Skip to Content


Generic Name: Progesterone Intrauterine Device

Primary: GU400

Commonly used brand name(s): Progestasert.

Note: For a listing of dosage forms and brand names by country availability, see Dosage Forms section(s).

Not commercially available in Canada.


Contraceptive (intrauterine-local)—



Pregnancy (prophylaxis)—Progesterone intrauterine devices are recommended as a contraceptive method, primarily for parous women who are in a mutually monogamous relationship and have no history of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). {01}
—An IUD may not be an appropriate choice for nulliparous or low parity women whose lifestyle (involvement in multiple relationships or in a nonmonogamous relationship) may expose them to sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) or for women at risk of developing PID because PID, if it develops, potentially may be more severe for these women. {01} {86} The IUD is not generally recommended for women whose uterine cavity measures less than 6.5 centimeters (cm). {01}
—IUDs do not protect against sexually transmitted diseases including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). {01} {13}
—The following table presents the results of studies examining contraceptive failure rates calculated using the life-table method. The first column lists the contraceptive method used. The second column indicates the percentage of women experiencing an accidental pregnancy in the first year of use of a contraceptive method while using the method perfectly under clinical conditions. The range of failure rates in the clinical trials may be explained by interstudy variations in study design or patient population characteristics, such as motivation, fecundity, or socioeconomic factors (including education). The third column indicates contraceptive failure rates in the first year of contraceptive use under clinical conditions for typical couples who start using a method (not necessarily for the first time). Failure rates among adolescents may be higher due to poorer compliance than in other age groups. {07} {53} {54}

  Method used
Failure rate range
(over 12 months)
in clinical
studies (%)
first year
rate (%)
Spermicides *
Periodic abstinence
Cervical cap with spermicide
Diaphragm with spermicide
Condom without spermicide
  Copper-T 200

  Copper-T 200Ag

  Copper-T 220C §

  Copper-T 380A
  Copper-T 380S {53} {54}

Oral contraceptive
  Estrogen and progestin

  Progestin only

injection (90-day)
Levonorgestrel (implants)
  Six capsules
  Two rods
  Female #
* Spermicides studied include creams, foams, gels, jellies, and suppositories. {53} {54}
 Methods studied include calendar, ovulation method, and symptothermal (cervical mucus method supplemented by basal body temperature in post-ovulatory phases, post-ovulation phases, post-ovulation). {53} {54}
 Life-table method rate is unavailable for Copper-T 200Ag and the Pearl method rate at 12 months was reported; these methods at 12 months are considered comparable. {04} {55} {56} {57}
§ Copper-T 220C is manufactured with copper sleeves instead of copper wire; often used as a control in clinical studies. {07}
# Methods studied include culdotomy, laparoscopy, minilaparotomy, electrocoagulation, laparotomy, tubal diathermy and/or use of rings or clips. {53} {54}


Physicochemical characteristics:

Physical description
    The ethylene/vinyl coacetate polymer (EVA) T-shaped body has a 36 millimeter tubular vertical stem that contains a reservoir of 38 mg of microcrystallized progesterone (initially) and radiopaque barium sulfate (to monitor location) dispersed in silicone fluid; the horizontal arms measure 32 millimeters. In addition, the T-shaped body contains two blue-black monofilament threads (to monitor placement and aid in IUD removal) {01}.

Mechanism of action/Effect:

Contraceptive, intrauterine-local:

The progesterone intrauterine device prevents pregnancy in 98% of users in the first year of use. The precise mechanism of action has not been fully elucidated; a number of mechanisms may contribute to the contraceptive effect. {01} {19} {20}

Progesterone is thought to enhance an unfavorable uterine environment for implantation by suppressing endometrial proliferation and to inhibit sperm penetration by causing cervical mucus to become thick and scanty. {01} {03} {24} {28} Progesterone also may directly inhibit metabolism, capacitation, and swimming speed of the sperm. Other normal cyclic reproductive function, including ovulation, continues as it does with other IUDs. {01} {03} {04} {28} {39}

In general, IUDs produce cellular reactions that can lead to local superficial ulceration in adjacent uterine cells. {24} {29} {30} This causes a foreign-body inflammatory response {18} {21} {22} leading to biochemical and morphological changes in the endometrial tissue and uterine fluid, including increased infiltration of leukocytes, {18} {29} {30} {31} especially macrophages. {30} {49} This action adds to progesterone's ability to interfere with sperm migration, fertilization and, to a lesser extent, with implantation. {01} {22} {23} {49} {52}

Other actions/effects:

Progesterone may decrease the endometrial content of prostaglandins and decrease the concentration of blood vessels in the endometrium which may result in fewer complaints of dysmenorrhea and a lower total volume of menstrual blood loss in women using a progesterone IUD. {05} {11} {16} {24} {25} {97} {98}


Readily absorbed into uterine epithelium; systemic progesterone absorption is low and not considered to be clinically significant. {01} {06} {26} {27} {39}. Progesterone IUDs release progesterone continuously into the uterus at an average rate of 65 mcg per day by membrane controlled diffusion from the reservoir. {01} This membrane barrier allows delivery of progesterone but prevents diffusion of silicone fluid and barium sulfate from the reservoir. {06}


