Peltzer H, Kern R, et al. (2002) "Effects of grapefruit juice and smoking on verapamil concentrations in steady state." Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 58, p. 45-53
  6. Bailey DG, Dresser GK (2004) "Natural products and adverse drug interactions." Can Med Assoc J, 170, p. 1531-2
  7. Bailey DG, Malcolm J, Arnold O, Spence JD (2004) "Grapefruit juice-drug interactions. 1998." Br J Clin Pharmacol, 58, S831-40; discussion S841-3
  8. Arayne MS, Sultana N, Bibi Z (2005) "Review: grape fruit juice - drug interactions." Pak J Pharm Sci, 18, p. 45-57
  9. Pillai U, Muzaffar J, Sandeep S, Yancey A (2009) "Grapefruit juice and verapamil: a toxic cocktail." South Med J, 102, p. 308-9
View all 9 references

Switch to consumer interaction data

Moderate

trandolapril food

Applies to: Tarka (trandolapril / verapamil)

GENERALLY AVOID: Moderate-to-high dietary intake of potassium can cause hyperkalemia in some patients who are using angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. In some cases, affected patients were using a potassium-rich salt substitute. ACE inhibitors can promote hyperkalemia through inhibition of the renin-aldosterone-angiotensin (RAA) system.

MANAGEMENT: It is recommended that patients who are taking ACE inhibitors be advised to avoid moderately high or high potassium dietary intake. Particular attention should be paid to the potassium content of salt substitutes.

References

  1. (2002) "Product Information. Vasotec (enalapril)." Merck & Co., Inc
  2. Good CB, McDermott L (1995) "Diet and serum potassium in patients on ACE inhibitors." JAMA, 274, p. 538
  3. Ray K, Dorman S, Watson R (1999) "Severe hyperkalaemia due to the concomitant use of salt substitutes and ACE inhibitors in hypertension: a potentially life threatening interaction." J Hum Hypertens, 13, p. 717-20

Switch to consumer interaction data

Moderate

cannabidiol food

Applies to: cannabidiol

ADJUST DOSING INTERVAL: Food may affect the plasma concentrations of cannabidiol. In healthy volunteers, administration of cannabidiol with a high-fat/high-calorie meal increased cannabidiol peak plasma concentration (Cmax) by 5-fold and systemic exposure (AUC) by 4-fold and reduced the total variability compared with administration in the fasted state.

GENERALLY AVOID: Grapefruit juice may increase the plasma concentrations of cannabidiol. The proposed mechanism is inhibition of CYP450 3A4-mediated metabolism of cannabidiol by certain compounds present in grapefruit. The interaction has not been studied, but the product labeling for cannabidiol recommends consideration of a dosage reduction when used with strong or moderate inhibitors of CYP450 3A4. In general, the effect of grapefruit juice is concentration-, dose- and preparation-dependent, and can vary widely among brands. Certain preparations of grapefruit juice (e.g., high dose, double strength) have sometimes demonstrated potent inhibition of CYP450 3A4, while other preparations (e.g., low dose, single strength) have typically demonstrated moderate inhibition.

MANAGEMENT: Cannabidiol should be taken about the same time each day consistently either with or without food. Patients should limit the consumption of grapefruit and grapefruit juice. If they are coadministered, cannabidiol levels should be monitored and the dosage adjusted as necessary.

References

  1. (2018) "Product Information. Epidiolex (cannabidiol)." Greenwich Biosciences LLC

Switch to consumer interaction data

Moderate

verapamil food

Applies to: Tarka (trandolapril / verapamil)

GENERALLY AVOID: Verapamil may increase the blood concentrations and intoxicating effects of ethanol. The exact mechanism of interaction is unknown but may involve verapamil inhibition of ethanol metabolism. In 10 healthy, young volunteers, verapamil (80 mg orally every 8 hours for 6 days) increased the mean peak blood concentration (Cmax) and the 12-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of ethanol (0.8 g/kg single oral dose) by 17% and 30%, respectively, compared to placebo. Verapamil AUCs were positively correlated to increased ethanol blood AUC values. Subjectively (i.e. each subject's perception of intoxication as measured on a visual analog scale), verapamil also significantly increased the area under the ethanol effect versus time curve but did not change the peak effect or time to peak effect.

MANAGEMENT: Patients treated with verapamil should be counseled to avoid alcohol consumption.

