Drug Interactions between amoxicillin / clarithromycin / lansoprazole and saquinavir

CONTRAINDICATED: Saquinavir in combination with ritonavir may cause dose-related prolongation of the QT interval. Theoretically, coadministration with other agents that can prolong the QT interval may result in additive effects and increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias including torsade de pointes and sudden death. In a study of 59 healthy volunteers aged 18 to 55 years who were administered saquinavir/ritonavir at a therapeutic dosage of 1000 mg/100 mg twice daily and a supratherapeutic dosage of 1500 mg/100 mg twice daily, the maximum mean QT prolongation (QTcS; study-specific QT interval correction) on treatment day 3 was 18.9 msec for the lower dosage and 30.2 msec for the supratherapeutic dosage, compared to 12.2 msec for the active control (moxifloxacin 400 mg). The majority of subjects (89% and 80% in the therapeutic and supratherapeutic groups, respectively) had a QTcS less than 450 msec, and none had a QTc interval exceeding the potentially clinically relevant threshold of 500 msec. In general, the risk of an individual agent or a combination of agents causing ventricular arrhythmia in association with QT prolongation is largely unpredictable but may be increased by certain underlying risk factors such as congenital long QT syndrome, cardiac disease, and electrolyte disturbances (e.g., hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia). In addition, the extent of drug-induced QT prolongation is dependent on the particular drug(s) involved and dosage(s) of the drug(s).

MANAGEMENT: Coadministration of ritonavir-boosted saquinavir with other drugs that can prolong the QT interval is considered contraindicated.

MONITOR: Coadministration with clarithromycin may increase the plasma concentrations of lansoprazole. The proposed mechanism is clarithromycin inhibition of intestinal (first-pass) and hepatic metabolism of lansoprazole via CYP450 3A4. Although lansoprazole is primarily metabolized by CYP450 2C19 in the liver, 3A4-mediated metabolism is the predominant pathway in individuals who are 2C19-deficient (approximately 3% to 5% of the Caucasian and 17% to 20% of the Asian population). Additionally, inhibition of P-glycoprotein intestinal efflux transporter by clarithromycin may also contribute to the interaction, resulting in increased bioavailability of lansoprazole. In 18 healthy volunteers--six each of homozygous extensive metabolizers (EMs), heterozygous EMs, and poor metabolizers (PMs) of CYP450 2C19--clarithromycin (400 mg orally twice a day for 6 days) increased the peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of a single 60 mg oral dose of lansoprazole by 1.47, 1.71- and 1.52-fold, respectively, and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) by 1.55-, 1.74- and 1.80-fold, respectively, in each of these groups compared to placebo. The AUC ratio of lansoprazole to lansoprazole sulphone, which is considered an index of CYP450 3A4 activity, was significantly increased by clarithromycin in all three groups. However, elimination half-life of lansoprazole was prolonged by 1.54-fold only in PMs. Mild diarrhea was reported in two subjects and mild abdominal disturbance in six subjects during clarithromycin coadministration. These side effects continued until day 6 and ameliorated the day after discontinuation of clarithromycin, whereas no adverse events were reported during placebo administration or after lansoprazole plus placebo. In another study, clarithromycin induced dose-dependent increases in the plasma concentration of lansoprazole in a group of 20 patients receiving treatment for H. pylori eradication. Mean 3-hour plasma lansoprazole concentration was 385 ng/mL for the control subjects who received lansoprazole 30 mg and amoxicillin 750 mg twice a day for 7 days; 696 ng/mL for patients coadministered clarithromycin 200 mg twice a day; and 947 ng/mL for patients coadministered clarithromycin 400 mg twice a day.

MANAGEMENT: Although lansoprazole is generally well tolerated, caution may be advised during coadministration with clarithromycin, particularly if higher dosages of one or both drugs are used. Dosage adjustment may be necessary in patients who experience excessive adverse effects of lansoprazole.

MONITOR: The concomitant administration of some proton pump inhibitors with saquinavir, with or without ritonavir, may significantly increase exposure to saquinavir. When omeprazole 40 mg once daily and saquinavir/ritonavir 1000 mg/100 mg twice daily were administered to healthy subjects (n=18), the steady-state area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) of saquinavir were increased by an average of 82 % (range, 37% to 234%) and 75 % (range, 31% to 234%), respectively, compared to saquinavir/ritonavir. Ritonavir concentrations were not changed significantly. The mechanism is unknown.

MANAGEMENT: Clinical and laboratory monitoring for saquinavir toxicity is recommended during concurrent use of a proton pump inhibitor. According to some authorities, a dose reduction for saquinavir may be considered.

Although some in vitro data indicate synergism between macrolide antibiotics and penicillins, other in vitro data indicate antagonism. When these drugs are given together, neither has predictable therapeutic efficacy. Data are available for erythromycin, although theoretically this interaction could occur with any macrolide. Except for monitoring of the effectiveness of antibiotic therapy, no special precautions appear to be necessary.