Could Cancer Drug Gleevec Help With Severe Asthma?
FRIDAY, May 19, 2017 -- A leukemia drug might also effectively treat severe asthma, a small-scale clinical trial suggests.
"We showed we could decrease the amount of airway twitchiness by a third," Israel said. "That's a substantial change, and that was significant compared with the placebo group."
Israel is director of the respiratory therapy department at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston.
The drug also improved overall airway function, an effect researchers hadn't expected, Israel said.
People whose severe asthma isn't controlled despite use of high-dose steroid medications are at risk of declining lung function and poor quality of life, the researchers said in background notes.
But, this powerful cancer drug can't be recommended for them on the basis of this small study, Israel and other specialists noted.
Gleevec fights leukemia by blocking a specific receptor on cancerous white blood cells, inhibiting their ability to multiply and spread, Israel said.
That same action also affects mast cells, a type of white blood cell distributed throughout the body that promotes inflammation and causes allergic reactions, Israel said.
For example, mast cells in the skin are responsible for hives, while mast cells in the lungs have been associated with severe asthma, he said.
"By blocking the signal that helps keep mast cells alive, we were hoping to reduce the number of these cells," Israel said. "By doing that, we hoped to produce improvements beyond the maximal therapy that these patients with severe asthma are on."
Israel and his colleagues recruited 62 severe asthma sufferers for the study. All received top-notch asthma treatment, and were randomly assigned to take either Gleevec or a placebo pill once daily during the 6-month trial.
Blood tests showed that Gleevec did reduce mast cell activity in patients, Israel said.
Further, allergy challenge tests showed a decrease in airway reactivity among patients taking Gleevec, the researchers reported. Airways became less likely to close off after exposure to an allergen.
Physical examinations showed that people taking Gleevec actually experienced a slight overall widening of their airways, Israel added.
"There was a small but significant improvement in the airway narrowing in these patients, which we didn't expect because we didn't think the mast cells were necessarily promoting that airway narrowing all the time," Israel said.
Side-effects were not as severe as expected, he added. One person dropped out because of a sharp decline in white blood cells, which bounced back after the drug was discontinued. Another person dropped out because of leg cramps associated with the drug.
"All in all, we were expecting a significantly greater pattern of side-effects, and we didn't see it," Israel explained.
According to Dr. Len Horovitz, a pulmonary specialist with Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City, "This drug represents a new mechanism for the immune modulation of severe asthma." Horovitz was not involved with the study.
"It has been a while since a new approach and treatment for severe asthma has emerged," Horovitz said. "Further studies will be needed to assess its utility in moderate asthma."
Pulmonologist Dr. Theodore Maniatis is medical director of Staten Island University Hospital in New York City. He sounded a more cautionary note.
"This is a very early work that in no way should encourage asthmatics," Maniatis said. "While it is a very interesting study for pulmonologists and immunologists, it is a very small study."
Until now, "this immune-modulating drug has been used only for cancer and is toxic," he added. "It will take years of study to determine the usefulness of this drug in treatment."
Israel agreed that further clinical trials are needed. "Before you go out and recommend this be used in general, you really want to repeat this in a larger population with greater numbers," he said.
It likely will be three to four years before Gleevec could be approved for asthma treatment, Israel estimated.
If proven effective, Gleevec might provide a relatively inexpensive new treatment for asthma patients. Two generic versions of the drug were launched last year, which could make it less pricey than new-wave asthma drugs headed for the market, Israel added.
The study was published May 18 in the New England Journal of Medicine.
For more on asthma, visit the U.S. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Posted: May 2017