Local, uterine. {01} {06} {26} {27} {39}


Rapid metabolism by endometrium. {26} {27}


Several minutes. {06} {26}

Onset of action:

Local contraceptive action begins immediately after insertion. {02}

Duration of action:

The manufacturer recommends progesterone IUD replacement within 12 months. {01} Local contraceptive action terminates quickly on removal. {02}

Precautions to Consider


Studies have not been done in either animals or humans. {92}

In most women, fertility resumes on removal of the IUD. Up to 76% of women desiring pregnancy conceive successfully within 12 months after IUD removal, and 49% of women conceive within the first 3 months. {01}

Monogamous women with monogamous partners have little risk of primary tubal infertility attributable to progesterone IUDs unless there are other risk factors, such as endometriosis or past history of surgery on the female reproductive system. {01} {12} {14} {15} IUDs increase the risk of tubal infertility caused by obstruction in or damage to the fallopian tubes, which are problems associated with pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) or an infection in the uterus or fallopian tubes. This risk from the insertion procedure is highest within the first few months after IUD insertion. {01} {20}

Use of a progesterone IUD is not recommended during pregnancy although there is no clear clinical evidence of adverse effects for infants conceived with an IUD in situ . {07} Long-term effects on the offspring if conceived with a progesterone IUD present are not known. A congenital anomaly, bilateral inguinal hernia, has occurred, but causal relationship was not established. {01} {07}

An IUD in utero during pregnancy has resulted in maternal sepsis (usually, but not exclusively, in the second trimester {01} {43}, secondary to a septic abortion or chorioamnionitis) and, rarely, death. {01} {43} {71} If pregnancy occurs with an IUD in situ , risk-benefit of leaving the IUD in situ versus IUD removal must be carefully considered. {01} If an IUD remains in utero , possible complications include a 50% {10} {18} risk of spontaneous abortion and an increased risk of premature rupture of membranes, labor, and delivery. {01} {10} {71}

If a pregnancy occurs with a progesterone IUD in place, the IUD should be removed if the string is visible and the removal is easy. However, manipulation of the IUD may stimulate spontaneous abortion. If the string is not visible, removal of the IUD may be attempted under ultrasound guidance, and/or the termination of the pregnancy should be considered. {01} {10} {18} {71}

When a pregnancy occurs with a progesterone IUD in situ , the possibility of an ectopic pregnancy should be considered as the IUD protects against intrauterine pregnancy more than it protects against extrauterine pregnancy. {01} {10} {66} Studies indicate that about 1 ectopic pregnancy per 200 users per year occurs with a progesterone IUD in situ , a rate similar to that of noncontracepting sexually active women but approximately 6 times higher than that of women using nonmedicated IUDs. {01} {10} {73} {75} {77} Clinical trials also show that the risk of ectopic pregnancy occurring in nulliparous women is twice that of parous women, 1 ectopic pregnancy of 3.6 pregnancies versus 1 ectopic pregnancy in 6.2 pregnancies, respectively. {01} {66}

Diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy may be difficult because early symptoms (enlarged and tender breasts, dizziness, faintness, nausea, unusual tiredness or weakness, lower abdominal pain, cramping or tenderness [possibly severe], vaginal bleeding [possibly heavy and/or unexpected], or absent or delayed menstrual cycle) are nonspecific and variable. Also, 83% of patients continue to have menses, and 53% do not suspect pregnancy. {01} {66} {79}


If an intrauterine pregnancy continues with an IUD in situ , the risk for premature delivery is increased along with the usual complications of premature infants. {01}

Postpartum —
It is recommended that postpartum IUD insertion be performed 8 weeks or more after delivery (interval insertion) or after complete involution of the uterus has occurred, although individual needs and desires should be taken into consideration by the physician. The risk of an IUD expulsion or uterine perforation caused by an IUD is lower for interval insertions than for postplacental insertions (insertions performed within 10 minutes after delivery). Immediate postpartum insertions (insertions performed within 48 hours after delivery) or immediate postabortion insertions may involve a risk of uterine perforation by the IUD similar to that for interval insertions, but the expulsion rate is higher. {20} {81} {82} Higher expulsion rates in postpartum women may be due to the difficulty in placing the IUD sufficiently high in the fundus. {10} {66}


Problems in humans have not been documented. IUDs are recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for use as a contraceptive method because IUDs do not interfere with lactation. {07}


Sexually active adolescents may be better served with a contraceptive method that also protects against sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). In general, young age and nulliparity in women appear to be associated with a higher expulsion rate, possibly due to a more reactive myometrium and irregular and heavy menses. {01} {17}

Drug interactions and/or related problems
The following drug interactions and/or related problems have been selected on the basis of their potential clinical significance (possible mechanism in parentheses where appropriate)—not necessarily inclusive (» = major clinical significance):

Note: Combinations containing the following medication, depending on the amount present, may also interact with this device.

