Drug Interactions between amoxicillin / clarithromycin / lansoprazole and betiatide

MONITOR: Coadministration of the radiopharmaceutical technetium (Tc99m) mertiatide with another drug that is also eliminated by active tubular secretion may result in increased plasma concentrations of one or both drugs. The exact mechanism has not been fully described but may involve competition in binding to organic anion transporter 1 (OAT1) in the proximal tubule of the kidney, which is involved in moving some drugs from the blood into the urine. The risk and significance of this interaction may vary. Some sources state that the risk is expected with diuretics like hydrochlorothiazide, but only theoretical with others (e.g., nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). Delayed excretion of Tc99m mertiatide may affect the efficacy of the diagnostic procedure. However, clinical data are limited. One crossover study conducted in 12 healthy male volunteers (22-25 years old), reviewed the differences in scans using Tc99m mertiatide injection alone to those obtained when subjects received either a selective OAT1 substrate (10% sodium p-aminohippurate (PAH) given via intravenous infusion at 120 mg/min 10 minutes prior to and during the scan) or a potent OAT1 inhibitor (probenecid 750 mg 1 hour prior to the scan). PAH appeared to have a greater impact than probenecid, increasing the late phase (30-60 minutes post radiopharmaceutical injection) plasma clearance half-life of Tc99m mertiatide from approximately 27.7 minutes to 54.9 minutes. However, in some circumstances, the administration of an NSAID or other medication that affects the secretion of Tc99m mertiatide may be clinically indicated. For example, there are some protocols that utilize aspirin to enhance Tc99m mertiatide renography for the investigation/diagnosis of renal artery stenosis.

MANAGEMENT: Caution is recommended with the concomitant administration of technetium (Tc99m) mertiatide with drugs that are secreted in the proximal tubule due to the potential to affect the efficacy of the diagnostic procedure. Likewise, since Tc99m mertiatide may also delay the excretion of other drugs eliminated via this route, monitoring for excessive pharmacologic effects of both drugs should be considered. Current clinical guidelines and/or manufacturer's labeling should be consulted for more specific information and guidance. Dehydration and acidosis can also impact kidney function and prolong renal drug elimination. Refer to the product labeling or local protocols for guidelines on patient hydration prior to testing with Tc99m mertiatide.

MONITOR: Coadministration with clarithromycin may increase the plasma concentrations of lansoprazole. The proposed mechanism is clarithromycin inhibition of intestinal (first-pass) and hepatic metabolism of lansoprazole via CYP450 3A4. Although lansoprazole is primarily metabolized by CYP450 2C19 in the liver, 3A4-mediated metabolism is the predominant pathway in individuals who are 2C19-deficient (approximately 3% to 5% of the Caucasian and 17% to 20% of the Asian population). Additionally, inhibition of P-glycoprotein intestinal efflux transporter by clarithromycin may also contribute to the interaction, resulting in increased bioavailability of lansoprazole. In 18 healthy volunteers--six each of homozygous extensive metabolizers (EMs), heterozygous EMs, and poor metabolizers (PMs) of CYP450 2C19--clarithromycin (400 mg orally twice a day for 6 days) increased the peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of a single 60 mg oral dose of lansoprazole by 1.47, 1.71- and 1.52-fold, respectively, and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) by 1.55-, 1.74- and 1.80-fold, respectively, in each of these groups compared to placebo. The AUC ratio of lansoprazole to lansoprazole sulphone, which is considered an index of CYP450 3A4 activity, was significantly increased by clarithromycin in all three groups. However, elimination half-life of lansoprazole was prolonged by 1.54-fold only in PMs. Mild diarrhea was reported in two subjects and mild abdominal disturbance in six subjects during clarithromycin coadministration. These side effects continued until day 6 and ameliorated the day after discontinuation of clarithromycin, whereas no adverse events were reported during placebo administration or after lansoprazole plus placebo. In another study, clarithromycin induced dose-dependent increases in the plasma concentration of lansoprazole in a group of 20 patients receiving treatment for H. pylori eradication. Mean 3-hour plasma lansoprazole concentration was 385 ng/mL for the control subjects who received lansoprazole 30 mg and amoxicillin 750 mg twice a day for 7 days; 696 ng/mL for patients coadministered clarithromycin 200 mg twice a day; and 947 ng/mL for patients coadministered clarithromycin 400 mg twice a day.

MANAGEMENT: Although lansoprazole is generally well tolerated, caution may be advised during coadministration with clarithromycin, particularly if higher dosages of one or both drugs are used. Dosage adjustment may be necessary in patients who experience excessive adverse effects of lansoprazole.

Although some in vitro data indicate synergism between macrolide antibiotics and penicillins, other in vitro data indicate antagonism. When these drugs are given together, neither has predictable therapeutic efficacy. Data are available for erythromycin, although theoretically this interaction could occur with any macrolide. Except for monitoring of the effectiveness of antibiotic therapy, no special precautions appear to be necessary.