Cefotaxime Sodium
PronunciationClass: Third Generation Cephalosporins
VA Class: AM117
CAS Number: 64485-93-4
Brands: Claforan
Introduction
Antibacterial; β-lactam antibiotic; third generation cephalosporin.a b
Uses for Cefotaxime Sodium
Bone and Joint Infections
Treatment of serious bone and joint infections caused by susceptible S. aureus, streptococci (including S. pyogenes), Pseudomonas (including Ps. aeruginosa), or P. mirabilis.230
Genitourinary Tract Infections
Treatment of serious genitourinary tract infections caused by susceptible S. aureus (including penicillinase-producing strains), S. epidermidis, enterococci, Citrobacter, Enterobacter, E. coli, Klebsiella, Morganella morganii, P. mirabilis, P. vulgaris, Providencia stuartii, P. rettgeri, Pseudomonas (including Ps. aeruginosa), or S. marcescens.230
Gynecologic Infections
Treatment of gynecologic infections (including pelvic inflammatory disease [PID], endometritis, pelvic cellulitis) caused by susceptible S. epidermidis, streptococci (including enterococci), E. coli, Enterobacter, Klebsiella, P. mirabilis, Bacteroides (including B. fragilis), Clostridium, Fusobacterium (including F. nucleatum), Peptococcus, and Peptostreptococcus.230
CDC states cefotaxime may be effective for PID, but is less active than cefoxitin against anaerobic bacteria.200 When an oral regimen is used for treatment of mild to moderately severe acute PID, CDC recommends a single IM dose of ceftriaxone, cefoxitin (with oral probenecid), or other parenteral third-generation cephalosporin (e.g., cefotaxime) given in conjunction with oral doxycycline (with or without oral metronidazole).200 369 Because cefotaxime (like other cephalosporins) is not active against Chlamydia, concomitant use of a drug active against Chlamydia (e.g., doxycycline) is necessary when these organisms are suspected pathogens.230 290
Intra-abdominal Infections
Treatment of serious intra-abdominal infections (including peritonitis) caused by susceptible streptococci, E. coli, Klebsiella, P. mirabilis, Clostridium, Bacteroides, or anaerobic cocci (including Peptococcus and Peptostreptococcus).230
Meningitis and Other CNS Infections
Treatment of meningitis and ventriculitis caused by susceptible H. influenzae, N. meningitidis, S. pneumoniae,230 275 291 294 296 335 E. coli, or K. pneumoniae.230 275 291 294 296 336
A drug of choice when a third generation cephalosporin is indicated for empiric treatment of bacterial meningitis;275 290 296 319 should not be used alone for empiric treatment when Listeria monocytogenes, enterococci, staphylococci, or Ps. aeruginosa may be involved.275 290 296 319
Treatment of brain abscesses and other CNS infections† (e.g., subdural empyema, intracranial epidural abscesses).319 336 347 Concomitant metronidazole usually recommended for empiric therapy;319 347 used in conjunction with a penicillinase-resistant penicillin or vancomycin if staphylococci suspected.319 347
Respiratory Tract Infections
Treatment of serious lower respiratory tract infections, including community-acquired pneumonia (CAP)211 269 342 caused by susceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae, S. pyogenes (group A β-hemolytic streptococci), other streptococci (except enterococci), Staphylococcus aureus (including penicillinase-producing strains), Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, Haemophilus influenzae (including ampicillin-resistant strains), H. parainfluenzae, Proteus mirabilis, indole-positive Proteus, Serratia marcescens, Enterobacter, or Pseudomonas (including Ps. aeruginosa).230
Recommended by ATS and IDSA as an alternative for treatment of CAP caused by penicillin-susceptible S. pneumoniae and as a preferred drug for treatment of CAP caused by penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae, provided in vitro susceptibility has been demonstrated.269 Also recommended in certain combination regimens used for empiric treatment of CAP.269 Select regimen for empiric treatment of CAP based on most likely pathogens and local susceptibility patterns; after pathogen is identified, modify to provide more specific therapy (pathogen-directed therapy).269
For empiric inpatient treatment of CAP in patients not requiring treatment in an intensive care unit (non-ICU patients), IDSA and ATS recommend monotherapy with a fluoroquinolone (moxifloxacin, gemifloxacin, levofloxacin) or, alternatively, a combination regimen that includes a β-lactam (usually cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, or ampicillin) given in conjunction with a macrolide (azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin).269
For empiric inpatient treatment of CAP in ICU patients when Pseudomonas and oxacillin-resistant (methicillin-resistant) S. aureus are not suspected, IDSA and ATS recommend a combination regimen that includes a β-lactam (cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, fixed combination of ampicillin and sulbactam) given in conjunction with either azithromycin or a fluoroquinolone (moxifloxacin, gemifloxacin, levofloxacin).269
Septicemia
Treatment of bacteremia/septicemia caused by E. coli, Klebsiella, S. marcescens, S. aureus, or streptococci (including S. pneumoniae).230 An aminoglycoside often is used concomitantly.230
Skin and Skin Structure Infections
Treatment of serious skin and skin structure infections caused by susceptible S. aureus, S. epidermidis, S. pyogenes, other streptococci (including enterococci), Acinetobacter, E. coli, Citrobacter (including C. freundii), Enterobacter, Klebsiella, P. mirabilis, P. vulgaris, M. morganii, P. rettgeri, Pseudomonas, Serratia, Bacteroides (including B. fragilis), Fusobacterium (including F. nucleatum), or anaerobic cocci (including Peptococcus and Peptostreptococcus).230
Capnocytophaga Infections
Alternative to penicillin G for treatment of infections caused by Capnocytophaga† (e.g., septicemia, meningitis, endocarditis).211
Gonorrhea and Associated Infections
Alternative for treatment of uncomplicated cervical, urethral, or rectal gonorrhea caused by susceptible Neisseria gonorrhoeae in adults or adolescents.200 230 366 367 369 Drug of choice is IM ceftriaxone or oral cefixime.200 251 275 369 Although effective, CDC states that IM cefotaxime appears to offer no advantage over IM ceftriaxone.200
Alternative for initial treatment of disseminated gonococcal infections† caused by susceptible N. gonorrhoeae.200 275 369 Ceftriaxone is usual drug of choice for initial parenteral treatment of disseminated gonorrhea in adults, adolescents, or children; CDC and AAP consider cefotaxime an alternative.200 275 369
Treatment of disseminated gonococcal infections†,200 275 gonococcal scalp abscesses†,200 275 and gonococcal ophthalmia neonatorum† in neonates.200 275
Lyme Disease
Treatment of early neurologic Lyme disease† with acute neurologic manifestations such as meningitis or radiculopathy.273 275 351 354 IV ceftriaxone is the drug of choice; alternatives are IV cefotaxime or IV penicillin G.273 275 351 354 Although an oral regimen (doxycycline, amoxicillin, cefuroxime axetil) may be effective for early localized or early disseminated Lyme disease associated with erythema migrans in the absence of specific neurologic manifestations or advanced atrioventricular (AV) heart block,270 273 275 284 285 286 287 338 351 353 355 356 357 a parenteral regimen usually is recommended when there are acute neurologic manifestations.270 273 275 284 285 286 287 338 351 353 355 356
Treatment of Lyme carditis† when a parenteral regimen is indicated.273 275 351 354 IV ceftriaxone is the drug of choice; alternatives are IV cefotaxime or IV penicillin G.273 275 351 354 Although a parenteral regimen usually is recommended for initial treatment of hospitalized patients, an oral regimen (doxycycline, amoxicillin, cefuroxime axetil) can be used to complete therapy and for the treatment of outpatients.273 275 351 354
Treatment of Lyme arthritis† when a parenteral regimen is indicated.273 275 351 354 361 IV ceftriaxone is the drug of choice; alternatives are IV cefotaxime or IV penicillin G.273 275 351 354 361 Although the comparative safety and efficacy of oral versus IV anti-infectives for treatment of Lyme arthritis have not been fully evaluated,351 those with concomitant neurologic disease generally should receive a parenteral regimen.273 275 351 354 361
Treatment of late neurologic Lyme disease† affecting the CNS or peripheral nervous system (e.g., encephalopathy, neuropathy).351 IV ceftriaxone is the drug of choice; alternatives are IV cefotaxime or IV penicillin G.351
Typhoid Fever and Other Salmonella Infections
Treatment of typhoid fever (enteric fever) or septicemia caused by Salmonella typhi or S. paratyphi†, including multidrug-resistant strains.275 306
Treatment of >;Salmonella gastroenteritis† caused by non-typhi Salmonella (e.g., S. enteritidis, S. typhimurium).211 245 275 309 Anti-infective treatment is indicated only in those with severe disease and in those at increased risk of invasive disease, including those <3–6 months of age or >50 years of age, those with hemoglobinopathies, severe atherosclerosis or valvular heart disease, prostheses, uremia, chronic GI disease, or severe colitis, and those immunocompromised because of malignancy, immunosuppressive therapy, HIV infection, or other immunosuppressive illness.211 245 275 309 Choice of anti-infective is based on in vitro susceptibility.211 245 275 309
Vibrio Infections
Treatment of severe Vibrio parahaemolyticus† infection when anti-infective therapy is indicated in addition to supportive care.218
Treatment of infections caused by V. vulnificus†.211 250 Optimum anti-infective therapy has not been identified; a tetracycline or third generation cephalosporin (e.g., cefotaxime, ceftazidime) is recommended.211 218 250 Because the case fatality rate associated with V. vulnificus is high, initiate anti-infective therapy promptly if indicated.250 294
Yersinia Infections
Treatment of GI infections caused by Yersinia enterocolitica or Y. pseudotuberculosis†.218 245 275 Usually self-limited infections, but anti-infectives may be indicated in immunocompromised individuals, for severe infections, or when septicemia or other invasive disease occurs.218 245 275
Perioperative Prophylaxis
Perioperative prophylaxis to reduce the incidence of infection in patients undergoing contaminated or potentially contaminated surgery (e.g., GI and genitourinary surgery, abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy) and in patients undergoing cesarean section.230
Other cephalosporins or cephamycins (cefazolin, cefotetan, cefoxitin) are the preferred drugs for perioperative prophylaxis.201 Cefotaxime and other third generation cephalosporins usually not used for perioperative prophylaxis since they are expensive, some are less active against staphylococci than cefazolin, they have a spectrum of activity wider than necessary for organisms encountered in elective surgery, and their use for prophylaxis promotes emergence of resistant organisms.201
Cefotaxime Sodium Dosage and Administration
Administration
Administer by IV injection or infusion or by deep IM injection.230
IV route preferred in patients with septicemia, bacteremia, peritonitis, meningitis, or other severe or life-threatening infections or in patients with lowered resistance resulting from debilitating conditions (e.g., malnutrition, trauma, surgery, diabetes, heart failure, malignancy), particularly if shock is present.230
Large IM doses may be painful; IV administration may be preferred when large doses are indicated.b
Cefotaxime ADD-Vantage vials and the commercially available frozen cefotaxime injection in dextrose should be used only for IV infusion.
