Drug Interactions between amoxicillin / clarithromycin / lansoprazole and isoniazid

MONITOR: Coadministration of isoniazid (INH) with other agents known to induce hepatotoxicity may potentiate the risk of liver injury. INH-associated hepatotoxicity is believed to be due to an accumulation of toxic metabolites and may also be partly immune mediated, though the exact mechanisms are not universally agreed upon. INH is metabolized by N-acetyltransferase and CYP450 2E1. The rate of INH's acetylation is genetically determined and generally classified as slow or rapid, with slow acetylators characterized by a relative lack of N-acetyltransferase. While the rate of acetylation does not significantly alter INH's effectiveness, it can lead to higher blood levels of INH and an increase of adverse reactions. In addition, INH is an in vitro inhibitor of several CYP450 isoenzymes (2C9, 2C19, 2E1, and 3A4). Coadministration of hepatotoxic drugs eliminated by one or more of these pathways may lead to elevated concentrations of the concomitant drug and increase the risk of hepatotoxicity. Most of the INH-associated hepatitis cases occur during the first 3 months of treatment, but may occur at any time and have been reported to be severe or even fatal. INH is reported in medical literature to cause clinically apparent acute liver injury with jaundice in 0.5% to 1% and fatality in 0.05% to 0.1% of recipients. A United States Public Health Service Surveillance Study of 13,838 people taking INH reported 8 deaths among 174 cases of hepatitis. Risk factors for INH related liver injury may include: age > 35 years, female gender, postpartum period, daily consumption of alcohol, injection drug user, slow acetylator phenotype, malnutrition, HIV infection, pre-existing liver disease, extra-pulmonary tuberculosis, and concomitant use of hepatotoxic medications. Clinical data have been reported with concurrent use of acetaminophen, alcohol, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, and rifampin.

MANAGEMENT: Coadministration of isoniazid (INH) with other hepatotoxic medications should be done with caution and close clinical monitoring. Some authorities recommend avoiding concurrent use when possible. If coadministration is needed, baseline and monthly liver function testing as well as monthly interviewing of the patient to check for signs and symptoms of adverse effects is recommended. More frequent testing may be advisable in patients at increased risk of INH-associated liver injury. Some manufacturers of INH recommend strongly considering its discontinuation if serum aminotransferase concentrations (AST or SGOT, ALT or SGPT) exceed 3 to 5 times the upper limit of normal. Patients should be counseled to immediately report signs or symptoms consistent with liver damage and notified that prodromal symptoms usually consist of fatigue, weakness, malaise, anorexia, nausea, and/or vomiting. If hepatic damage is suspected, INH should be immediately discontinued as continuation may lead to more severe damage. If hepatitis is attributed to INH in patients with tuberculosis, alternative drugs should be used. However, if INH must be used, it should only be resumed after the patient's symptoms and laboratory abnormalities have cleared. It should also be restarted in very small, gradually increasing doses and immediately withdrawn if there is any indication of recurrent liver involvement. Consultation with product labeling and relevant guidelines is advisable.

Switch to consumer interaction data

MONITOR: Coadministration with clarithromycin may increase the plasma concentrations of lansoprazole. The proposed mechanism is clarithromycin inhibition of intestinal (first-pass) and hepatic metabolism of lansoprazole via CYP450 3A4. Although lansoprazole is primarily metabolized by CYP450 2C19 in the liver, 3A4-mediated metabolism is the predominant pathway in individuals who are 2C19-deficient (approximately 3% to 5% of the Caucasian and 17% to 20% of the Asian population). Additionally, inhibition of P-glycoprotein intestinal efflux transporter by clarithromycin may also contribute to the interaction, resulting in increased bioavailability of lansoprazole. In 18 healthy volunteers--six each of homozygous extensive metabolizers (EMs), heterozygous EMs, and poor metabolizers (PMs) of CYP450 2C19--clarithromycin (400 mg orally twice a day for 6 days) increased the peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of a single 60 mg oral dose of lansoprazole by 1.47, 1.71- and 1.52-fold, respectively, and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) by 1.55-, 1.74- and 1.80-fold, respectively, in each of these groups compared to placebo. The AUC ratio of lansoprazole to lansoprazole sulphone, which is considered an index of CYP450 3A4 activity, was significantly increased by clarithromycin in all three groups. However, elimination half-life of lansoprazole was prolonged by 1.54-fold only in PMs. Mild diarrhea was reported in two subjects and mild abdominal disturbance in six subjects during clarithromycin coadministration. These side effects continued until day 6 and ameliorated the day after discontinuation of clarithromycin, whereas no adverse events were reported during placebo administration or after lansoprazole plus placebo. In another study, clarithromycin induced dose-dependent increases in the plasma concentration of lansoprazole in a group of 20 patients receiving treatment for H. pylori eradication. Mean 3-hour plasma lansoprazole concentration was 385 ng/mL for the control subjects who received lansoprazole 30 mg and amoxicillin 750 mg twice a day for 7 days; 696 ng/mL for patients coadministered clarithromycin 200 mg twice a day; and 947 ng/mL for patients coadministered clarithromycin 400 mg twice a day.

MANAGEMENT: Although lansoprazole is generally well tolerated, caution may be advised during coadministration with clarithromycin, particularly if higher dosages of one or both drugs are used. Dosage adjustment may be necessary in patients who experience excessive adverse effects of lansoprazole.

Switch to consumer interaction data

Although some in vitro data indicate synergism between macrolide antibiotics and penicillins, other in vitro data indicate antagonism. When these drugs are given together, neither has predictable therapeutic efficacy. Data are available for erythromycin, although theoretically this interaction could occur with any macrolide. Except for monitoring of the effectiveness of antibiotic therapy, no special precautions appear to be necessary.

Switch to consumer interaction data