Drug Interactions between amoxicillin / clarithromycin / lansoprazole and letermovir

MONITOR: Coadministration with clarithromycin may increase the plasma concentrations of lansoprazole. The proposed mechanism is clarithromycin inhibition of intestinal (first-pass) and hepatic metabolism of lansoprazole via CYP450 3A4. Although lansoprazole is primarily metabolized by CYP450 2C19 in the liver, 3A4-mediated metabolism is the predominant pathway in individuals who are 2C19-deficient (approximately 3% to 5% of the Caucasian and 17% to 20% of the Asian population). Additionally, inhibition of P-glycoprotein intestinal efflux transporter by clarithromycin may also contribute to the interaction, resulting in increased bioavailability of lansoprazole. In 18 healthy volunteers--six each of homozygous extensive metabolizers (EMs), heterozygous EMs, and poor metabolizers (PMs) of CYP450 2C19--clarithromycin (400 mg orally twice a day for 6 days) increased the peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of a single 60 mg oral dose of lansoprazole by 1.47, 1.71- and 1.52-fold, respectively, and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) by 1.55-, 1.74- and 1.80-fold, respectively, in each of these groups compared to placebo. The AUC ratio of lansoprazole to lansoprazole sulphone, which is considered an index of CYP450 3A4 activity, was significantly increased by clarithromycin in all three groups. However, elimination half-life of lansoprazole was prolonged by 1.54-fold only in PMs. Mild diarrhea was reported in two subjects and mild abdominal disturbance in six subjects during clarithromycin coadministration. These side effects continued until day 6 and ameliorated the day after discontinuation of clarithromycin, whereas no adverse events were reported during placebo administration or after lansoprazole plus placebo. In another study, clarithromycin induced dose-dependent increases in the plasma concentration of lansoprazole in a group of 20 patients receiving treatment for H. pylori eradication. Mean 3-hour plasma lansoprazole concentration was 385 ng/mL for the control subjects who received lansoprazole 30 mg and amoxicillin 750 mg twice a day for 7 days; 696 ng/mL for patients coadministered clarithromycin 200 mg twice a day; and 947 ng/mL for patients coadministered clarithromycin 400 mg twice a day.

MANAGEMENT: Although lansoprazole is generally well tolerated, caution may be advised during coadministration with clarithromycin, particularly if higher dosages of one or both drugs are used. Dosage adjustment may be necessary in patients who experience excessive adverse effects of lansoprazole.

MONITOR: Coadministration with letermovir may increase the plasma concentrations of drugs that are substrates of CYP450 2C8, CYP450 3A4, and/or organic anion transporting polypeptide protein (OATP) 1B1 and 1B3. Letermovir has been shown to be a reversible inhibitor of CYP450 2C8 in vitro, although its effect on CYP450 2C8 substrates has not been evaluated clinically. Letermovir is also a time-dependent inhibitor and inducer of CYP450 3A4 in vitro. According to the product labeling, midazolam peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and systemic exposure (AUC) increased by an average of 1.7- and 2.3-fold, respectively, when a single 2 mg oral dose of midazolam was coadministered with letermovir 480 mg orally once daily. The Cmax did not change when midazolam 1 mg was administered intravenously with letermovir 240 mg orally once daily, but AUC increased by 1.5-fold and concentration at 24 hours postdose (C24hr) increased by 2.7-fold. The increased AUC of midazolam, a CYP450 3A4 probe substrate, indicates that net effect of letermovir on the isoenzyme is moderate inhibition. In addition, letermovir is an inhibitor of the hepatic uptake transporters, OATP 1B1 and 1B3. When a single 20 mg dose of atorvastatin, a CYP450 3A4 and OATP1B1/1B3 substrate, was coadministered with letermovir 480 mg orally once daily, atorvastatin Cmax, AUC and C24hr increased by an average of 2.2-, 3.3- and 3.6-fold, respectively. Additional use of cyclosporine is likely to further increase the magnitude of these interactions, since it is an inhibitor of CYP450 3A4 and a strong inhibitor of OATP 1B1 and 1B3.

MANAGEMENT: Caution is advised when letermovir is used concurrently with drugs that are substrates of CYP450 2C8, CYP450 3A4, and/or OATP 1B1 and 1B3, particularly those with a narrow therapeutic range. Dosage adjustments as well as clinical and laboratory monitoring may be appropriate for some drugs whenever letermovir is added to or withdrawn from therapy. Moreover, clinicians should be aware that the magnitude of CYP450 3A- and OATP1B1/3-mediated drug interactions with coadministered drugs may be different when letermovir is used with cyclosporine. The combined effect of the two drugs on CYP450 3A4 may be similar to that of a strong CYP450 3A4 inhibitor, hence clinicians should refer to the prescribing information for dosing recommendations of the CYP450 3A4 substrate with a strong CYP450 3A4 inhibitor. Similarly, letermovir and cyclosporine may demonstrate some additive effects on OATP1B1 inhibition, although cyclosporine by itself is already a strong OATP1B1/3 inhibitor.

MONITOR: Coadministration with letermovir may decrease the plasma concentrations of drugs that are metabolized by CYP450 2C9 and/or 2C19. The interaction has been studied with voriconazole, a substrate of CYP450 2C9 and 2C19. According to the product labeling, voriconazole peak plasma concentration (Cmax), systemic exposure (AUC) and concentration at 12 hours postdose (C12hr) decreased by an average of 39%, 44% and 51%, respectively, when voriconazole 200 mg orally twice daily was coadministered with letermovir 480 mg orally once daily.

MANAGEMENT: Caution is advised when letermovir is used concomitantly with drugs that are substrates of CYP450 2C9 and/or 2C19, particularly those with a narrow therapeutic range. Dosage adjustments as well as clinical and laboratory monitoring may be appropriate for some drugs whenever letermovir is added to or withdrawn from therapy.

Although some in vitro data indicate synergism between macrolide antibiotics and penicillins, other in vitro data indicate antagonism. When these drugs are given together, neither has predictable therapeutic efficacy. Data are available for erythromycin, although theoretically this interaction could occur with any macrolide. Except for monitoring of the effectiveness of antibiotic therapy, no special precautions appear to be necessary.