Anticoagulants{01}    (use of anticoagulants may initially potentiate the risk of abnormal uterine bleeding around the time of the progesterone IUD insertion; risk lessens with use but spotting may persist)

Laboratory value alterations
The following have been selected on the basis of their potential clinical significance (possible effect in parentheses where appropriate)—not necessarily inclusive (» = major clinical significance):

With physiology/laboratory test values
Glucose, plasma    (glucose measurements induced by glucose tolerance tests were slightly elevated at 3 hours according to studies in women using progesterone IUDs at 6 and 12 months; fasting and 0.5 hour glucose measurements were unchanged {40} {41})

Insulin concentration, serum    (measurements induced by glucose tolerance tests in women using progesterone IUDs for 12 months have shown that insulin concentrations taken at fasting, 0.5 hour, and 3 hours increased from 10.3, 69, and 40.5 microunits/mL to 18.1, 118.4, and 68.5 microunits/mL, respectively; insulin concentrations at 1 and 2 hours were not significantly changed {40} {41})

Triglyceride, plasma, fasting    (although no change was shown at 6 months, a study showed that triglyceride concentrations decreased at 12 months from 76.3 to 61.8 mg/dL for women using progesterone IUDs for 12 months {40} {41})

Medical considerations/Contraindications
The medical considerations/contraindications included have been selected on the basis of their potential clinical significance (reasons given in parentheses where appropriate)— not necessarily inclusive (» = major clinical significance).

Except under special circumstances, this device should not be used when the following medical problems exist:
» Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) or
» Autoimmune diseases or{01}
» Malignancy treated with antineoplastic agents and/or radiation or{01}
» Malignancy, uterine or cervical, known or suspected or{01}
» Any other condition associated with or resulting in decreased immunity and/or increased susceptibility to infection{01}{20}    (possible increased risk of infection with an IUD when a patient lacks an intact immune system {01} {90})

» Bleeding, genital, of unknown etiology    (insertion of a progesterone IUD may initially exacerbate uterine bleeding, then, with continued use, decrease uterine bleeding; this could mask other serious underlying conditions and delay the diagnosis of the condition {01} {07} {22})

» Ectopic pregnancy, history of    (may increase risk of ectopic pregnancy with contraceptive failure, especially in nulliparous women {01} {07} {10} {20} {23} {32} {66} {70} {73} {76} {80})

» Infection or inflammation in female reproductive tract, including
Abortion, recent septic{01}{18}
Genital actinomyces-like infection{01}{44}{45}{58}{59}
PID, acute or history of{01}{08}{09}{14}{15}{50}{60}{61}{62}{63}{64}{67}{68}{69}{72}{83}{84}{87}
Sexually transmitted diseases during last 12 months{01}{07}{08}{09}{12}{14}{17}{60}{61}{62}{64}{67}{68}{69}{72}{83}{84}{87}
Vaginitis, excluding candidiasis but including bacterial vaginosis, until controlled{01}    (use of an IUD, when any of the above conditions is present, may predispose the patient to upper genital tract infections that may range in severity from mild to life-threatening; risk is highest within the first 30 days after IUD insertion {07} {49} {84})

    (women with a history of PID may be at increased risk of developing PID; nulliparous women may be at greater risk than parous women {07})

    (significant risk of infection progressing to PID may be related to acquisition of or exposure to PID-associated sexually transmitted diseases {01} {07} {08} {09} {12} {14} {17} {60} {61} {62} {64} {67} {68} {69} {72} {83} {84} {85} {86} {87})

» Surgery involving the uterus or fallopian tubes    (women currently using an IUD may have an increased risk of surgical complications; also, in cases of contraception failure, women having had surgery involving the uterus or fallopian tubes may have additional risk for developing an ectopic pregnancy {10} {73} {75} {78} {79})

» Uterine abnormalities or cavity distortion{01}    (possibility of decreased contraceptive effectiveness; {89} increased risk of IUD expulsion or IUD perforation of the uterus)

Risk-benefit should be considered when the following medical problems exist
Bradycardia, neurovascular, history of or
Syncope, neurovascular, history of{01}    (short-term syncope or bradycardia may occur with IUD insertion; increased risk if these conditions are present)

Cervical stenosis{01}{91}    (may prevent ease of insertion of IUD; excessive force to overcome this resistance is not advised)

» Coagulopathy{01}{30}{42}    (use of a progesterone IUD when increased vascularity and permeability and decreased hemostatic response exists may increase risk of of an IUD expulsion)

Diabetes, insulin-dependent{01}    (IUDs may be a good choice for diabetics; however, complications from infection, if infection occurs, are potentially more likely)

Heart defect, valvular or congenital{01}{10}    (insertion of an IUD may represent a potential source of septic emboli, since these patients are prone to develop subacute bacterial endocarditis)

Patient monitoring
The following may be especially important in patient monitoring (other tests may be warranted in some patients, depending on condition; » = major clinical significance):

Papanicolaou (Pap) test    (recommended annually; examination for actinomycosis-like organisms {01} and, if appropriate, gonococcal and chlamydial tests should be performed {01})

» Physical examination    (recommended once during the first 3 months and at 12 months after insertion for removal {01}; special attention should be given to reports of delayed menses and/or pelvic pain because of the possibility of ectopic pregnancies with failed IUD contraception {01})