For solution and drug compatibility information, see Compatibility under Stability.
IV Injection
Reconstitution
Reconstitute vials containing 500 mg, 1 g, or 2 g of cefotaxime with 10 mL of sterile water for injection to provide solutions containing approximately 50, 95, or 180 mg/mL, respectively.230
Rate of Administration
Inject directly into a vein over a period of 3-5 minutes or slowly into the tubing of a freely flowing compatible IV solution.230
Do not inject IV over <3 minutes; rapid (over <1 minute) injection is associated with potentially life-threatening arrhythmias.230
IV Infusion
Reconstitution and Dilution
Reconstitute infusion bottles containing 1 or 2 g of cefotaxime with 50–100 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride injection or 5% dextrose injection to provide solutions containing 10–20 or 20–40 mg/mL, respectively.230 May be diluted further in 50 mL to 1 L of compatible IV solution.230
Reconstitute 10-g pharmacy bulk package according to the manufacturer’s directions and then dilute further in a compatible IV solution.230
Reconstitute ADD-Vantage vials or infusion bottles containing 1 or 2 g of cefotaxime according to the manufacturer’s directions.230
Thaw the commercially available injection (frozen) at room temperature or in a refrigerator; do not force thaw by immersion in a water bath or by exposure to microwave radiation.230 A precipitate may have formed in the frozen injection, but should dissolve with little or no agitation after reaching room temperature.230 Discard thawed injection if an insoluble precipitate is present or if container seals or outlet ports are not intact.230 The injection should not be used in series connections with other plastic containers, since such use could result in air embolism from residual air being drawn from the primary container before administration of fluid from the secondary container is complete.230
Rate of Administration
For intermittent IV infusion, infuse over 20–30 minutes via butterfly or scalp vein-type needles.b
During infusion, discontinue other IV solutions flowing through a common administration tubing or site230 unless the solutions are known to be compatible and the flow-rate is adequately controlled.b
IM Injection
Inject IM deeply into a large muscle mass such as the upper outer quadrant of the gluteus maximus.230 Use aspiration to avoid inadvertent injection into a blood vessel.230
2-g IM doses should be divided and administered at 2 different injection sites.230
Reconstitution
Reconstitute vials containing 500 mg, 1 g, or 2 g of cefotaxime with 2, 3, or 5 mL, respectively, of sterile or bacteriostatic water for injection to provide solutions containing approximately 230, 300, or 330 mg/mL, respectively.230
Dosage
Available as cefotaxime sodium; dosage expressed in terms of cefotaxime.230
Pediatric Patients
General Dosage in Neonates <1 Week of Age
IV
50 mg/kg every 12 hours for premature or full-term neonates <1 week of age recommended by manufacturers.230 366 367
IV or IM
AAP recommends 50 mg/kg every 12 hours for neonates <1 week of age weighing ≤2 kg and 50 mg/kg every 8 or 12 hours for those weighing >2 kg.275
General Dosage in Neonates 1–4 Weeks of Age
IV
50 mg/kg every 8 hours recommended by manufacturers.230 366 367
IV or IM
AAP recommends 50 mg/kg every 12 hours for neonates 1–4 weeks of age weighing <1.2 kg; 50 mg/kg every 8 hours for those weighing 1.2–2 kg; and 50 mg/kg every 6 or 8 hours for those weighing >2 kg.275
General Dosage in Children 1 Month to 12 Years of Age
IV or IM
50–180 mg/kg daily given in 4–6 equally divided doses in those weighing <50 kg.230 366 367 The higher dosage should be used for more severe or serious infections.230 366 367
AAP recommends 75–100 mg/kg daily given in 3 or 4 equally divided doses for mild to moderate infections and 150–200 mg/kg daily given in 3 or 4 equally divided doses for severe infections.275
Children weighing >50 kg should receive the usual adult dosage.230 366 367 (See Adult Dosage under Dosage and Administration.)
Meningitis and Other CNS Infections
IV
Manufacturers recommend that children 1 month to 12 years of age weighing <50 kg receive dosage at the high end of the range of 50–180 mg/kg daily.230 366 367 Some clinicians recommend that infants and children <18 years of age with meningitis receive 50 mg/kg IV every 6 hours.296 Others recommend 100–150 mg/kg daily given in divided doses every 8–12 hours in neonates ≤7 days of age, 150–200 mg/kg daily given in divided doses every 6–8 hours in neonates 8–28 days of age, and 225–300 mg/kg daily given in divided doses every 6–8 hours in older infants and children.365
AAP recommends 300 mg/kg daily given in 3 or 4 divided doses for treatment of meningitis in pediatric patients beyond the neonatal period.275 If meningitis is known or suspected to be caused by S. pneumoniae, AAP recommends that infants and children ≥1 month of age or older receive 225–300 mg/kg daily given in divided doses every 6–8 hours.275 297
Duration of treatment is 7 days for uncomplicated meningitis caused by susceptible H. influenzae or N. meningitidis; ≥10–14 days for complicated cases or meningitis caused by S. pneumoniae; and ≥21 days for meningitis caused by susceptible Enterobacteriaceae.275 296 318
Gonorrhea and Associated Infections
Disseminated Gonococcal Infection or Gonococcal Scalp Abscess in Neonates†
IV or IM25 mg/kg every 12 hours for 7 days recommended by CDC and AAP; if meningitis is documented, continue for 10–14 days.200 275
Disseminated Gonorrhea in Children ≥8 Years of Age or Weighing ≥45 kg†
IV1 g every 8 hours recommended by CDC and AAP.200 275 369 Continue for 7 days275 or discontinue 24–48 hours after improvement occurs and switch to an oral regimen (e.g., cefixime or cefpodoxime) to complete ≥7 days of treatment.200 275 369
Lyme Disease†
Early Neurologic Lyme Disease†
IV150–200 mg/kg daily (up to 6 g daily) given in divided doses every 6–8 hours for 14 days (range: 10–28 days) recommended by IDSA and others for early Lyme disease in children with acute neurologic manifestations (e.g., meningitis, radiculopathy).273 351 354
Lyme Carditis†
IV150–200 mg/kg daily (up to 6 g daily) given in divided doses every 6–8 hours for 14 days (range: 14–21 days) recommended by IDSA and others for those with AV heart block and/or myopericarditis associated with early Lyme disease when a parenteral regimen is indicated (e.g., hospitalized patients).273 351 354
Parenteral regimen can be switched to an oral regimen (doxycycline, amoxicillin, cefuroxime axetil) to complete therapy when clinically indicated.351
Lyme Arthritis†
IV150–200 mg/kg daily (up to 6 g daily) given in divided doses every 6–8 hours for 14 days (range: 14–28 days) for children with evidence of neurologic disease or when arthritis has not responded to an oral regimen.351
Late Neurologic Lyme Disease†
IV150–200 mg/kg daily (up to 6 g daily) given in divided doses every 6–8 hours for 14 days (range: 14–28 days) recommended by IDSA for children with late neurologic disease affecting the CNS or peripheral nervous system.273 351
Response to anti-infective treatment usually is slow and may be incomplete in such patients.351 IDSA states that retreatment is not recommended unless relapse is shown by reliable objective measures.351
Adults
General Adult Dosage
Uncomplicated Infections
IV or IM1 g every 12 hours.230 366 367
Moderate to Severe Infections
IV or IM1–2 g every 8 hours.230 366 367
Severe or Life-threatening Infections
IV2 g every 6–8 hours.230 366 367 For life-threatening infections, 2 g every 4 hours.230 366 367
Meningitis and Other CNS Infections
IV
2 g every 6–8 hours for 7–21 days.230 296 Some clinicians recommend 8–12 g daily in divided doses every 4–6 hours.365
Duration of treatment is 7 days for uncomplicated meningitis caused by susceptible H. influenzae or N. meningitidis; ≥10–14 days for complicated cases or meningitis caused by S. pneumoniae; and ≥21 days for meningitis caused by susceptible Enterobacteriaceae.275 296 318
Meningitis Caused by S. pneumoniae
IVInitially, 350 mg/kg daily given in 4 divided doses; reduce dosage to 225 mg/kg daily given in 3 divided doses if organism is susceptible to penicillin.327 335
Respiratory Tract Infections
Community-acquired Pneumonia
IV or IM1 g every 6–8 hours.269
Duration of treatment depends on the causative pathogen, illness severity at the onset of anti-infective therapy, response to treatment, comorbid illness, and complications.269
Gonorrhea and Associated Infections
Uncomplicated Urethral, Cervical, or Rectal Gonorrhea
IM500 mg as a single dose.200 230 366 367 369
Manufacturers recommend 1 g as a single dose for treatment of rectal gonorrhea in males.230 366 367
Disseminated Gonorrhea†
IVCDC recommends 1 g every 8 hours; continue for 24–48 hours after improvement begins and switch to an oral regimen (cefixime or cefpodoxime) to complete ≥1 week of treatment.200 369
Lyme Disease†
Early Neurologic Lyme Disease†
IV2 g every 8 hours for 14 days (range: 10–28 days) recommended by IDSA and others for adults with acute neurologic manifestations (e.g., meningitis, radiculopathy).273 351 354
Lyme Carditis†
IV2 g every 8 hours for 14 days (range: 14–21 days) recommended by IDSA and others for adults with AV heart block and/or myopericarditis associated with early Lyme disease when a parenteral regimen is indicated (e.g., hospitalized patients).351 354
Parenteral regimen can be switched to an oral regimen (doxycycline, amoxicillin, cefuroxime axetil) to complete therapy when clinically indicated.351
Lyme Arthritis†
IV2 g every 8 hours for 14 days (range: 14–28 days) recommended by IDSA for adults with evidence of neurologic disease or when arthritis has not responded to an oral regimen.351
Late Neurologic Lyme Disease†
IV2 g every 8 hours for 14 days (range: 14–28 days) recommended by IDSA for adults with late neurologic disease affecting the CNS or peripheral nervous system.273 351
Response to anti-infective treatment usually is slow and may be incomplete in such patients.351 IDSA states that retreatment is not recommended unless relapse is shown by reliable objective measures.351
Perioperative Prophylaxis
Contaminated or Potentially Contaminated Surgery
IV or IM1 g 30–90 minutes prior to surgery.230
Cesarean Section