References

  1. Bauer LA, Schumock G, Horn J, Opheim K (1992) "Verapamil inhibits ethanol elimination and prolongs the perception of intoxication." Clin Pharmacol Ther, 52, p. 6-10
  2. (2001) "Product Information. Isoptin (verapamil)." Knoll Pharmaceutical Company

Switch to consumer interaction data

Moderate

verapamil food

Applies to: Tarka (trandolapril / verapamil)

MONITOR: Calcium-containing products may decrease the effectiveness of calcium channel blockers by saturating calcium channels with calcium. Calcium chloride has been used to manage acute severe verapamil toxicity.

MANAGEMENT: Management consists of monitoring the effectiveness of calcium channel blocker therapy during coadministration with calcium products.

References

  1. Henry M, Kay MM, Viccellio P (1985) "Cardiogenic shock associated with calcium-channel and beta blockers: reversal with intravenous calcium chloride." Am J Emerg Med, 3, p. 334-6
  2. Moller IW (1987) "Cardiac arrest following intravenous verapamil combined with halothane anaesthesia." Br J Anaesth, 59, p. 522-6
  3. Oszko MA, Klutman NE (1987) "Use of calcium salts during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for reversing verapamil-associated hypotension." Clin Pharm, 6, p. 448-9
  4. Schoen MD, Parker RB, Hoon TJ, et al. (1991) "Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics and electrocardiographic effects of intravenous verapamil with intravenous calcium chloride pretreatment in normal subjects." Am J Cardiol, 67, p. 300-4
  5. O'Quinn SV, Wohns DH, Clarke S, Koch G, Patterson JH, Adams KF (1990) "Influence of calcium on the hemodynamic and anti-ischemic effects of nifedipine observed during treadmill exercise testing." Pharmacotherapy, 10, p. 247
  6. Woie L, Storstein L (1981) "Successful treatment of suicidal verapamil poisoning with calcium gluconate." Eur Heart J, 2, p. 239-42
  7. Morris DL, Goldschlager N (1983) "Calcium infusion for reversal of adverse effects of intravenous verapamil." JAMA, 249, p. 3212-3
  8. Guadagnino V, Greengart A, Hollander G, Solar M, Shani J, Lichstein E (1987) "Treatment of severe left ventricular dysfunction with calcium chloride in patients receiving verapamil." J Clin Pharmacol, 27, p. 407-9
  9. Luscher TF, Noll G, Sturmer T, Huser B, Wenk M (1994) "Calcium gluconate in severe verapamil intoxication." N Engl J Med, 330, p. 718-20
  10. Bar-Or D, Gasiel Y (1981) "Calcium and calciferol antagonise effect of verapamil in atrial fibrillation." Br Med J (Clin Res Ed), 282, p. 1585-6
  11. Lipman J, Jardine I, Roos C, Dreosti L (1982) "Intravenous calcium chloride as an antidote to verapamil-induced hypotension." Intensive Care Med, 8, p. 55-7
  12. McMillan R (1988) "Management of acute severe verapamil intoxication." J Emerg Med, 6, p. 193-6
  13. Perkins CM (1978) "Serious verapamil poisoning: treatment with intravenous calcium gluconate." Br Med J, 2, p. 1127
  14. Moroni F, Mannaioni PF, Dolara A, Ciaccheri M (1980) "Calcium gluconate and hypertonic sodium chloride in a case of massive verapamil poisoning." Clin Toxicol, 17, p. 395-400
View all 14 references

Switch to consumer interaction data

Therapeutic duplication warnings

No warnings were found for your selected drugs.

Therapeutic duplication warnings are only returned when drugs within the same group exceed the recommended therapeutic duplication maximum.


Report options

Loading...
QR code containing a link to this page

Drug Interaction Classification

These classifications are only a guideline. The relevance of a particular drug interaction to a specific individual is difficult to determine. Always consult your healthcare provider before starting or stopping any medication.
Major Highly clinically significant. Avoid combinations; the risk of the interaction outweighs the benefit.
Moderate Moderately clinically significant. Usually avoid combinations; use it only under special circumstances.
Minor Minimally clinically significant. Minimize risk; assess risk and consider an alternative drug, take steps to circumvent the interaction risk and/or institute a monitoring plan.
Unknown No interaction information available.

Further information

Always consult your healthcare provider to ensure the information displayed on this page applies to your personal circumstances.