Side/Adverse Effects

Note: Cervical laceration, cervical or uterine perforations, and/or abdominal displacement of the IUD {01} {66} {91} may progress to peritonitis, sepsis, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) {01}, abdominal adhesions {01}, intestinal penetration {01}, intestinal obstruction {01}, cystic masses in the pelvis {01}, and local inflammatory reaction with abscess formation, including tubo-ovarian abscess {01} {18}. Certain of these adverse effects of IUDs, although very rare, can lead to a loss of fertility, require partial or total removal of reproductive organs, and, in extremely rare circumstances, cause death. {01} {10} {43} {79} {80} An IUD must be surgically removed as soon as feasible after IUD displacement has been diagnosed {10} {66}.
Because many of the side effects listed below present with uterine bleeding and pain, these symptoms should always be evaluated even though they may not signify a serious problem. Persistent or recurring abnormal uterine bleeding and/or abdominal pain may lessen with continued progesterone IUD use. Other problems such as cervical or uterine perforation, IUD displacement, ectopic pregnancy, PID, and IUD embedment should be ruled out. {66}

The following side/adverse effects have been selected on the basis of their potential clinical significance (possible signs and symptoms in parentheses where appropriate)—not necessarily inclusive:

Those indicating need for medical attention
Incidence more frequent
Abdominal pain or cramping on insertion, continuing
intermenstrual spotting or uterine bleeding (uterine bleeding between menstrual periods)
uterine bleeding on insertion, continuing{33}{34}{35}{36}

Note: Abdominal pain or uterine bleeding should be investigated if it continues beyond several days after IUD insertion. Intermenstrual spotting can be expected for up to 6 months after insertion and intermenstrual uterine bleeding may stop within 3 months. The amount of menstrual blood loss usually is less than preinsertion levels. {01} {18} {33} {34} {35} {36} {37} {38}

Incidence rare
Cervical perforation or laceration {01}{18}{35}{37}{66}{81}
embedment of IUD or perforation of the uterus (severe abdominal pain or cramping; unexpected, heavy vaginal bleeding, sharp pain on insertion){01}{18}{34}{35}{37}{66}{81}
fragmentation of device {01}
neurovascular episodes (dizziness; faintness)—at time of insertion{01}{37}
PID (dull or aching abdominal pain, continuing; fever; odorous vaginal discharge; unusual tiredness or weakness; unusual uterine bleeding)—2 to 3.1%{01}{08}{37}{61}

Note: Increased risk of PID occurs within the first 3 months of IUD insertion; {01} {10} {66} {69} ectopic pregnancy should be ruled out before treatment of PID because of similar presenting symptoms. Also, PID and actinomycosis-like infection may be asymptomatic. {07} {10} {66}

Patient Consultation
As an aid to patient consultation, refer to Advice for the Patient, Progesterone Intrauterine Device (IUD).
In providing consultation, consider emphasizing the following selected information (» = major clinical significance):

Before using this device

Note: In the U.S., the health care professional is required by U.S. federal regulation to provide a patient information brochure to the patient regarding the use of IUDs for contraception, discussing it and other methods of contraception.

»   Conditions affecting use, especially:

Pregnancy—IUD use is not recommended for women during pregnancy, those planning to become pregnant shortly, or women who have had an ectopic pregnancy. If contraception fails with a progesterone IUD, complications to the mother or infant are possible whether the pregnancy continues with the IUD in situ or the device is removed; also, the risk of uterine perforation and expulsion of the IUD may be increased when an IUD is inserted before 8 weeks postpartum

Use in adolescents—
Sexually active adolescents may be better served with a contraceptive method that also protects against sexually transmitted diseases (STDs); IUD use in adolescents of young age and nulliparous women appears to be associated with a higher expulsion rate

Other medical problems, especially acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), autoimmune diseases, immunosuppressive therapy, malignancy of the cervix or uterus, or any other conditions of decreased immunity or increased risk of infection; coagulopathy; genital bleeding of unknown etiology; history of ectopic pregnancy; infection or inflammation in female reproductive tract; surgery involving the uterus or fallopian tubes; or uterine abnormalities or cavity distortion

Proper use of this device
» Reading a copy of the patient information brochure provided by the health care professional helps explain possible side effects, risks, and warning signs of trouble with the IUD

Spermicides are not needed with a properly placed IUD

» Checking for changes in the IUD thread length after the monthly menses, if not more often, as instructed by physician

» Proper dosing, including IUD removal or replacement times

Precautions while using this device
» Visiting physician regularly to check progress, especially within the first 3 months, preferably the first month, and at 12 months for removal

» Alerting medical personnel before having diagnostic or therapeutic procedures such as surgery involving the uterus or fallopian tubes

» Notifying physician immediately if a partial or complete expulsion is suspected; using another form of nonhormonal contraception until evaluated by a physician; patient should not try to remove the IUD or re-insert it

» Reporting missed or scanty menses to physician immediately and using other nonhormonal contraceptive methods

» Reporting symptoms of possible pregnancy, including ectopic pregnancy, to physician in the rare case when IUD contraceptive effects fail

» Notifying physician and using other nonhormonal contraceptive methods if any of the following occur:    —Abnormal vaginal bleeding
   —Exposure to sexually transmitted diseases
   —Feeling the tip of the IUD at the cervix or pain during sexual intercourse
   —Change in length of IUD threads or disappearance of IUD threads on periodic observation after menses
   —Lifestyle change from a mutually monogamous relationship
   —Pelvic/lower abdominal pain or cramping, unusual or severe, possibly with fever
   —Vaginal discharge or signs of genital lesions or sores