IV or IM1 g IV as soon as the umbilical cord is clamped, followed by additional 1-g IM or IV doses given 6 and 12 hours after the first dose.230
Prescribing Limits
Pediatric Patients
Maximum 12 g daily for children weighing >50 kg.230 366 367
Adults
Maximum 12 g daily.230 366 367
Special Populations
Hepatic Impairment
No dosage adjustments required.289 290
Renal Impairment
Patients with Clcr <20 mL/minute per 1.73 m2 should receive 50% of the usual dose given at the usual time intervals.230
Patients undergoing hemodialysis should receive 0.5–2 g as a single daily dose with a supplemental dose after each dialysis period.265
Cautions for Cefotaxime Sodium
Contraindications
-
Known hypersensitivity to cefotaxime or other cephalosporins.230
Warnings/Precautions
Warnings
Superinfection/Clostridium difficile-associated Diarrhea and Colitis
Possible emergence and overgrowth of nonsusceptible organisms, especially Enterobacter, Pseudomonas, enterococci, or Candida.230 Careful observation of the patient is essential.230 Institute appropriate therapy if superinfection occurs.230
Treatment with anti-infectives alters normal colon flora and may permit overgrowth of Clostridium difficile.230 C. difficile-associated diarrhea and colitis (CDAD; also known as antibiotic-associated diarrhea and colitis or pseudomembranous colitis) has been reported with nearly all anti-infectives, including cefotaxime, and may range in severity from mild diarrhea to fatal colitis.230 Hypertoxin-producing strains of C. difficile are associated with increased morbidity and mortality since they may be refractory to anti-infectives and colectomy may be required.230
Consider CDAD if diarrhea develops during or after therapy and manage accordingly.230 Careful medical history is necessary since CDAD has been reported to occur as late as 2 months or longer after anti-infective therapy is discontinued.230
If CDAD is suspected or confirmed, the anti-infective may need to be discontinued.230 Some mild cases of CDAD may respond to discontinuance alone.230 342 343 344 345 346 Manage moderate to severe cases with fluid, electrolyte, and protein supplementation, anti-infective therapy active against C. difficile (e.g., oral metronidazole or vancomycin), and surgical evaluation when clinically indicated.230 342 343 344 345 346
Cardiac Effects
Potentially life-threatening arrhythmia reported with rapid injection (<1 minute) through a central venous catheter.230 Do not inject IV over <3 minutes.230 (See IV Injection under Dosage and Administration.)
Sensitivity Reactions
Hypersensitivity Reactions
Possible hypersensitivity reactions, including rash (maculopapular or erythematous), pruritus, fever, eosinophilia, urticaria, anaphylaxis, erythema multiforme, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis.230
If a hypersensitivity reaction occurs, discontinue cefotaxime and institute appropriate therapy as indicated (e.g., epinephrine, corticosteroids, and maintenance of an adequate airway and oxygen).230
Cross-hypersensitivity
Partial cross-allergenicity among cephalosporins and other β-lactam antibiotics, including penicillins and cephamycins.a
Prior to initiation of therapy, make careful inquiry concerning previous hypersensitivity reactions to cephalosporins, penicillins, or other drugs.230 Cautious use recommended in individuals hypersensitive to penicillins:a avoid use in those who have had an immediate-type (anaphylactic) hypersensitivity reaction and administer with caution in those who have had a delayed-type (e.g., rash, fever, eosinophilia) reaction.a
General Precautions
Selection and Use of Anti-infectives
To reduce development of drug-resistant bacteria and maintain effectiveness of cefotaxime and other antibacterials, use only for treatment or prevention of infections proven or strongly suspected to be caused by susceptible bacteria.230
When selecting or modifying anti-infective therapy, use results of culture and in vitro susceptibility testing.230 In the absence of such data, consider local epidemiology and susceptibility patterns when selecting anti-infectives for empiric therapy.230
History of GI Disease
Use with caution in patients with a history of GI disease, particularly colitis.230 (See Superinfection/Clostridium difficile-associated Diarrhea and Colitis under Cautions.)
Local Effects
May be locally irritating to tissues.230 Inflammation, phlebitis, and thrombophlebitis reported with IV administration;b pain, induration, and tenderness may occur at IM injection sites.230
Perivascular extravasation responds to changing the infusion site;230 extensive perivascular extravasation may result in tissue damage requiring surgery.230
Regularly monitor infusion sites and change site when appropriate.230
Hematologic Effects
Possible transient neutropenia, granulocytopenia, leukopenia, eosinophilia, or thrombocytopenia.230
Agranulocytosis may occur rarely during prolonged therapy.230 Monitor blood cell counts if treatment lasts >10 days.230
CNS Effects
Seizures reported with some cephalosporins, especially in patients with renal impairment who received dosages inappropriate for the degree of renal impairment.230
If seizures occur, discontinue cefotaxime and administer anticonvulsant therapy as indicated.230
Sodium Content
Contains approximately 50.5 mg (2.2 mEq) of sodium per g of cefotaxime.230 366 367
Specific Populations
Pregnancy
Category B.230
Lactation
Distributed into milk; use with caution.230
Pediatric Use
Adverse effects similar to those reported in adults.291
Safety of the chemical components that may leach out of the plastic containing commercially available frozen cefotaxime sodium injections not established.230
Geriatric Use
No overall differences in safety or efficacy in those ≥65 years of age compared with younger adults, but the possibility of increased sensitivity in some geriatric individuals cannot be ruled out.230 366 367
Substantially eliminated by kidneys; risk of toxicity may be greater in those with impaired renal function.230 366 367 Select dosage with caution and consider monitoring renal function because of age-related decreases in renal function.230 366 367 (See Renal Impairment under Dosage and Administration.)
Hepatic Impairment
Possible increased plasma half-life and clearance of cefotaxime and its major metabolite.117 289
Renal Impairment
Plasma half-life of cefotaxime and its major metabolite increased in severe renal impairment.13 16 19 Possibility of seizures if dosage is inappropriately high for the degree of renal impairment.230
Dosage adjustment recommended in those with Clcr <20 mL/minute per 1.73 m3.230
Common Adverse Effects
Local reactions at injection sites, hypersensitivity reactions, GI effects.230
Interactions for Cefotaxime Sodium
Specific Drugs and Laboratory Tests
|
Drug or Test |
Interaction |
Comments |
|---|---|---|
|
Aminoglycosides |
Possible increased risk of nephrotoxicity.230 In vitro evidence of additive or synergistic antibacterial activity; antagonism also reported.a |
Closely monitor renal function, especially if high aminoglycoside dosage is used or therapy is prolonged.230 Administer separately; do not admix.230 |
|
Probenecid |
Decreased renal clearance and increased concentrations of cefotaxime and its metabolites.b |
|
|
Tests for glucose |
Possible false-positive reactions in urine glucose tests using Clinitest, Benedict’s solution, or Fehling’s solution.a |
Use glucose tests based on enzymatic glucose oxidase reactions (e.g., Clinistix, Tes-Tape.)a |
Cefotaxime Sodium Pharmacokinetics
Absorption
Bioavailability
Not appreciably absorbed from GI tract; must be administered parenterally.b
Following IM administration, peak serum concentrations attained within 30 minutes.6 8 11 230
Distribution
Extent
Widely distributed into body tissues and fluids, including aqueous humor, bronchial secretions,224 sputum, middle ear effusions, bone,115 bile,115 116 and ascitic,117 pleural, and prostatic fluids.9
Distributed into CSF; highest concentrations attained in those with inflamed meninges.263 264 288 290 b
Crosses the placenta21 and is distributed into milk.21
Plasma Protein Binding
Elimination
Metabolism
Partially metabolized in the liver to desacetylcefotaxime, which has antibacterial activity.2 7 14 Desacetylcefotaxime is further metabolized into inactive metabolites in the liver.2 7 14 18
Elimination Route
Cefotaxime and its metabolites excreted principally in urine.2 14 In adults with normal renal function, 40–60% of a dose excreted as unchanged drug; 24% excreted as the active metabolite.b
Half-life
Terminal serum half-life of cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime is 0.9–1.7 and 1.4–1.9 hours, respectively.2 7 10 11 13 14 19
Special Populations
Terminal half-lives of cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime may be prolonged in patients with hepatic impairment.117 289
Terminal half-life of cefotaxime only slightly prolonged in adults with Clcr ≥20 mL/minute per 1.73 m2.13 16 In those with Clcr of ≤10 mL/minute per 1.73 m2, terminal half-lives of 1.4–11.5 and 8.2–56.8 hours reported for cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime, respectively.13 16 19
Stability
Storage
Parenteral
Powder for Injection
15–30°C;230 366 367 protect from light.230 366 367
Powder for injection and solutions may darken.230
IV solutions reconstituted with 0.9% sodium chloride injection or 5% dextrose injection and further diluted in a compatible IV solution are stable for 24 hours at room temperature (≤22°C) or at least 5 days refrigerated at ≤5°C.230 When reconstituted as directed in 0.9% sodium chloride injection or 5% dextrose injection, solutions prepared from ADD-Vantage vials are stable for 24 hours at room temperature (≤22°C); these solutions should not be frozen.230
IM solutions containing 230–330 mg/mL prepared using sterile or bacteriostatic water for injection are stable in their original containers for 24 hours at room temperature (≤22°C) or 10 days refrigerated at ≤5°C and stable for 5 days in plastic syringes refrigerated at ≤5°C.230
Injection (Frozen)
-20°C or lower.230 After thawing, store up to 24 hours at room temperature (≤22°C) or up to 7 days under refrigeration (≤5°C).230
Do not refreeze after thawing.230
Compatibility
For information on systemic interactions resulting from concomitant use, see Interactions.
