Pa. Faces Off Against Drug Firm In Court
Pa. Faces Off Against Drug Firm In Court [The Philadelphia Inquirer]
From Philadelphia Inquirer (PA) (June 10, 2010)
Jun. 10--In a City Hall courtroom this week, Pennsylvania is trying to convince a Philadelphia jury that it was duped into overpaying $160 million for the antipsychotic drug Risperdal.
The state, which provided the drug to the poor and elderly, wants to be reimbursed by Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, maker of Risperdal.
Pennsylvania contends that Janssen falsely claimed Risperdal was safer and more effective than similar but less expensive antipsychotic drugs, such as haloperidol, also known as Haldol. As a result, the state says it paid millions of dollars in unnecessary premiums for Risperdal.
According to Fletch Trammell, attorney for Pennsylvania, the state was paying as much as $13 a pill for Risperdal, as opposed to 50 cents per tablet for comparable medication.
"There were a dozen antipsychotics that were just as good as Risperdal and cost a fraction" as much, he told the jury in his opening statement last week.
Janssen has denied misleading Pennsylvania about Risperdal.
"Janssen has always been committed to ethical business practices," Greg Panico, a spokesman for Janssen, said in a written statement. "We are fully prepared to defend against these claims, which we think are without merit."
The case is among numerous claims that have been brought against Janssen for allegedly marketing Risperdal to treat conditions for which the drug had not been approved, or for allegedly understating its shortcomings.
The drug was part of a new generation of antipsychotics introduced in the early 1990s to treat severe mental illnesses, such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.
Over time, Risperdal was also prescribed for a variety of other ailments for which it had not been approved, including dementia, aggression, and behavior problems.
Such unapproved applications for a drug are known as "off-label uses." They are acceptable if prescribed by doctors. The drug manufacturer, however, is not permitted by the FDA to market products for off-label uses.
That is what Janssen is accused of doing in the Pennsylvania case.
On Wednesday, Trammell produced a number of internal documents from Janssen that showed the FDA had warned the firm as long ago as 1993 not to market Risperdal for off-label uses.
Trammell showed the documents to Mary E. Diamond, a psychiatrist and chief medical officer of the state mental hospital system.
Diamond, who serves on a committee that recommends drugs for use in state programs, said she was distressed by the documents. Had she been aware of them, she said, she might have opposed recommending Risperdal.
"I feel duped," she said, adding that she and others on the committee approved the use of Risperdal in part because of their belief that it was cheaper and more effective than other antipsychotics. She said they believed that because of the results of research studies they were shown. Those studies, she said, were underwritten in part by pharmaceutical firms, including Janssen.
Under cross-examination, Diamond acknowledged that she had no direct knowledge that Janssen had ever tried to market Risperdal for off-label uses or as a better alternative to other antipsychotics.
She also acknowledged under questioning that she still prescribes Risperdal in her private practice. The case, which began last week, is expected to take two weeks to complete.
One twist in the case is the Rendell administration’s decision to use the Texas firm Bailey, Perrin, Bailey L.L.P. to represent the state on a contingency basis. Bailey’s founder, F. Kenneth Bailey, made more than $91,000 in campaign contributions to Gov. Rendell. Rendell has denied any impropriety. Janssen has asked the state Supreme Court bar the state from using the Texas firm. The court has not ruled yet on the request.
Contact staff writer Christopher K. Hepp at 215-854-2208 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
This article contains information from Bloomberg News.
To see more of The Philadelphia Inquirer, or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to http://www.philly.com.
Copyright (c) 2010, The Philadelphia Inquirer
Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.
For reprints, email email@example.com, call 800-374-7985 or 847-635-6550, send a fax to 847-635-6968, or write to The Permissions Group Inc., 1247 Milwaukee Ave., Suite 303, Glenview, IL 60025, USA.
Posted: June 2010