Thanks so much for everyone's response. I am stunned that apparently, there is a good chance that one generic would perform better than a different one. And the FDA allows up to a 20% difference? That seems outrageous!
I see that everyone seems to prefer the Watson brand. Interestingly enough, I have actually filled
Norco with both Mallinckrodt and Watson pills on two different occasions in the past, and for some reason, I thought I liked the Mallinckrodt better!? [?] How can this be? Isn't Watson the original maker of Norco but so as to also make money on the generics, they have their own generic brand. How could their own generic be worse than a competitor's? Is it all (or mostly) in mine and people's heads that they only THINK that one is better than another? I believe it is called psychosomatic or the placebo effect, if my memory serves me correctly.
I know Watson is a very well established brand but I talked to several pharmacists about this and by and large, they all say both Mallinckrodt and Watson are very big companies and have excellent products. [?][?][?]
Based on the above, what do all of you think?