Parenteral
Cefotaxime sodium is most stable at a pH of 5–7 and should not be diluted with IV solutions that have a pH >7.5 (e.g., sodium bicarbonate).230
Solution Compatibility
|
Compatible |
|---|
|
Dextrose 5% in sodium chloride 0.2, 0.45, or 0.9%230 |
|
Invert sugar 10%230 |
|
Ringer’s injection, lactated230 |
|
Sodium chloride 0.9%HID |
|
Sodium lactate (1/6) M230 |
|
Travasol 8.5% without electrolytes230 |
Drug Compatibility
|
Compatible |
|---|
|
Clindamycin phosphate |
|
Metronidazole |
|
Metronidazole HCl |
|
Verapamil HCl |
|
Variable |
|
Amikacin sulfate |
|
Gentamicin sulfate |
|
Compatible |
|---|
|
Acyclovir sodium |
|
Amifostine |
|
Aztreonam |
|
Bivalirudin |
|
Cyclophosphamide |
|
Dexmedetomidine HCl |
|
Diltiazem HCl |
|
Docetaxel |
|
Etoposide phosphate |
|
Famotidine |
|
Fenoldopam mesylate |
|
Fludarabine phosphate |
|
Granisetron HCl |
|
Hetastarch in lactated electrolyte injection (Hextend) |
|
Hydromorphone HCl |
|
Levofloxacin |
|
Lorazepam |
|
Magnesium sulfate |
|
Melphalan HCl |
|
Meperidine HCl |
|
Midazolam HCl |
|
Milrinone lactate |
|
Morphine sulfate |
|
Ondansetron HCl |
|
Pemetrexed disodium |
|
Perphenazine |
|
Propofol |
|
Remifentanil HCl |
|
Sargramostim |
|
Teniposide |
|
Thiotepa |
|
Tolazoline HCl |
|
Vinorelbine tartrate |
|
Incompatible |
|
Allopurinol sodium |
|
Azithromycin |
|
Filgrastim |
|
Fluconazole |
|
Gemcitabine HCl |
|
Hetastarch in sodium chloride 0.9% |
|
Pentamidine isethionate |
|
Variable |
|
Vancomycin HCl |
Actions and Spectrum
-
Based on spectrum of activity, classified as a third generation cephalosporin.a Usually less active in vitro against susceptible staphylococci than first generation cephalosporins; has an expanded spectrum of activity against gram-negative bacteria compared with first and second generation cephalosporins.a b
-
Usually bactericidal.a
-
Like other β-lactam antibiotics, antibacterial activity results from inhibition of bacterial cell wall synthesis.230 a
-
Spectrum of activity includes many gram-positive aerobic bacteria, some gram-negative aerobic bacteria, and some anaerobic bacteria; inactive against Chlamydia, fungi, and viruses.a
-
Gram-positive aerobes: active in vitro and in clinical infections against S. pneumoniae, S. pyogenes (group A β-hemolytic streptococci), S. agalactiae (group B streptococci), S. aureus (including β-lactamase-producing strains), and some enterococci (e.g., Enterococcus faecalis).230 a b Also active in vitro against some viridans streptococci.350 Oxacillin-resistant (methicillin-resistant) staphylococci and some enterococci are resistant.a b
-
Gram-negative aerobes: active in vitro and in clinical infections against Acinetobacter, Citrobacter, Enterobacter, E. coli, H. influenzae (including ampicillin-resistant strains), H. parainfluenzae, Klebsiella, M. morganii, N. gonorrhoeae, N. meningitidis, P. mirabilis, P. vulgaris, P. rettgeri, P. stuartii, and Serratia.230 a b Also active in vitro against Campylobacter,222 223 Capnocytophaga,312 314 315 Eikenella corrodens,220 221 249 Moraxella,232 236 240 244 Salmonella,a b Shigella,a b and Vibrio vulnificus.292 Active against some strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, but less active against susceptible Ps. aeruginosa than ceftazidime.b
-
Anaerobes and other organisms: active in vitro and in clinical infections against Bacteroides, Eubacterium, Fusobacterium, Peptococcus, Peptostreptococcus, Propionibacterium, Veillonella, and some strains of Clostridium.230 265 a b Also active against the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi.265
Advice to Patients
-
Advise patients that antibacterials (including cefotaxime) should only be used to treat bacterial infections and not used to treat viral infections (e.g., the common cold).230
-
Importance of completing full course of therapy, even if feeling better after a few days.230
-
Advise patients that skipping doses or not completing the full course of therapy may decrease effectiveness and increase the likelihood that bacteria will develop resistance and will not be treatable with cefotaxime or other antibacterials in the future.230
-
Advise patients that diarrhea is a common problem caused by anti-infectives and usually ends when the drug is discontinued.230 Importance of contacting a clinician if watery and bloody stools (with or without stomach cramps and fever) occur during or as late as 2 months or longer after the last dose.230
-
Importance of informing clinicians if an allergic reaction occurs.230
-
Importance of informing clinicians of existing or contemplated therapy, including prescription and OTC drugs as well as any concomitant illnesses.230
-
Importance of women informing clinicians if they are or plan to become pregnant or plan to breast-feed.
-
Importance of informing patients of other important precautionary information. (See Cautions.)
Preparations
Excipients in commercially available drug preparations may have clinically important effects in some individuals; consult specific product labeling for details.
* available from one or more manufacturer, distributor, and/or repackager by generic (nonproprietary) name
|
Routes |
Dosage Forms |
Strengths |
Brand Names |
Manufacturer |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Parenteral |
For injection |
500 mg (of cefotaxime)* |
Cefotaxime Sodium for Injection |
|
|
Claforan |
Sanofi-Aventis |
|||
|
1 g (of cefotaxime)* |
Cefotaxime Sodium for Injection |
|||
|
Claforan |
Sanofi-Aventis |
|||
|
2 g (of cefotaxime)* |
Cefotaxime Sodium for Injection |
|||
|
Claforan |
Sanofi-Aventis |
|||
|
10 g (of cefotaxime) pharmacy bulk package* |
Cefotaxime Sodium for Injection |
|||
|
Claforan |
Sanofi-Aventis |
|||
|
20 g (of cefotaxime) pharmacy bulk package* |
Cefotaxime Sodium for Injection |
|||
|
For injection, for IV infusion |
1 g (of cefotaxime) |
Claforan |
Sanofi-Aventis |
|
|
Claforan ADD-Vantage |
Sanofi-Aventis |
|||
|
2 g (of cefotaxime) |
Claforan |
Sanofi-Aventis |
||
|
Claforan ADD-Vantage |
Sanofi-Aventis |
* available from one or more manufacturer, distributor, and/or repackager by generic (nonproprietary) name
|
Routes |
Dosage Forms |
Strengths |
Brand Names |
Manufacturer |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Parenteral |
Injection (frozen), for IV infusion |
20 mg (of cefotaxime) per mL (1 g) in 3.4% Dextrose* |
Cefotaxime Sodium in Iso-osmotic Dextrose Injection (Galaxy) |
|
|
40 mg (of cefotaxime) per mL (2 g) in 1.4% Dextrose* |
Cefotaxime Sodium in Iso-osmotic Dextrose Injection (Galaxy) |
Disclaimer
This report on medications is for your information only, and is not considered individual patient advice. Because of the changing nature of drug information, please consult your physician or pharmacist about specific clinical use.
The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. and Drugs.com represent that the information provided hereunder was formulated with a reasonable standard of care, and in conformity with professional standards in the field. The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. and Drugs.com make no representations or warranties, express or implied, including, but not limited to, any implied warranty of merchantability and/or fitness for a particular purpose, with respect to such information and specifically disclaims all such warranties. Users are advised that decisions regarding drug therapy are complex medical decisions requiring the independent, informed decision of an appropriate health care professional, and the information is provided for informational purposes only. The entire monograph for a drug should be reviewed for a thorough understanding of the drug's actions, uses and side effects. The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. and Drugs.com do not endorse or recommend the use of any drug. The information is not a substitute for medical care.