Progesterone IUDs should not interfere with the proper use of other vaginal products such as tampons or condoms

Side/adverse effects
Signs of potential side effects, especially abdominal pain or cramping on insertion (continuing), intermenstrual spotting or uterine bleeding, uterine bleeding on insertion (continuing), cervical perforation or laceration, embedment of IUD, fragmentation of device, perforation of the uterus, neurovascular episodes on insertion, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID)

General Dosing Information
In the U.S., the health care professional is required by U.S. Federal Regulations (21 CFR 310.502) to give the patient a copy of the Patient Information for an Informed Decision to ensure complete understanding of the risks and benefits, safety, and efficacy of the progesterone IUD. {93}

It is generally believed that perforations occur at the time of insertion, although they may not be detected until later. {01} {18} {37} Adequate training of those health care professionals inserting the device may help prevent cervical or uterine perforation. A number of supervised insertions may be necessary before a solo attempt. The degree of training needed depends on the health care professional's skill and experience with IUD aseptic insertion techniques and uterus manipulation. {01}

The manufacturer's product information should be consulted for specific directions. {46}

The IUD may be inserted at any time during the menstrual cycle. Many physicians prefer insertion at the end of or within 2 days after a menstrual period to reduce the possibility of inserting an IUD in the presence of an undiagnosed pregnancy. {01} {18} However, the optimal time for insertion appears to be the periovulatory period. Caution should be used to avoid inserting a second IUD, as patients may forget about a previously inserted IUD or may assume it to be expelled. {01} {51}

Using aseptic technique and removing the IUD from the sterile packaging no more than 5 minutes before the insertion procedure are recommended. {01} Prophylactic treatment with antibiotics theoretically may reduce the risk of infection, {60} which is 6 times higher within the first 20 days after insertion. {01} {09} {50} {67} Regimens include doxycycline 200 mg orally one hour before insertion, or erythromycin 500 mg orally one hour before insertion and 500 mg orally six hours after insertion. {01} This may be of limited benefit and unnecessary for women at low risk of sexually transmitted disease (STDs).

It is recommended that an IUD be removed for the following medical reasons: pelvic infection, {01} {10} {37} genital actinomycosis, {01} {10} dyspareunia, {01} pregnancy (when able to remove the IUD), {01} {10} endometrial or cervical malignancy, {01} {10} uterine or cervical perforation, {01} {10} or partial expulsion {01} {10}.

If the retrieval threads cannot be seen, they may have retracted into the uterus or have been broken, or the IUD may have been expelled. Pregnancy, both uterine and ectopic, should be considered before attempting to locate the IUD. Although ultrasound is the preferred method of locating a malpositioned IUD, high- or intermediate-strength magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), uterine probe, or x-rays may also be used. {65} {71}

Removing an intraperitoneal progesterone IUD as soon as medically feasible after the diagnosis is recommended because of the possibility of abdominal adhesion formation, intestinal penetration, and local inflammatory reaction with abscess formation and erosion of adjacent viscera, maternal sepsis, or, rarely, death. {43} {71}

The manufacturer's information should be consulted for the recommended removal procedure. If an IUD is difficult to remove, the procedure may need to be done in a hospital or operating room. {01} {81} {91} Another type of contraception should begin immediately after IUD removal if contraception is desired. {74}

For treatment of adverse effects
Recommended treatment consists of the following:    • For pain—Treating with mild analgesics for several hours after IUD insertion. {18}
   • For pelvic inflammatory disease (PID)—Removing the progesterone IUD and treating the patient with appropriate broad-spectrum antibiotics; the patient's partner may require treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics as well. {69}
Note: HIV-infected women with PID who are immunocompromised may be at increased risk of a complicated clinical course and should be hospitalized for intravenous therapy. {69}

Intrauterine Dosage Form


Usual adult and adolescent dose
Intrauterine, one device; the maximum duration of use is 12 months. {01}

Strength(s) usually available

38 mg progesterone (Rx) [Progestasert{01}]

Not commercially available.

Packaging and storage:
Store below 40 °C (104 °F), preferably between 15 and 30 °C (59 and 86 °F), unless otherwise specified by manufacturer. {01} Preserve in sealed, single-unit containers. {48}

Note: Provide patient with patient package insert (PPI).

