Drug Interactions between amoxicillin / clarithromycin / lansoprazole and lidocaine

MONITOR: Coadministration with moderate and potent inhibitors of CYP450 3A4 may increase the plasma concentrations of lidocaine, which is primarily metabolized by CYP450 3A4 and 1A2 isoenzymes to active metabolites (monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX) and glycinexylidide). In addition, antiarrhythmic calcium channel blockers that also inhibit CYP450 3A4 (e.g., diltiazem, verapamil) may have additive negative inotropic effects on the heart when coadministered with lidocaine. A pharmacokinetic study of 9 healthy volunteers showed that the administration of lidocaine oral (1 mg/kg single dose) with itraconazole (200 mg daily), a combined potent CYP450 3A4 and P-gp inhibitor, increased lidocaine systemic exposure (AUC) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax) by 75% and 55%, respectively. However, no changes were observed in the pharmacokinetics of the active metabolite MEGX. In the same study, when the moderate CYP450 3A4 inhibitor erythromycin (500 mg three times a day) was administered, lidocaine AUC and Cmax increased by 60% and 40%, respectively. By contrast, when intravenous lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg infusion over 60 minutes) was administered on the fourth day of treatment with itraconazole (200 mg once a day) no changes in lidocaine AUC or Cmax were observed. However, when lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg infusion over 60 minutes) was coadministered with erythromycin (500 mg three times a day) in the same study, the AUC and Cmax of the active metabolite MEGX significantly increased by 45-60% and 40%, respectively. The observed differences between oral and intravenous lidocaine when coadministered with CYP450 3A4 inhibitors may be attributed to inhibition of CYP450 3A4 in both the gastrointestinal tract and liver affecting oral lidocaine to a greater extent than intravenous lidocaine. While the clinical significance of this interaction is unknown, increased exposure to lidocaine may lead to serious and/or life-threatening reactions including respiratory depression, convulsions, bradycardia, hypotension, arrhythmias and cardiovascular collapse.

MANAGEMENT: Caution and clinical monitoring are advised if lidocaine must be used concomitantly with moderate and potent CYP450 3A4 inhibitors. Monitoring of pharmacologic response and plasma lidocaine levels may be advised whenever a potent CYP450 3A4 inhibitor is added to or withdrawn from therapy, and the lidocaine dosage adjusted as necessary.

Switch to consumer interaction data

MONITOR: Coadministration with clarithromycin may increase the plasma concentrations of lansoprazole. The proposed mechanism is clarithromycin inhibition of intestinal (first-pass) and hepatic metabolism of lansoprazole via CYP450 3A4. Although lansoprazole is primarily metabolized by CYP450 2C19 in the liver, 3A4-mediated metabolism is the predominant pathway in individuals who are 2C19-deficient (approximately 3% to 5% of the Caucasian and 17% to 20% of the Asian population). Additionally, inhibition of P-glycoprotein intestinal efflux transporter by clarithromycin may also contribute to the interaction, resulting in increased bioavailability of lansoprazole. In 18 healthy volunteers--six each of homozygous extensive metabolizers (EMs), heterozygous EMs, and poor metabolizers (PMs) of CYP450 2C19--clarithromycin (400 mg orally twice a day for 6 days) increased the peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of a single 60 mg oral dose of lansoprazole by 1.47, 1.71- and 1.52-fold, respectively, and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) by 1.55-, 1.74- and 1.80-fold, respectively, in each of these groups compared to placebo. The AUC ratio of lansoprazole to lansoprazole sulphone, which is considered an index of CYP450 3A4 activity, was significantly increased by clarithromycin in all three groups. However, elimination half-life of lansoprazole was prolonged by 1.54-fold only in PMs. Mild diarrhea was reported in two subjects and mild abdominal disturbance in six subjects during clarithromycin coadministration. These side effects continued until day 6 and ameliorated the day after discontinuation of clarithromycin, whereas no adverse events were reported during placebo administration or after lansoprazole plus placebo. In another study, clarithromycin induced dose-dependent increases in the plasma concentration of lansoprazole in a group of 20 patients receiving treatment for H. pylori eradication. Mean 3-hour plasma lansoprazole concentration was 385 ng/mL for the control subjects who received lansoprazole 30 mg and amoxicillin 750 mg twice a day for 7 days; 696 ng/mL for patients coadministered clarithromycin 200 mg twice a day; and 947 ng/mL for patients coadministered clarithromycin 400 mg twice a day.

MANAGEMENT: Although lansoprazole is generally well tolerated, caution may be advised during coadministration with clarithromycin, particularly if higher dosages of one or both drugs are used. Dosage adjustment may be necessary in patients who experience excessive adverse effects of lansoprazole.

Switch to consumer interaction data

Although some in vitro data indicate synergism between macrolide antibiotics and penicillins, other in vitro data indicate antagonism. When these drugs are given together, neither has predictable therapeutic efficacy. Data are available for erythromycin, although theoretically this interaction could occur with any macrolide. Except for monitoring of the effectiveness of antibiotic therapy, no special precautions appear to be necessary.

Switch to consumer interaction data