AHFS Drug Information. © Copyright, 1959-2013, Selected Revisions December 1, 2008. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc., 7272 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, Maryland 20814.
† Use is not currently included in the labeling approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.
References
2. Hoechst-Roussel Pharmaceuticals Inc. Claforan (cefotaxime sodium) sterile IM–IV: clinical and laboratory experience—an update. Somerville, NJ; 1981 Oct.
6. Esmieu F, Guibert J, Rosenkilde HC. Pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime in normal human volunteers. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1980; 6(Suppl A):83-92. [PubMed 6252184]
7. Reeves DS, White LO, Holt HA. Human metabolism of cefotaxime. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1980; 6(Suppl A):93-101. [PubMed 6252185]
8. Neu HC, Aswapokee P, Fu KP et al. Cefotaxime kinetics after intravenous and intramuscular injection of single and multiple doses. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1980; 27:677-85. [IDIS 113130] [PubMed 6245831]
9. Grabe M, Andersson KE, Forsgren A et al. Concentrations of cefotaxime in serum, urine and tissues of urological patients. Infection. 1981; 9:154-8.
10. Luthy R, Munch R, Blaser J et al. Human pharmacology of cefotaxime (HR 756), a new cephalosporin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979; 16:127-33. [IDIS 106317] [PubMed 485125]
11. Fu K, Aswapokee P, Ho I et al. Pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979; 16:592-7. [IDIS 109979] [PubMed 526000]
12. Wise R, Baker S, Livingston R. Comparison of cefotaxime and moxalactam pharmacokinetics and tissue levels. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980; 18:369-71. [IDIS 122916] [PubMed 6252833]
13. Wise R, Wright N, Wills PJ. Pharmacology of cefotaxime and its desacetyl metabolite in renal and hepatic disease. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981; 19:526-31. [IDIS 133921] [PubMed 6264849]
14. Luthy R, Blaser J, Bonetti A et al. Comparative multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime, moxalactam, and ceftazidime. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981; 20:567-75. [IDIS 141468] [PubMed 6275776]
15. Kafetzis DA, Brater DC, Kanarios J et al. Clinical pharmacology of cefotaxime in pediatric patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981; 20:487-90. [IDIS 139336] [PubMed 6282194]
16. Wise R, Wright N. cefotaxime metabolism and renal function. Lancet. 1979; 1:1106-7.
17. Clumeck N, Vanhoof R, Valaethem Y. Cefotaxime and nephrotoxicity. Lancet. 1979; 1:835.
18. Chamberlain J, Coombes JD, Dell D et al. Metabolism of cefotaxime in animals and man. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1980; 6(Suppl A):69-78. [PubMed 6252182]
19. Fillastre JP, Leroy A, Humvert G et al. Pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime in subjects with normal and impaired renal function. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1980; 6(Suppl A):103-11. [PubMed 6252138]
20. Karimi A, Seeger K, Stolke D et al. Cefotaxime concentration of cerebrospinal fluid. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1980; 6(Suppl A):119-20. [PubMed 6252140]
21. Kafetzis DA, Lazarides CV, Siafas CA et al. Transfer of cefotaxime in human milk and from mother to fetus. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1980; 6(Suppl A):135-41. [PubMed 6252147]
39. Kobayashi Y, Morikawa Y, Huruta T et al. Clinical evaluation of cefotaxime in the treatment of purulent meningitis in children. Clin Ther. 1981; 4(Suppl A):89-110. [PubMed 6276000]
48. Neu HC, Aswapokee N, Fu KP et al. Antibacterial activity of a new 1-oxa cephalosporin compared with that of other β-lactam compounds. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979; 16:141-9. [IDIS 132053] [PubMed 314774]
50. Hall WH, Opfer BJ, Gerding DN. Comparative activity of the oxa-β-lactam LY127935, cefotaxime, cefoperazone, cefamandole, and ticarcillin against multiply resistant gram-negative bacilli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980; 17:273-9. [IDIS 111702] [PubMed 6247970]
59. File TM, Tan JS. Enterococcal sensitivity to third generation cephalosporins. Lancet. 1981; 2:477. [PubMed 6115237]
61. Kurtz TO, Winston DJ, Hindler JA et al. Comparative in vitro activity of moxalactam, cefotaxime, cefoperazone, piperacillin, and aminoglycosides against gram-negative bacilli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980; 18:645-8. [IDIS 123768] [PubMed 6255864]
64. Lang SDR, Edwards DJ, Durack DT. Comparison of cefoperazone, cefotaxime, and moxalactam (LY127935) against aerobic gram-negative bacilli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980; 17:488-93. [IDIS 116143] [PubMed 6252831]
65. Barza M, Tally FP, Jacobus NV et al. In vitro activity of LY127935. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979; 16:287-92. [IDIS 132166] [PubMed 507785]
66. Pulliam L, Hadley WK, Mills J. In vitro comparison of third-generation cephalosporins, piperacillin, dibekacin, and other aminoglycosides against aerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981; 19:490-2. [IDIS 134666] [PubMed 6454384]
68. Wise R, Andrews JM, Bedford KA. LY127935, a novel oxa-β-lactam: an in vitro comparison with other β-lactam antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979; 16:341-5. [IDIS 132167] [PubMed 507788]
69. Masuyoshi S, Arai S, Miyamoto M et al. In vitro antimicrobial activity of cefotaxime, a new cephalosporin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980; 18:1-8. [IDIS 131867] [PubMed 6251749]
70. Cherubin CE, Corrado ML, Sierra MF et al. Susceptibility of gram-positive cocci to various antibiotics, including cefotaxime, moxalactam, and N-formimidoyl thienamycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981; 20:553-5. [IDIS 139345] [PubMed 6282200]
72. Trager GM, White GW, Zimelis VM et al. In vitro comparison of three new cephalosporins: LY-127935, cefotaxime and cefoperazone. Chemotherapy. 1981; 27:34-8. [IDIS 130358] [PubMed 6260435]
75. Appelbaum PC, Tamim J, Stavitz J et al. Sensitivity of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus strains to seven cephalosporins. Lancet. 1981; 2:472. [IDIS 136435] [PubMed 6115226]
78. Verbist L. Comparison of in vitro activities of eight β-lactamase-stable cephalosporins against β-lactamase-producing gram-negative bacilli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981; 19:407-13. [IDIS 134657] [PubMed 6972728]
80. Tutlane VA, McCloskey RV, Trent JA. In vitro comparison of N-formimidoyl thienamycin, piperacillin, cefotaxime, and cefoperazone. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981; 20:140-3. [IDIS 135358] [PubMed 6269481]
100. Papdatos CJ, Kafetzis DA, Kanarios J. Cefotaxime in the treatment of severe paediatric infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1980; 6(Suppl A):243-8. [PubMed 6252164]
106. King A, Warren C, Shannon K et al. The in vitro antibacterial activity of cefotaxime compared with that of cefuroxime and cefoxitin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1980; 6:479-94. [IDIS 132028] [PubMed 6253433]
109. Neu HC, Aswapokee N, Fu KP. HR 756, a new cephalosporin active against gram-positive and gram-negative aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979; 15:273-81. [IDIS 123925] [PubMed 426518]
115. Kosmidis J, Stathakis CH, Mantopoulos K et al. Clinical pharmacology of cefotaxime including penetration into bile, sputum, bone and cerebrospinal fluid. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1980; 6(suppl A):147-51. [PubMed 6252149]
116. Soussy CJ, Deforges LP, Le Van Thoi J et al. Cefotaxime concentration in the bile and wall of the gallbladder. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1980; 6(Suppl A):125-30. [PubMed 6252143]
117. Moreau L, Durand H, Biclet P et al. Cefotaxime concentrations in ascites. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1980; 6(Suppl A):121-2. [PubMed 6252141]
200. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2006. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006; 55(RR-11):1-96.
201. Anon. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery. Med Lett Treat Guid. 2004; 2:27-32.
202. Barry AL, Brown SD, Novick WJ. In vitro activities of cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cefpirome, and penicillin against Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995; 39:2193-6. [IDIS 356005] [PubMed 8619565]
203. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twelfth informational supplement. NCCLS document M100-S12. Wayne, PA: NCCLS; 2002 Jan.
210. Bartlett JG. Treatment of antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis. Rev Infect Dis. 1984; 6(Suppl 1):S235-41.
211. Anon. Choice of antibacterial drugs. Med Lett Treat Guid. 2004; 2:13-26.
215. Sanders CC, Sanders WE Jr. Microbial resistance to newer generation β-lactam antibiotics: clinical and laboratory implications. J Infect Dis. 1985; 151:399-406. [PubMed 2982957]
216. Sanders CC. Novel resistance selected by the new expanded-spectrum cephalosporins: a concern. J Infect Dis. 1983; 147:585-9. [IDIS 168702] [PubMed 6601169]
217. Curtis NAC, Eisenstadt RL, Rudd C et al. Inducible type I β-lactamases of gram-negative bacteria and resistance to β-lactam antibiotics. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1986; 17:51-61. [PubMed 3485092]
218. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Diagnosis and management of foodborne illness. A primer for physicians. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2001; 50(RR-2):1-69.