Revised: 06/16/1997

  1. Progestasert package insert (Intrauterine progesterone contraceptive system, Alza—US), Rev 5/93, Rec 5/95.
  1. Personal communication, 7/19/95.
  1. Lee WI, Blandau RJ. Laser light-scattering study of the effect of progesterone on sperm motility. Fertil Steril 1979 Sep; 32(3): 320-3.
  1. Rosado A, Hicks JJ, Aznar R, et al. Intrauterine contraception with the progesterone-T device. Contraception 1974; 9: 39.
  1. Scommegna A, Ilekis J, Sotrel G, et al. The effect of intrauterine progesterone treatment on the endometrial prostaglandin F content in the rabbit. Fertil Steril 1977 May; 28(5): 581-6.
  1. Pharriss BB, Erickson R, Bashaw J, et al. Progestasert: a uterine therapeutic system for long-term contraception: I. Philosophy and clinical efficacy. Fertil Steril 1974 Nov; 25(11): 915-21.
  1. World Health Organ Techn Rep Ser 753. Mechanism of action, safety and efficacy of intrauterine devices. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1987.
  1. Mueller BA, Luz-Jimenez M, Daling JR, et al. Risk factors for tubal infertility: Influence of history of prior pelvic inflammatory disease. Sex Transm Dis 1992 Jan-Feb: 28-34.
  1. Farley TM, Rosenberg MJ, Rowe PJ, et al. Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: an international perspective. Lancet 1992 Mar 28; 339: 785-8.
  1. The intrauterine device (IUD). In: Speroff L, Glass RH, Kase NG, editors. Clinical gynecologic endocrinology and infertility. 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1994: 777-93.
  1. Cameron IT, Leask R, Kelly RW, et al. The effects of danazol, mefenamic acid, norethisterone and a progesterone-impregnated coil on endometrial prostaglandin concentrations in women with menorrhagia. Prostaglandins 1987 Jul; 34(1): 99-110.
  1. Cramer DW, Schiff I, Schoenbaum SC, et al. Tubal infertility and the intrauterine device. N Engl J Med 1985 Apr 11; 312(15): 941-7.
  1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. HHS NEWS [FDA bulletin]. 1993 April: P93-P112.
  1. Sundby J, Olsen A. The influence of education, age at sexual debut, use of intrauterine device and number of sex partners on tubal factor infertility. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 13(2): 135-46.
  1. Daling JR, Weiss NS, Metch BJ, et al. Primary tubal infertility in relation to the use of an intrauterine device. N Engl J Med 1985 Apr 11; 312(15): 937-41.
  1. Shaw ST, Macaulay LK, Aznar R, et al. Effects of a progesterone-releasing intrauterine contraceptive device on endometrial blood vessels: a morphometric study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981 Dec; 821-7.
  1. Sulak PJ, Haney AF. Unwanted pregnancies: understanding contraceptive use and benefits in adolescents and older women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993 Jun; 168(6): 2042-8.
  1. Tatum HJ. Contraception and family planning. In: Pernoll ML, Benson RC, editors. Current obstetric & gynecologic diagnosis & treatment. 6th rev. ed. Norwalk: Appleton & Lange, 1987: 586-611.
  1. Newton J, Szontagh F, Lebech P, et al. A collaborative study of the progesterone intrauterine device (Progestasert). The World Health Organization Task Force on Methods for the Regulation of Implantation. Contraception 1979 Jun 19(6): 575-89.
  1. Liskin L, Fox G. IUDs: an appropriate contraceptive for many women. Popul Rep B; Intrauterine Devices, (4), Washington, DC, 1982.
  1. Sagiroglu N. Phagocytosis of spermatozoa in the uterine cavity of women using intrauterine device. Int J Fertil 1971; 16: 1-14.
  1. Johannisson E. Mechanism of action of intrauterine devices: biochemical changes. Contraception 1987 Jul; 36(1): 11-22.
  1. Treiman K, Liskin L. IUDs—a new look. Popul Rep B; Intrauterine Devices, (5), Washington, DC, 1988.
  1. Sheppard BL. Endometrial morphological changes in IUD users: a review. Contraception 1987 Jul: 36(1): 1-10.
  1. Liedholm P, Sjoberg N-O, Srivastava K, et al. No increase of the fibrinolytic activity of the human endometrium by progesterone-releasing IUD (Progestasert). Contraception 1978 Jun; 17(6): 531-6.
  1. Scommegna A, Avila T, Luna M, et al. Fertility control by intrauterine release of progesterone. Obstet Gynecol 1974 May; 43(5): 769-79.
  1. Ermini M, Carpino F, Petrozza V, et al. Distribution and effect on the endometrium of progesterone released from a progestasert device. Hum Reprod 1989 Apr; 4(3): 221-8.
  1. Alvarez F, Brache V, Fernandez E, et al. New insights on the mode of action of intrauterine contraceptive devices in women. Fertil Steril 1988 May; 49(5): 768-72.
  1. Mishell DR, Bell JH, Good RG, et al. The intrauterine device: A bacteriologic study of the endometrial cavity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1966; 96(1): 119-26.
  1. Sheppard BL. Endometrial morphological changes in IUD users: a review. Contraception 1987 Jul; 36(1): 1-9.
  1. Sedlis A, Reyniak JV. Endometrial leukocytes in patients using intrauterine contraceptive devices. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1970; 180: 1209-12.
  1. Diaz A, Croxatto HB, Pavez M, et al. Ectopic pregnancies associated with low-dose progestagen-releasing IUDs. Contraception 22(3): 259-69.
