Trastuzumab Improves the Efficacy of Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Treatment Beyond Progression

(Results of a multicenter, randomized phase III study comparing capecitabine alone versus in combination with trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer and progression after previous treatment with trastuzumab)

NEU-ISENBURG, Germany, Sept. 15, 2008: The GBG 26 – TBP study of the German Breast Group addressed the question of whether the treatment of women with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer with trastuzumab is effective beyond progression (Trastuzumab Beyond Progression TBP).


In this study, women with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer who had progressed on prior trastuzumab treatment were treated either with a combination of trastuzumab (Herceptin®) and capecitabine (Xeloda®) or capecitabine alone.


The primary objective of the study was to find out whether the continuation of trastuzumab treatment beyond progression could improve the efficacy of chemotherapy, in this case capecitabine, and hence progression of the disease would occur significantly later than with capecitabine therapy alone.
Further endpoints were response rate, duration of response, clinical benefit, side effects and overall survival of treatment with capecitabine with or without continuation of trastuzumab.


Between January 2004 and May 2007, 156 patients in total were included in the study, of whom 78 received the combination of trastuzumab and capecitabine and 78 received capecitabine monotherapy.

The results clearly demonstrate that the efficacy of capecitabine is significantly increased by continuing trastuzumab treatment:
Median time to progression was increased from 5.6 to 8.2 months (hazard ratio 0.69; P=0.0338) (Fig. 1).


Response rate was increased from 27% with capecitabine alone to 48.1% with capecitabine and trastuzumab (odds ratio=2.50; P=0.0115).
Clinical benefit rate, which includes complete or partial responses and stable disease > 24 weeks was increased from 54.1% to 75.3% (odds ratio=2.59; P=0.0068).


Duration of response was comparable between both treatment groups (3.4 and 3.9 months, respectively) (hazard ratio=1.08; P=0.8159).
The follow-up period of 15.6 months is still too short to evaluate overall survival, however a positive trend for overall survival was observed, with an increase from 20.4 to 25.5 months in favour of the continuation of trastuzumab (hazard ratio 0.76; P=0.257) (Fig. 2).

 
Figure 1: Time to disease progression


 
Figure 1: Overall survival

The tolerability of capecitabine did not change by continuation of trastuzumab treatment. Only lower-grade, clinically non-relevant anemia was observed more often in the combination arm (64% vs. 41.6%, P=0.02). Only one patient in the capecitabine plus trastuzumab arm experienced cardiac dysfunction. No therapy-related deaths occurred.

The GBG 26 study is the only randomized study worldwide that has prospectively demonstrated the efficacy of trastuzumab treatment beyond disease progression. 


The first evidence for the effectiveness of trastuzumab treatment beyond disease progression was obtained from pre-clinical studies, which led to the frequent use of trastuzumab in this setting in clinical practice. Several non-randomized studies with women who had received prior trastuzumab treatment have already provided preliminary evidence for an increase in efficacy by continuing trastuzumab therapy. Due to the retrospective nature of these studies, however, the results might be biased by patient selection.


Only the prospective, randomized GBG 26 – TBP study enables a definitive recommendation of continued treatment of trastuzumab beyond progression now.
The GBG 26 study was conducted by the German Breast Group in international collaboration with study groups and centers in Austria, The Netherlands, and Slovenia, Denmark and Great-Britain.

The results of the study were presented by Prof. Dr. Gunter von Minckwitz on behalf of the study group at the European Society of Medical Oncology conference (ESMO) in Stockholm on September 14, 2008.

Reference:
von Minckwitz G, Zielinski C, Maartense E, Vogel P, Schmidt M, Maass, N, Cufer T, de Jongh FE, Kaufmann M, Nekljudova V, Loibl S. Capecitabine vs. capecitabine + trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer progressing during trastuzumab treatment: The TBP phase III study (GBG 26/BIG 3-05).

 

Reprint free of charge, please forward a copy.
 

More information about GBG: www.germanbreastgroup.de or
GBG Forschungs GmbH
Stefanie Hildebrandt
Public Relations
Schleussnerstraße 42
63263 Neu-Isenburg
Germany
Tel. 0049 (0) 6102 / 7480-420
Fax. 0049 (0) 6102 / 7480-440
E-Mail: stefanie.hildebrandt@germanbreastgroup.de


About the German Breast Group (GBG) and the GBG Forschungs GmbH

The German Breast Group is a group of scientifically active physicians, investigating preventive, preoperative, adjuvant and palliative treatments for breast cancer in the framework of clinical studies.


The German Breast Adjuvant Breast Cancer Group (GABG e.V.) was founded in 1982 to conduct these studies, from which the GBG Forschungs GmbH emerged. This improved structure has enabled the treatment of more than 25,000 breast cancer patients in Germany in more than 40 studies. More than 100 employees of the GBG Forschungs GmbH are working together with 500 healthcare institutions and around 700 investigators. The GBG Forschungs GmbH is one of the leading cooperative study groups in the therapeutic area of breast cancer.


The executive director, Prof. Dr. Gunter von Minckwitz, is an internationally recognized clinical scientist in this area, having led numerous clinical studies and with over 100 scientific original publications to his credit.

 

Posted: September 2008

View comments

Hide
(web2)