219. Jones RN, Barry AL. Antimicrobial activity of ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, desacetylcefotaxime, and cefotaxime-desacetylcefotaxime in the presence of human serum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987; 31:818-20. [PubMed 3606081]
220. Goldstein EJ, Cherubin CE, Shulman M. Comparison of microtiter broth dilution and agar dilution methods for susceptibility testing of Eikenella corrodens. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983; 23:42-5. [IDIS 164447] [PubMed 6338819]
221. Goldstein EJ, Gombert ME, Agyare EO. Susceptibility of Eikenella corrodens to newer beta-lactam antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980; 18:832-3. [IDIS 127705] [PubMed 7004350]
222. Ahonkhai VI, Cerubin CE, Sierra MF et al. In vitro susceptibility of Campylobacter fetus subsp jejuni to N-formimidoyl thienamycin, rosaramicin, cefoperazone, and other antimicrobial agents.. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981; 20:850-1. [IDIS 142043] [PubMed 6459767]
223. Van der Auwera P, Scorneaux B. In vitro susceptibility of Campylobacter jejuni to 27 antimicrobial agents and various combinations of β-lactams with clavulanic acid or sulbactam. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985; 28:37-40. [IDIS 203395] [PubMed 2994557]
224. Fick RB, Alexander MR, Prince RA et al. Penetration of cefotaxime into respiratory secretions. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987; 31:815-7. [IDIS 229469] [PubMed 3606080]
225. Nichols RL, Wikler MA, McDevitt JT et al. Coagulopathy associated with extended-spectrum cephalosporins in patients with serious infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987; 31:281-5. [IDIS 226549] [PubMed 3471181]
226. Saxon A, Beall GN, Rohr AS et al. Immediate hypersensitivity reactions to beta-lactam antibiotics. Ann Intern Med. 1987; 107:204-15. [IDIS 233229] [PubMed 3300459]
227. Norrby SR. Adverse reactions and interactions with newer cephalosporins and cephamycin antibiotics. Medical Toxicol. 1986; 1:32-46.
228. Barriere SL, Flaherty JF. Third generation cephalosporins: a critical evaluation. Clin Pharm. 1984; 3:351-73. [IDIS 187699] [PubMed 6432420]
229. Balant L, Dayer P, Auckenthaler R. Clinical pharmacokinetics of the third generation cephalosporins. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1985; 10:101-43. [IDIS 198911] [PubMed 3888488]
230. Sanofi-Aventis. Claforan (cefotaxime) injection and for injection prescribing information. Bridgewater, NJ; 2007 May.
231. American Academy of Pediatrics. Report of the task force on diagnosis and management of meningitis. Pediatrics. 1986; 78(Suppl):959-82. [IDIS 307460] [PubMed 3763317]
232. Alvarez S, Jones M, Holtsclaw-Berk S et al. In vitro susceptibilities and β-lactamase production of 53 isolates of Branhamella catarrhalis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985; 27:646-7. [IDIS 198592] [PubMed 3873905]
233. Hammerschlag MR, Gleyzer A. In vitro activity of a group of broad-spectrum cephalosporins and other β-lactam antibiotics against Chlamydia trachomatis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983; 23:493-4. [IDIS 167353] [PubMed 6847175]
234. Muytjens HL, Heessen FW. In vitro activities of thirteen β-lactam antibiotics against Chlamydia trachomatis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982; 22:520-1. [IDIS 157302] [PubMed 7137988]
235. Cullmann W, Opferkuch W, Stieglitz M et al. A comparison of the antibacterial activities of N-formimidoyl thienamycin (MKO787) with those of other recently developed β-lactam derivatives. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982; 22:302-7. [IDIS 156712] [PubMed 6821459]
236. Mandell W, Neu HC. In vitro activity of CI-934, a new quinolone, compared with that of other quinolones and other antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986; 29:852-7. [PubMed 3729343]
237. Neu HC, Labthavikul P. In vitro antibacterial activity and β-lactamase stability of E-0702, a new cephalosporin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983; 24:313-20. [IDIS 175794] [PubMed 6605718]
238. Schell RF, Francisco M, Bihl JA et al. The activity of ceftazidime compared with those of aztreonam, newer cephalosporins and Sch 29482 against nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli. Chemotherapy. 1985; 31:181-90. [IDIS 200330] [PubMed 3888543]
239. Fass RJ. In vitro activity of ciprofloxacin (Bay o 9867). Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983; 24:568-74. [IDIS 177504] [PubMed 6228192]
240. Jones RN, Barry AL, Thornsberry C et al. The anti-microbial activity, beta-lactamase stability, and disk diffusion susceptibility testing of carumonam (RO 17-2301, AMA-1080), a new monobactam. Am J Clin Pathol. 1986; 86:608-18. [IDIS 222719] [PubMed 3096130]
241. Eliopoulos GM, Reiszner E, Moellering RC Jr. In vitro activity of Sch 34343 against enterococci and other gram-positive bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985; 27:28-32. [PubMed 3845792]
242. Eliopoulos GM, Moellering AE, Reiszner E et al. In vitro activities of the quinolone antimicrobial agents A-56619 and A-56620. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985; 28:514-20. [IDIS 207607] [PubMed 3935046]
243. Baxter Healthcare Corporation. Descriptive information on premixed frozen products. Baxter Healthcare Corporation: Deerfield, IL; 1992 Sep.
244. Calder MA, Croughan MJ, McLeod DT et al. The incidence and antibiotic susceptibility of Branhamella catarrhalis in respiratory infections. Drugs. 1986; 31(Suppl 3):11-6. [IDIS 217398] [PubMed 3488189]
245. Guerrant RL, Gilder TV, Steiner TS et al. Practice guidelines for the management of infectious diarrhea. Clin Infect Dis. 2001; 32:331-50. [IDIS 466024] [PubMed 11170940]
246. Goldstein EJC, Citron DM. Comparative in vitro inhibitory and killing activity of cefpirome, ceftazidime, and cefotaxime against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococci, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and methicillin-susceptible and -resistant and tolerant and nontolerant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985; 28:160-2. [IDIS 203416] [PubMed 3929677]
247. Garzone P, Lyon J, Yu VL. Third-generation and investigational cephalosporins: II. Microbiologic review and clinical summaries. Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1983; 17:615-22. [IDIS 174601] [PubMed 6311502]
248. Jones RN, Thornsberry C. Cefotaxime: a review of in vitro antimicrobial properties and spectrum of activity. Rev Infect Dis. 1982; 4(Suppl):S300-15.
249. Goldstein EJC, Cherubin CE, Corrado ML et al. Comparative susceptibility of Yersinia enterolitica, Eikenella corrodens, and penicillin-resistant and penicillin-susceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae to β-lactam and alternative antimicrobial agents. Rev Infect Dis. 1982; 4(Suppl):S406-10.
250. Anon. Vibrio vulnificus infections associated with eating raw oysters—Los Angeles, 1996. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1996; 45:621-4. [PubMed 8965788]
251. Anon. Drugs for sexually transmitted infections. Med Lett Treat Guid. 2004; 2:67-74.
252. Kumar A, Kelly KJ. In vitro activity of cefixime (CL284635) and other antimicrobial agents against Haemophilus isolates from pediatric patients. Chemotherapy. 1988; 34:30-5. [IDIS 239247] [PubMed 3258232]
253. Nakashio S, Nakamura M. In vitro activity of cefotaxime against clinically significant pathogens. Drugs. 1988; 35:14-21. [IDIS 241650] [PubMed 3260852]
254. Kawakami Y, Okimura Y, Horiuchi N et al. In vitro activity of cefotaxime, ceftizoxime, cefmenoxime, and latamoxef in comparison with other β-lactam antibiotics against recent clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae and Haemophilus parainfluenzae. Microbiol Immunol. 1982; 26:617-21. [PubMed 6290854]
255. Chin NX, Neu HC. In vitro antibacterial activity and beta-lactamase stability of CL 118523, an aminothiazol iminomethoxy cephalosporin. Chemiotherapia. 1987; 6:329-36.
256. Chin NX, Neu HC. Comparative in vitro activity and beta-lactamase stability of CGP 31523A, a new aminothiazolyl cephalosporin. Chemioterapia. 1986; 5:92-100. [PubMed 3518967]
257. Vuram-Rapp U, Kayser FH, Barberis-Maino L. Antibacterial properties of imipenem with special reference to the activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci, cefotaxime-resistant enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1986; 18:27-33. [PubMed 3102452]
258. Moellering RC Jr, Eliopoulos GM. Activity of cefotaxime against enterococci. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1984; 2(Suppl 3):85-90S. [PubMed 6232086]
259. Winstanley TG, Spencer RC. An in vitro study of the interaction between cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime. Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1986; 12:967-71. [PubMed 3471432]
260. Elliott AM, Karam GH, Cobbs CG. Interaction of cefotaxime and aminoglycosides against enterococci in vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983; 24:847-50. [IDIS 179228] [PubMed 6318661]
261. Goldstein EJC, Citron DM. Comparative in vitro inhibitory and killing activity of cefpirome, ceftazidime, and cefotaxime against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, enterococci, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and methicillin-susceptible and -resistant and tolerant and nontolerant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985; 28:160-2. [IDIS 203416] [PubMed 3929677]
262. Thornsberry C, Jones RN, Barry AL et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests with cefotaxime and correlation with clinical bacteriologic response. Rev Infect Dis. 1982; 4(Suppl):S316-24.
263. Asmar Bi, Thirumoorthi MC, Buckley JA et al. Cefotaxime diffusion into cerebrospinal fluid of children with meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985; 28:138-40. [IDIS 203411] [PubMed 4037772]
264. Trang JM, Jacobs RF, Kearns GL et al. Cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime pharmacokinetics in infants and children with meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985; 28:791-5. [IDIS 208812] [PubMed 4083862]
265. Preac-Mursic V, Wilske B, Schierz G et al. In vitro and in vivo susceptibility of Borrelia burgdorferi. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1987; 6:424-6. [PubMed 3665899]
266. Hassler D, Zoller L, Haude M et al. Cefotaxime versus penicillin in the late stage of Lyme disease—prospective, randomized therapeutic study. Infection. 1990; 18:16-20. [PubMed 2179134]
267. Pfister H-W, Preac-Mursic V, Wilske B et al. Cefotaxime vs penicillin G for acute neurologic manifestations in Lyme borreliosis. Arch Neurol. 1989; 46:1190-4. [PubMed 2684107]
268. Abdel-Hag NM, Asmar BI, Abuhammour WM et al. Yersinia enterocolitica infection in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000; 19:954-8. [PubMed 11055595]
269. Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2007; 44 Suppl 2:S27-72. [PubMed 17278083]
270. Luft BJ, Gorevic PD, Halperin JJ et al. A perspective on the treatment of Lyme borreliosis. Rev Infect Dis. 1989; 11(Suppl 6):S1518-25.