  1. Gibor Y, Mitchell C. Selected events following insertion of the Progestasert system. Contraception 1980 May; 21(5): 491-503.
  1. Zador G, Nilsson BA, Nilsson B, et al. Clinical experience with the uterine progesterone system (Progestasert). Contraception 1976 May; 13(5): 559-95.
  1. Wan L, Hsu Y-C, Gonguly M, et al. Effects of the Progestasert on the menstrual pattern, ovarian steroids, and endometrium. Contraception 1977 Oct; 16(4): 417-34.
  1. Gyozo G. Progesterone-releasing intrauterine contraceptive device [letter]. Am J Obstet Gynecol 124(2): 214-5.
  1. Pharriss BB. Clinical experience with the intrauterine progesterone contraceptive system. J Reprod Med 1978 Mar; 155-65.
  1. Intrauterine progesterone contraceptive system as an alternative in cases where conventional IUD's are unsuitable. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1979; 58(3): 279-81.
  1. Bryant-Greenwood GD, Greenwood FC, Hale RW, et al. Hormonal evaluation of the intrauterine progesterone contraceptive system. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1977; 44(4): 721-7.
  1. Spellacy WN, Buhi WC, Birk SA. Studies of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in women using the progesterone-T intrauterine device for six months: blood glucose, insulin, cholesterol, and triglyceride levels. Fertil Steril 1978 May; 29(5): 505-8.
  1. Spellacy WN, Buhi WC, Birk SA. Carbohydrate and lipid studies in women using the progesterone intrauterine device for one year. Fertil Steril 1979 Apr; 31(4): 381-4.
  1. Andrade ATL, Orchard EP. Quantitative studies on menstrual blood loss in IUD users. Contraception 1987; 36(1): 129-43.
  1. Potasman I, Leibovitz Z, Sharf M. Candida sepsis in pregnancy and the postpartum period. Rev Infect Dis 1991; 13; 146-9.
  1. Duguid HLD, Parratt D, Traynor R. Actinomyces-like organisms in cervical smears from women using intrauterine contraceptive devices. Br Med J 1980; 281: 534-7.
  1. Hill GB. Eubacterium nodatum mimics Actinomyces in intrauterine device-associated infections and other settings within the female genital tract. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79(4): 534-8.
  1. Panel comment, 9/95.
  1. Shaw ST, Macaulay LK, Hohman WR. Morphological studies on IUD-induced metrorrhagia. I. Endometrial changes and clinical correlations. Contraception 1979; 19: 47-61.
  1. The United States pharmacopeia. The national formulary. USP 23rd revision (January 1, 1995). NF 18th ed (January 1, 1995). Rockville, MD: The United States Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc., 1995: 1307.
  1. Moyer DL, Mishell DR Jr. Reactions of human endometrium to the intrauterine foreign body. II. Long-term effects on the endometrial histology and cytology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1971 Sep; 111(1): 66-80.
  1. Grimes DA. Intrauterine device and pelvic inflammatory disease: recent developments. Contraception 1987; 26(1): 97-109.
  1. Nanda S, Rathee S. Three intrauterine contraceptive devices in a single uterus. Trop Doct 1992 Jan; 33-4.
  1. Kar AB, Engineer AD, Goel R, et al. Effect of an intrauterine contraceptive device on biochemical composition of uterine fluid. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1968; 101(7): 966-70.
  1. Trussell J, Hatcher RA, Cates W Jr, et al. Contraceptive failure in the United States: an update. Stud Fam Plann 1990; 21(1): 51-4.
  1. Trussell J, Kost K. Contraceptive failure in the United States: A critical review of the literature. Stud Fam Plann 1987 Sep/Oct; 18(5): 237-83.
  1. Bull MJV. A life table analysis technique for the evaluation of the intrauterine contraceptive devices. J R Coll Gen Pract 1983 Jul; 33: 403-7.
  1. Tietze C, Lewit S. Recommended procedures for the statistical evaluation of intrauterine contraception. Stud Fam Plann 1973; 4: 35-42.
  1. Keller A, Bailey J, Jiminiez RA, et al. Limitations of life table analysis: Empirical evidence from Mexico. Stud Fam Plann 1981 Oct; 12(10): 341-5.
  1. Hemsell DL, Cunningham FG, Mickal A, et al. Pelvic infections & sexually transmitted diseases. In: Pernoll ML, Benson RC, editors. Current obstetric & gynecologic diagnosis & treatment. 6th ed. Norwalk: Appleton & Lange, 1987: 715-41.
  1. Scully RE, Mark EJ, McNeeley WF, et al. Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital [case 10-1992]. N Engl J Med 1992: 326(10): 692-9.
  1. McGregor JA, Hammill H. Contraception and sexually transmitted diseases: interactions and opportunities. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993 Jun; 168(6): 2035-9.
  1. Burkman RT. Association between intrauterine device and pelvic inflammatory disease. Obstet Gynecol 1981; 57(3): 269-76.
  1. Kronmal RA, Whitney CW, Mumford SD. The intrauterine device and pelvic inflammatory disease: The Women's Health Study reanalyzed. J Clin Epidemiol 1991; 44(2): 109-22.
  1. Toivonen J. Intrauterine contraceptive device and pelvic inflammatory disease. Ann Med 1993 Apr; 25(2): 171-3.
  1. Burkman RT, Lee NC, Ory HW, et al. Response to The Women's Health Study reanalyzed. J Clin Epidemiol 1991; 44(2): 123-5.