271. Neu HC. A perspective on therapy of Lyme infection. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1988; 539:314-6. [PubMed 3056200]
272. Reviewers’ comments on Lyme disease revisions (personal observations). 1989 Dec 4.
273. Anon. Treatment of Lyme Disease. Med Lett Drugs Ther. 2000; 42:37-9. [PubMed 10825919]
274. Steere AC, Schoen RT, Taylor E. The clinical evolution of Lyme arthritis. Ann Intern Med. 1987; 107:725-31. [PubMed 3662285]
275. American Academy of Pediatrics. 2006 Red Book: Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 27th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2006.
276. Anon. Prevalence of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae—Connecticut, 1992-1993. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1994; 43:216,217,223. [PubMed 8127327]
277. Leggiadro RJ. Penicillin- and cephalosporin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae: an emerging threat Pediatrics. 1994; 93:500-3.
278. Baxter Healthcare Corporation. Descriptive information on premixed products. Deerfield, IL; 1994 Feb 21.
279. Hofmann J, Cetron MS, Farley MM et al. The prevalence of drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in Atlanta. N Engl J Med. 1995; 333:481-6. [IDIS 351542] [PubMed 7623880]
280. Pallares R, Linares J, Vadillo M et al. Resistance to penicillin and cephalosporin and mortality from severe pneumococcal pneumonia in Barcelona, Spain. N Engl J Med. 1995; 333:474-80. [IDIS 351541] [PubMed 7623879]
281. Klass PE, Klein JO. Therapy of bacterial sepsis, meningitis and otitis media in infants and children: 1992 poll of directors of programs in pediatric infectious diseases. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1992; 11:702-5. [PubMed 1448307]
282. Feigin RD, McCracken GH, Klein JO. Diagnosis and management of meningitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1992; 11:785-814. [PubMed 1448332]
283. Sloas NM, Barrett FF, Chesney PJ et al. Cephalosporin treatment failures in penicillin- and cephalosporin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1992; 11:662-6. [PubMed 1523079]
284. Sigal LH. Early disseminated Lyme disease: cardiac manifestations. Am J Med. 1995; 98(4A):25-8S.
285. Sigal LH. Management of Lyme disease refractory to antibiotic therapy. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1995; 21:217-30. [PubMed 7732170]
286. Spach DH, Liles WC, Campbell GL et al. Tick-borne diseases in the United States. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329:936-47. [IDIS 320338] [PubMed 8361509]
287. Nadelman RB, Wormser GP. Erythema migrans and early Lyme disease. Am J Med. 1995; 98(4A):15-23S.
288. Nau R, Prange HW, Muth P et al. Passage of cefotaxime and ceftriaxone into cerebrospinal fluid of patients with inflamed meninges. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993; 37:1518-24. [IDIS 316800] [PubMed 8363385]
289. Ko RJ, Sattler FR, Nichols S et al. Pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime in patients with liver disease. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991; 35:1376-80. [IDIS 284981] [PubMed 1929296]
290. Todd PA, Brogden RN. Cefotaxime: an update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use. Drugs. 1990; 40:608-51. [PubMed 2083516]
291. Jacobs RF, Darville T, Parks JA et al. Safety profile and efficacy of cefotaxime for the treatment of hospitalized children. Clin Infect Dis. 1992; 14:56-65. [IDIS 295049] [PubMed 1571464]
292. Chuang YC, Liu JW, Ko WC et al. In vitro synergism between cefotaxime and minocycline against Vibrio vulnificus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997; 41:2214-7. [IDIS 395008] [PubMed 9333050]
293. Chuang YC, Ko WC, Wang St et al. Minocycline and cefotaxime in the treatment of experimental murine Vibrio vulnificus infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998; 42:1319-22. [PubMed 9624467]
294. Kumamoto KS, Vukich DJ. Clinical infections of Vibrio vulnificus: a case report and review of the literature. J Emerg Med. 1998; 16:61-6. [PubMed 9472762]
295. Anon. Vibrio vulnificus infections associated with raw oyster consumption—Florida, 1981-1992. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1993; 42:405-7. [PubMed 8497241]
296. Quagliarello VJ, Scheld WM. Treatment of bacterial meningitis. N Engl J Med. 1997; 336:708-16. [IDIS 388664] [PubMed 9041103]
297. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infectious Diseases. Therapy for children with invasive pneumococcal infections. Pediatrics. 1997; 99:289-99. [IDIS 381500] [PubMed 9024464]
298. Walker CK, Kahn JG, Washington AE et al. Pelvic inflammatory disease: metaanalysis of antimicrobial regimen efficacy. J Infect Dis. 1993; 168:969-78. [IDIS 320603] [PubMed 8376843]
299. Cunha BA. Treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease. Clin Pharm. 1990; 9:275-85. [IDIS 265474] [PubMed 2184973]
300. Hemsell DL, Little BB, Faro S et al. Comparison of three regimens recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for the treatment of women hospitalized with acute pelvic inflammatory disease. Clin Infect Dis. 1994; 19:720-7. [IDIS 337500] [PubMed 7803638]
301. Adu A, Armour CL. Drug utilisation review (DUR) of the third generation cephalosporins: focus on ceftriaxone, ceftazidime and cefotaxime. Drugs. 1995; 50:423-39. [PubMed 8521766]
302. Kishiyam JL, Adelman DC. The cross-reactivity and immunology of β-lactam antibiotics. Drug Saf. 1994; 10:318-27. [PubMed 8018304]
303. Thompson JW, Jacobs RF. Adverse effects of newer cephalosporins: an update. Drug Saf. 1993; 9:132-42. [PubMed 8397890]
304. Nataro JP. Treatment of bacterial enteritis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1998; 17:420-2. [IDIS 407084] [PubMed 9613658]
305. Zenilman JM. Typhoid fever. JAMA. 1997; 278:847-50. [IDIS 391174] [PubMed 9293994]
306. Soe GB, Overturf GD. Treatment of typhoid fever and other systemic salmonelloses with cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, cefoperazone, and other newer cephalosporins. Rev Infect Dis. 1987; 9:719-36. [IDIS 232251] [PubMed 3125577]
307. Mermin JH, Townes JM, Gerber M et al. Typhoid fever in the United States, 1985-1994: changing risks of international travel and increasing antimicrobial resistance. Arch Intern Med. 1998; 158:633-8. [PubMed 9521228]
308. Guerrero MLF, Ramos JM, Nunez A et al. Focal infections due to non-typhi Salmonella in patients with AIDS: report of 10 cases and review. Clin Infect Dis. 1997; 25:690-7. [IDIS 393737] [PubMed 9314463]
309. US Public Health Service (USPHS) and Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Prevention of Opportunistic Infections Working Group. 2001 USPHS/IDSA guidelines for the prevention of opportunistic infections in persons with human immunodeficiency virus. From HIV/AIDS Treatment Information Services (ATIS) website ().
310. McClean KL, Sheehan GJ, Harding GKM. Intraabdominal infection: a review. Clin Infect Dis. 1994; 19:100-6. [IDIS 333128] [PubMed 7948510]
311. Karam GH, Sanders CV, Aldridge KE. Role of newer antimicrobial agents in the treatment of mixed aerobic and anaerobic infections. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1991; 172(Suppl):57-64. [IDIS 281378] [PubMed 2024228]
312. Cormican MG, Jones RN. Antimicrobial activity of cefotaxime tested against infrequently isolated pathogenic species (unusual pathogens). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995; 22:43-8. [PubMed 7587049]
313. Gomez-Garces JL, Alos JI, Sanchez J et al. Bacteremia by multidrug-resistant Capnocytophaga sputigena. J Clin Microbiol. 1994; 32:1067-9. [PubMed 8027314]
314. Hawkey PM, Smith SD, Hayes J et al. In vitro susceptibility of Capnocytophaga species to antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987; 31:331-2. [PubMed 3566254]
315. Rummen JL, Gordts B, Van Landuyt HW. In vitro susceptibility of Capnocytophaga species to 29 antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986; 30:739-42. [PubMed 3800350]
316. Pers C, Gahrn-Hanson B, Frederiksen W. Capnocytophaga canimorsus septicemia in Denmark, 1982-1995: review of 39 cases. Clin Infect Dis. 1996; 23:71-5. [PubMed 8816132]
317. Pitkin DH, Sheikh W, Nadler HL. Comparative in vitro activity of meropenem versus other extended-spectrum antimicrobials against randomly chosen and selected resistant clinical isolates tested in 26 North American centers. Clin Infect Dis. 1997; 24(Suppl 2):S238-48.
318. Tunkel AP, Scheld WM. Issues in the management of bacterial meningitis. Am Fam Physician. 1997; 56:1355-62. [IDIS 393071] [PubMed 9337758]
319. Townsend GC, Scheld WM. Infections of the central nervous system. Adv Intern Med. 1998; 43:403-47. [PubMed 9506189]
320. Paris MM, Ramilo I, McCracken GH. Management of meningitis caused by penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995; 2171-5.
321. Buchingham SC, Brown SP, San Joaquin VH. Breakthrough bacteremia and meningitis during treatment with cephalosporins parenterally for pneumococcal pneumonia. J Pediatr. 1998; 132:174-6. [IDIS 401044] [PubMed 9470026]
322. Pacheco TR, Cooper CK, Hardy DJ et al. Failure of cefotaxime treatment in an adult with Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis. Am J Med. 1997; 102:303-5. [IDIS 389050] [PubMed 9217602]
323. Wubbel L, McCracken GH. Management of bacterial meningitis: 1998. Pediatr Rev. 1998; 19:78-84. [PubMed 9509854]
324. McIntyre PB, Berkey CS, King SM et al. Dexamethasone as adjunctive therapy in bacterial meningitis: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials since 1988. JAMA. 1997; 278:925-31. [IDIS 391326] [PubMed 9302246]
325. Chesney PJ, Halsey NA, Marcy SM. Treatment of bacterial meningitis. N Engl J Med. 1997; 337:793-4. [IDIS 390965] [PubMed 9289652]
326. Quagliarello V, Scheld WM. Treatment of bacterial meningitis. N Engl J Med. 1997; 337:794. [IDIS 390967] [PubMed 9289653]
327. Bhattacharya S. Management of meningitis caused by penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996; 40:827-8. [IDIS 364393] [PubMed 8851626]
328. Ahmed A. A critical evaluation of vancomycin for treatment of bacterial meningitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997; 16:895-903. [IDIS 392888] [PubMed 9306486]
329. Kleiman MB, Weinberg GA, Reynolds JK et al. Meningitis with beta-lactam-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae: the need for early repeat lumbar puncture. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1993; 12:782-4. [PubMed 8414810]
330. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae—Kentucky and Tennessee, 1993. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1994; 43:23-7. [IDIS 324201] [PubMed 8277937]
331. Friedland IR, Shelton S, Paris M et al. Dilemmas in diagnosis and management of cephalosporin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1993; 12:196-200. [PubMed 8451095]
332. Chesney PJ. The escalating problem of antimicrobial resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Am J Dis Child. 1992; 146:912-6. [IDIS 300056] [PubMed 1636656]
333. John CC. Treatment failure with use of a third-generation cephalosporin for penicillin-resistant pneumococcal meningitis: case report and review. Clin Infect Dis. 1994; 18:188-93. [IDIS 325352] [PubMed 8161625]
334. Hofmann J, Cetron MS, Farley MM et al. The prevalence of drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in Atlanta. N Engl J Med. 1995; 333:481-6. [IDIS 351542] [PubMed 7623880]
335. Viladrich PF, Cabellos C, Pallares R et al. High doses of cefotaxime in treatment of adult meningitis due to Streptococcus pneumoniae with decreased susceptibilities to broad-spectrum cephalosporins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996; 40:218-20. [IDIS 361527] [PubMed 8787909]
336. Sjolin J, Lilja A, Eriksson N et al. Treatment of brain abscess with cefotaxime and metronidazole: prospective study on 15 consecutive patients. Clin Infect Dis. 1993; 17:857-63. [IDIS 321794] [PubMed 8286626]
338. Nadelman RB, Wormser GP. Lyme borreliosis. Lancet. 1998; 352:557-65. [IDIS 415637] [PubMed 9716075]
340. Rahn DW, Felz MW. Lyme disease update. Current approach to early, disseminated, and late disease. Postgrad Med. 1998; 103:51-4, 57-9, 63-4. [IDIS 405540] [PubMed 9590986]
341. Luft BJ. Treatment of erythema migrans. Ann Intern Med. 1997; 126:408-9.
342. Johnson S, Gerding DN. Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. Clin Infect Dis. 1998; 26:1027-36. [IDIS 407733] [PubMed 9597221]
343. Gerding DN, Johnson S, Peterson LR et al for the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Position paper on Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea and colitis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1995; 16:459-77. [PubMed 7594392]
344. Fekety R for the American College of Gastroenterology Practice Parameters Committee. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea and colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997; 92:739-50. [IDIS 386628] [PubMed 9149180]
345. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists Commission on Therapeutics. ASHP therapeutic position statement on the preferential use of metronidazole for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 1998; 55:1407-11. [IDIS 407213] [PubMed 9659970]
346. Wilcox MH. Treatment of Clostridium difficile infection. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1998; 41(Suppl C):41-6. [IDIS 407246] [PubMed 9630373]
347. Mathisen GE, Johnson JP. Brain abscess. Clin Infect Dis. 1997; 25:763-81. [IDIS 395783] [PubMed 9356788]
348. Reviewers’ comments (personal observations).
349. Sobraques M, Maurin M, Birtles RJ et al. In vitro susceptibilities of four Bartonella bacilliformis strains to 30 antibiotic compounds. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999; 43:2090-2. [IDIS 433952] [PubMed 10428946]
350. Aracil B, Gomez-Garces JL, Alos JI. A study of susceptibility of 100 clinical isolates belonging to the Streptococcus milleri group to 16 cephalosporins. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999; 43:399-402. [IDIS 425875] [PubMed 10223596]
351. Wormser GP, Dattwyler RJ, Shapiro ED et al. The clinical assessment, treatment, and prevention of lyme disease, human granulocytic anaplasmosis, and babesiosis: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2006; 43:1089-134. [PubMed 17029130]
352. Heffelfinger JD, Dowell SF, Jorgensen JH et al. Management of community-acquired pneumonia in the era of pneumococcal resistance. A report from the drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae therapeutic working group. Arch Intern Med. 2000; 160:1399-1408. [IDIS 448719] [PubMed 10826451]
353. Nocton JJ, Steere AC. Lyme disease. Adv Intern Med. 1995; 40:69-117. [PubMed 7747659]
354. Steere AC. Lyme disease. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345:115-25. [IDIS 467351] [PubMed 11450660]
355. Steere AC. Musculoskeletal manifestations of Lyme disease. Am J Med. 1995; 98(4A):44-48S.
356. Shapiro ED. Lyme disease in children. Am J Med. 1995; 98(4A):69-73S.
357. Pachner AR. Early disseminated Lyme disease: Lyme meningitis. Am J Med. 1995; 98(4A):30-37S.
358. Klempner MS, Hu LT, Evans J et al. Two controlled trials of antibiotic treatment in patients with persistent symptoms and a history of Lyme disease. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345:85-92. [IDIS 467349] [PubMed 11450676]
359. Patel R, Grogg KL, Edwards WD et al. Death from inappropriate therapy for Lyme disease. Clin Infect Dis. 2000; 31:1107-9. [IDIS 456009] [PubMed 11049799]
360. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Ceftriaxone-associated biliary complications of treatment of suspected disseminated Lyme disease—New Jersey, 1990-1992. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1993; 42:39-42. [PubMed 8419791]
361. Thompson C, Spielman A, Krause P. Coinfecting deer-associated zoonoses: Lyme disease, babesiosis, and ehrlichiosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2000; 33:676-85.
362. Luft BJ, Gardner P, Lightfoot RW Jr. Appropriateness of parenteral antibiotic treatment for patients with presumed Lyme disease. Ann Intern Med. 1993; 119:518. [PubMed 8357119]
363. Lightfoot RW, Luft BJ, Rahn DW et al. Empiric parenteral antibiotic treatment of patients with fibromyalgia and fatigue and a positive serologic result for Lyme disease. A cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Intern Med. 1993; 119:503-9. [IDIS 320377] [PubMed 8357117]
364. Ettestad PJ, Campbell GL, Welbel SF et al. Biliary complications in the treatment of unsubstantiated Lyme disease. J Infect Dis. 1995; 171:356-61. [IDIS 342008] [PubMed 7844372]
365. Tunkel AR, Hartman BJ, Kaplan SL et al. Practice guidelines for the management of bacterial meningitis. Clin Infect Dis. 2004; 39:1267-84. [IDIS 537717] [PubMed 15494903]
366. American Pharmaceutical Partners, Inc. Cefotaxime for injection, USP prescribing information. Schaumburg, IL. 2004 Nov.
367. American Pharmaceutical Partners, Inc. Cefotaxime for injection, USP pharmacy bulk package prescribing information. Schaumburg, IL. 2004 Nov.
368. Pfister HW, Preac-Mursic V, Wilske B et al. Randomized comparison of ceftriaxone and cefotaxime in Lyme neuroborreliosis. J Infect Dis. 1991; 163:311-8. [PubMed 1988514]
369. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated recommended treatment regimens for gonococcal infections and associated conditions—United States, April 2007. From CDC website (). Accessed 2007 April 12.
a. AHFS Drug Information 2003. McEvoy GK, ed. Cephalosporins General Statement. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists; 2003:125-39.
b. AHFS Drug Information 2003. McEvoy GK, ed. Cefotaxime. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists; 2003:168-78.
HID. Trissel LA. Handbook on injectable drugs. 13th ed. Bethesda, MD: American Society of Health-System Pharmacists; 2007:296-303.
More Cefotaxime Sodium resources
- Cefotaxime Prescribing Information (FDA)
- cefotaxime MedFacts Consumer Leaflet (Wolters Kluwer)
- cefotaxime Concise Consumer Information (Cerner Multum)
- cefotaxime Injection Advanced Consumer (Micromedex) - Includes Dosage Information
- Claforan Prescribing Information (FDA)
Compare Cefotaxime Sodium with other medications
- Bacteremia
- Bone infection
- Cesarean Section
- CNS Infection
- Endometritis
- Epiglottitis
- Gonococcal Infection, Disseminated
- Gonococcal Infection, Uncomplicated
- Intraabdominal Infection
- Joint Infection
- Kidney Infections
- Lyme Disease
- Lyme Disease, Arthritis
- Lyme Disease, Carditis
- Lyme Disease, Neurologic
- Meningitis
- Pelvic Inflammatory Disease
- Peritonitis
- Pneumonia
- Salmonella Gastroenteritis
- Sepsis
- Septicemia
- Skin Infection
- Surgical Prophylaxis
- Urinary Tract Infection