  1. Mark AS, Hricak H. Intrauterine contraceptive devices: MR imaging. Radiology 1987; 162(2): 311-4.
  1. Rowe PJ. The intrauterine device: a review of recent advances and controversies. In: Finn CA, editor. Oxford reviews of reproductive biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1981; 2: 49-64.
  1. Lee NC, Rubin GL, Ory HW, et al. Type of intrauterine device and the risk of pelvic inflammatory disease. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 62(1): 1-6.
  1. Lee NC, Rubin GL, Borucki R. The intrauterine device and pelvic inflammatory disease revisited: new results from The Women's Health Study. Obstet Gynecol 1988 Jul; 72(1): 1-6.
  1. Morbidity, Mortality Weekly Report. 1992 Apr 26; 40: (RR-5): 1-25.
  1. Pouly JL, Chapron C, Canis M, et al. Subsequent fertility for patients presenting with an ectopic pregnancy and having an intra-uterine device in situ. Hum Reprod 1991; 6(7): 999-1001.
  1. Sachs BP, Gregory K, McArdle C, et al. Removal of retained intrauterine contraceptive devices in pregnancy. Am J Perinatol 1992 May; 9(3): 139-41.
  1. Westrom L. Incidence, prevalence and trends of acute pelvic inflammatory disease and its consequences in industrialized countries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 138: 880-92.
  1. Edelman DA, Porter CW. The intrauterine device and ectopic pregnancy. Contraception 1987 Jul; 36(1): 85-96.
  1. Ory HW. The Women's Health Study. Ectopic pregnancy and intrauterine contraceptive devices: new perspectives. Obstet Gynecol 1981; 57: 137-44.
  1. Marchbanks PA, Annegers JF, Coulam CB, et al. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a population-based study. JAMA 1988 Mar; 259(12): 1823-7.
  1. Sivin I. Dose- and age-dependent ectopic pregnancy risks with intrauterine contraception. Obstet Gynecol 1991 Aug; 78(2): 291-8.
  1. Progestasert: Clinical evidence [report]. Alza—US, rev 7/90.
  1. Golan A, Raziel A, Neuman M, et al. Fertility before and after surgery for primary ovarian pregnancy. Fertil Steril 1991 Jan; 55(1): 200-1.
  1. Hallatt JG. Repeat ectopic pregnancy: A study of 123 consecutive cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975; 122(4): 520-4.
  1. Current trends: ectopic pregnancy—United States, 1987. MMWR 1990 June 22; 39(24): 401-4.
  1. Heartwell SF, Schlesselman S. Risk of uterine perforation among users of intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 61(1): 31-6
  1. Chi I, Kelly E. Is lactation a risk factor of IUD- and sterilisation-related uterine perforations? A hypothesis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1983; 61: 31-6.
  1. Eschenbach DA. Acute pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). Urol Clin North Am 1984; 11: 65-81.
  1. Flesh G, Weiner JM, Corlett RC, et al. Contraceptive device and acute salpingitis: A multifactor analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979; 135: 402-8.
  1. Haukkamaa M, Stranden P, Jousimies-Somer H, et al. Bacterial flora of the cervix in the women using different methods of contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986 Mar; 154(3): 520-4.
  1. Rossing MA, Weiss NS. IUDS and pelvic inflammatory disease [letter]. Lancet 1992 Jul; 340: 248.
  1. Farley TM, Rowe PJ, Meirik O, et al. IUDS and pelvic inflammatory disease [letter]. Lancet 1992 Jul; 340: 248-9.
  1. Tietze C, Lewit S. Evaluation of intrauterine devices. Ninth progress report of the Cooperative Statistical Program. Stud Fam Plann 1970; 1(55): 1-49.
  1. Furst A, Harais H. Intrauterine contraceptive device and embryo sharing a bicornuate uterus: case report. Br J Gen Pract 1992 Mar: 129.
  1. Zerner J, Doil KL, Drewry J, et al. Intrauterine contraceptive device failures in renal transplant patients. J Reprod Med 1981 Feb; 25(2): 99-102.
  1. Roke CM. A comparative study of the ease of removal of intrauterine contraceptive devices. Contraception 1988 Jun; 37(6): 555-62.
  1. Castellsague X, Thompson WD, Dubrow R. Intrauterine contraception and the risk of endometrial cancer. Int J Cancer 1993; 54: 911-6.
  1. US Federal Regulations (21 CFR 310.502) 1993: 34-40.
  1. Volpe A, Botticelli A, Abrate M, et al. An intrauterine progesterone contraceptive system (52 mg) used in pre- and peri-menopausal patients with endometrial hyperplasia. Maturitas 1982; 4: 73-9.
  1. Shoupe D, Meme D, Mezrow G, et al. Prevention of endometrial hyperplasia in postmenopausal women with intrauterine progesterone [letter]. N Engl J Med 1991 Dec; 325(25): 1811-2.
  1. Andersson K, Mattsson L-A, Rybo G, et al. Intrauterine release of levonorgestrel—a new way of adding progestogen in hormone replacement therapy. Obstet Gynecol 1992 Jun; 79(6): 963-7.
  1. Raudaskoski T, Lahti EI, Kauppila A, et al. Transdermal estrogen with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device for climacteric complaints: clinical and endometrial responses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995 Jan; 172 (1, pt 1): 114-9.
  1. Suhonen S, Homstrom T, Allonen HO, et al. Intrauterine and subdermal progestin administration in postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy. Fertil Steril 1995 Feb; 63(2): 336-42.